Germany Nuclear Shutdown: Plants Will Be Closed by 2022

Germany Nuclear

First Posted: 05/30/11 08:56 AM ET Updated: 07/30/11 06:12 AM ET

(CP) -- BERLIN - Gremany's governing coalition said Monday it will shut down all the country's nuclear power plants by 2022. The decision, prompted by Japan's nuclear disaster, will make Germany the first major industrialized nation to go nuclear-free in years.

It also completes a remarkable about-face for Chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right government, which only late last year had pushed through a plan to extend the life span of the country's 17 reactors — with the last scheduled to go offline in 2036.

But Merkel now says industrialized, technologically advanced Japan's helplessness in the fact of the Fukushima disaster made her rethink the risks of the technology.

"We want the electricity of the future to be safe, reliable and economically viable," Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters on Monday after overnight negotiations among the governing parties. "We have to follow a new path."

While Germany already was set to abandon nuclear energy eventually, the decision — which still requires parliamentary approval — dramatically speeds up that process.

Germany's seven oldest reactors, already taken off the grid pending safety inspections following the March catastrophe at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, will remain offline permanently, Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen said.

The country's energy supply chain "needs a new architecture," necessitating huge efforts in boosting renewable energies, efficiency gains and overhauling the electricity grid, Merkel said.

The determination of Germany, Europe's largest economy, to gradually replace its nuclear power with renewable energy sources makes it stand out among the world's major industrialized nations. Among other members of the Group of Eight, only Italy has abandoned nuclear power, which was voted down in a referendum after the 1986 Chornobyl disaster.

Until March — before the seven reactors were taken offline — just under a quarter of Germany's electricity was produced by nuclear power, about the same share as in the U.S.

Energy from wind, solar and hydroelectric power currently produces about 17 per cent of the country's electricity, but the government aims to boost its share to around 50 per cent in the coming decades.

Many Germans have been vehemently opposed to nuclear power since Chornobyl sent radioactive fallout over the country. Tens of thousands of people repeatedly took to the streets after Fukushima to urge the government to shut all reactors quickly.

A decade ago, a centre-left government first penned a plan to abandon the technology for good by 2021 because of its inherent risks. But Merkel's government last year amended the plan o extend the plants' lifetime by an average of 12 years — a decision that became a political liability after Fukushima was hit by Japan's March 11 earthquake and tsunami disaster.

"This is a great day of relief for all opponents of nuclear energy in Germany," said Sigmar Gabriel, leader of the opposition Social Democrats. "Today, our political opponents are forced ... to accept our policies."

Merkel's government ordered the country's seven oldest reactors, all built before 1980, shut down four days after problems emerged at Fukushima. The plants accounted for about 40 per cent of the country's nuclear power capacity.

Shutting down even more reactors, however, will require billions of euros (dollars) of investment in renewable energies, more natural gas power plants and an overhaul of the country's electricity grid.

Germany, usually a net energy exporter, has at times had to import energy since March, with the seven old reactors shut down and others temporarily taken off the grid for regular maintenance work.

Still, the agency overseeing its electricity grid said Friday that the country will remain self-sufficient.

The government has stressed that Germany must not rely on importing power from its nuclear-reliant neighbours.

Environmental groups welcomed Berlin's decision.

"The country is throwing its weight behind clean renewable energy to power its manufacturing base and other countries like Britain should take note," said Robin Oakley, Greenpeace UK's campaigns director.

Germany's industry umbrella organization said the government must not allow the policy changes to lead to an unstable power supply or rising electricity prices, both of which would affect the country's competitiveness.

"Transforming the energy sector is a hugely demanding project," said Hans-Peter Keitel, the president of the Federation of German Industries.

He urged the government not to set the nuclear exit date of 2022 in stone, but to agree on a date that would be adjustable if problems arise in the coming years.

The coalition government's decision broadly follows the conclusions of a government-mandated commission on the ethics of nuclear power, which delivered recommendations on how to abolish the technology within a decade on Saturday, and presented them Monday.

"Fukushima was a dramatic experience, seeing there that a high-technology nation can't cope with such a catastrophe," said Matthias Kleiner, the commission's co-chairman. "Nuclear power is a technology with too many inherent risks to inflict it on us or our children."

The shares of Germany's four nuclear utility companies were down Monday. The biggest of them, E.ON AG and RWE AG, slipped by about 2 per cent, to €19.62 and €40.05 respectively.

Neighbouring Switzerland, where nuclear power produces 40 per cent of electricity, also announced last week that it plans to shut down its reactors gradually once they reach their average lifespan of 50 years — which would mean taking the last plant off the grid in 2034.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Kenny Yum  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:20 PM on 05/30/2011
A great way of making them non-nuclear is by using vanadium redox fuel cells. They can be as large as you can make them. http://www.vanadiumsite.com/germany-embraces-vanadium-redox-fuel-cell-technology
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abuckley23
Published author. Visit me at Planet Kibi!
02:05 PM on 05/30/2011
That's a fantastic hat! He obviously put a lot of work into it. I particularly like the green skull.
01:22 PM on 05/30/2011
don't worry nuclear trawliees, the US and Canada are fully owned by corporations. they will stick with nuclear even when an accident happens. corporate control. woohoo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Bullock
01:37 PM on 05/30/2011
Plus it's too bad we have Harper, who's willing to fire anyone who brings up the questionable state of some of our reactors.
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
12:55 PM on 05/30/2011
What I find really positive about this is that there is a world leader who is prepared to make a major reversal of long-term policy based on new events, and isn't worried that she has somehow flushed all her credability down the tube in the process.

