Speedy Passage Of Crime Bill Urged

Canada Prison Crime Bill Omnibus

First Posted: 10/06/11 11:55 AM ET Updated: 12/06/11 05:12 AM ET


The Conservatives are estimating the cost of their omnibus crime bill at $78.6 million over five years, a figure the opposition says is unrealistic.


Opposition MPs have been pressing the government for a price tag for the Safe Streets and Communities Act since it was introduced two weeks ago, and hadn't been successful in hearing one until now. During testimony Thursday at a parliamentary committee, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Public Safety Minister Vic Toews touted the bill but never disclosed the figure when asked about associated costs.


At the end of his appearance, Nicholson said he was leaving some documentation with analysis of the costs for the bill with the committee. Nicholson said much of the material had already been given to MPs last spring when they were arguing with the government over disclosing costs of previous crime bills. The papers include a breakdown of the costs for some measures that have already passed, and ones contained in the omnibus crime bill.


The omnibus crime bill combines nine bills that were introduced in previous sessions of Parliament and never passed. Only two come with added costs, according to the government's figures. Increased penalties for drug crimes are estimated to cost $67.7 million over five years because of higher prison populations and new mandatory minimum sentences for sexual offences are expected to cost $10.9 million over two years and additional funding to be approved after that.


On the other seven bills that are contained in the omnibus bill, the government says there are "no federal costs."


The government's figures also indicate that the crime bills already passed by Parliament are estimated to cost $2.5 billion over five years. Those measures, combined with the omnibus bills, brings the total to $2.7 billion over five years.


On Power & Politics with Evan Solomon, Toews said some costs for the omnibus bill will be borne by the provinces and they are aware of that, but he couldn't provide any figures. He also said that the $78.6 million is only an estimate and could fluctuate depending on how many people end up in jail.


"Let's recall that these numbers are very, very sketchy estimates at best," he said. "This is the best we can do in terms of looking into the future."


Toews said officials from different departments came up with the numbers and he couldn't specify the methodology. "I don't figure out the math, I give that to the officials who have all of the available data," said Toews.


Parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page is tackling the omnibus crime bill and will try and come up with his own estimate of its price tag. He said he thinks it will exceed $3 billion but cautioned he had yet to do his analysis.


Toews said that Page has been wrong more often than he has been right.


NDP justice critic Joe Comartin said he had never heard the $78.6-million figure before, and dismissed its accuracy saying the number is "ridiculous."


"They're playing with these figures and they're not accurate," he told CBC News.


Ministers push for quick passage


During the appearance by Toews and Nicholson at the justice committee earlier in the day, they said the crime bill targets the right people while protecting victims and urged its speedy passage.


The few Liberal and NDP MPs on the committee questioned the ministers about the fallout on the provinces from the federal legislation. The justice minister said this is the fourth time the drug law reforms have been proposed and that the provinces are well aware of the possible consequences for them because of increased prisoner populations.


More people are expected to be in jail once the changes are enacted due to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for some drug crimes, including the possession of more than six marijuana plants. The ministers were asked for more specifics on that provision, such as whether someone having six seedling plants in a window box would qualify them for a jail sentence if convicted.


Nicholson said the bill is meant to target drug traffickers, not drug addicts, and that his critics often neglect to mention that the person has to be in possession of the drugs for the purpose of selling them in order to fall under the provision.


Bill aimed at drug traffickers not addicts


"That is an essential element of the offence," he said. The justice minister said that the government's national anti-drug strategy tries to reach those who are addicted to drugs, and that the proposed legislation is not meant to target them.


"Certainly we want to help those individuals who have unfortunately become addicted. This bill is very specific. It goes after those individuals who are in the business of selling and distributing and producing drugs. It takes aim at organized crime," he said.


Other changes proposed in C-10 are wide-ranging and involve amendments to a number of existing laws. The reforms include restricting the use of conditional sentences for certain offences, new mandatory minimum sentences and increasing maximum penalties for some sexual offences, introducing mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug crimes, not allowing pardons to be granted to some repeat offenders, new conditions for prisoner transfers from foreign countries, and allowing Canadians to sue foreign governments for perpetrating or supporting terrorist acts.


The government will issue a list of those foreign governments that would be open to prosecution, and Liberal MP Irwin Cotler asked Toews whether he is willing to consider alternatives to that approach.


Toews said that following an earlier discussion with Cotler on this matter, he asked his officials if it would be justified to consider alternatives to a listing mechanism.


"I'm willing to consider arguments but this is where officials advise us is the best route at this point," said Toews.


The omnibus crime bill, promised by the Conservatives during the spring election, is the subject of much criticism by the opposition parties. It bundles together nine bills that were introduced in previous sessions of Parliament and never passed. With a majority in the House of Commons and Senate now, the Conservatives will be able to push C-10 through successfully. They promised to pass it within 100 sitting days of Parliament.


