Proposed Seal Cull In St. Lawrence Gulf Draws Fire From Top Scientists And Conservation Group

First Posted: 09/25/11 01:33 PM ET Updated: 11/25/11 05:12 AM ET

Grey Seals

HALIFAX - Two of Canada's leading marine biologists and a conservation group say a five-year proposal to slaughter 140,000 grey seals in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence is being driven by politics, not science.

"I don't support it," said Hal Whitehead, a professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax who specializes in the study of whales. "From what I've seen of the rationale, it doesn't make much sense to me."

Earlier this month, a federal advisory panel urged Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield to approve the cull, which would result in the killing of 70 per cent of the grey seals that feed in an area that stretches from Quebec's Gaspe Peninsula to the east side of Cape Breton.

The Fisheries Resource Conservation Council, made up of scientists and fishing industry representatives appointed by the minister, said the proposed cull is an experiment that will test indirect scientific evidence suggesting grey seals are impeding the recovery of cod stocks.

Whitehead said the council's description of the project as an experiment is laughable.

"There's no control group," he said in an interview, referring to the unaltered group in a scientific experiment that allows for comparison of results.

"In this case, there's just one lot and you're killing a large part of them. If the cod population goes up, it doesn't necessarily mean the seals were to blame. ... Disentangling relationships in the ocean is really tough."

The professor also said that even though other predators eat cod, including some species of whales, the federal government seems intent on taking aim at seals to appease the fishing industry.

"In this part of the world ... a substantial part of the population really dislikes seals," Whitehead said.

"Before humans started industrial fishing, there were large populations of seals and of cod. Clearly, they can coexist perfectly well. ... It appears to me that politicians are playing into this largely irrational hatred of seals to make it look like they're doing something."

Federal scientists say the southern Gulf cod population is at the lowest recorded level and is declining even though large-scale commercial cod fishing has been suspended since 1993.

Boris Worm, a Dalhousie biology professor who studies marine biodiversity, said former fisheries minister Gail Shea had said a cull was a good idea in 2009, and federal scientists have since been pushed to justify that decision.

"It was something that was announced before the science was heard, and then a meeting was convened to produce the science to support that decision," he said, referring to a series of scientific workshops held last fall.

"To me, as a scientist, that's not acceptable."

A call to Ashfield's office in Ottawa was not returned.

Wayne Stobo, a retired researcher with the federal Fisheries Department, said his extensive fieldwork with grey seals has led him to the conclusion that the proposed cull is worth a try.

While he doesn't disagree with the professors' arguments, he insisted that experiments don't need control groups to be valid.

"The nature of an experiment is that you try something and see what the result is," he said, adding that scientists didn't need a control group to conclude that the collapse of the cod stocks in the early 1990s was largely due to overfishing.

"There's a little bit of scientific game playing here. ... For them to turn around and say it's not an experiment is a bit disingenuous."

Stobo spent about 13 years tracking the grey seal population on Sable Island, where he found the herd was growing rapidly at 12 per cent per year.

The Fisheries Department says there are now up to 410,000 grey seals living off the Atlantic coast — a 30-fold increase since the 1960s. A majority of them live part time on the island, a spit of land about 160 kilometres southeast of Nova Scotia.

"They're going to be eating more cod when the population is 30 times higher than before," said Stobo. "That's simple math. Nobody has to be a scientist to figure that one out."

Debbie MacKenzie, chairwoman of the Halifax-based Grey Seal Conservation Society, said the notion that a growing population of grey seals is eating too many cod is too simplistic.

She said the council's approach ignores the fact that the seals are part of a complex ecosystem — and that removing them could have unexpected consequences.

While grey seals do eat a considerable amount of fish, MacKenzie said, they also expel enough nitrogen to encourage the growth of algae, a key source of food for the most basic life forms in the ocean, including plankton.

"The assumption is that there will be absolutely no harm from their experiment. ... But what you can hurt is what's dependent on the grey seals," she said. "This is an experiment in manipulating decision makers by using only part of the information available. ... It's obscene."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

HALIFAX - Two of Canada's leading marine biologists and a conservation group say a five-year proposal to slaughter 140,000 grey seals in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence is being driven by politics, ...
HALIFAX - Two of Canada's leading marine biologists and a conservation group say a five-year proposal to slaughter 140,000 grey seals in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence is being driven by politics, ...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:08 PM on 09/26/2011
70% of a seal group eliminated as an experiment? No, that's not an experiment. That being said, if the population is growing at 12% per year, have a cull of 12% per year so the size of the heard is stable. Or do an initial cull that decreases the heard size first and then do a yearly cull. We should be looking for a healthy balance.
.
02:07 PM on 09/26/2011
As several posters have noted, the Canadian governments recent draft proposal to kill wolves in the Alberta tar sands to ostensibly protect caribou is very similar to the proposal to kill gray seals to protect cod. The former, however, received little attention in Canada, despite substantial disparaging coverage internationally.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/17/oil-sands-wildlife?INTCMP=SRCH

Both proposals are morally and ethically bankrupt. Neither proposal could possibly garner the necessary approval of an Animal Care Committee. In Canada (and most other countries) all proposed scientific endeavors involving animals in research are reviewed to assess the scientific efficacy of the project and assure compliance with humane standards. Approval from an Animal Care Committee is necessary to proceed with research projects and to publish results in most peer reviewed journals.

