Netanyahu Asked Harper To Support Israel At G8: Reports

Netanyahu Harper

First Posted: 05/29/11 11:58 AM ET Updated: 07/29/11 06:12 AM ET

(CP) -- Stephen Harper's spokesman is denying a report that Israel's prime minister specifically asked Canada to thwart G8 support for a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders.

A report published by Israeli newspaper Haaretz on Sunday quoted a senior Israeli official saying Benjamin Netanyahu telephoned Harper two days before the Group of Eight leaders met, and asked the prime minister to prevent the G8 from supporting the border proposal outlined in a statement by U.S. President Barack Obama.

Obama's speech earlier this month on the future of the Middle East said talks between the Palestinians and Israel should be based on 1967 borders that existed before the Six Day War in which Israel occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Israel was particularly concerned about the border proposal because, according to a government official, at least seven out of the eight G8 countries supported including it in the summit declaration, Haaretz said.

The G8's final declaration released Friday did not include any mention of borders in discussion of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Harper's spokesman Dimitri Soudas told The Canadian Press Sunday that there was no G8 discussion with Netanyahu.

"The prime minister's views are long-standing and well known on the Middle East process towards a two state solution," Soudas said. "It's important that any statement on the Middle East always have balanced references to the various positions and the G8 statement is a balanced statement."

According to Haaretz however, Netanyahu told Harper that mentioning the border issue would be detrimental to Israeli interests and a reward to the Palestinians.

As the summit wrapped, European diplomats told reporters the omission of the Obama border proposal from the G8 statement was brought about because of objections from Canada.

Harper neither confirmed nor denied that report at the time. He told reporters that while he broadly supported the theme of Obama's speech, bits of it could not be cherry-picked as the basis for a peace deal.

"President Obama emphasized that in a two-state solution, one of those states has to be a Jewish state and conceded to be a Jewish state, another is that the Palestinian state must be a demilitarized state," Harper said Thursday. "So I think these and other messages are important messages to deliver and I say I think if you look at the statement in its totality it was very balanced and it is certainly something that Canada can support."

Harper has been a staunch supporter of Israel for years, and was described by Haaretz as the head of a "rightist government under whose leadership Canada has become one of Israel's greatest allies."

Herb Keinon, diplomatic correspondent at The Jerusalem Post, said reports of Canada's support for Israel at the G8 are likely to raise Harper's profile among the Israeli public.

"When everyone else is coming down hard against us, to see somebody stand up for us is something that will resonate among the public," he said. "I think there is a growing realization that Canada is probably the best friend we have."

From a government perspective, Keinon said the Netanyahu administration knows very well who its friends are, and makes sure to acknowledge its appreciation of Canada's pro-Israel stance.

An example of this was seen on Saturday when Israel's foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman phoned his Canadian counterpart, John Baird, to thank him for Ottawa’s position at the G8 — an event reported by both Haaretz and The Jerusalem Post.

"Canada is a true friend of Israel and with a realistic and proper view of things, it understands that the 1967 borders do not conform to Israel's security needs and with the current demographic reality," Lieberman told the media.

Canada's profile among the general Israeli public is often still overshadowed by the U.S., but more frequent reports of Harper's pro-Israel stand could change that, said Keinon.

"The public who don't follow these things with a microscope take their lead from the government, and when the government puts out a statement thanking Canada for what they did ... that filters down into the people."

That way of thinking resonates with Alan Levita, a Canadian citizen who has been living in Israel since 1982.

The 54-year-old said Canada in general has long played second fiddle to the States when it comes to public discourse on North American policy.

"It's always going to be what the United States says," he said. "There's going to be very little what Canada says."

But with Harper and Canada making headlines in Israel over the weekend, Levita said that tone could change.

"The U.S. features completely, but maybe Canada is getting a little more recognition now."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

(CP) -- Stephen Harper's spokesman is denying a report that Israel's prime minister specifically asked Canada to thwart G8 support for a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders. A report published ...
(CP) -- Stephen Harper's spokesman is denying a report that Israel's prime minister specifically asked Canada to thwart G8 support for a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders. A report published ...
Filed by Lisa Yeung  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yumster
11:41 AM on 05/30/2011
With or without Netayanhu, there will be a Palestinian State. He will just be a side reference when the history of peace in Palestine is written. He wants a demilitatised Bantustan like enclave for the Palestinian .
He has found a new friend in Canada and its about time Israel gets off US welfare.
11:40 AM on 05/30/2011
harper is a foooooollll!!!!
photo
Vlady
Better Late
11:59 PM on 05/29/2011
Canada is a good friend of US and Israel
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
01:55 AM on 05/30/2011
Ever heard the saying "Friends don't let friends drive drunk."?

Well. Stevie boy not only lets Israel drive drunk, he just pointed Israel's car towards the cliff, tied the steering wheel in place, disabled the emergency brake and put a brick on the accelerator.

