Women In Leadership: Canada's Long-Standing Failure

The Huffington Post Canada     First Posted: 09/01/11 09:53 AM ET   Updated: 11/01/11 06:12 AM ET

Canada is lagging behind to support women in leadership roles, and the shortcoming is noticeable both on a local and international scale.

From the absence of Canadians in celebrity-filled lists to empty seats in board rooms, two notable organizations have called out the lack of women leaders.

The Conference Board of Canada revealed Wednesday the number of women in senior management positions has barely changed in the past 22 years leaving men more than twice as likely to hold these positions. In 2009, women made up 48 per cent women of the labour force, yet only 0.32 per cent held senior management positions, according to the report.

“Now that the rousing early days of feminism are behind us, perhaps we have become complacent about the success of women in senior management,” Anne Golden, president and chief executive officer at the board, said in the report.

Story continues below

HuffPost Canada has put together a list of Canada’s most influential leaders today who excel in their own fields. Who do you think are Canada's most influential female leaders?

Margaret Atwood
1 of 15
Author Margaret Atwood is one of Canada's literary icons, with more than 50 volumes of poetry, children's books, and most famously, novels. She recently made headlines as an advocate for Toronto libraries, started Twitter war with Toronto mayor Rob Ford and his brother, and crashed the server of a petition by directing her 225,000 followers to sign. A subsequent grass-roots campaign is jockeying for Atwood to replace Ford as mayor. Now that's power.
Total comments: 84 | Post a Comment
1 of 15
Who's Got Clout?
Needs More Exposure
Mighty Powerful

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Most Influential Women
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

In middle-management levels, which includes managers and directors, men were still 1.5 times more likely to have these positions.

“Between 1987 and 2009, the proportion of women in middle management rose by about 4 per cent. At that rate, it will take approximately 151 years before the proportion of men and women at the management level is equal,” Golden says.

Canada On An International Scale

This news comes days after Forbes’ list of the world’s 100 most powerful women which includes influential political figures, business powerhouses and newsmakers. This year’s list was led by Chancellor Angela Merkel, and includes Lady Gaga , Hillary Clinton and Arianna Huffington president and editor-in-chief of the AOL Huffington Post Media Group.

This year not one Canadian made the cut. A Canadian woman hasn’t been on the list since 2005, when Louise Frechétte, former deputy secretary-general of the United Nations, was given the nod.

Canada’s absence on the list is particularly notable to Pamela Jeffery. She’s the founder of the Women’s Executive Network in Canada, an organization that also creates a top 100 list every year, but which focuses solely on powerful Canadian women.

“I was stunned, surprised and disappointed,” she told HuffPost Canada. “How did they put the list together? Why is their largest trading partner not on the list?” she says.

Forbes has a distinct method to create the list based on dollars, prominence in the media and power base points.

The Huffington Post Canada contacted Forbes to comment on the absence of Canadians in its list, but had not received a response at the time of publishing.

Lagging In Leadership

The lack of powerful female Canadian leaders and the absence on international lists is not surprising to Tracey Rossignol, an advisory board member of the Women in Leadership Foundation , a national, non-profit organization in Vancouver B.C dedicated to advancing women in leadership.

“I doubt that most women in Canada would be surprised by the list. There are few Canadians, male or female, on the world’s most powerful lists,” she told The Huffington Post Canada.

Rossignol says that innovation is the key, and Canada simply lags behind other countries that nurture and create leadership opportunities for women.

Canada is definitely behind. About 82 per cent of Canadian public and private sector organizations that have attempted to achieve diverse workforces do not have strategies in place for women to develop leadership roles, according to the Women’s Leadership Development Survey conducted by Mercer in March 2011.

But there are lists in Canada like the WXN top 100 list and PROFIT Magazine's list of top women entrepreneurs. Sammie Kennedy, the CEO and creator of Booty Camp Fitness Inc. was ranked No. 37 in PROFIT's list in 2010.

The Need For Role Models

For Kennedy, the PROFIT list ranking raised her confidence and helped her set business goals for the future, while also giving her company a credible spot in the fitness market.

“In the case of women seeking to start up a business or in the beginning stages of entrepreneurship, it's very important to have strong role models,” Kennedy says.

Alison M. Konrad, a professor of organizational behaviour at the Richard Ivey School of Business at Western University in London, Ont., agrees.

“It’s great to have women who are stellar talk about how they also have children and successful marriages, yes you can have a rich life and be successful in your business career,” she says.

Konrad says the visibility is there when younger generations listen to female leaders speak.