"I urge the committee to work with the government to support the timely enactment of the safe streets and communities. We are taking action to protect families, stand up for victims and hold individuals accountable," said Nicholson.


The opposition parties have been demanding to know how much all of the reforms are going to cost. The government hadn't provided a price tag for C-10 until Thursday. Every time ministers were asked about one, they said that the cost of crime to victims and society is billions of dollars per year.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

The Conservatives are estimating the cost of their omnibus crime bill at $78.6 million over five years, a figure the opposition says is unrealistic. Opposition MPs have been p...
The Conservatives are estimating the cost of their omnibus crime bill at $78.6 million over five years, a figure the opposition says is unrealistic. Opposition MPs have been p...
Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Capital Ottawa
11:06 AM on 10/07/2011
What's the rush? Crime is at a 30 year low, wouldn't it be prudent to take the time to properly review the Bill to find out how much the legislative changes will cost?

Remember this Bill was based on the Tory notion of "unreported crime" as opposed to real facts and figures collected by Stats Canada. It seems that the supporting documentation requested by Kevin Page is just as fictional as "unreported crime". Canadians deserve to know what this Bill will cost, we will bear the cost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeanMartin
Everything in moderation.
05:22 AM on 10/07/2011
Can we put any politician who votes for this idi0tic bill in one of these new prisons for a few months? After all, they should know first-hand what they've inflicted on us.
11:49 AM on 10/07/2011
What do you mean, for a few months. Leave them there.
photo
Add In Canadia
Egotism is a weakness
05:32 PM on 10/06/2011
Ugh, if people really wanted safer streets and communities, they'd legalize the possession and sale of marijuana already. That way we don't have people shooting each other for drug deals gone wrong. Not to mention it would save a lot of grow op houses from demolition because of mold growth. It would also boost the national economy because a lot of the stuff is sold and passed around tax free as well.
05:31 PM on 10/06/2011
First off, the drug laws regarding trafficking and being part of a criminal enterprise (may not be correct wording) are reverse onus and should be struck. The crown should have to prove the person intends to traffic or is connected to organized crime. Isn't it supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around? Tying the hands of judges by forcing them to give minimum sentences has not worked anywhere, its only purpose is to play into the ideology of the party and to pad their false crime stats ( and set up the donations from the for profit prison industry) I think the country has bigger problems than pot smokers or home growers. I can only assume the Cons are connected to organized crime. They have the perfect opportunity, by letting people grow their own , to take pot profits away from organised crime. It would free up money and allow the police to go after real crime ( which is going down but that doesn't play well). Sorry, I don't believe smoking pot or growing a reasonable( 12 mature plants) amount should be a crime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
06:44 PM on 10/06/2011
hopefully this will be struck down by the courts as the obvious reverse onus as you said. a year 1 university law would know this.. boooo i vote a revote and we get this thuggish goons out of the power they so obviously dont deserve. i do have faith in our judges and that aspect of the judicial system, often their judgements are soft, but when ruling on charter rights issues or protecting our rights from Gov, they are usually the most unbiased, even handed and fair judges i have yet to see. its as if their institution reinforces unbiased and politically neutralness all by itself. madd respect judges pleassse save us and tie these conservatives political hands behind their back as much as possible
08:35 PM on 10/06/2011
Thanks for replying Kristopher Leang. I can't seem to see replies to my post under my original post ,so I have to reply this way. Can you see your own reply? I can only see it under the comments activity section. Two days like this. Anyway , I agree that reverse onus laws should be easy to overturn and agree a first year law student should know this. Trouble is, I have heard this exact same quip since the 70's when they fist started talking about reforming MJ laws and we still have them. They were supposed to not be able to survive a supreme court challenge but they are still being used and have been expanded with the anti-gang and terrorism laws. The crown still determines when you have exceeded the simple possession laws arbitrarily. I also have faith in our judges, they have thrown out a number of MJ laws, as recently as last year. Unfortunately, judges hands are being tied with minimum sentences thanks to our Regressive Conservatives. Conservatives don't like independent thinking, either by judges or the public. They prefer a lemming mentality. I fear for our country.
08:48 PM on 10/06/2011
My tech issue was resolved after I contacted HuffPo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
04:30 PM on 10/06/2011
"Opposition MPs eager to hear more about the costs associated with the lengthy and complex bill did not learn any new figures from the ministers."

