B.C. Boy Accidentally Shoots And Kills Cranbrook Teen

Shotgun

First Posted: 06/21/11 11:37 AM ET Updated: 08/21/11 06:12 AM ET

CBC — A 10-year-old boy was holding a loaded shotgun when it accidently discharged, killing a 17-year-old teenager on Thursday, according to RCMP in Cranbrook, B.C.

Police said six teens were hanging out in a house when they started fooling around with a shotgun owned by one of their parents. The gun went off, hitting Michael Voth, 17, who was pronounced dead at the scene, said police.

"The police investigation, to date, indicates that the shooting was an accident. A 10-year-old child was able to access a loaded shotgun, which discharged while he held it in his hands," said a statement released by Cpl. Chris Faulkner.

"Under the Criminal Code of Canada, there are no provisions for a child under the age of 12 years to face criminal charges, nor can their identity be released," he said.

The investigation is now turning to the owner of the shotgun, who was in the house at the time the shooting took place, he said.

"The matter of the insecure firearm is still part of the police investigation, and it is anticipated that the owner of the firearm may face charges," said Faulkner.

Three of the teens lived in the house and three were visiting. There was no indication of liquor or drug use, said Faulkner.

Faulkner said the teens are devastated and so are the parents of the dead boy.

"The mother of the boy told me, 'You see your son leave the house and you don't think he's never coming back again.' They are distraught, horrified." he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

CBC — A 10-year-old boy was holding a loaded shotgun when it accidently discharged, killing a 17-year-old teenager on Thursday, according to RCMP in Cranbrook, B.C. Police said six teens were han...
CBC — A 10-year-old boy was holding a loaded shotgun when it accidently discharged, killing a 17-year-old teenager on Thursday, according to RCMP in Cranbrook, B.C. Police said six teens were han...
Filed by Scaachi Koul  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:39 PM on 07/03/2011
Another tragic example of how guns in the home will be used to kill the innocent children,
08:26 AM on 07/11/2011
No, a tragic example of a parent acting carelessly with a firearm and a child that had not received the proper firearm safety training (to include, treat all firearms as loaded and no not touch a firearm).

Ask yourself this, if the anti-gun agenda is actually concerned with saving life (rather then simply exploiting a tragedy to serve their own agenda), why has a group like The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence never funded, let alone taught, one single class of firearm safety?

Ironically, the only groups teaching the gun safety and proper firearms handling techniques, which this family clearly needed, are pro-gun groups.
11:33 AM on 06/23/2011
Why would there be any criminal charges brought against a ten year old?

The charges should be brought against the owner (parents?) of the gun. The guns should have been locked in a gun vault with NO access to kids.

Amazing. And stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Bullock
03:45 PM on 07/03/2011
I'm guessing you missed these parts:

"'Under the Criminal Code of Canada, there are no provisions for a child under the age of 12 years to face criminal charges, nor can their identity be released,' he said."

and

"'The matter of the insecure firearm is still part of the police investigation, and it is anticipated that the owner of the firearm may face charges,' said Faulkner."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
10:57 AM on 06/22/2011
What a horrible tragedy.

It's a sad fact of life that the amount of common sense in a situation is inversely proportional to the number of teens (or many adults, unfortunately) in the group. There have been too many incidents where everyone thought someone else had removed the shells, put on the safety or put the gun in a "safe" place.
10:25 PM on 06/21/2011
We may not have all the facts about this tragic shooting, but here are two facts that are pertenant to this incedent. 1- all guns must by law be stored in a metal, locked container. 2- all amunition must be stored in a metal, locked container seperate from the guns. Keeping the guns and the amunition locked separately is a two fold safty measure to prevent accidents like this, so someone screwed up royally for this child to end up with a loaded gun.
02:50 PM on 07/03/2011
Better to not have guns in the home at all. They serve no purpose, only give the illusion of safety.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
01:52 PM on 06/21/2011
a loaded shotgun? The owner obviously is one of those sloppy careless gun owners that probably hates the gun registry (don't tell me what to do), and proclaims loud and often that 'guns don't kill people'. He should practice his lines from prison! A 17 year old kid is dead, and a 12 year old probably traumatized because Mr Gun Owner can't follow the rules. Too may sloppy 'demand my rights' fools out there who can't do anything properly.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
03:05 PM on 06/21/2011
Isn't it amazing how all you judgemental mind readers can extrapolate facts out of a shallow and incomplete report in a news media. Obviously you were on the scene and know all the details and have information the rest of us just don't. Must be an urbanite
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
05:46 PM on 06/21/2011
yup - an urbanite with more ability to recognize people who can't follow thru with the Law, with Safety, or with any ability. Must be some pickup driving bumpkin.
02:51 PM on 07/03/2011
Dead kid. Gun used. Case closed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
05:48 PM on 06/21/2011
Yes, an urbanite in a city full of inept gun totin' hoods. Not sum country bumpkin who can't follow safety regulations, or able to.
11:39 AM on 06/23/2011
Were you born an idiot, or have you always been this way?
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
01:12 PM on 06/21/2011
In most provinces, the age for hunting and access to guns is 18. In some, the legal age for hunting is as low as 12 under direct supervision. The question is, did one of the "kids" have legal access to his father's gun safe and did he/she do something particularly stupid. Before I would condem the owner, I would like to know who took the gun out and under what circumstances. If your 17 year old borrows the family car ( which he has done responsibly hundreds of times) and kills a friend in a really stupid display of carelesness, are you then criminally responsible? I think these comments are primarily driven by urban anti gun paranoia and not by the reported facts because there are, as yet, no reported facts.
02:58 PM on 07/03/2011
Its obvious what is stupid is having guns in the home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tooldude
12:24 PM on 06/21/2011
The owner of the gun had better be charged to the full extent of the law, and please don't give me that line that they have already suffered enough. The gun owner has no reason at all to have a loaded firearm in the house.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
11:44 AM on 06/21/2011
I thought registered guns did not kill people. I am so confused.
02:58 PM on 07/03/2011
Gun use kills people.
photo
Nihilicious
Humanist>Realist>Atheist>Nihlist
11:17 AM on 06/21/2011
lol..oops.. criminally responsible. Period.
photo
Nihilicious
Humanist>Realist>Atheist>Nihlist
11:17 AM on 06/21/2011
Who ever owned that gun is negligent and responsible of. Period.