Cancer Rates Downstream From Oil Sands To Be Probed

Oilsands

First Posted: 08/19/11 06:30 PM ET Updated: 10/19/11 06:12 AM ET


A long-awaited Alberta Health study into the health of people living downstream from the oilsands, where cancer rates are higher than normal, appears to be finally going ahead.


Concerns were first raised in 2006 about elevated cancer rates in Fort Chipewyan, about 220 kilometres north of Fort McMurray. A provincial government study released in 2009 confirmed the trend and recommended more analysis into possible causes.


"For various reasons, and none of them really sort of satisfactory, nothing has happened — this is over 2½ years later," said John O'Connor, the family doctor who drew widespread attention five years ago for alleging Fort Chipewyan had a high rate of a rare bile-duct cancer.


"But in the interim, we've had a lot of scientific studies that have revealed the lack of monitoring and the lack of due diligence on the part of governments, both federal and provincial, in looking after the environment," O'Connor said Thursday.


The study will investigate residents of Fort Chipewyan as well as Fort MacKay, about 175 kilometres to the south, since the communities are tightly linked and people often move from the former to the latter, O'Connor said. Researchers will try to determine whether contaminants from oilsands developments in the Athabasca River are harming people.


A 414-page report by an expert panel of the Royal Society of Canada concluded last December that "there is currently no credible evidence of environmental contaminant exposures from oilsands reaching Fort Chipewyan at levels expected to cause elevated human cancer rates."


When it recommended a long-term study in 2009, the Alberta Cancer Board concluded the cancer rates were 30 per cent higher than expected. Other scientific reports have shown high levels of toxic pollutants in the Athabasca River.


The chief of the Fort Chipewyan Mikisew Cree said he's approaching the study with caution.


"I want to see some results, but at the same time I don't want my community to be getting our hopes up and at the end of the day finding out that we're not any closer to what's causing these various cancers," Steve Courtoreille said.


Alberta Health and Wellness said it's in discussions about the study with the communities, and a final agreement still needs to be concluded on how the health assessment will proceed.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

A long-awaited Alberta Health study into the health of people living downstream from the oilsands, where cancer rates are higher than normal, appears to be finally going ahead. ...
A long-awaited Alberta Health study into the health of people living downstream from the oilsands, where cancer rates are higher than normal, appears to be finally going ahead. ...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 147
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
07:39 PM on 08/24/2011
Were are the billionaires making wind farms and Solar Panels. We really need them to fend of crap like this. We do not need to destroy more fresh water supplies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:32 PM on 08/24/2011
Read Ethical Oil to learn about the oil sands and those who oppose them.

http://www.amazon.ca/Ethical-Oil-Case-Canadas-Sands/dp/0771046413#_

Review:

" Why Canadian oil is better from a liberal point of view,

I'm a liberal and someone who cares greatly about the environment. I am aware however that a lot of causes that are supposed to be helpful for the environment such as recycling are not as beneficial as we would perceive and you can't believe what you hear from biased groups such as Greenpeace and co.

Ethical Oil is Ezra's take on why Alberta's Oil sands are the best option to supply the world with oil. He makes extremely logical and straightforward points and his writing is clear and articulate, I feel sorry for those people who will debate him on this topic ( see the poor guy from Greenpeace here: [...] ). This book should be essential reading for Canadians as the Oil Sand issue is going to be a big topic in our near future and Canadians should be well informed on the issue and get all sides of the story.

Although most of us are aware that oil comes from parts of the world that we'd rather not send money too (Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, etc) we don't really think about it. Ezra's book really makes you understand what you're financing when you're buying oil from these parts of the world and why Canadian oil is the best option. "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
12:53 AM on 08/24/2011
The Tar Sands cause Grief and nothing more. Grief!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:35 PM on 08/24/2011
The oil sands is the largest aboriginal employer in Canada.
California's heavy oil has a bigger carbon footprint than the oil sands oil.
Ft. McMurray has the highest rate of donations to the United Way.
O'Connor lied about the cancer rates.

Of course facts don't matter...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
07:37 PM on 08/24/2011
I've always understood facts as information that was given only after the damage is done. In this case it would be nice if the leaky oil pipes would stay in Canada and not be permited to cut through the U.S. as the population would rather not see the cancer statistics after the leaky pipe lines pollute the drinking water and cause our cancer rate to explode.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:23 PM on 08/23/2011
Things that make ya go hmmmmmm:

http://www.ethicaloil.org/fact/mythbusting-do-the-oilsands-cause-cancer/

"The Royal Society of Canada is no apologist for Big Oil. Devoted to “recognizing excellence in learning and research” since 1882, it’s prestigious, it’s stacked with the brightest academics in the country, and, most importantly, it’s incorruptible. You won’t find any reasonable person — even oilsands critics — who’ll tell you otherwise.

