Ice-Free Northwest Passage Brings Migrating Whales, Plankton To New Waters

Gray Whale

First Posted: 06/26/11 02:29 PM ET Updated: 08/26/11 06:12 AM ET

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- HALIFAX - Some marine species are migrating to oceans where they were once extinct because of warming temperatures and polar melt, according to scientists who say the shakeup poses risks to entire ecosystems.

Researchers said they have found evidence of various marine life forms relocating halfway around the world because of the disappearance of sea ice in the Arctic.

Chris Reid, a professor of oceanography at the University of Plymouth in England, said they discovered the presence of a microscopic plankton in the North Atlantic 800,000 years after it had disappeared from that area.

It would be the first evidence of a trans-Arctic migration for plankton in modern times and one of the first times in tens of thousands of years that water has flown freely between the two oceans after ice retreated from the Alaska coastline.

They have also spotted a Pacific gray whale off the coasts of Spain and Israel more than three centuries after it vanished from the Atlantic.

Reid said they are convinced the relocations are the result of melting ice in the North, which has opened a channel for roving species.

"They are a marker of a major transition because the last time we had an opening between the Pacific and the Atlantic was about two to three million years ago," Reid said from Plymouth before the release of the findings Sunday.

"This could have big impacts on living marine resources as well as fisheries and aquaculture."

Reid, whose research with the Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science was released Sunday, is collecting the material as part of a major study on the effects of climate change on marine life.

He said the species shuffle could shake up the marine food web and transform the biodiversity of the Arctic and North Atlantic ecosystems.

Scientists from around the globe say they're already documenting the effects of species relocation due to warming water temperatures.

Some changes in plankton life have been linked to the collapse of some fish stocks, as well as declines in fish-eating North Sea birds, the researchers report.

Changes in tiny animals called copepods are threatening the food supply for fish such as cod, herring and mackerel, the scientists said, adding that the North Sea has warmed by one degree over 50 years.

Some of the tiny creatures, which are rich in oil, are being replaced by smaller and less nutritious varieties because of warming waters in the Atlantic and North Sea.

Reid said species will extend their ranges if waters continue to warm and could flourish, increasing the risk of algal blooms that involve harmful phytoplankton or species like jellyfish overtaking other marine life.

Some regions, like the Baltic Sea, could see improved biodiversity because of the warmer temperatures.

"Most of the impacts are so clearly negative and the scope of change so potentially huge that, taken together, they constitute brightly flashing warning signals," said Carlo Heip, director general of the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research.

The report says that in enclosed seas, species that require cooler conditions might have nowhere to go when the waters warm. Researchers predict that by 2060, as the Mediterranean warms, one-third of its 75 fish species will be threatened and six will be extinct.

The findings also raise alarms about chemical cycling in the Atlantic, one of most crucial oceans in the world for climate change and the absorption of carbon dioxide.

It is known as the global conveyor belt because deep water sinks to the bottom of the ocean and takes oxygen and carbon dioxide with it. It then moves down the Atlantic southward and then to the Pacific as a surface warm current back to the Atlantic.

It is key to the treatment of carbon dioxide produced by human activity.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- HALIFAX - Some marine species are migrating to oceans where they were once extinct because of warming temperatures and polar melt, according to scientists who say the shakeup po...
THE CANADIAN PRESS -- HALIFAX - Some marine species are migrating to oceans where they were once extinct because of warming temperatures and polar melt, according to scientists who say the shakeup po...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
10:11 AM on 07/11/2011
Worried about sea ice?

Here's what you should know:

In Sept of 2010, Antarctic Sea Ice set another new all time record high for extent...

http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/09/arctic_summer_sea_ice_third_sm.html

"the Antarctic sea ice extent for the southern winter was the largest on record, 4.1 percent above the 1979-2000 average"

In March of 2010, right before the big Iceland volcano erupted, Arctic Sea ice was "back to normal..."

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2010/040610.html

Arctic Sea ice has a "variance," and that variance is highly sensitive to volcanic eruptions, especially those UNDER THE ARCTIC OCEAN...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080625140649.htm

"ScienceDaily (June 26, 2008) — A research team led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) has uncovered evidence of explosive volcanic eruptions deep beneath the ice-covered surface of the Arctic Ocean."
photo
singsingsing
it's not easy being green
08:47 AM on 07/12/2011
LaDaris- Could have possibly have missed the point of the migration of species from one ocean to another and the possible ramifications BY A WIDER MARGIN ?
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
01:01 PM on 07/12/2011
singsingsing: "LaDaris- Could have possibly have missed the point of the migration of species from one ocean to another and the possible ramificati­ons BY A WIDER MARGIN ? "

Indeed. Somehow facts like that elude LaDairis, and on a constant basis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
09:52 PM on 06/29/2011
First, can anyone explain how surface ice in the Arctic Ocean was supposed to ever prevent microscopic plankton from passing back and forth between the north Pacific and the north Atlantic? The ice doesn't freeze all the way to the bottom of the ocean. Ocean currents pass directly under the sea ice. Also, there are at times open water routes through the Arctic Ocean during the summer months.