Of course, the Canadian government and agency scientists might very well exempt themselves from the rigours of scholarly science. Canada is already an international pariah, but government scientists who are complicit in promoting and engaging in questionable research on behalf of the government risk professional condemnation and permanent damage to their reputation.
12:05 PM on 09/26/2011
Stop killing all the sharks and maybe there won't be a problem! Damn fools they have it all backwards!!! So Frustrating!!! Besides McFrickinDonalds still sells cod fish sandwiches –what is wrong with this picture?
12:01 PM on 09/26/2011
Nova Scotia pollutes the oceans-it stinks and thyflush raw sewage into the ocean.There are pictures of crabs with extra legs. The reall issue here-jobs and the amountof money seal skins bring in to the economy. Are we going to allow this to happne??? IF so it will happen every year. WE ARE PEOPLE LIED TO PEOPLE!!!!!!! As Canadians we need to protiect our environment now-
evecaren
In every cloud there is a silver lining
11:30 AM on 09/26/2011
The proposed cull of 140,000 grey seals on Sable Island, Novia Scotia is horrendous. According to a recent article on the www.greyseal.net website, "Canadian fisherman are worried that these grey seals are eating too much fish and they are harming the recovery of cod stocks." On the same website,another journalist wrote the following."In a recent article of Ms. MacKenzie in November 2010, " A high density of grey seals on the Eastern Scotian shelf now seems to be kick-starting a cod recovery. Seals concentrate nitrogen in the surface water, raising overall productivity and triggering faster growth of fish. Regardless, Canada's Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans and Federal fisheries minister Gail Shea, are preparing to authorize a large misguided grey seal cull on Sable Island, which risks causing harm to cod and other wildlife." Ms. MacKenzie stated in another article she wrote that "nobody said the seal hunt was cruel, and nobody complained that Canada kills whitecoat pups, at the Department of Fisheries and Ocean's latest public consultation on seal hunting." " A mass harvest of seals today carries a greater ecological risk to the ocean than it did when great hordes of large predatory fish shared the waters (cod,shark, halibut, etc.) and shared the seal's ecological role. The grey seals seem to be kick-starting a cod recovery. Let's call this proposed plan to slaugher thousands of seals what it is, an
attrocity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anugs
08:31 AM on 09/26/2011
Canada's commercial seal hunt is a slaughter of defenseless baby seals. It is true that in Canada, newborn "whitecoat" harp seals are protected from hunting. But as soon as they begin to shed their fluffy white coats—as young as 12 days old—these baby seals are legally hunted by sealers. In fact, 97 percent of the seals killed in the commercial seal hunt over the past three years have been younger than 3 months, and most were younger than 1 month old. At the time of slaughter, many of these pups had not yet eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim. Sealers prefer to kill the baby seals because their skins are in "prime" condition and fetch the highest prices.

Myth: The seal hunt is humane.

Fact: In 2001, an independent veterinary panel performed post-mortems on seal carcasses abandoned on the ice floes. Their report concluded that in 42 percent of cases, the seals did not show enough evidence of cranial injury to even guarantee unconsciousness at the time of skinning. This report is supported by the testimony of independent journalists, parliamentarians and scientists who observe and document the commercial seal hunt each year. Footage from the commercial seal hunt consistently shows conscious pups stabbed with boathooks and dragged across the ice, wounded pups left to choke on their own blood and conscious seal pups cut open. Video footage of the 2005 hunt can be viewed at www.protectseals.org.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kadellagroove
Left leaning, Jeffersonian Whig.
02:40 AM on 09/26/2011
why do canadians hate seals so much?! its literally the only thing I ever hear about canada... that they are killing seals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KNW
07:42 AM on 09/26/2011
Then maybe you should read more Canadian news, eh.
07:58 AM on 09/26/2011
We do plenty of other stupid things to uglier animals, as well. But people think the seals are cute, therefore they talk about it in the media.