Nice if we could evolve our political systems to the point where leaders have more breathing room to respond to new information without the constant fear of being branded wimps or sellouts.
photo
Toddynho
I needs proof read more!
12:28 PM on 05/30/2011
Not only is THIS a great initiative, but their work with alternatives is stunning. This is a country that sees the writing on the wall, and will be well prepared for the future.
11:59 AM on 05/30/2011
Bad bad BAD Idea! Nuclear Fission Power isn't all that bad. The problem is the lack of safety measures in the power plants. In time, we will develop Nuclear Fusion Power which will yield more power than Nuclear Fission. The safety regulations in a lot of fission power plants are inadequate and that is the main reason why the Fukushima plants fail. Yes, it was deadly accident but we shouldn't abandon nuclear power.

If Germany really want sustainable energy, they should start by becoming more energy and resource efficient. A lot of products waste energy tremendously and that HAS to change.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald Trudel
history geek, chef
12:52 PM on 05/30/2011
The safety of the power plant isn't the big concern. I agree a fail proof system may be possible. But there is still the problem of the spent fuel, or more accurately, nuclear waste. That doesn't go away.
I would also like to address your comment on German sustainability. Over ten years ago they started a program to get solar panels on residential roof tops. The banks provided the loans that where secured by the government. The surplus electricity was sold added to the grid and purchased at a premium. Look up 'Feed In Tariff'. To date only about 2% of their electricity is generated this way, but continues to increase. They have run into some issues recently though. The cost of German made panels has increased to the point where the tariff is not high enough to see a return on investment in an attractive time period. The Chinese manufacturers have undercut them. The entire program is built around having a domestic industry, so we will see what happens. Overall it's a positive step in the right direction though.
02:36 PM on 05/30/2011
Granted, however, Solar and Wind power do not yield enough energy to sustain the entire nation. Where will you put the Wind and Solar power plants? How about Hydroelectricity and its toxicity to the lakes? At the current rate of power consumption, Nuclear Fission is the only viable solution in the short run. In the long run, we need nuclear Fusion to evade the environmental destruction we're currently doing.
11:45 AM on 05/30/2011
Brilliant! After Fukushima the cost argument really goes out the door.
Great to see a western nation finally stepping up to the obvious first step in making change that is inevitable.
10:57 AM on 05/30/2011
I actually think this is sad. Nuclear is safe and green - when it is regulated. My cousin is a nuclear engineer in France, where 80% of all electricity is nuclear. No money to undemocratic oil regimes (unlike Italy) - no green house gasses (unlike Germany- that still uses a lot of coal).
Japan was not following regulations- neither was Cherenobyl.
Nuclear takes regulated proffesional work - which is best when it is run by governments- to avoid BP issues.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sock De Jour
Democracy is an illusion
09:59 AM on 05/30/2011
Smart, but the rest of the world needs to follow suit. Radionuclides don't understand borders.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:27 AM on 05/30/2011
Next stop, nuke free EU.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:25 AM on 05/30/2011
Finally, some sensible leadership on this issue!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
08:41 AM on 05/30/2011
Germany is leading the way!
They make more solar power than any other country and are leading in renewable energy.
Why can't America do this too?

I put in a solar array after hearing that Germany makes so much solar power. I'm in Vermont and get more sun hours than Germany. My array makes 120% of my power.
10:27 AM on 05/30/2011
It costs around $50,000 or more to go strictly solar and the panels last an average of 10 years. Not exactly cost effective.My current electric bill runs under $200 per month or less than $24,000 in 10 years so in essence you pay more than double. I think I'll pass on the solar
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
12:17 PM on 05/30/2011
You are wrong, it cost me less than 35.000 and the panels last well over 20 years !
You should reconsider as I pay $0 for my power and the power company is going to buy my excess at 6 cents per kwh starting 1-1-2012 by law here in Vermont.

You go ahead and waste your money , though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valar84
08:36 AM on 05/30/2011
There are two winners to this announcement:

1- The German coal industry. The renewable sector is unable to pick up the lost power from nuclear, so it means burning more coal and more gas.

2- The French nuclear industry. Since Germany is ridiculously choosing to get rid of its clean nuclear power, it will have a need to import more electricity and French nuclear power is generating a lot of it, in excess of what France itself consumes.

The losers?

1- The German people. Pricier electricity and more pollution.

2- The entire world, because it will increase carbon emissions greatly and accelerate global warming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scoville Scale
Canadian Contrarian
09:00 AM on 05/30/2011
Perhaps in your world...
But in reality, they're cutting energy from coal at an even faster rate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valar84
09:33 AM on 05/30/2011
Please check the facts before typing.

Nuclear power represents 23% of Germany's electricity production versus 17% for renewables, despite very high subsidies to encourage them. Fossil fuels represent 55% of electricity production. Getting rid of nuclear power cannot come only from renewables, especially since areas that are good sites for wind and solar aren't an unlimited resource. So fossil fuels are bound to produce more electricity than they do now, unless Germany wants to import even more.

In fact, Germany is planning to build a lot of new coal power plants, an article in 2007 spoke of more than two dozens of them:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,472786,00.html

If they are to shut down nuclear power even faster, they will have to build even more.

Since its moratorium on the old 7 plants began, Germany has become a net importer of electricity, mainly from France (79% nuclear).
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/04/us-germany-power-wholesale-idUSTRE7331M820110404

Even if they are able to limit the rise in fossil fuels by investing even more massively into renewables, it still means that they lose an opportunity to reduce the use of fossil fuels, because they could be retiring coal plants instead of nuclear power plants.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:26 AM on 05/30/2011
Completely false. Keep trying.