“Students get inspired. They come back re-motivated and empowered to really take the steps forward,” she says.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

Canada is lagging behind to support women in leadership roles, and the shortcoming is noticeable both on a local and international scale. From the absence of Canadians in celebrity-filled lists to ...
Canada is lagging behind to support women in leadership roles, and the shortcoming is noticeable both on a local and international scale. From the absence of Canadians in celebrity-filled lists to ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:53 PM on 09/25/2011
I'm very surprised that Beverley McLachlin didn't make this list, especially since Louise Arbour did. Canada is extremely unusual in having a female Chief Justice of the Supreme Court - that would seem worth mentioning in this article! I'd think a woman who is the head of the highest court in the land is certainly a leader and a role model!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
06:24 PM on 09/04/2011
So what do I see here? A Kardashian. Look, the media has to mature, maybe Danielle Crittenden will help out and give women a boost on the front page here. Get away from Kardash..., Rhianna etc. PLEASE I want to get sick.
11:10 AM on 09/03/2011
When I approached women in positions of leadership to feature in my book Leaders: Their Stories, Their Words, Conversations with Human-Based Leaders, almost all refused as they believed the "label" human-based leader would make them look weak and soft. All the men, save one, who I approached were honored to be asked and dove in. That in itself is a topic for conversation.

One can lead from a perspective of humanity and caring without being a pushover or soft. They had an opportunity to have a light shone on them and didn't take it. What are the limiting beliefs that are holding them back? They need to address that in order to be recognized and stand out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
08:54 PM on 09/02/2011
Don't forget Nicole Turmel, current leader of Canada's Official Opposition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
06:30 PM on 09/02/2011
It is not 'Canada's' failure, it is the 'failure' of Canadian women.

Nobody is holding them back.

I've witnessed countless acts of affirmative action, coaxing, cajoling, encouraging women into positions of responsibility and leadership.

I think we need to rexamine what we mean by 'equality' of the sexes ... God forbid we are actually 'different' in many ways, and those differences will exibhit themselves in the definition of success and what it means to be successful.

I know of very, very few women who want to have that bold, slightly arrogant, slightly neurotic and compulsive addiction to creating things, companies, wealth ... maybe it's something as simple as the fact we boys have testosterone coursing through our blood 24/7 but I think the answer is more complex.

Men are different than women - simple as that. Those differences will be apparent in every measure of life. We need to stop making expectations of women regarding their success according to mens standards.

Oh - and by the way - it's very hypocritical to be concerned about the lack of women in positions of leadership - and at the same time not worry about the total lack of women doing carpentry, plumbing, fork-lift drivers etc..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:27 PM on 09/02/2011
You said everything I was going to say.. ;o)
11:05 AM on 09/02/2011
This research/study fails to consider two things:

1. The emergence of women entrepreneurs in Canada, which was a practically non-existent segment, and will almost certainly continue to grow.

2. The lack of growth of women in management and executive positions because a lot of women simply don't want the headaches that often come with those types of positions.

I had a conversation with a colleague on this topic not two days ago, and both of us agreed it's more important to us to have something left in the tank at the end of the day and week, to have some energy and brain power left for things -gasp- outside of work. I don't want to be drained mentally and physically so that my life outside of work suffers.

Then there is the the coveted work-life balance. I think many women recognize the reality in achieving that balance: you cannot have the 80-hour week/career AND raise a family (at least most people can't). Anecdotal evidence I've observed through women I know shows that many women choose to stay away from a high-powered career in favour of a more manageable one, or even the opportunity to start their own business. In terms of traditional spheres of influence and power, these women may not be present at board room tables, but they sure are present and influential other circles of society as pioneers and leaders in their own right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:30 PM on 09/02/2011
"1. The emergence of women entreprene­urs in Canada, which was a practicall­y non-existe­nt segment, and will almost certainly continue to grow.

2. The lack of growth of women in management and executive positions because a lot of women simply don't want the headaches that often come with those types of positions."

exactly.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/work/women-outpacing-men-as-small-business-owners/article1329885/

I don't think women seek ego stroking as much as men. So position and power mean less than filling her days with quality time and things..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 AM on 09/02/2011
What vastly limited yardstick are you using to assess this question?

I don't perceive any lack of powerful women in leadership. They are not necessarily engaged in politics or the corporate world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valerie Keefe
left-wing euro-tory trans lesbian
08:20 AM on 09/02/2011
“It’s great to have women who are stellar talk about how they also have children and successful marriages, yes you can have a rich life and be successful in your business career,” she says.

Not in this culture you can't. You want someone to work an 80-hour a week job, then expect them to be a supermom and raise 1.8 children, obviously with a heterosexual husband?

Something's suffers. And someone in a position of leadership will do the responsible thing and sacrifice personal involvement with family for personal involvement with the institution.

I don't think they should have to, but when you make professional jobs carry 80-hour weeks, then you get parents who, yes, spend time with the kids, but as recreation.

Exactly like kids from the 50's who describe having a doting dad who put in double-shifts.