Enjoy the ride. The crash will happen in September.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
12:36 PM on 05/30/2011
>>The crash will happen in September

...poor Palestinians
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danny Dan
09:56 PM on 05/29/2011
At this point every argument that has come before has no teeth.
As long as Israel has the US support the UN can say what they will.
Just as Hamas refuses to recognize Israels existence so it is Israels right to not recognize palestinian state borders that dont work for them.
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
01:56 AM on 05/30/2011
Feel free to do some research on Resolution 377.
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
09:12 PM on 06/07/2011
Why should Hamas recognize Israel when Israel does not recognize Hamas as a democratically elected government by the people. The recognition of Israel is a
smokescreen. It means that Paelstinians will relinquish their right of return to their land, the land taken from them and declared "held in belligerant occupation and illegal by the Israeli Supreme court.
07:36 PM on 05/29/2011
The G-8 should have come out with a strong endorsement of Israeli security within 1967 borders. And a clear endorsement of independent Palestine. This would be in Israel's own best interests.
07:25 PM on 05/29/2011
why didnt he phone BE OTA--she could have inserted the NOT
07:22 PM on 05/29/2011
meet CIPAC president ---steve harper ---you go steve your new BFF's have money
05:33 PM on 05/29/2011
Israel already owns the U.S. and now it wants to branch out. Harper knows that this is very good for his campaign coffers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
03:05 PM on 05/29/2011
Harper needs to review law and history. "The Charter of the United Nations bars the acquisition of territory by war. Thus Israel has never had any legal rights of sovereignty over any of the lands it "won" in 1967, and never had any right to settle its own citizens there. Regarding peace talks, as leaked documents show, during peace talks Palestinian negotiators have consistently offered concessions beyond the international consensus. Meanwhile, Israeli negotiators, at Camp David for example, demanded sovereignty or long-term control over 20% of the West Bank, and all of Jerusalem except a few distant Palestinian suburbs. During his speech, Netanyahu also claimed to be willing to make "a far-reaching compromise," while at the same time claiming occupied East Jerusalem, the Jordan Valley, and most illegal settlements for Israel, rejecting the Palestinian refugees' right of return, and demanding a demilitarized Palestinian state. Such proposals by Israeli leaders are quite the opposite of "generous" or "far-reaching."
http://imeu.net/news/article0020963.shtml
04:13 PM on 05/29/2011
Harper needs to review law and history. "The Charter of the United Nations bars the acquisitio­n of territory by war."

Is that right? How far back do you go? Should Mexico get back its land like Cal. Arizona, New Mex., Texas? You get the picture.
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
01:58 AM on 05/30/2011
Apparently your ignorance of history doesn't allow you to know when the UN was formed.

Take a history course and come back and comment when you are educated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trial Lawyer
12:16 PM on 05/31/2011
"The Charter of the United Nations bars the acquisitio­n of territory by war."--I just read the whole charter--It does not say that. There are 2 competing sections. Article 2 paragraph 4 which states:
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
and Article 51, which states:
Article 51

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Things are not so black and white as you state.
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
03:05 PM on 05/29/2011
I think it's hilarious that the only support Bibi can find is from a person who wants all Jews to return to Israel so the world will suffer from Armageddon, the Jews will die, and Stevie boy gets raptured.

But then I guess when you commit war crimes on a daily basis you take whatever support you can find.

(And for the Hasbara artists who scream Israel doesn't commit war crimes, please explain this:

Opening of Rafah crossing spells end of Israel's blockade of Gaza
Move heralds closer ties between Hamas and Egypt; Israel objects to gesture but does not see it causing major security damage.
http://www.haaretz.com/misc/article-print-page/opening-of-rafah-crossing-spells-end-of-israel-s-blockade-of-gaza-1.364634?trailingPath=2.169,2.225,2.226,

If opening the border crossing does NOT cause major security damage than what reason, other than collective punishment of a civilian population, did Israel have for closing Gaza's borders?)
02:31 PM on 05/29/2011
I think Stephen Harper did not serve the best interests of Canada, or even of Israel, when he blocked any mention of the 1967 borders in the statement released by the G-8 after the summit.
02:42 PM on 05/29/2011
That is correct. He was serving the interest of Fundamentalists like Charles McVety, and the Alliance Church (Which is why we had an "Alliance"Party. Canada is now a theocracy.
02:22 PM on 05/29/2011
Thank you Harper for drawing us in this Israeli-instigated US-Arab war. Perhaps we shall also have our own 911 here thanks to you. I know I don't want to die for Zionism.
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
02:09 PM on 05/29/2011
Mr. Harper's most recent comment at the G8 is confusing to say the least.

It is also a contradiction of the historically established and accepted position that the 1967 border issue would be the starting point, from which to negotiate.

Welcome to NeoCon Canada.....................................F35s anyone? Crazy, crazy, crazy.
02:33 PM on 05/29/2011
sonof - - Yes, the neocons and other fanatical elements of the Israel lobby are taking ever-greater control over Canadian foreign policy. They already have near-total control of US foreign policy in the ME.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
12:40 PM on 05/29/2011
since pres O is in and W out bebe has to find someother neoconman for support in NA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Creox
Life is too important to take seriously.
12:31 PM on 05/29/2011
Harper is just doing his usual pro Israel tap dance. I have nothing against Israelis or Israel but I sure as hell have something against the government of Israel and Zionism.

Even the U.S. is changing its tune (albeit subtly). Canada needs to look beyond the politics of blanket support and see what is really happening in that region.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
01:08 PM on 05/29/2011
Looking beyond is hard to do when you squint as hard as Harper does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljkcan
Yes, I am prone to spelling errors
01:52 PM on 05/29/2011
who knew Harper is now the poodle in Bibi's lap. Too bad it would almost had been better if Burlesconi had cornerd Harper about his legal woes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
04:16 PM on 05/29/2011
He's best at being a poodle to everyone.
He was one of Georgie's favorite poodles.
He's good at kissing a**.
It makes him feel important.