Keystone Pipeline Meets Opposition From Princeton, Harvard Experts

Keystone Xl Pipeline

First Posted: 08/03/11 05:04 PM ET Updated: 10/03/11 06:12 AM ET

Scientists from some of the most prominent institutions in the U.S. have written a letter to president Barack Obama urging him not to approve a pipeline that would deliver bitumen from Alberta's oilsands.

The letter is signed by 19 researchers from Princeton, Harvard and Columbia universities, as well as facilities such as the Woods Hole Research Centre and the Scripps Institute of Oceanography.

It was organized by environmentalist and author Bill McKibbon.

The United States government is debating whether to approve the Keystone XL pipeline.

Advocates say it would give that country a safe and secure energy supply and give Canada an assured market.

But some say the pipeline would be unsafe and would lock the U.S. into high-carbon oil when the country is trying to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Scientists from some of the most prominent institutions in the U.S. have written a letter to president Barack Obama urging him not to approve a pipeline that would deliver bitumen from Alberta's oilsa...
Scientists from some of the most prominent institutions in the U.S. have written a letter to president Barack Obama urging him not to approve a pipeline that would deliver bitumen from Alberta's oilsa...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:42 PM on 08/04/2011
This would be good for the Canadian economy and the US economy. There are risks, but if it means more domestic oil for North America it might be too good to pass up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
11:35 AM on 08/04/2011
Why does it matter if they were scientists or not? Silly article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:40 PM on 08/04/2011
Some people believe being a scientist in the field would imply that they are experts, therefore people in power should listen to them... but you know. that's only relavent to all those elitist, book-learnin' types
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
02:41 PM on 08/04/2011
you mean you need a scientist's opinion to tell you that if the pipeline leaks, it would be a disaster? Where is their study on this huge leap for mankind?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rickthaluddite
What noisy cats are we
11:32 AM on 08/04/2011
The problem here is that Obama only listens to conservative 'experts.'
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:24 AM on 08/04/2011
Obama is likely to delay this decision til the last moment, and equivocate the entire way. He'll probably make it clear how difficult this decision is for him. He'll "feel the environmentalists' pain".

But he has little choice but to approve it. First, the U.S. desperately needs secure sources of oil from politically stable countries. Second, it would be a huge job generator, both in Canada and the U.S.
11:16 AM on 08/04/2011
Finally something I can agree with, that Bitumen should be processed in Canada employing 10's of Thousands of Canadians with great wages. Let the Yanks wallow in unemployment. We can always sell it to China as value added crude instead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 PM on 08/04/2011
Sweet
07:46 PM on 08/04/2011
freefromyou - stupid idiotic criminal. Buy a bike.
06:19 PM on 08/05/2011
Yes, that's it, cyber bully me. What an effective argument. I have a bike btw.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cameron d
Good Guys Win
11:06 PM on 08/03/2011
Smart people say one thing, those in charge will decide not to listen.