Is it fighting the drought or fighting the famine? Kind of two different things. Fighting the drought implies that we're somehow going to make it rain over there. Not that I'm against a rain making device, that would certainly be something awesome. Not that fighting the famine is a bad thing either, but really their own government could take care of their own people if not for the fact that they don't use their money to feed their people.

Is that kid eating Cap'n Crunch?

money does not buy rain would seem to be the scientific consensus

money can support a group of 9 000 maharishi vedic pandits and yogic flyers which automatically will create end of drought and end of conflicts

those scientists [[[ permanentpeace.org etc]]]who are aware of what " yogic flying " means and what " superradiance effect " or extended Maharishi effect in published research means know that the only solution not just best or most economical quickest the only solution is funding a group of 9 000 yogic flyers ; those who can contribute monthly can donate at vedicpandits.org

UNESCO says vedic pandits are a prescious intangible heritage of mankind

President Chissano todate is the only head of state who engaged a group of yogic flyers. in 1993 he credited a group of 3 000 yogic flyers in his army with ending the drought and the civil war [ peacefully]

the cold war ended when a group of 7 000 maharishi vedic pandits was funded for about a year and a half in 1988/89 by a multimillionaire

the canadian governemnt can provide the billion dollars endowment fund needed and i have asked them to do so i asked the wisehouse whitehouse to do so in 2008 and 2009

it's like the Nobel prize in chemistry the chemist was ridiculed for his discovery then and now is a winner