Brigette DePape, Senate Page, In Throne Speech Protest: Removed From Chamber With 'Stop Harper' Sign

Speech From The Throne Protest

First Posted: 06/03/11 05:06 PM ET Updated: 08/03/11 06:12 AM ET

UPDATE: New story including video about the former Page: Brigette DePape, Senate Protester And Performance Artist, And Her Instant Rise To Fame

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- OTTAWA - Paging all protesters!

A 21-year-old Senate page put her job on the line Friday in a silent call for Canadians to give some sober second thought to Prime Minister Stephen Harper's majority Conservative government.

Brigette DePape staged an unprecedented protest on the floor of the Senate chamber, walking out into the red-carpeted centre aisle carrying a red "Stop Harper" sign that she'd pulled from beneath her skirt as Gov. Gen. David Johnston read the new government's speech from the throne.

The University of Ottawa graduate stood silently holding her hand-painted sign for at least 20 seconds — while the vice-regal made a barely perceptible hitch in his address and a stunned room full of dignitaries and invited guests stared in mute astonishment.

With Harper, RCMP Commissioner William Elliott and Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Walter Natynczyk — among others — looking on, the sergeant-at-arms of the House of Commons finally escorted DePape out of the Senate.

Six seated justices of the Supreme Court of Canada sat in their ermine robes with their backs to DePape, seemingly oblivious to the drama unfolding three paces behind them.

DePape was nearing the end of her year-long job as a page, and the Senate communications staff said her employment has been terminated.

The stunt was well planned, with a news release popping up in the emails of Parliament Hill reporters minutes after the event.

"Contrary to Harper's rhetoric, Conservative values are not in fact Canadian values," DePape, calling herself Brigette Marcelle, said in the release.

"How could they be when three out of four eligible voters didn't even give their support to the Conservatives? But we will only be able to stop Harper's agenda if people of all ages and from all walks of life engage in creative actions and civil disobedience."

In an interview later, DePape said she was "extremely nervous."

"But, I don't know, there was something inside of me that said, 'You have to do this.'"

Reaction from senators and MPs was decidedly cool, although Sen. Pierre Claude Nolin, a Progressive Conservative, noted that the Senate floor is supposed to be a place of free speech.

"One of the principal rules is free speech," Nolin shrugged. But he noted the security staff "are scratching their head today."

Being a page is highly coveted part-time job in which university students run errands for MPs and Senators in parliament — everything from fetching a glass of water to exchanging messages.

Veteran Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett called the protest by a security-cleared employee "an abuse of parliamentary privilege."

"That's lots of room for that out on the lawn, or whatever," she said.

And Green party Leader Elizabeth May lauded DePape for her bravery but suggested that by interrupting the Governor General she'd used it in the wrong venue.

"Essentially, in theory, we're in the presence of Her Majesty, that is the sovereign," said May. "That isn't Stephen Harper's room. That's somebody else's room."

It's not the first protest for DePape, who graduated this spring after an award-winning four years studying international development at the University of Ottawa.

She worked as a summer intern last year for the left-leaning Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives in Winnipeg and took part in last June's G20 protests in Toronto.

Afterwards, DePape wrote an op-ed in the Winnipeg Free Press where she opined about the impact of protesters.

"My dad told me that protesting at the G20 was unproductive and ineffective. I was crushed. Suddenly, riding in my parents' car, I felt powerless ... But my question for him and his generation is: what will change things, then? If protesting is meaningless, as he suggests, what can we do to create a more just society?"

DePape exhibited no signs of remorse when speaking of her latest exploit.

"I've been learning a lot about politics and being on the Hill, I really got to see first-hand the politics of Harper and his agenda going forward," she said, adding "I decided that I could not just sit idly by any longer and decided this was a good time to take action."

Liberal MP Justin Trudeau said DePape had stepped on the "sense of respect and decorum" that goes with a throne speech and he'd rather the protest hadn't happened.

"Dissent is part of our democratic system," added Trudeau.

"I don't think she'll be too badly punished for it, either — concretely here, or in her future endeavours."

In fact, the buzz on social networking site Twitter was largely positive, and DePape appeared to have a job offer from someone at the Public Service Alliance of Canada before the day was done.

"Brigitte Marcelle contact me for a job at the #PSAC," said the message. "We are looking for gutsy organizers."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 327
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
Hard Truth
Veritas vos Liberabit
08:48 AM on 06/06/2011
Don't they have Tasers in Canada? That would have been the apropriate response to such a juvenile temper tantrum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StealGeorgia
04:05 PM on 06/04/2011
If the British Monarchy is barely relevent to the Brits, how less so for Canadians? There really is no place for a "Throne Speech" in Canada, or any country other than England (perhaps).

