Ontario NDP Seeks Pre-Election Ad Ban

Andrea Horwath

First Posted: 08/19/11 02:16 PM ET Updated: 10/19/11 06:12 AM ET

TORONTO - Ontario's New Democrats want to ban all political advertisements before elections and make leaders own up to negative ads if they choose to use them during the campaign.

"I'm seeing very clearly that there are a lot of attack ads, there's a lot of influence that's going around the legislature, and what ends up happening is the people's voice gets lost," NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Friday after a speech to the Rotary Club of Toronto.

"It's rarely about the real issues."

The party is proposing a blackout on all ads prior to the start of official campaigning, including those from interest groups. The NDP is also suggesting that leaders of political parties take responsibility for their own ads by recording an acknowledgment, in their own voice, indicating that they have approved the spot.

"If leaders think voters approve of these tactics, then they need to take ownership of it," said Horwath. "They won't be able to hide."

As the province gears up for an Oct. 6 election, both the Tories and Liberals have attacked each other as well as the NDP, but Horwath has said she has no plans to "get in the sandbox" and join the negative campaigns.

Two non-political groups have also attacked the parties. There have been ads accusing the Liberals of wasting millions of dollars on what they called a "road to nowhere'' in Windsor, paid for by the Canadian Transit Company, the Canadian wing of a business that owns the Ambassador Bridge linking Windsor and Detroit.

The television ads claim that a new bridge will likely never be built, and building a road there is a waste of money.

The Progressive Conservatives have been targeted by the Working Families Coalition, a group that is backed by money from some of the province's private and public unions.

Premier Dalton McGuinty has defended his government's attempts to ban the Windsor ads while allowing those that criticize the Tories.

The Progressive Conservatives introduced legislation in the past that would have put limits on the extent to which third party advertising can be used, hoping the changes would put an end to the coalition's ability to advertise.

It was voted down by the Liberals, and previous Tory complaints were shot down by Elections Canada and the courts.

PC critic Peter Shurman said Friday he didn't see the need to ban third party advertising, but suggested making changes to stop collusion, which is what the Tories say happened with the Working Families Coalition.

"This really comes down to what Dalton McGuinty's been doing: sticking Ontario families with the bill for his secret union deals," said Shurman.

"In return, the Working Families, which is nothing but a Liberal front, has spent millions of dollars and will spend millions more attacking (Leader) Tim Hudak and our Ontario PC party."

Laurel Broten, Minister of Children and Youth Services, noted that the NDP are themselves playing ads ahead of the campaign, and haven't been strangers to negative attacks in the past.

"They do advance negative attacks in campaigns and so I'm not sure that their actions and the history of their actions are backed up by the gloss and spin that Andrea's trying to put out there right now," Broten said.

Horwath is also pushing for three televised debates across the province, possibly in northern and eastern Ontario as well as in Toronto, focusing on health care, jobs, the economy and energy.

She also wants to create a new lobbyist registry that will show not just who is lobbying but who they're meeting and when.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

TORONTO - Ontario's New Democrats want to ban all political advertisements before elections and make leaders own up to negative ads if they choose to use them during the campaign."I'm seeing very clea...
TORONTO - Ontario's New Democrats want to ban all political advertisements before elections and make leaders own up to negative ads if they choose to use them during the campaign."I'm seeing very clea...
Filed by CP  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:46 AM on 08/24/2011
Andrea - Hudak can't win without negative ads. You are so mean.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
07:04 PM on 08/19/2011
Now if Harper Government could be so bold and actually campaign on a real platform instead of spitting on their opponents over 9 month course before an election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
06:26 PM on 08/19/2011
If that was a Federal rule the Liberals would be unknown. Oh wait a minute they are an unknown.
09:37 AM on 08/20/2011
piceaglauca - if that were the rule then the party of Harper would not exist. The thing is the old Reform Party (now called the Conservative Party and is not Progressive Conservative Party)couldn't have survived without appealing to people who don't read so they respond well to negative ads. Running negative ads for a year or two about Ignatieff before the law kicked in limiting political ads to the money the party had rather than money from companies such as Suncorps. Horwath should have gone a step further and said campaigns must be financed by tax dollars and limited. And negative ads cannnot be used. They don't tell you how good a leader is. They are the sign of weakness. Harper is a religious creep who doesn't seem to understand the commandment "Thou shalt not steal" He he had a minister who believed Adam and Eve were real people. Harper prorogued parliament twice, was in contempt of parliament and had ethics commissioners quitting so they would be free to speak about the lack of ethics in the government. Bureaucrats fear saying what is really the truth. Flaherty won't appear with anyone else to discuss what is going on re Canada and the economy. Why vote for anyone who plans to spend a fortune on three new jails when the crime rate has been dropping for twenty years. If you want the crime rate to drop put your money into good preschools and schools. It pays off at seven dollars to
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
03:06 PM on 08/20/2011
You have some valid points here but far too many to dissect for this discussion. Hopefully we wil have the opportunity to discuss one or two of these points in a future encounter. Thank you for thoughts. One point however regarding your last remark. My experience in social services over 40 years suggests schools and preschools are only one component and not necessarily the key element in resolving persons who are incarcerated. Remember historically more people went to jail or reform school then today. Keeping that in mind the thought that rates have been declining only reflects the new directions report in the past which kept people out of jails/prisons. If we wish to keep them out then the money that goes into these jails/prisons would be better spent but the focus has to address the community and its ability to function. With the new mandatory sentencing we will only put back that which was there in the first place. Maybe I am saying this wrong but I think we spent a lot of money on something more to hide it rather then solve it but I could be mistaken.