The Unstoppable Stephen Harper

Stephen Harper Unstoppable Sarkozy Cameron

The Huffington Post Canada   First Posted: 09/06/11 07:21 AM ET Updated: 11/06/11 05:12 AM ET

If you thought Stephen Harper reached the zenith of political power with his majority government win on May 2, think again.

Though the powers of a majority government are considerable, the emergence of a strong opposition under a charismatic leader in Jack Layton nevertheless posed a problem for the Conservative prime minister.

With the passing of Layton, however, the opposition is leaderless and circumstances both inside and outside Ottawa are fracturing the opposition even further.

Still shaken by the death of their leader, the New Democrats are entering into a leadership contest that is already delineating the divisions between the party’s left wing and its more moderate elements, as well as between its Quebec caucus and its base outside of the province.

Disagreements over what share of the vote to give organized labour and whether to hold the leadership convention later rather than sooner (in part to give the Quebec wing of the party time to increase its paltry membership numbers) have already popped up.
The two leading candidates to replace Jack Layton, Thomas Mulcair and Brian Topp, are at opposite sides of this debate.

For Stephen Harper, this means the New Democrats will likely be focused more on their own affairs than on mounting a unified opposition, at least until the spring. Whether the party will come out of the leadership race in one piece remains to be seen.

This passes the baton to the Liberal Party, reduced to 34 MPs in the House of Commons. Though interim leader Bob Rae has the experience and the profile to keep the party in the public’s eyes, and he may well step into the void as the unofficial voice of opposition while the NDP chooses its next leader, he holds the job only temporarily. A leadership race likely to be held in 2013 means the Liberals, too, will be looking inward for a good portion of Harper’s tenure as Prime Minister. And until the Liberals choose their next leader, Rae can only take the party so far.

Then there is the Bloc Québécois, which lost its official party status in the general election. While it is too small to cause much trouble for the Conservatives, it still does have a base of support in the province that can be used to raise the ire of Quebecers against the federal government. But its voice is severely diminished.

For example, the appointment of Angelo Persichilli as the Prime Minister’s director of communications, a former journalist and columnist who does not speak French and has written critically about Quebec’s influence in Ottawa, would have been cause célèbre for the Bloc under Duceppe. Instead, the voice which spoke with most authority against Persichilli’s nomination was likely Pierre Moreau, intergovernmental affairs minister in Jean Charest’s government.

With the PQ in turmoil, the sovereignty movement tearing itself apart, and no figure of any real stature willing to take on the job as leader, the Bloc is in no position to strongly oppose the government.

Provincially, Ontarians may choose as their next premier a Harper ally in Tim Hudak. British Columbians have a conservative-friendly leader in Christy Clark, who’s preoccupied with keeping her government together after the HST referendum. Jean Charest has to worry about the emergence of François Legault’s new party (though the Quebec premier is no stranger to going after the federal government to bolster his own poll numbers).

All of this means that Stephen Harper, ensconced in the comfort of a majority government, can expect little opposition to his agenda inside Ottawa and out.

Éric Grenier taps The Pulse of federal and regional politics for Huffington Post Canada readers on Tuesdays and Fridays. Grenier is the author of ThreeHundredEight.com, covering Canadian politics, polls and electoral projections.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

If you thought Stephen Harper reached the zenith of political power with his majority government win on May 2, think again. Though the powers of a majority government are considerable, the emergenc...
If you thought Stephen Harper reached the zenith of political power with his majority government win on May 2, think again. Though the powers of a majority government are considerable, the emergenc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This comment has been removed.
photo
Add In Canadia
Egotism is a weakness
05:04 AM on 09/07/2011
It's kind of the perfect political storm for everyone but Harper who's standing in the calm middle of the eye. I don't think he could have anticipated how he was dealt such a favorable hand. He holds a majority government, and every opposing political party with seats (save for the Green Party funny enough) is leaderless.

The only one who can stop Harper really is his own party, and he's taken several missteps (who doesn't? Politician or otherwise), but nothing sticks to the man. Every blunder he's done seems to slide right off him, and I certainly don't credit his PR team for that (who are unable to make the man more 'likeable')

I think with the rhetoric that's thrown with Harper is that he's able to bend as opposed to break, that he is capable of compromise; that his minority government survived for so long is a testament to that reality. While people view Harper as a control freak, that's probably one quality a leader should have; because if the guy in charge isn't calling the shots, then who is? Chretien had a firm grasp when he was in power as well, but the knives ended up coming out for him in the end.