So what better way to protest against Conservatism than to point out how pointless bowing to a foreign potentate really is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
02:31 PM on 06/04/2011
Signgate really shows how terrified conservatives are of free speech. Nothing violent happened. A sign got shown. There wasn't even any audio because nothing got said. And yet you read some of the republican comments here and you get the feeling that she created an armed rebellion.
04:10 PM on 06/04/2011
It's about respect for democracy and accepting the will of the people. The timing of this protest - right after an election that resulted in a majority government - and the location show the blatant disregard for a system that has produced what I believe to be one of the best countries to live in. People of your political leaning who condone and encourage this anarchistic behavior also show their true colours.

And by the way ... the 'armed rebellion' is all in your head ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
04:19 PM on 06/04/2011
I knew deep down inside you were an idealist too. F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:23 PM on 06/04/2011
I fully support free speech, including your right to non-specifically label some comments as republican and underplay the issue because it wasn't violent...no audio etc. Perhaps you could clarify if, in your opinion, individual citizens (and, don't forget, employees) can break any rule or policy in any time or place as it suits their whim or clever "under-the-skirt" plans. I'm not terrified of free speech, and, I get it, this actually isn't a huge deal. But, given the abuse of priviledge and position it represents, it was wrong. Or maybe 'wrong' is the new 'right'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
05:51 PM on 06/04/2011
Many people have faced the ethical choice of speaking their mind or keeping their jobs. Most choose to keep their jobs. But occasionally an idealist will appear who makes a different choice. I have no problem with her losing her job. She chose to forgo economic rewards in return for personal integrity. I do have a problem with the double standard that is applied to her. Her ethical stance is being cast as flawed while the actions of, say, a Mulroney are cast as heroic.
Note - her salary was 11 000 per year. Mulroney's airbus bribe was 300 000.
12:54 PM on 06/04/2011
Which part of 'democracy' does this naive, young and supposedly politically-savy idealist not understand? Harper won a majority government in a democratic process. He is now following through on all of the promises he made during his campaign and that the majority of the voters voted for.

She is the type of idealist that will lead the next group of 'peaceful' protestors to set fire to police cars, smash windows of small businesses trying to make a living, and then pillage - all in the name of 'creative actions and civil disobedience'. What a crock!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
01:55 PM on 06/04/2011
She can't be that naive, she got you to show your true colours. The stuff about smashing windows and burning police cars is only in your mind. She simply held up a sign.
10:28 AM on 06/05/2011
that's the thing, you don't get it...38% of our country voted for harper out of the people that showed up, out of the eligible voters, harper got around 20%

While I agree that the fault lies on the people who did not show up,

It is safe to say that our democratic system wastes votes, and wastes the opinions of Canadians, Almost every western country has some type of proportional representation OR a strong movement to change their electoral system

The opinions of all Canadians matter, and most Canadians are NOT mad at this girl. So your opinion means nothing to me.
08:28 AM on 06/06/2011
The Conservatives won a MAJORITY government regardless of how you want to spin it. This is the result of democracy which it seems that the left wants to redefine to mean that the result is valid only if it suits them.

In one breath you write "The opinions of all Canadians matter ..." and in the next "your opinion means nothing to me". Thanks for clearly showing the hypocrisy of the left and for proving my point.
11:49 AM on 06/04/2011
Intelligence AND social compassion AND guts at ***21***??? That's the stuff of comic book superheroes. I am awed. But also so sad, that this combination of character qualities have become so rare
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 PM on 06/04/2011
These qualities are not rare at all. Plenty of citizens, young and old, challenge themselves to be informed, involved and courageous, and take leadership roles in our communities. She may make a fine superhero and perhaps there is a gripping graphic novel in her future. In the real world, she, like the rest of us, acts in a complex world where the balance between personal opinion and public expression is continually negotiated and held to standards of appropriate conduct, including considerations of time and place. She missed the mark on this one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
02:04 PM on 06/04/2011
I agree her courage and compassion are rare. But there will always be fewer natural leaders than followers. And her actions will inspire others.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MissMapleLeaf
princesshighandmightytoldyousobossoftheworld
11:38 AM on 06/04/2011
She was described as having used the wrong venue for her protest. I say, what was a better venue. She had the eyes of the nation because she was on a national camera where every bored Canadian political journalist sat up and took notice.
11:40 AM on 06/04/2011
Of course people in the house thought it was the wrong venue - but I'am pretty sure the rest of us thought she couldn't have picked a better place to get out her message.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:50 AM on 06/04/2011
"Pretty sure the rest of us..." Not so.
11:38 AM on 06/04/2011
What more does she want for our country? We are doing well in comparison to nearly all of our peers. There is no perfect system, but we are in relatively good spot. Lower unemployment, healthcare for all, relative peace, our homes haven't bottomed out, and the outlook is fairly positive.

