Arctic Airships: Discovery Air Signs Deal With Hybrid Air Vehicles

Airship

First Posted: 09/05/11 11:00 AM ET Updated: 11/05/11 06:12 AM ET

The idea has been floating around for years, but a deal between a northern aviator and a British manufacturer could finally see giant airships sailing through Arctic skies within three years.

"It's been the next big thing for a long time," said Rolf Dawson of Yellowknife-based Discovery Air, which recently signed an agreement in principle with the United Kingdom's Hybrid Air Vehicles (HAV) to develop and bring in the first specially adapted airships to the land of bush planes and ice roads.

"We're working toward a commercial agreement which will stipulate how many aircraft we're going to commit to buying, what the timing of the delivery and what the payment terms are going to be."

Airship boosters have long suggested that using lighter-than-air craft to haul equipment and supplies could change the economics of development in remote areas.

Airships require neither ice roads nor runways. Both are expensive to build and increasingly tough to maintain in the warming northern climate. Airships use far less fuel than planes and have massive lift capacity. The HAV design can haul 50 tonnes — about twice the payload of a Hercules airplane.

Until now — despite an active community of supporters who stage yearly conferences on airships in the Arctic — they have remained pie-in-the-sky. But the deal moors them solidly to reality, said Peter Wallis of the transportation think-tank Van Horne Institute.

"HAV is in the game," he said.

What's changed, said Dawson, is a new generation of airship design.

"Lighter-than-air ships, unless you've got them tied down properly, you're at risk of having them float away. This one is more stable. It almost has characteristics of an airplane and a helicopter."

That's because this airship is a little bit of everything.

Lift comes from both lighter-than-air helium and the wing-shaped body of the craft. Engines rotate to provide forward thrust and vertical take-off. Hovercraft technology along the bottom helps with landing and keeps the craft on the ground.

"If you put all those together, you get a hybrid," said company spokesman Gordon Taylor. "It enables you to do things you can't do with a (traditional) airship."

It doesn't even need a mooring mast.

"It can land and take off anywhere," Taylor said. "Anything that's reasonably flat — water, snow, gravel, ice, tundra, whatever."

HAV is currently building an airship for the U.S. military. Dawson says that craft will serve as a field test for the ships that come North.

The northern ships would have to be modified for industrial use.

"Our role is going to be to work with HAV on the interface between them and our customers to help design what our customers are looking for in these things," Dawson said.

He said Discovery hopes to take the first delivery in 2014.

There are challenges.

Airships are slower than planes, which means companies will have to hire more crew to fly them. They're also huge — the model that Discovery is considering is over 100 metres long and 32 metres high.

"If it isn't flying, where are you going to put it?" asks Taylor.

Regulatory issues need sorting out as well — although Taylor points out that HAV's airships have already been certified by European regulators, who have reciprocal agreements with agencies in North America.

Airships could change how northern development gets done, said Wallis.

"Mines use ice roads pretty intensively during the period of time they're available. With airships available on a year-round basis, it could affect the cost of resupply at the mines."

Remote northern communities could fly in supplies more cheaply, lowering the northern cost of living.

Airships also create less environmental impact.

"You avoid the big ecosystem impacts that go with things like building runways and terminals," Dawson said. "This thing just floats along the surface and doesn't disturb much of anything."

Taylor is confident that the airship's time has come.

"We're not going to replace helicopters. We're going to replace trains or boats or planes. We're going to fit in between where boats, planes and cars don't work.

"Like the North."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
08:40 AM on 09/06/2011
The losses of the 1930s were either fire or storm. Both the British and Americans had really bad experiences with their military ships, the Americans worst of all. The Germans of course had the Hindinburg tragedy. Can they be made to avoid these problems is the question now. During the 1970s, a design was offered that was a lifting body airship which had speeds in excess of 100 knots and was going to have a cieling of 20,000 feet. It was designed to carry 1200 passengers safely transatlantic and was allegedly capable of operating in the same weather that fixed wings could. It was turned down by the airline industry due to lack of speed and the recent advent of the 747. So, on paper I guess it might be possible to build one that could withstand high winds in flight. Still, what do you do with it on the ground? No thanks boys, I'll stick with the Twin otter
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
10:11 AM on 09/06/2011
Well the Hindinburg was filled with hydrogen, so that won't be a problem these ones will have. But yeah, I would have liked to see some more detail around how they would react in winds they would likely encounter and what the moorage strategy would be for them.
06:00 PM on 09/05/2011
Hmm... 50 tons is a lot of oil. Do we need a pipeline in the North?
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
02:26 PM on 09/05/2011
Airships are not wind tolerant, and they are slow. Consequently, sooner or later one will be torn to pieces in high winds either en route or moored. I do not hold out any hope for this latest scheme to resurrect a technology whose time never was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:26 AM on 09/06/2011
Depends on how they're built. The Germans built some very good dirigibles...the Americans not so much.
Blimps have a very good safety record, I believe.
You're certainly correct about wind; gusts are the most dangerous...but if it's just a hard, steady wind, the airship's AIRSPEED would be the same, even though it would be going at a high speed over the ground.
12:43 PM on 09/05/2011
This makes perfect sense.
I lived in the Canadian Arctic from 1979 to 1992 and the idea of airships was discussed many times for resupplying the North.
Glad to see someone is finally taking the leap.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterTheChanter
11:52 AM on 09/05/2011
are there other non-flammable gases that could be used?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:27 AM on 09/06/2011
Helium.
11:26 AM on 09/05/2011
Well perfect, then...except for the helium factor. THAT is an expense, hard to find and harder to transport.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:31 AM on 09/06/2011
And contain; it bleeds through its container much like hydrogen.

I don't know if they would use hot air, partly using heat recovered from engine exhaust. If the envelope could be insulated somehow, it would reduce the amount of heat required to maintain lift.
10:44 AM on 09/05/2011
Problem: helium is a non-renewable resource whose production from radioactivity in the earths crust is extremely slow. We may have seen production of helium peak some years ago.
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_60/iss_6/31_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1