Germany Nuclear Power Substitute? Coal From Australia

Nuclear

First Posted: 06/01/11 07:53 AM ET Updated: 08/01/11 06:12 AM ET

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- CANBERRA, Australia - Germany signed a resource co-operation deal on Wednesday with Australia, the world's largest coal exporter, only days after committing to shut down its nuclear reactors by 2022.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle signed the deal during his first visit to Australia. But he said Germany did not plan to substitute coal and gas for nuclear power to fulfil its energy needs.

"We want to finish the use of nuclear energy. We do not want to substitute it with fossil energy, but we want to substitute it with renewable energy," Westerwelle told reporters.

Germany was a world leader in renewable energy technology such a solar cells and wind turbines and recognized that Australia has a "clear commitment for renewable energy," he said.

Australia is one of the world's worst greenhouse gas polluters per capita because of its heavy reliance on abundant reserves of cheap coal to generate electricity.

But it passed a law in 2009 requiring that 20 per cent of its electricity come from renewable sources such as the sun and wind by 2020 — up from 8 per cent at the time the law was passed.

Coal and iron ore are Australia's most lucrative exports, but natural gas, which is cleaner than coal, is a rapidly expanding industry through multibillion dollar contracts with Asia. China is also increasing its stake in Australian resource companies as its demand for natural resources burgeons.

Under the deal, German and Australia have agreed to increase co-operation in the resource and energy sectors through investment and collaboration in research and development. It does not specify the types of energy on which they will co-operate.

Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said that Germany, as the world's fourth-largest economy, was an important partner in promoting free global markets for energy and resources as well being a major potential investor in Australia's resources sector.

Germany invested 75 million Australian dollars ($81 million) in Australian mineral exploration and development in the 2009-10 fiscal year, he said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's government decided Monday to shut all of Germany's 17 nuclear reactors by 2022 — reversing a decision last year to extend their life span. The move followed a crisis in Japan, when a mammoth earthquake and tsunami on March 11 disabled a nuclear power plant and caused it to leak radiation. It was weeks before the country got the leak under control.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- CANBERRA, Australia - Germany signed a resource co-operation deal on Wednesday with Australia, the world's largest coal exporter, only days after committing to shut down its nucl...
THE CANADIAN PRESS -- CANBERRA, Australia - Germany signed a resource co-operation deal on Wednesday with Australia, the world's largest coal exporter, only days after committing to shut down its nucl...
Filed by Kenny Yum  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:00 PM on 06/02/2011
It will be an interesting experiment, to say the least. So now we play the waiting game...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
05:12 AM on 06/02/2011
Germany invested 75 million Australian dollars ($81 million) in Australian mineral exploration and development in the 2009-10 fiscal year, he said.

The Environmental fraud of the anti nukers is colossal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
05:16 AM on 06/02/2011
Thats the bottom line. Not this fairy tale Green Germany that is based in ¨wonderful discoveries and plans¨ with no backing - its what they are doing, and they are committing to more pollution.
08:18 PM on 06/02/2011
Why fraud?
The decision itself, to end using nuclear power, was made a decade ago. The current controversy was just about the fact that last fall, contrary obviously to the will of the majority of citizens, the government extended the lifelines of our nukes until the late 2030ies. That has now been revoked and the current plan is to speed up the original phasing out.
To compensate for that, renewables and new grids are installed as well as energy efficiency of privately owned buildings is increased. We roughly need to compensate for 20%, most likely less since we generate more electricity than Germany actually needs.
Coal and gas plants are an entirely different matter. Even with the goal to have 80% renewables by 2050 we will still need them anyways. So it's necessary to secure access to foreign coal and/or gas. There are coal/gas cogeneration plants under construction, yes, but only to replace older, existing ones. The government will stick to the goal of reducing carbon by 40%.
No matter if you like it or not, coal/gas/renewables have another desired effect nuclear plants don't: They can be run profitably by communities or small companies, thus breaking the grip the oligopoly of four energy giants has right now. It's fair to assume that with more competition between smaller providers prices will be reined in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
08:29 PM on 06/01/2011
Considering people do not want to live in the dark... these are our choices.

Solution? Energy 'X Prize'

Instead of never ending subsidization and mandates requiring 'green' sources... why not actually push technology forward?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
12:50 AM on 06/02/2011
Or at least go back 60 years and approve the molten salt reactor aka LFTR
(It's way better).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
01:08 AM on 06/02/2011
There was an article in the WSJ about this back in February... or a modern incarnation... backed by Bill Gates with TerraPower.

Better technology is the solution, not the problem... and is our only hope to improve things. Putting all our eggs in the Wind/Solar basket is a ruinous energy policy.
08:25 PM on 06/02/2011
Ok, but then also reduce the indirect subsidies to nuclear plants:
- demand the same level of disaster insurance as for other plants and don't socialize this insurance.
- demand that the owners of the plants themselves have to built and run (fully scientific verification, state-of-the-art technology) a nuclear waste storage.
- reimburse in full the states for the extra amount of police the nuclear waste transports and plant security require
- etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
04:20 PM on 06/01/2011
"We do not want to substitute it (nuclear) with fossil energy," But they will.