On a less ridiculous note, this is one of those ongoing protests where nature runs into the rump of the economy of a region, and all science will take a back seat until about the time the cod and the seals are extinct, after which some other excuse will be made for why the fishery is troubled. Since people seem to want simple explanations, I'm figuring it'll end up being whales and dolphins, and maybe turtles, just so the oceans can be scoured entirely clear of life forms. And this from somebody who doesn't really like seals, and still realises how foolish the process of slaughtering them wholesale is.
12:46 AM on 09/26/2011
Gee, and it couldn't possibly be overfishing. That would mean humans were accepting accountability for something.
10:26 PM on 09/25/2011
The proposed seal cull may have no impact on the cod recovery. The loss of cod is being blamed on the high number of seals. Yet the the decline of nutrients in the water ecosystems may be more responsible for the decline . Seals contribute to the health of the ecosystem, helping more fish survive. Overfishing does not. Pollution of the water is what we should be looking at , not destroying the seals.
10:25 PM on 09/25/2011
A 70% kill-off? Yeah, there isn't anything scientific about that kind of chunk of 'population control.' Removing competition with us, yes, that is very possible. The question that I have is: What will be done with all the dead seals? When an interest group pushes for something, they usually get it, so are we going to have new seal-skin boots for next year?
10:55 PM on 09/25/2011
Seal is pretty tasty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KNW
12:08 AM on 09/26/2011
So ship some out here to the prairies before BBQ season ends!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:32 PM on 09/25/2011
They should cull Canada's conservatives. 70% should be just about right.
09:58 PM on 09/25/2011
"Before humans started industrial fishing, there were large populations of seals and of cod. Clearly, they can coexist perfectly well."

Key part is "BEFORE humans started industrial fishing". Unless that guy wants to kill industrial fishing, upon which rests a very large part of the economy of the Atlantic Provinces, his affirmation makes no sense.

Now, these dissenting scientists are bringing up important points and questions, and I would like to have them answered or their answers publicized before the cull proceeds. For instance, what expected effects will there be on the ecosystem? If seal populations continue to grow at the current rhythm, what effects will that have?
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
09:15 PM on 09/25/2011
Last week, Huffpo ran an article on the proposed cull of 6000 Wolves in northern Saskachawan. No cute pictures, no PETA campaign history just a story on the slaughter of these wolves in order to save a small herd of woodland Caribou that might go extict. Not the Caribou, just this woodland herd. Apart from concerns regarding the impact of the oil exploration that has contributed to this, there was barely an outcry. Reason? no cute pictures, no history of being cute, no Holywood actors with "cute" pictures. Good old double standards at work driven by special interest group propaganda and Walt Disney. The problem is that even in wilderness areas we have so screwed up the balance that we must now take a direct role in trying to re-establish it before our "Walt Disney" mentality prevents it and both species die. You may not like it but that is the current reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KNW
10:06 PM on 09/25/2011
It doesn't look cute, PETA couldn't care less. It very nicely exposes their hypocrisy.
10:48 PM on 09/25/2011
woodland caribou is a diferent species. It's not caribou, it's woodland caribou. Difference between a moose and an elk.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
07:14 AM on 09/26/2011
okay, I learned something. thanks
01:40 PM on 09/26/2011
Respectfully, woodland caribou, boreal caribou, Peary caribou, barren ground cairbou, and reindeer are all the same species, Rangifer tarandus. Each of these, however, has been recognized as a subspecies of Rangifer tarandus. On the other hand, moose (Alces alces) and N.A. elk (Cervus elaphus or Cervus canadensis) are different species.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian UU student
08:49 PM on 09/25/2011
What will be done with all that meat? Let it rot?
09:14 PM on 09/25/2011
I hope not. Put it to market. I'd buy some.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onebluebrick
08:43 PM on 09/25/2011
So, you kill off one species to save another? It will NOT work. This should never be permitted. Who did and left this person in charge of this whole cujlture off wildlife? Does he know if there will be orphans? Does he care?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebbyM
09:12 PM on 09/25/2011
They will go after the babies who are helpless on the ice. Adults will escape so there will be no orphans.
09:16 PM on 09/25/2011
No they won't, that's a lie. It is ILLEGAL in Canada to kill baby seals and has been for more than 30 years! Yet another myth/lie about seal hunting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rightasrain
08:32 PM on 09/25/2011
It appears seal meat is edible and some comments say it's good smoked. I'm serious to know why any animal would be slaughtered and nothing done with the meat. If they multiply at the rate mentioned here, why would they not be harvested? But, this is mild compared to what happens in slaughter houses. My husband worked in a packing house and I have heard storeies I would like to wipe from memory. He didn't participate but the guys on the killing floor seemed to develop a love for torture. If a bull became amorous, as they will during times of fright, they used 22's to eliminate that particular part of the body just for fun.
09:18 PM on 09/25/2011
I hav had seal meat, and it is quit good. Hopefully they put the meat to market.