So, if you’re going to consult an authority on the widely repeated myth that the oilsands have been linked to cancer problems in Fort Chipewyan, the largely native community downstream from the industry, you can’t do better than going with the RSC. And in its most recent, indepth report into the oilsands, released in December 2010, the Society’s Expert Panel on the Health Impacts of the Oil Sands Industry says this:

“There is currently no credible evidence of environmental contaminant exposures from oil sands reaching Fort Chipewyan at levels expected to cause elevated human cancer rates.” And “Environmental contaminants at current levels of exposure are unlikely to cause major health impacts for the general population. Projected additional emissions from expanded operations are not likely to change this expectation.”"
--------

O'Connor lied.
10:17 AM on 08/24/2011
Sounds like someone has an ax to grind here. Tell us, Canada Stan, do you work in Fort MacMurray? Or is it the oil industry that is paying you to comment on these negative PR stories?

Oh, and does it still cost 1 part gasoline for every 2 parts extracted from the oil sands?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:12 PM on 08/24/2011
No, I don't though I've visited friends there and toured the mines.
I turned down a job at Syncrude a while ago.
I work in a diamond mine.

Wanna explain that whole "1 part gasoline for every 2 parts extracted' thingy?
Are you sure you don't mean natural gas?

Ever heard of the THAI process?
SAGD?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:48 PM on 08/23/2011
O'Connors is a complete joke, anyone using him as a source is either hopelessly incompetent or trying to deceive readers.
He reported several cancer cases in Ft. Chip that simply did not exist.
And when Alberta Health was genuinely concerned about his reports and tried to investigate, something strange happened, he wouldn't give them any of his information.
In fact one of the people he had reported dying of cancer there simply did not in fact exist.
Google it if you don't believe me.
"Hide the decline....Hide the patient information.."?
Sound familiar?

Natives have higher rates of some cancers than Caucasians, and lower rates of other cancers.
Lake Athabasca is in the Athabasca Basin, home of by far the highest grade uranium deposits in the world, huge deposits as well.
Over 20% of the worlds uranium production comes from the Athabasca Basin.
There isn't a scrap of land near it that isn't claimed by one uranium miner or another.
And Uranium City and the old Cluff Lake uranium mines are there as well.
Many people from that area worked in those mines and worked in uranium exporation.

Ft. McMurray is one of the closest scrutinized operations in the world, the death of a few ducks was worldwide news.
The oil sands has taken a huge bite out of the Saudi's market share, who do you think is funding all the anti-oil sands protesters and lobbyists?
Hmmmmm?
11:24 AM on 08/26/2011
0 friends = corporate shill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHMB
What's long and brown and sticky? A Stick.
02:02 PM on 08/22/2011
Of course, when the findings go against what the government says, the scientist will promptly be fired, and their reputation destroyed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:48 PM on 08/22/2011
yep, such is a steveocracy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHMB
What's long and brown and sticky? A Stick.
10:44 AM on 08/23/2011
Heh, steveocracy. The word is funny, the thought is frightening. Fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:25 PM on 08/23/2011
Really?!

http://www.rsc.ca/documents/expert/RSC%20report%20complete%20secured%209Mb.pdf
01:29 PM on 08/21/2011
BTW I can see my house from a satellite as well..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 PM on 08/20/2011
Nonsense! Harper says he puts oil in his coffee every morning and he ain't sick! Sprinkles some asbestos in there too for added sweetness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:48 PM on 08/22/2011
and he sleeps under a asbestos blanket.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firstad
09:24 PM on 08/20/2011
If you know and understand the process of obtaining the oil from the soil, you would know there is not any possibility of NOT creating toxic polution...for the people that work at Athabasca and downstream 70 miles away. They boil the oil out of the soil, and release into the air and water the byproducts as waste. WE DON'T NEED THIS OIL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
11:13 PM on 08/22/2011
And it takes considerable energy to get the oil out -- it's really not worth it with present technology.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:26 PM on 08/23/2011
Really?
How much energy does it take?
11:47 PM on 08/23/2011
FANNED AND FAVED
07:27 PM on 08/20/2011
Been employed in the oilsands for several years, yes there is pros and cons in the oil industry people will point fingers at the oil companies when something goes bad.Has anyone taken the stats on the cancer rates on reserves? Take for example the jobless rate on my reserves at 90 per cent.We have people who died of cancer in the past in our rez,nearest oil production is some five hundred miles.Face it people die of cancer regardless where you live...
08:19 PM on 08/20/2011
I was thinking the same thing. It's a known fact that aboriginal communities struggle with higher than average rates of alcoholism and drug use, which would definitely increase cancer rates. I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just curious as to how cancer rates in Fort Chip and Fort MacKay compare to the national average on reserves.
10:41 PM on 08/20/2011
I'd consider looking around for a dumping ground of toxic waste, Bud Bird. When you consider how disenfranchised Aboriginals are, it would not surprise me to learn a company had dumped it's waste on or near a Native reserve to save on costs. I'm not basing this on any facts, mind you, other than the fact that a corporation only cares about it's bottom line.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:27 PM on 08/23/2011
Why not base your comments on facts?
Seems a bit odd not to.....
03:20 PM on 08/20/2011
West Virginia residents..............take NOTES!
01:35 PM on 08/20/2011
Even without human intervention and development the oil sands have been leaching into the surrounding water table for eons. They discovered the oil sands by observing the black sandy banks of the Athabasca river.