No big surprise. The money trail on this will be predictable.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
08:51 PM on 10/06/2011
The only beneficiaries of this nonsense will be the contractors who build the prisons; and, it is likely, the private jail operators Harper no doubt will bring in.
Already, one small part of this bill has soared from about $100 million to almost $600 million. Patent silliness from the Cons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
03:50 PM on 10/06/2011
Statisitcs claim crime is down. The article says the provinces can expect to have more people in jail. I'm confused. If crime is down there should be room for more so why would the provinces have more people in jail?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
04:55 PM on 10/06/2011
They are creating business. That's what these laws are all about. Pass the law, create more business. It is important to understand that governments are just a reaction to the failures of the economic system. That's really all they are. They do 2 things. Regulate the monetary system and the distortions caused by it. And perpetrate war on other countries or its own people. That's it. Am I missing anything?
06:35 PM on 10/06/2011
I believe the provincial and federal jails are overcrowded,. Instead of getting rid of certain useless or outdated laws to bring the population down the cons are doubling down so they can justify building more (privatized) jails. While I am not against harsher penalties if a crime involves violence,children or guns it should not be a government policy to incarcerate people who are non violent and disagree with the government's ideology. The thing that really irks me is they will lock up more people and then say see, there is more crime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
03:36 PM on 10/06/2011
Please, please pass it now! I'm scared to leave my home, what with the teenagers, just look at em out there in their roving gangs, and the packs of dogs, the homeless with the shopping carts, the and the the uh the crackheads hiding in the alley just waiting to break in for their next fix.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
08:56 PM on 10/06/2011
Unfortunately, the cons prey on irrational fears. If you were to ask readers of the Toronto Sun how many murders are committed in the city, they'd probably insists it's 400 or so. In fact, it averages about 60, pretty darn good for a city of 3 million. Perception of crime is often many times greater than the reality.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
02:40 PM on 10/06/2011
Does someone who enjoys a cold beer or two after work considered an alcoholic ? Does he need treatment because he likes to enjoy a few cold ones ?

The same applies to Cannabis. Most people who consume Cannabis aren't addicted to it (when I go on vacation abroad, I'm not biting my finger nails anxiously awaiting my return to Canada, I simply enjoy myself without Cannabis).

So if we want to tackle organized crime, wouldn't it then make more sense to allow people to grow up to, say, 8-12 plants so that they can smoke stuff they grow themselves, but more importantly, to NOT feed money towards organized crime ?

Smoking Cannabis isn't a deficiency, it's a civil right.

You want to hit organized crime where it hurts ? Make growing Cannabis for personal consumption legal, and put a cap on it so that it doesn't get abused.

But, all I say falls on deaf ears when it comes to our current government who is insistent on pushing through the same failed American policies that is causing so much strain on their system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
03:52 PM on 10/06/2011
It won't be long before there will be random drug tests at the border as there is random testing generally. Sniffer dogs are also more common.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:50 PM on 10/06/2011
How about leaving out the pot possession stuff?
It is also kind of hard for the 5 million Canadian pot smokers
to find a dealer with 5 plants.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
12:33 PM on 10/06/2011
What's the hurry? If it is so vital, why are they avoiding attempts to debate its merits?
01:25 PM on 10/06/2011
because there are no merits to it. It is a sledgehammer solution in search of a problem, completely ideologically driven with no attention paid to reality.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
01:43 PM on 10/06/2011
Exactly.
06:06 PM on 10/06/2011
Follow the money.
Who stands to benefit from the passing of this inhumane bill ?
Which politicians do these people end up donating to ?
This stuff is happening under the guise of ideology but it is politics as usual.

The Conservatives think that adding a steady flow of influence buying cash invigorates the political machinery and allows for great accomplishments. ( like holding on to power )
History shows otherwise.

Plenty of attention IS being paid to 'reality'.
Just not, you know, 'your' reality

Huzzah ! Huzzah !
02:52 PM on 10/06/2011
They think the US is the model to follow, and it will look like the East German Stasi state of the 80s following the Soviet Union as it headed for collapse. The problem is that Canada will have to pay for this fiasco with more taxes wasted on the punitive state and the slippery slope of loss of liberty which ends in the latest incarnation of the US, which has abandoned the rule of law.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
08:59 PM on 10/06/2011
A lot of American jurisdictions, even those with extremist Republican lawmakers, are finally waking up to the fact that jailing everyone on sight is a very expensive and counterproductive proposition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AC Fraser
bend before you break
12:30 PM on 10/06/2011
The Cons won't show any new figures, because they don't want to disclose how much this useless expansion of the jail system is going to cost the taxpayers. And they're not big on useless things like statistics anyways - since they aren't letting the fact that the crime rate in Canada has been dropping to get in the way of their Politics of Fear. I wouldn't be surprised if Harper and his cronies are paving the way for the privatization of the Canadian penal system.

Open wide, Canada, Bill C-10 is about to be shoved down your gullet.