Harper's Cost Cutter Consultant Costs $90,000 A Day

Stephen Harper

First Posted: 09/20/11 05:00 AM ET Updated: 11/19/11 05:12 AM ET

OTTAWA - The Harper government defended paying almost $90,000 a day to a big consulting firm for advice on how to save money, saying it can't do the job properly by itself.

"The fact is that we feel we need to have outside advice," Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Tuesday.

"It isn't good, quite frankly, for a government to just look at itself. There's a lot of expertise in Canada on the subject of public-sector productivity, for example, and we look forward to having the advice of, in this case, Deloitte's."

The Canadian Press earlier reported that Deloitte Inc. was hired on Aug. 15 on a $19.8-million contract to advise the federal cabinet and senior officials on finding enough savings to balance the books by 2014.

The contract, which runs until March 31, is to advise "senior and elected officials on public- and private-sector best practices in improving productivity and achieving operational efficiencies." There's an option for a one-year extension.

Opposition MPs dismissed the government's justifications.

"They are spending $90,000 a day for an outside consultant to plan cuts — and that is their explanation," New Democrat Jean Crowder said in the House of Commons. "Canadians will not buy it.

"A day's pay for this consultant is more than a year's pay for front-line Service Canada workers. While Conservatives throw money away on high-priced consultants, they are forcing Canadians to accept cuts to the programs and services that they rely on."

On July 11, Public Works invited a group of 20 "pre-qualified" firms to bid on the contract, rather than use a fully open tendering process. Documents describing the work required were supplied directly to the invited bidders, rather than posted on a tendering website for anyone to see.

The Canadian Press obtained a copy of the so-called "statement of work" under the Access to Information Act.

Deloitte will advise the government on the strategic and operating review, a year-long exercise announced in the March 22 budget that will eventually trim $4 billion from $80 billion in annual program spending.

Tony Clement, Treasury Board president, has asked 67 departments, agencies and Crown corporations to submit two scenarios by Oct. 3, one with cuts of five per cent, another with cuts of 10 per cent.

A nine-person committee headed by Clement will then vet the proposals over the following three months and report their recommendations to the finance minister in mid-January. Flaherty will then include the final plan in his next budget, with the actual cuts slated to begin April 1.

Clement has said that transfer payments to individuals and the provinces will not be touched.

To date, the government has provided only minimal information about the timelines and process.

Industry Minister Christian Paradis on Monday called the Deloitte contract "normal."

"There will be major decisions to be taken and we need an expert from the private sector to do it properly," he said.

Deloitte has already provided training sessions for officials, as well as management tools to help the committee review the spending-cut proposals.

The contract also calls for advice on consolidating the government's far-flung data centres, a centrepiece of the current belt-tightening exercise.

The government has already paid PriceWaterhouseCoopers a $2.5-million fee for advice on how to reduce 308 data centres to about 20.

Deloitte must also provide an information specialist to advise on "disposing of information," and "co-ordinating Access to Information and Privacy Act requirements." The expert will also be "responsible for the efficient and systematic control of the creation, receipt, maintenance, use and disposition of records."

Other firms invited to bid on the $20-million contract included Ernst & Young, IBM Canada, Bell Canada and Accenture Inc.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The Harper government defended paying almost $90,000 a day to a big consulting firm for advice on how to save money, saying it can't do the job properly by itself."The fact is that we feel we...
OTTAWA - The Harper government defended paying almost $90,000 a day to a big consulting firm for advice on how to save money, saying it can't do the job properly by itself."The fact is that we feel we...
Filed by Kenny Yum  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:23 PM on 09/21/2011
When a party whose central tenet is that government should be as small as possible (so as not to interfere with business with such silly things like environmental, labour, or financial regulations) except when providing bailouts and padded contracts, they always cut jobs. Harper (and Ford in Toronto, and Hudak in Ontario, if he wins) fail to mention that if you replace government workers with lower-paid private sector workers, or don't replace them at all, strangely enough, there are fewer people who can afford to buy goods and services (houses, cars, restaurant meals, vacations, ...). And that's not even considering the possibility that the jobs they are performing ARE necessary to the well-being of the common people who don't live in gated communities, fly to New York for health care, and drive German or Italian cars (as I suspect the executives and senior analysts at Deloitte do).