So this posits the question of whether or not this is a natural occurrence or one of man's making. How do you determine the root cause and how far back do our records go to help with making that determination? Is it the new developments that are causing this? Older abandoned developments from when we had less regulations than we do today? Or perhaps mother nature is the cause?

I'm all for a greener society, but common sense tells us this isn't an easy question to answer given the history and geography of the region.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:20 PM on 08/20/2011
It's always fascinating to see all the different people and groups coming to things like the Oil Sands and, each with their own sense of the blasphemous & the sacred, tossing their worldviews around :3
01:21 PM on 08/20/2011
I'm someone working in the area with first hand access to water quality data from a major company. I know exactly what is in the water immediately after being pumped out of the river, and what contamination exists when it's pumped back into the river. I can tell you (although I'm sure almost no one will believe me) that there is no difference in water quality, and the rare occasion that contamination has occurred in the past, it's been dealt with quickly and severely. People who have no idea about how the operation works just love to jump on the "green" bandwagon and be angry at something. They think there's toxic sludge being pumped into the river, with no regard for the environment. That's absolutely false, and this whole debate is an insult to those of us who work to ensure the environment is protected as well as it can be.

BP did more environmental damage in one month than every oil sands company combined will for the entirety of their existence. Try to find an environmental incident that occurred in Fort McMurray which comes even remotely close to other major occurrances around the world. Canada would not be the same without the oil sands industry, so if you're going to whine about it, you'd better have a suggestion as to how the country can recover the lost tax revenue, and how you'll employ the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who either directly or indirectly depend on industry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
06:47 PM on 08/20/2011
Horse how about some links to back up your assertions.. And of course not corporate propoganda links.
08:33 PM on 08/20/2011
The stories of employees getting fired for being careless aren't the ones that make the news. Here's a link to the Oil Sands Conservation Act that describes some of the environmental policies.

http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/laws/stat/rsa-2000-c-o-7/latest/rsa-2000-c-o-7.html

This quote is directly from Wikipedia: " Environment Canada claims the oil sands make up 5% of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, or 0.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions". Yes, 0.1%. That's what all this is about. Let's not forget how many people the industry employs, and what it provides.

Here's a link to an article about Syncrude being fined $3m when 1600 ducks happened to land in a tailings pond during a storm. Remind me how many birds fly into skyscrapers per year.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2010/10/22/edmonton-syncrude-dead-ducks-sentencing.html

I'll let you research some more on your own.
08:41 PM on 08/20/2011
Oh, and will you provide some links demonstrating that the oil sands industry is, in fact, the reason for the increased cancer rates?
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
11:01 PM on 08/23/2011
Water used by oil sands companies is NOT "pumped back into the river" as you claim. It is dumped into giant reservoirs called "tailings ponds." The water is so toxic, any birds landing in it will die within hours. In fact, that did happen to 500 of them a few years ago when one of the bird cannons failed to scare them away. These are literally lakes of poison.

The main concern by actual scientists and the residents who live downstream from oil sands operations is actually breaching of that toxic water from the tailings ponds into the groundwate­r and/or Athabasca. This is a legitimate concern given the size of the tailings ponds and fact that no one can guarantee no breaches will ever happen for the LIFETIME that those ponds. In fact, no one can guarantee it's not already happening, that's why they're taking a closer look at water quality.

Please don't claim knowledge in these things. You didn't even know what actually happens to the water when it's used by the oil companies.
12:01 PM on 08/20/2011
I remeber Love Canal in upstate NY where for years the "officials", "Company" etc. denied any link to the contaminated soil and cancer etc. high death rates etc. of the people ...then decades later they evacuated the town of Love Canal. Then there is agent orange used to defoliate the jungle in the Vietnam war and also used on roads etc. in the US and some in Canada. Again denial of any link with deaths, cancers etc. by "officials", "Company", US military, Gov. for any link and then was decades later we find it was all true there was a link.

So people living downstream of the oilsands don't wait for any study etc. that will take decades to reach a conclusion or to know the truth...by that time you or your family, children, grand kids are dead, dying and wasting away. Leave that area now, think of what your health or your families health are worth. The "Officials", "Oil Companies", and gov. are all corrupted by the money (billions$) being made now and they don't give a fig about you......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Creox
Life is too important to take seriously.
10:34 AM on 08/20/2011
science and politics rarely agree unless it confirms the politicians BS that particular day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 08/20/2011
Which includes us as well. We all have our particular BS (belief systems) that we conform reality to :3