Anyone who compares this girls stunt to "arab spring" or protesting equal rights for men and women, or those who fought for racial equality, or against the vietnam war, is out of their mind. Those were real issues.

I'm all for what she did - I'm just not sure of the substance or value of her message.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
02:26 PM on 06/04/2011
Arab Spring is about repairing a governance disaster after it has become pathological. Signgate is about treating an illness in its early stages. Look to your southern neighbour to see an intermediate phase.

An ounce of prevention...
11:34 AM on 06/04/2011
This brave young lady is saying exactly what many of us feel.
12:59 PM on 06/04/2011
The majority feels otherwise.
01:23 PM on 06/04/2011
A majority would be anything over 50%. He did not even come close.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:04 PM on 06/04/2011
No argument on that, except, at the core of this issue is not her political stance but her inappropriate action and poor judgment in using her position and priviledge to further her own agenda. For some, this is a criticism often levelled at the Harper government. Ironic, then, that Brigette is so heroically admired and praised for flagrantly abusing her power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prestonmacdougall
the Chemical Eye Guy
11:32 AM on 06/04/2011
Bravo! It says a lot about Canadian democracy when one of the two people in the room that were mentioned in the story, and who went through any kind of serious competitive process to be officially in the Senate Chamber, was escorted out by the other. And the Sergeant at Arms is probably a patronage appointment.
11:26 AM on 06/04/2011
good for her! do you think young Canadians care about parliamentary rules established 400 years ago? We care about student debt, healthcare and transit. Many of us finally got out to vote, and we were stuck with Harper again.

I was watching the CBC and Evan Soloman said that we have ways of implementing change, it's called voting. And I have to disagree, voting for any party doesn't seem to bring about very much change, there are some serious issues like low-income housing, poverty and first nations issues that nothing is being done about....

this is our government, our country, but it almost seems like Canadians are "invited" to participate in the games of politicians.

while I do believe that the Arab spring analogy she made is a bit intense, i wish Canadians were more involved....

If only we were a direct democracy, and we were regularly involved in major issues via referendums like in Switzerland.
11:22 AM on 06/04/2011
I'm with Brigette DePape! She's a brave young women. It took a lot of courage to do that.
Citizens are not allowed to speak in any House of Commons, Senate or Legislature.
They are relegated to the front lawns while MP's are hidden inside. What better place than the Senate
Chamber while reading the scripted, whitewashed Throne Speech. Listening to that the rest of the world would think we live in Utopia. Senate Chamber, where Senators are appointed, when they lose the election and paid big fat checks. We will never hear from them again! Who speaks for us?
No one! Free Speech? What a crock! This lady should not be fired. Wish I could have stood beside her! CORRUPT GOVERNMENT, CORRUPT SENATE, CORRUPT COURTS WHO ARROGANTLY RULE OVER US!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 PM on 06/04/2011
Free speech is not unbounded. Whether you work at a cafe, bank, office, or in a government department, you are a representative of the institution. Rarely, is it, or should it be, your own personal soap-box to promote whatever political, religious or social views you might hold. Even in this forum, there are certain things that are off limits. (Luckily for you, ranting in capital letters is not one of them.) The phrase, "We're not going to pay you to do that here", is a good fit and firing her is absolutely the right call.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:17 PM on 06/04/2011
CORRUPT PAGES!!! Hmmm, ranting does feel good.
photo
MochasMom
Common sense since 1968
11:14 AM on 06/04/2011
Good for you, Brigette!
11:12 AM on 06/04/2011
in 20 years she will be running for PM ----her detractors with be asking if you want fries with that order.
11:45 AM on 06/04/2011
Her detractors will be the business leaders of Canada putting their campaign donations into the conservative leaders bid. So probably not the fry thing, but you might be right that we'll see more of this person in the future.
12:07 PM on 06/04/2011
her detractor will be business leader of tomorrow ----you are probably right ---they should be managers of the fries division by then
11:06 AM on 06/04/2011
Far out!

More Canadians should be aware of what their pols are doing to them. And be willing to 'hit the streets' to effect change. A ballot every 4 years is not responsible government.
10:59 AM on 06/04/2011
harper didnt even get 40%, he got less than 6 million votes, that means 27 million residents of Canada didnt viote for him, roughly only 20% of residents of Canada voted for him.

"Therefore 80% of residents of Canada didnt vote for Harper"

Good talking point eh? The babies, the kids, the teens, the people who were too busy, couldnt care less, etc etc didnt vote for Harper. Bottom line folks, virtually every riding they won was over 50% of the vote in that riding, and they won seats in EVERY SINGLE province.
11:07 AM on 06/04/2011
""""""every riding they won was over 50% of the vote in that riding"""""

that is absurd and not factual
11:33 AM on 06/04/2011
not near as absurd as the "3 out of 4 Canadians" statement.