The solution would be if we, especially women, stopped demanding women have children as some essential function of womanhood. That's like saying Newton was a failure because his existence didn't result in pregnancy.

If I have a child it will be after my girlfriend and I are financially secure, and able to make that child the most important thing in our lives.

And I will insist on a girl, ideally with the same relation to her assigned gender that I have, and I will tell her that there is no door closed to her, that she can do anything.

But also stress that she cannot do everything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
06:31 PM on 09/02/2011
I'm glad you pointed out the obvious dilemma.

In this age, gender equality is not as magical and easy as it was in 1920's when it was a simple matter of giving women the right to vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valerie Keefe
left-wing euro-tory trans lesbian
08:07 PM on 09/02/2011
Absolute bodily autonomy, higher minimum wages, a progressive income tax...

It's actually pretty easy.
12:25 PM on 09/05/2011
WOW ! Is that ever deep !! Get a real life !!
06:57 AM on 09/02/2011
I love the way the title of the brief description of this piece has changed three times in a little more than a day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:54 AM on 09/02/2011
Ah yes, we all must join the corporatist worldview.

When women already have a vital role in the economy (and no, I don't mean bringing new consumers into the world) that still isn't economically fairly taken into account.

All of this in an environment of corporations replacing governments and non-scarcity-based economic systems replacing the current ones.

It's an exciting time to be alive.
03:00 AM on 09/02/2011
"No Country for Bold Women"

lol

Someone give that headline writer a promotion!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:57 AM on 09/02/2011
I don't really like Cormac McCarthy's nihilistic writing being lauded as a good thing, but darn that was a fine movie -- the Cohen Brothers got the Midas Touch :3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
02:00 AM on 09/02/2011
OLIVIA CHOW FOR PRIME MINISTER.
06:58 AM on 09/02/2011
And why is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valerie Keefe
left-wing euro-tory trans lesbian
08:21 AM on 09/02/2011
Give me a red tory like Atwood any day over someone who has transphobes like Michelle Landsberg write fundraising letters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
10:07 AM on 09/02/2011
Atwood is a back seat hack. She throws darts and that is her place.
01:01 AM on 09/02/2011
Even though she wasn't in office very long, Canada had a female Prime Minister once. That's worth something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:58 AM on 09/02/2011
She's something -- has a great sense of humour; another reason why she couldn't stay very long -- it seems to be PM ya gotta have furrows of worry on yer brow.
12:31 PM on 09/05/2011
Yea, and that was a real succes , wasn't it ?? Her famous comment: " This no time to talk about issues during an election " . Wow, bloody , wow !!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geminivoyager
12:18 AM on 09/02/2011
In business it's all about the dollar. If a woman makes the company the dollar, she gets the job.

In politics it's all about the power. If a woman gains the power, she gets the job.

The only ones upset are the ones who cannot make the dollar or gain the power but think they should be given the job regardless. Poor losers.
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
02:13 AM on 09/02/2011
Are you suggesting there is not a woman out there who can make a company money or be good enough for politics?

Methinks attitudes like yours could actually be the problem, not women themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geminivoyager
03:04 AM on 09/02/2011
Carly - why are you so busy trying to read extra inferences into plain words?

MEthinks you're too busy feeling to actually think. Good luck with that.

ps - I've met capable, successful women in both business and politics. and guess what? - they don't whine or look for freebies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valerie Keefe
left-wing euro-tory trans lesbian
08:23 AM on 09/02/2011
Most of these jobs require that one sacrifice their personal lives. MPs, CEOs, these people work 80 hour weeks if they're lucky.

And we women? We're better at the work-life balance thing... we run for office far less, and get elected out of proportion to our numbers.
12:10 AM on 09/02/2011
Who was the genius that put the slide show above together and didn't include the Premier of Canada's third largest province: Christy Clark, Premier of British Columbia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
03:05 AM on 09/02/2011
Why? Did Christie lead her party to victory in a general election or did she just postpone the inevitable?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:00 AM on 09/02/2011
Oh, the American infection of Canadian politics (with it's overweaning seriousness) with it's Evangelism and militarism?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 AM on 09/02/2011
Clark capitalized on an opportunity. Not much of a stretch considering the options were people like Kevin Falcon.

As the currently selected (though unelected) premier, she may be a leader, but she has yet to prove herself a Leader.
10:45 AM on 09/02/2011
So, just so I have this straight, if Olivia Chow is selected by her party as the New Leader of the NDP, she is "an unproven leader?" Seems a shame to me that in an article that decries the lack of women in leadership positions in Canada folks choose to denigrate Ms. Clark because they fail to share her political views.

No matter how Ms. Clark came to the position of Premier in British Columbia, I can assure you that SHE IS the Premier of British Columbia, Canada's third largest province. I would suggest that puts her in an important leadership position.