This is a very stark contrast to American politics in where their leaders have no real control over the dialogue. Bush was led by his party, as opposed to Bush leading his party; and this reality is the same for Obama.
09:21 PM on 09/06/2011
it is the nature of democracy ------

when there are majority governments you really dont have democracy ---you have a series of four/five year dictatorships
09:17 PM on 09/06/2011
keep waving the pom poms eric ---you may get a shot at prime ministers press secretary.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
01:42 AM on 09/09/2011
Or like some get to eat in the big trough with Mike and Pam in the Senate!
07:59 PM on 09/06/2011
The horseshoe up his derrière must hurt.
04:23 PM on 09/06/2011
Something creepy about Harpers eyes.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
05:29 AM on 09/07/2011
..................not to mention his goddam brain
02:10 PM on 09/06/2011
I cringe every time I see something written about our Prime Minister Stephen Harper because the Huffpost doors open and out spews all this hate. Check yourselves people, it's only politics!!! Dislike his politics yes, but actually hating any person is taking things a step beyond measure. All this negative spew comes from someplace deep inside of you and you should be concentrating on why you have all this hate inside you rather than trying to impress your fellow hate spewers with your hostile dribble. There is only good and evil out there for us to latch onto and you hate spewers are only showing the rest of us who is in control of your lives. Good waits for us to embrace it while evil wins by default...and guess what, evil owns those of us who spew hate...
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
01:43 AM on 09/09/2011
You get what you give
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
northof49th
01:52 PM on 09/06/2011
Dictaors don't listen to opposition anyway so move forward and in 4 years elect someone else and reassemble the country
02:19 PM on 09/06/2011
Dictator? Really? Do you even know what that word means? Gimme a break...check out Syria, Libya, Cuba and a host of countries with real dictators before making such a comment. You should be thanking your lucky stars to live in Canada, Stephen Harper or not.
02:41 PM on 09/06/2011
Invitations only go to parties with MPs in the House. They are making this up as they go along. The debate decision-making is an unregulated, ad hoc process that makes decisions without benefit of rules or criteria. The decision makers are the so-called Broadcast Consortium, as the news directors from CBC, CTV, Global, TVA and Radio Canada style themselves when making all the decisions about the leaders' debate.

How can a group of five television executives decide to exclude a party running in 308 ridings when they include a party that only runs candidates in Quebec? How can debates, a critical part of the democratic process, operate in such a high-handed and arbitrary fashion? How can a party with the support of one in ten Canadians be excluded? And most fundamentally, how can TV executives tell Canadians that a vote for Green candidates is not a viable vote? That is in fact what they are doing. Far from facilitating a full and fair discussion in a democracy, they are interfering in democracy by dictating what votes are worth casting. What other interpretation can there be when the news media tells the public what leaders have a right to be heard?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
northof49th
04:05 PM on 09/06/2011
I know how lucky I'm but the point is he is one, you don't have to be like anyone else anywhere in the world to be one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
01:46 PM on 09/06/2011
It is true. Harper is in complete control while the opposition is (necessarily) navel gazing.
Let's see how things are in a year. In the meantime, we just have to grin and bare it.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
01:29 PM on 09/06/2011
Things that should not be moving forward wil stop.
11:55 AM on 09/06/2011
"Stephen Harper ... can expect little opposition to his agenda." Of course, given his famous egomania, this could prove his eventual downfall. The danger for progressives is how much damage he could possibly do to the foundations of democracy and civil society in the meantime.
11:31 AM on 09/06/2011
This lead is only actual if we believe it and make it so. Choosing Hudak as Ontario's next premier would consolidate Harper's ultra-right wing agenda, but again, only if we let it happen. Remember the big lie. Remember the function of propaganda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterTheChanter
11:17 AM on 09/06/2011
Body language says so much. Here it appears to say:
"Hey, can I sit with you at lunch?"
"Sorry, old chap, I don't know where you've been"
"Non, va te faire foutre, trouduc."
10:43 AM on 09/06/2011
if harpo is unstoppable, then we're in a whole heap of trouble

harpo's gov't promised to NEVER run a deficit and they did
never to change income trusts and they did

buying f35 jets we don't need and lying about the price tag

i'm very very scared what canada will become under harpo et al
11:44 AM on 09/06/2011
Fear for the sake of fear, is stupid. The man's name is Harper NOT Hitler.
Whatever trouble he gets us into, we can reverse in 4 years.
Meanwhile, if you don't like it, go down into the streets and protest. (then spend several days in 'jail' as our youth did in TO)
photo
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
12:25 PM on 09/06/2011
No one but you brought up the name "Hitler."

Who is "our youth" and what are you referring to?
04:26 PM on 09/06/2011
so protesting now gets you jail time?

hmmm, where/when did that happen before.....?

gov't should be afraid of the people not the other way around
01:49 PM on 09/06/2011
OH PLEASE!!!!! All this hate is grating...
03:15 PM on 09/06/2011
feel free to email the PMO with that same comment
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moriquenda M Moriquenda
08:37 PM on 09/06/2011
Then don't read the comments. Stephen Harper is a despot in a Christmas sweater. He is one scary dude.
10:09 AM on 09/06/2011
yyzmel just exposed his flank by using the term "moral majority".

What frauds these Christianists be !

Note to the faithful : We are all going to the same place when we die. Stop pretending that you are something special. You are most certainly not.