Canada Energy Policy Charted At Kananaskis Ministers' Meeting

Ministers Energy

First Posted: 07/19/11 07:14 PM ET Updated: 09/18/11 06:12 AM ET

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- KANANASKIS, Alta. - Ministers emerged from a summit on Tuesday with a rough outline of what a pan-Canadian approach to energy will look like, though it's likely to take many more such gatherings for them to fully flesh out all the key details.

"There were expectations by some that we would come out of this conference with all of the details that would set energy policy for this country for the next several decades," Alberta Energy Minister Ron Liepert told a news conference at a picturesque Rocky Mountain lodge southwest of Calgary.

"I can tell you that if there's one recipe for failure, it's trying to do too much at once and get into too many details in the beginning."

The federal, provincial and territorial ministers agreed to a series of priorities, including expanding the market reach of Canadian energy exports, and streamlining the regulatory system.

In a communique, they also said they plan to boost energy efficiency, improve electrical grids and support Canadians' awareness of energy issues.

"It's very encouraging that we have governments who are issuing this document together. The votes were unanimous in all occasions," said federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver. Ministers for Quebec and Ontario were not present at the meeting.

"We have a really good basis to move forward, and it's incumbent upon all of us to continue the dialogue with Canadians."

Liepert has long been urging a strategy that would allow Alberta crude to flow to markets outside the United States, overwhelmingly the biggest buyer of Canadian energy exports. In recent days, his federal counterpart has been pounding the same drum.

"America is a great customer, but 97 per cent of our energy is being exported to the United States, and we want to diversify to other markets," Oliver said.

"Asia is growing. China, in particular, is now the largest consumer of energy in the world."

Oliver said Ottawa is supportive of Enbridge Inc.'s (TSX:ENB) Northern Gateway project, a controversial proposal to ship oilsands crude to Asia via a pipeline to the West Coast.

The focus on "one project, one approval" for new energy and mining developments was appealing to the resource minister for Saskatchewan, a major producer of oil, uranium and potash.

"We've had some delays in projects as a result of two regulatory processes -- federal and provincial," Bill Boyd said in an interview.

"We want to try and address those. So think there was good movement in that area."

Environmentalists applauded the goal of focusing more on energy efficiency and better electrical grids. But they said the ministers' continued support for development of the oilsands -- also called tarsands, mainly by critics -- is the wrong way forward.

"Non-renewable, high-carbon sources of energy are by their very nature unsustainable. Canada needs to plan for a transition away from depending on exports of such sources, like the oilsands," said Ed Whittingham, executive director of environmental think-tank The Pembina Institute.

"A national energy framework needs to seize the economic opportunities offered by clean energy and achieve Canada's climate targets. Unfortunately, the documents released today failed to make either addressing climate change or supporting renewable energy a priority."

Steven Guilbeault of Equiterre said "it seems that the oil industry got what it paid for -- tacit support for the rapid expansion of the tarsands." Environmental groups have been critical that several industry lobby groups and energy companies sponsored the event.

Liepert said the ministers recognize energy and environmental issues are intertwined, but there's little chance of success if they take on too much at once.

"So as we move down this path, as we start on some of these action items, ultimately it's going to unfold that it becomes a joint energy-environment initiative going forward. But let's not set ourselves up for failure."

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, an industry lobby group, said governments have an important role to play in a Canadian energy strategy.

"The strategy must, however, be grounded in a fundamental view that market forces are the key determinant in decisions on energy supply, transportation and use, both domestically and in Canada's trading relationships," the group said in a statement Tuesday.

The next meeting of natural resources ministers will be held in Charlottetown in September of 2012.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

THE CANADIAN PRESS -- KANANASKIS, Alta. - Ministers emerged from a summit on Tuesday with a rough outline of what a pan-Canadian approach to energy will look like, though it's likely to take many more...
THE CANADIAN PRESS -- KANANASKIS, Alta. - Ministers emerged from a summit on Tuesday with a rough outline of what a pan-Canadian approach to energy will look like, though it's likely to take many more...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
02:07 PM on 07/20/2011
Throughout Canada, outside of Oil Company board rooms and Alberta (same thing) we call it 'Tar Sands', which is what it has always been called before Harper's Cowboys started pushing hard to develop this extremely dangerous and filthy form of energy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
09:40 AM on 07/21/2011
f&f'd. All science agencies (real ones, not the advocacy advertisers for the industry) are unanimous about the dangers of the Tar Sands.
photo
Daniel Kilgallon
Calgary Heavy Oil
12:26 AM on 07/20/2011
I absolutely love my job at an oil company. It's not like we go out and say, "hey lets go cut down huge swaths of forests!" No, we go out and say, "how can we get this resource without mining it?" Well guess what, we developed SAGD. It uses as much land as an oil well, co generates electricity through our steam production, and is more efficient than mining operations.

We continually improve what we do, and I know exactly what the people out there that keep wishing in one hand and shitting in other will get.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skbull44
Check out Olduvai the novel
12:47 PM on 07/23/2011
While I'm sure you and many of your colleagues in the oil-industry may believe this, the reality is something very different. All we need do is look at the tobacco and asbestos industries to see how something so very damaging can be 'marketed' as safe and worthwhile to sell. Oil is no different except that it helps to support almost everything we do in life (i.e. transportation, food production, etc., etc.). It is the dependency we have on fossil fuels that needs to be rethought and addressed, quickly.

But Canada's continuing exploitation of these dangerous resources that makes me question whether I want to flaunt my Canadian citizenship abroad. We continue to sell asbestos to developing countries and poison our environment through the extraction and production of the tar sands. China and the US would do well to support our tar sands development; this way they get the oil and we get the environmental fallout that will continue to plaque our future generations--not to mention the wasted dollars on infrastructure to support this whole endeavour.

Let's ride the coattails of China's growth (that cannot be sustained at current levels) and the US (whose economy is quickly falling apart) so we can be pulled down too. Well done, Canada!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
09:23 PM on 07/19/2011
Gee, Congrats there HuffPo Canada!

You have some Senator in another section of the website FLUSHING the same KRAP as is being FLUSHED here by Canadian Press.

And all of this FLUSHING is being SPONSORED BY THE OIL CARTEL, what a surprise.

After this Media Flushing, Corporate Polling Firms move in producing survey's that say 7 out of 10 Canadians NOW support a National Energy Policy, as wrote up by the OIL CARTEL!

But, as happened in the early 80's, a little IBM 16K personal computer hit the streets commercially. And in 20 short years, that personal computer has invaded every business and every home practically.

Now, the HYDROGEN FUEL CELL has hit the streets and it too will in TWENTY SHORT YEARS annihilate THE CARBON ECONOMY and we will all be using this POLLUTION FREE technology to electrically power homes, businesses and transport.

I think HuffPo needs a Hydrogen Economy CONSULTANT
07:22 PM on 07/19/2011
""""It's very encouraging that we have governments who are issuing this document together. The votes were unanimous in all occasions," said federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver. Ministers for Quebec and Ontario were not present at the meeting."""""

unanimous except for ontario and quebec --------joe ------ontario and quebec are the two largest provinces --
you are engaged in self delusion or you are being very disingenuous.