Second, how do we know the plankton didn't simply catch a ride in the hull of a large ship, to move from one ocean to the other? Cargo ships, and ice breaker craft, have moved many living things around the world innumerable times.

Third, the article states that the gray whale was a previous native species in the North Atlantic, prior to the expansion of the whaling industry. Isn't it reasonable to assume that there was some migration back and forth between the two oceans, say 1,000 years ago, when there were large numbers of gray whales in both the Atlantic and the Pacific?

Or are the authors asserting that the two ancient gray whale populations in the North Pacific and the North Atlantic evolved independently? Isn't it most probable these two populations shared a common origin, and necessarily moved from one ocean to the other, depending on which ocean the first gray whales appeared in?

Isn't this simply the case of a steadily growing gray whale population in the eastern Pacific reclaiming some of its previous historical ocean territory?
photo
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
04:45 AM on 07/07/2011
white noise
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
01:03 PM on 07/12/2011
Richard2: "First, can anyone explain how surface ice in the Arctic Ocean was supposed to ever prevent microscopi­c plankton from passing back and forth between the north Pacific and the north Atlantic?"

First, can anyone explain how Richard2 doesn't understand that his question is an irrelevant straw man?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:14 AM on 06/27/2011
Bob Hunter of Greenpeace.

" Pat, this is the beginning of something really important and very powerful. But there is a very good chance it will become a kind of ecofascism. Not everyone can get a Phd in ecology. So the only way to change the behavior of the masses is to create a popular mythology, a religion of the environment where people simply have faith in the gurus."

I wonder if Mr Hunter knew his religion would attract some many that are fearful of any changes in the natural world. Fear of change. I guess these are the type always seeking out a religion to believe in. But come on, the world, climate, nature is ever changing.
photo
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
04:47 AM on 07/07/2011
do you even know what you're talking about...?
02:49 PM on 06/26/2011
I'll concede that there is not sure way to know for sure what is causing global temperatures to rise. It could be the natural cyclical shifts we've seen throughout Earth's history. It could be a direct result of the massive burning of fossil fuel and the destruction and clear cutting of rain forests throughout the world. It could be a combination of both.

Regardless, we need to wise up and realise that we have to stop looking for instant gratification and realise that all our actions carry very long-term consequences that will affect generations to come for a very long time.

It won't hurt us to switch to cleaner sources of energy. It won't hurt us to stop overfishing our oceans and it certainly won't hurt us if we stop using our oceans as giant garbage disposal sites. It's about time to think responsibly because if anything major happens in the oceans, it will carry to land.
11:26 AM on 07/23/2011
You are absolutely correct! There is no way to know for sure that injecting a massive and significant amount GHGs into the atmosphere can cause global temperatures to rise. Except for observations made for the last century. Or, scientific first principles. It definitely wouldn't be by testing theory and the quantum mechanics in the laboratory. Nope, none of the above can account for any of it.

Climate change most certainly can't have an effect on deforestation. You're right about too.Some unkown vector is causing the pine beetle infestations that are deforesting the boreal forests. It's been catagorically dimissed that winters are no longer cold enough to keep the pine beetle populations in check. Never, in the history of climate science have so many ducks been so perfectly arrayed in such a laser straight line as yours.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
puff puff.. pass!
02:25 PM on 06/26/2011
this is wonderful news!

go whales..
05:28 PM on 06/26/2011
Go whales?
Is your worldview so strong with that you have no empathy for the mostly negative impacts that this change will bring about as clearly stated?

"Most of the impacts are so clearly negative and the scope of change so potentially huge..."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
puff puff.. pass!
08:06 PM on 06/26/2011
uh..

you fell for that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
08:27 PM on 06/30/2011
The population of gray whales in the eastern Pacific has expanded to a level which some think is near the maximum that the ocean can handle. It would seem reasonable that some of these whales explored other areas. In the western Pacific, whales are not treated as kindly as along the west coast of North America. In the north Atlantic, how are they likely to be treated? Will there be eco-tourism, or whale hunting?

The return of a large marine mammal to an Atlantic ecosystem, where it had been previously extirpated by mankind, would seem to be a step forward, not a step back. Don't know where the Atlantic gray whales previously went to give birth to young whales. On the west coast of Mexico, the gray whales give birth to their young in a large bay having a higher level of salinity than the Pacific Ocean as a whole.
01:55 PM on 06/26/2011
let us swim
02:03 PM on 06/26/2011
If the world is billions of years old why did it take so long to come up with the television?

Climate change is a joke and the world recycles itself every couple thousand years so it's only a matter of time before the poles reverse again.

It's quite clear that something wiped the MAYA off the map and it wasn't climate change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
02:41 PM on 06/26/2011
If there was a button to unfan someone I'd never fanned, I'd use it now.
photo
singsingsing
it's not easy being green
03:12 PM on 06/26/2011
"two to three million years" , TomasJefferson - Do you even know how long two to three millions years are? And by the way, he is rolling over in his grave.