Reminds me of the $100 million contract Mike Harris handed out to a company to develop and administer a welfare snitch hotline... Money's no object to meet an ideological (or idea-illogical) goal; the health and welfare of 'families', on the other hand, has to be paid for out of petty cash.
01:55 PM on 09/21/2011
A couple things:

1) This isn't A consultant - that is to say this isn't ONE PERSON, this is a huge team of people (likely many teams) working with personnel across various departments
2) These consultants do not make $90,000 a day, not even close - that is the total expense of the contract divided by the number of days. It's like saying a construction worker is making $100,000 / day to build a building over 2 years. This isn't even the total take home pay of the individuals on the project - it is the firm cost. Note that some of the analysts working on the project will likely make less than front line service workers annual salary - but they will be pulling 10-14 hours a day on this effort and likely working weekends. These aren't fat cats feeding at the trough - these are some of the smartest, dedicated and hard-working people you will find anywhere.
3) The ROI (return on investment) on this project will be high and positive for the government, that is to say the government will get a great return on its money. $19 million may sound like a lot, but projects like these usually find hundreds of millions of dollars in savings.
4) The fact is public workers do not have the expertise, training or education to pull this type of project off without wasting a lot of money and likely generating erroneous results that would cost far in excess of $19-$20
10:56 PM on 09/20/2011
Flaherty:“The fact is that we feel we need to have outside advice,”. Translation: Harper knows I'm incompetent.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
10:36 PM on 09/20/2011
"As always, our government is committed to maintaining an open, fair and transparent procurement process while obtaining the best possible value for Canadians."

Did Tooney Clements office really say that?

How was that $50 million divided up amongst friends, hidden from the auditor, and just prior to the election? And what about the F-35 bomber procurement project - when does it begin? How about the G20 billion dollar expendature - are all the receipts in yet and or will that be a scam - aka hidden under national security?
05:21 PM on 09/20/2011
Ka-ching Ka-ching Ka-ching!!!!! Gotta love those smart corporations that whisper in a politicians ear.
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
04:59 PM on 09/20/2011
Of course, the need to cut $4 billion would have nothing to do with the $6 billion tax cut that Harper gave to business before the election.

"Tory: The word "Tory" derives from the Middle Irish word tóraidhe; modern Irish tóraí: outlaw, robber or brigand..."

How very apropos!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christina Robins
06:24 PM on 09/20/2011
Except Harper ain't no Tory...he is reform all the way, Tories have been hijacked by the reform party.
photo
EllaMai
Non-violent complainer. From North of the border.
03:42 PM on 09/20/2011
Don't worry, that 20 million will be back in government hands as soon as they lay off 2/3 of the IT work force, as per the PWG report advice.

No tax increases, of course, when you have people to fire!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cameron d
Don't blame me, I voted Smitherman.
03:36 PM on 09/20/2011
Another textbook example a fiscal conservative.
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
03:05 PM on 09/20/2011
A Tory government gives a non-publicly-tendered $90,000 per day contract to a consulting firm to advise it on how to cut $4 billion in spending. Must be politics, and politics was described by Ambrose Bierce as "The conduct of public affairs for private advantage."

Deloitte and Touche are also an auditing firm, and auditors have defined as "...those who go in after the battle has been lost, and bayonet the wounded."
12:54 PM on 09/20/2011
$90,000 per day for a year is roughly the same amount of money saved by firing 700 scientists from Environment Canada.

There is a terrible irony somewhere here that I fail to grasp ...
12:46 PM on 09/20/2011
On a side note - several federal agencies also hired Deloitte for advice on how to escape the budget cuts!
/sarcasm
12:27 PM on 09/20/2011
Are we going to get rid of elections and just let Deloite and KPMG run the budgets? If these elected officials can't do their jobs perhaps they are the ones that should be fired.
12:18 PM on 09/20/2011
I'm no conservative, but I would rather put 20 million into the hands of a fiercely meritocratic private firm full of overworked, over caffeinated MBAs to cut costs than pay public officers to sit around and dream up ways to fire themselves...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
11:44 AM on 09/20/2011
Great. So now we are run by an unelected accounting firm. And the Tory nightmare has just begun...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickwwalker
11:48 AM on 09/20/2011
Yup. I never again want to hear Canadians mocking Americans about how stupid *they* are ever again in my entire life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
11:53 AM on 09/20/2011
Let's not get carried away here. LOL.
10:39 AM on 09/20/2011
Dear Harper,

If you pay me the same amount only once, I'll tell you how to save money. It's easy too, all you have to do is stop spending money on useless things. It's a crazy concept, I know. But it's one that I know works.