Senate Reform Bill Tabled In The House of Commons

Governor General

First Posted: 06/21/11 12:27 PM ET Updated: 08/21/11 06:12 AM ET

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper's quest to reform the Senate began again in earnest Tuesday, with his new bill for term limits and support for Senate elections bolstered by the Conservative government's majority mandate.

But the proposed Senate Reform Act, introduced by junior democratic reform minister Tim Uppal, is already expected to face opposition outside of Ottawa and perhaps even within the red chamber.

Quebec Premier Jean Charest has promised to go to the courts if the provinces aren't consulted and don't provide their consent for any changes to the Senate. Other provinces, including Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia, have said they would prefer its abolition.

Uppal has said he will not let that opposition or court cases stand in the way of implementing the reforms. This is the fourth time the Conservatives have attempted to bring forward reforms, but the first within the context of a majority government.

At the same time, some Conservative senators have expressed reservations about the reforms. In its news release on the legislation, the government included a quote from a Tory senator who would be impacted by a proposed new nine-year term limit.

"As a senator, I am well aware of the importance of the Senate in our parliamentary system," said Senator Claude Carignan.

"The Senate Reform Act, announced today in the House of Commons, builds on our Government’s long-standing commitment to transform the Senate into a renewed institution based on democratic principles."

The legislation would limit senators appointed after October 2008 to one nine-year term. If a senator leaves before the end of the term and comes back later, he or she is still only entitled to a cumulative nine-year appointment. The maximum age for a senator of 75 will remain the same.

The Conservative government points out that Parliament unilaterally changed the age restriction in 1965 through an amendment to the Constitution. Before then, senators were appointed for life.

The other part of the bill provides a framework for provinces interested in starting up Senate elections.

Based on the Alberta model, it sets out the basic parameters for a Senate vote. For example, elections would most likely be linked to municipal or provincial election periods.

The prime minister would be obliged to consider the elected senators from the provinces, but ultimately would still make the final decision on appointments.

Provinces wouldn't have to follow the exact framework or even have an election at all, but the government said it wants to signal its support for provinces who come up with their own systems. A backbencher in the B.C. Liberal government recently tabled a bill to introduce Senate elections there, which Premier Christy Clark is supporting.

Take our Facebook Poll: What's your position on senate reform?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper's quest to reform the Senate began again in earnest Tuesday, with his new bill for term limits and support for Senate elections bolstered b...
THE CANADIAN PRESS -- OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper's quest to reform the Senate began again in earnest Tuesday, with his new bill for term limits and support for Senate elections bolstered b...
Filed by Ron Nurwisah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 PM on 06/22/2011
Just get rid of the damn thing. It is completely useless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sfurr
02:38 PM on 06/21/2011
"The Conservative government points out that Parliament unilaterally changed the age restriction in 1965 through an amendment to the Constitution."

More arrogance and stupidity.

A month ago, they were claiming that the Constitution didn't require amending, since there was precedent.

It doesn't take a constitutional scholar to know that the federal government had the right in 1965 to unilaterally amend the constitution in this way. Since it was an amendment, it doesn't create any precedent for Harper, but he is a bald-faced liar and sophist. In other words, since the repatriation of the constitution with an amending formula, if a constitutional amendment would have been required under the old BNA, one would be required today -- with consent of the provinces.

The man is morally and intellectually bankrupt. He will say anything to support his idealogically driven agenda.
02:15 PM on 06/21/2011
no elected senate --------it is causing havoc in the usa ------abolish the useless old relic

we dont need two elected governments at the federal level
01:03 PM on 06/21/2011
And what about the existing senators? Are they grandfathered (no pun intended) in until they die? Or, does the nine year clock start counting for them when the bill passes?
photo
Mastiff
Via ovicipitum dura est.
01:34 PM on 06/21/2011
Yes, they are grandfathered in 'til age 75.

Not entirely fair, but if it helps get it done I can live with it. Otherwise we'll spend another 30 years talking about senate reform instead of acting.
12:54 PM on 06/21/2011
Lets the complaining begin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
12:40 PM on 06/21/2011
Now if we could balance it out so there isn't 4 Quebecer Senators to every 1 BC Senator I will be happy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 PM on 06/22/2011
give everyone 0 senators. Problem solved.