Internet Providers Could Face Hearings Over Throttling

Crtc Traffic Throttling

First Posted: 09/22/11 04:05 PM ET Updated: 11/22/11 05:12 AM ET

Internet service providers that slow down games or other applications in violation of a CRTC policy may face a third-party audit or even a public hearing, the telecommunications regulator says.

In addition, a summary of complaints about internet service providers slowing down online games or other applications will be published online four times a year, the CRTC says.

The guidelines announced Thursday for resolving complaints about ISPs slowing down certain kinds of internet traffic — a practice known as internet throttling — come after a series of complaints in the past year from online gamers about Rogers slowing down World of Warcraft and possibly other games. Rogers says it has resolved the problem with World of Warcraft. It has been ordered to file a plan to the CRTC by Sept. 27 for fixing problems that may affect other games and applications.

The new guidelines say:

* The CRTC will forward consumer complaints to the ISP concerned.

* If the ISP fails to comply with CRTC rules, the CRTC may take further action such as discussing the complaint with the ISP, requesting an on-site inspection or third-party audit or holding a public hearing.

* If the CRTC rules that the ISP is not complying with the rules, it will publish the company's name and the nature of the complaint.

* Four times a year, the CRTC will publish a summary of the number and types of complaints it has received, including the number that have been resolved and the number that are still under investigation.

Gamers unimpressed

The new rules don't satisfy Jason Koblovsky, who co-founded a group representing gamers and has made a number of complaints to the CRTC about apparent internet throttling of online games by Rogers.

Koblovsky, speaking on behalf of the Canadian Gamers Organization, criticized the fact that the CRTC is relying on consumer complaints to monitor whether ISPs are complying with its rules on internet traffic management.

"We find this policy update to be more of an insult to consumers.… This is not acceptable by any means," he said in a statement. "The CRTC has the responsibility to follow through, monitor and enforce its policies."

Koblovsky told CBC News in an email that he would like to see the CRTC audit ISPs regularly and impose fines for non-compliance.

Under a 2009 CRTC policy, ISPs are allowed to use technology to slow down certain types of internet traffic and prioritize others in order to ensure that time-sensitive applications such as voice calling and video streaming function properly.

However, the rules say:

* ISPs must be transparent about the use of such methods so consumers can make informed decisions about the internet services they purchase and use.

* The methods must be designed to "address a defined need and nothing more."

* The methods must not be "unjustly discriminatory nor unduly preferential" toward particular applications.

* The CRTC’s prior approval would be required for any internet traffic management practices that would result in the carrier controlling the content or influencing the meaning or purpose of telecommunications.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Internet service providers that slow down games or other applications in violation of a CRTC policy may face a third-party audit or even a public hearing, the telecommunications regulator says. In ...
Internet service providers that slow down games or other applications in violation of a CRTC policy may face a third-party audit or even a public hearing, the telecommunications regulator says. In ...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:51 PM on 09/22/2011
The Canadian Gamers Organization Official Press Release on this is here: http://openmedia.ca/blog/gamers-unhappy-about-new-throttling-guidelines

We have a petition up. Please sign and pass around: http://openmedia.ca/gamers

Warm Regards,
Jason Koblovsky
(Canadian Gamers Organization)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valar84
04:31 PM on 09/22/2011
Maybe my opinion won't be popular, but I don't think throttling is always bad. For instance, on video streaming websites, if clips require 50 kbytes/sec and they throttle traffic at 64 kbytes/sec, then I see no problem.

My main grip is the unjustified download caps and high price of excess downloaded data. Again, I don't disagree with some sort of fee for excess bandwidth, but it has to be reasonable. When I want to buy games online and I realize that downloading the game will cost me more in bandwidth fees than the game cost in itself (ex: a discounted game sold at 9,99$ needing a 8 gig download, with a 1,5$ fee per gig), that is completely unreasonable. When it would cost less to buy a second connection than to have a single connection and pay the bandwidth fees (even if two connections are worse than one for the network), it is completely unreasonable. The excess fees should be cents per gigabyte, not dollars.

Telecoms claim that they must punish big users to discourage intensive use of their facilities... what a joke. They make their sky-high profits mostly on the backs of these users and have fun milking them of as much money as they can.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LittleSanityLeft
04:59 PM on 09/22/2011
I agree, download caps are a big problem (I'm grandfathered on an unlimited plan thankfully) and since online content is going to become richer over time it's purely a money grab investment by the ISP's. They know that internet download usage will increase as the media streaming/cloud technology becomes more prevalent and the younger online generation gets older replacing an older generation that isn't nearly so plugged in.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:50 PM on 09/22/2011
Stop the ISP oligarchy free Canada