Ontario Election: Voter Turnout An All-Time Low

First Posted: 10/07/11 08:25 PM ET Updated: 10/07/11 10:03 PM ET

Vote

TORONTO - A majority of eligible Ontario residents didn't cast a ballot in Thursday's election, marking the first time turnout in the province dipped below 50 per cent.

Preliminary figures from Elections Ontario show that the unofficial voter turnout was 49.02 per cent.

It marks a new low in turnout for Ontario elections, though voter turnout at all levels has been steadily declining for years. The number shouldn't be surprising, said Carleton University political science professor Jon Pammett. The 50-per-cent mark is more of a mental barrier, he said.

"I'm not sure I'd say it's significant, but you might consider it symbolic," he said. "It's a symptom of an overall attitude to public participation."
In 2007, the last provincial election, 52.1 per cent of voters went to the polls and in 2003 the voter turnout was 56.8 per cent. The turnout is even lower than the 50.6 per cent of eligible voters who cast a ballot in Toronto's municipal election last year.

And there's nothing to suggest it won't keep slipping.

"It's hard to see anything working at the moment to push turnout up," Pammett said.

Voter fatigue after a federal election in May and municipal elections last October and tapped-out party resources likely contributed to the low turnout, but Queen's University political studies professor Scott Matthews thinks the main issue is fairly simple.

"It was kind of a boring campaign," he said. "It didn't really raise any issues to really excite the interests of voters."

Elections Ontario introduced some new ways to vote, and the turnout at advance polls was up, but Matthews said he suspects those were people who would have voted on Thursday anyway.

"These things don't matter all that much," he said. "People don't decide to stay home because it's just too hard to walk down the street and cast a ballot at the local church. They stay home because they're just not interested."

The responsibility for turning that around lies with the parties, who need to better engage voters and differentiate themselves, Matthews said. High-stakes elections can get people out to the polls in higher numbers, but there wasn't a sense of that this time, he said.

"When the sort of central elements of public policy are shared by the leading parties, why would you turn out to vote?" Matthews said. "You know things are going to work out pretty much OK anyway."

The federal election in May produced a slight increase in voter turnout, 61.1 per cent up from 58.8 in the 2008 federal election. Turnout also increased federally in 2006 in the election that saw Prime Minister Stephen Harper first wrest power away from the Liberals.

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath, speaking Friday morning in Hamilton, said voters were turned off by negative campaigning.

"If politics continues to just be about the ugly fighting between people who want power, the people of the province, the voters, the residents of Ontario, get lost in that fight," she said. "Then it's no wonder that they become cynical and they walk away from voting."

In a riding-by-riding analysis, voter turnout appears to have been lowest in areas just outside Toronto. The riding of Mississauga-Brampton South saw the smallest turnout at 37.3 per cent.

Those regions are ones in which a lot of new Canadians tend to settle, and recent immigrants are one group of people who, research shows, are less likely to vote, Matthews said. Other low turnout groups include youth and low-income people, he said.

According to the preliminary numbers, the riding with the highest turnout was Huron-Bruce, where about 60.1 per cent of voters cast their ballots. That riding is where Agriculture Minister Carol Mitchell lost her seat to Conservative Lisa Thompson, general manager of the Ontario Dairy Goat Co-operative.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:19 AM on 10/11/2011
Anyone have any idea who the author of this article is? I'd like to use it as a basis for a causal relationship assignment and I'm dreadfully in need of the author's name! Please PLEASE HELP! Urgent.
05:35 PM on 10/09/2011
When there was nothing to get exicted about, why expext a high turnout
11:04 AM on 10/09/2011
In Alberta, we have voter turnout in the 30% range.

It isn't "voter burnout." You guys are so damn homogenized you represent nothing.

You're so focused on winning that you pursue agendas that assure that voters won't turn out.

You so want to win that you blockade people with strong voices.

Somehow no one has identified that having 50 to 70 percent of your population disaffected is a situation that will eventually lead to radicalization.

The Politics of the Bland.
11:34 PM on 10/08/2011
We should offer voting online. It could not hurt voter turn out to have it as an option.
12:24 PM on 10/08/2011
Foreigners did not vote!
11:07 AM on 10/09/2011
I'd like to see you substantiate that.

Foreign born candidates seem particularly effective in organizing their groups to vote. They tell the men who to vote for, then the men tell their wives who they are voting for, and all of them make sure to get to the polls.

