Air Canada Strike Possible As Flight Attendants Reject Agreement

Air Canada Flight Attendants

First Posted: 08/27/11 07:02 PM ET Updated: 10/27/11 06:12 AM ET

MONTREAL - Air Canada suffered yet another labour setback on Saturday with word its flight attendants have rejected a tentative agreement reached earlier this month.

The union representing the roughly 6,800 flight attendants, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, said in a news release that 87.8 per cent of those who voted gave the tentative agreement a thumbs down.

"The results send a strong message to the company," Jeff Taylor, President of the Air Canada Component of CUPE, said in the news release. "We have heard our members loud and clear."

"After a decade of concessions, the membership has clearly said it wants a fair deal, especially since the company is in a much better financial position," Taylor added.

The union noted that turnout for the vote was high, with 78.6 per cent of members casting a vote.

A strike vote will be organized for next month, and union officials will meet with management as soon as possible on resuming talks, Taylor added.

Air Canada issued a terse release acknowledging the rejection, but offered little other immediate comment.

The airline has grappled with serious labour troubles this year with its customer service agents going on strike for three days.

The two sides reached an agreement and the strike ended after the federal government indicated it would bring in back-to-work legislation.

Air Canada pilots also rejected an agreement hammered out earlier this year and they have yet to negotiate a deal.

The airline is also negotiating with mechanics and baggage handlers, represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.

A major issue in negotiations with all of the unions is over pensions.

The unions say the airline wants to establish a defined contribution pension plan for new hires, instead of the current defined benefit plan.

With defined contribution plans, the company's contribution is limited to a set, negotiated amount.

Payouts to retirees depend on the performance of the underlying investments. Defined benefit plans require a set amount to be paid to retirees.

Air Canada says high fuel costs are threatening its future profitability and it said this month it would raise fares and try to trim costs where possible to offset that.

The airline posted a $46 million loss in the spring quarter ended June 30 due to the cost of fuel.

But that was a big improvement over last year, when the losses were far greater.

Canada's largest airline and its regional partners carry about 31 million passengers annually to more than 170 destinations on five continents.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

MONTREAL - Air Canada suffered yet another labour setback on Saturday with word its flight attendants have rejected a tentative agreement reached earlier this month.The union representing the roughly ...
MONTREAL - Air Canada suffered yet another labour setback on Saturday with word its flight attendants have rejected a tentative agreement reached earlier this month.The union representing the roughly ...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:20 PM on 09/19/2011
United Airlines are hiring for 2012. accepting applications now so apply now.....
09:04 AM on 08/29/2011
I still don't understand that why there isn't a constant public outrage against unions. their time has come and gone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tuffcityt
Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot, over.
11:30 AM on 08/28/2011
Give them the money cause nobody hands out peanuts like air canada flight attendants and I`d hate to see us lose this national source of pride to foreign airlines that pay more for this vital service.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:27 AM on 08/28/2011
Air Canada is obviously not a viable business. The union needs to understand we the people of Canada will no longer try to keep this airline in business so they can continue to have wages and benefits that are out of line. Open the airways up, let any airline that thinks they can make a go of it on their own without taxpayer monies run airlines in Canada. All the present Air Canada employees can apply for jobs and see if they get them at the new airlines or any other jobs available.
06:06 AM on 08/28/2011
The airline posted a $46 million loss in the spring quarter ended June 30 due to the cost of fuel.

But that was a big improvement over last year, when the losses were far greater.

Time to close the doors in the real world, but not in the world of the Loonie Lefties, for them it's time for a big raise.
06:35 AM on 08/28/2011
So how much is the CEO and the upper echelons making?
07:24 AM on 08/28/2011
If you don't agree, don't do business with them

open your own company and pay your workers more
09:06 AM on 08/29/2011
this is a terrible argument against "candan." anytime someone raises a voice against publicly funded, unionized corporations, the counterargument always centers on executive compensation. unions, especially those funded by the public, are parasitic. they are like gangs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
08:37 PM on 08/27/2011
That's good for business.
08:34 PM on 08/27/2011
If the airline is unprofitable because of fuel costs, the HarpoCons should look up from the boots they are licking and ask their oil company masters to please help the poor airline, not take it out on the futures of the people doing the work.
Let's see who our government actually represents...
06:16 AM on 08/28/2011
Maybe we could leave it up to the people using the service to pay for it.

Who is setting the price of oil right now ? OPEC - IRAN

While the Loonie Left and Environ-Mental-ists stop North America from harvesting our own natural resources.

"Something is very wrong" Rev Terry Jones
06:39 AM on 08/28/2011
The high price of oil is in great part due to speculators. Last time I looked that would be the fault of capitalists...

As for harvesting natural resources, no problem as long as the same capitalists pay for all associated costs. Not the hybrid capitalisms that Harpercons espouse... You know; private the profits but socialize the loses...