Effective.
11:02 AM on 10/08/2011
Two thoughts. Maybe that new low in voter turnout is an indicator of the new low of contestants in the political arena(especially federally). Secondly the voter numbers would come way up in the next election if they had on the ballot none of the above. My aunt Kay,who was very active in politics, after an election used to say just a bunch of new pigs at the trough-no matter who won!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
09:38 AM on 10/08/2011
I honestly believe that low voter turnout in this most recent provincial election had more to do with lack of choice rather than voter apathy or burnout. The Liberals should have recognized that McGuinty was done before the election - he pulled a really risky move by going into this vote and almost pulled an Ignatief. The leaders of the political parties need to realize when they've seen their time and do their party a favour and step aside. In addition to this, the party leaders seem less and less able to read the political nature of the province. Whether it's being able to tell if their time is done and which issues to press the most...they just don't know how to pull the voters off the couch...this election seemed just like the federal election: one saying, trust me I have experience (Harper/McGuinty); another saying how can you trust him (Ignatief/Hudak); and the last saying, I'm neither of them but I have a very nice smile (Layton/Horwath - not to be a hit at Layton I love him). People are tired, and haven't seen change for years...give them a break....
09:07 AM on 10/08/2011
Has anyone experienced any real change in the past 30 years or so? No matter who we vote for, we get the same results. Higher taxes, lower services, ideological bickering...but no real change. We elect a local representative who shuffles off to parliament to follow the party line. We really have no local representation anymore.

The game is rigged and I think more and more voters are recognizing that fact. Our standard of living is continually eroded.Oour real income has been steadily dropping, and people don't believe that politicians have any answers. In my opinion, voting implies confidence in a broken system. We may be entering a time where you will have a larger turnout for revolution than you will at the voting booth.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
02:14 PM on 10/08/2011
richer...I wish you could articulate for me what real change you want to see. I hear this a lot but no one seems to want to explain what they mean.
03:26 PM on 10/08/2011
Perhaps you should read my comment again. It shouldn't be too difficult to ascertain what I'm getting at but I'll indulge you a little.

How about fiscal responsibility? Can you tell me what government in the last 30 to 40 years that has exercised fiscal responsibility?

Smaller government? We don't need all of these services, its time to seriously cut back. Focus on the essentials and deliver them with high customer service. Government is too big to manage efficiently and they keep adding new programs like daycare.

A civil parliament where things get done. Once the election is over, put aside partisanship and work for the people that voted you in. Compromise. Integrity.

Vote for your constituencies best interest and not the party's interest. If we want to see trained seals, we'll go to Marineland.

Does that satisfy you a little?
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
08:31 AM on 10/08/2011
The problem is that we have always voted to punish, not to elect. It is now obvious that the punishment has not worked so most of the voters have quit trying.
07:39 AM on 10/08/2011
Andrea Horvath's claim about not engaging in negative politics is starting to wear thin. I have the feeling that is just a strategy to power, not a conviction. McGuinty might be in forever now. Next time we will have 42% voter turn out due to public and Media apathy. That is a winning strategy.
They all ran lacklustre campaigns . The media did not focus on the real issues about debt, sustainability, demographics, energy. When the bill comes due, maybe McGuinty won't want to be in power.
07:31 AM on 10/08/2011
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE MARXISTS THAT RULE CANADA WANT.

Communists and Marxists want everyone to think like they do.

Until there are 0 percent voting, the Marxists will not be happy.

They bore everybody to death will Marxist policies and then wonder why a sleeping population can't get out of bed to vote?

Not just that but the teachers union used THE TAXPAYERS money to get McGiggles elected again.

Canada is ONE vote away from being a full blown Communist country.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
02:16 PM on 10/08/2011
Teachers used taxyer money to get McGuinty elected....Can you provide me with an objective source for that assertion?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
02:03 AM on 10/08/2011
Surely somewhere there is a political scientist who has written a series of questions to determine who is voting and who is not. The question as to why they are not voting can be answered second once we determine who is and who is not voting. List characteristics such as age, sex, ethnicty etc., to establish some groups. Look also at economics and geographical locations. Select a number of regional sites. Draw some conclusions then test other sites to see if there is parallel patterns. This can't be that difficult. Skip the why they aren't just determine who they are. The why will probalby be pretty obvious.
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
12:53 AM on 10/08/2011
Low voter turnout is a dangerous sign that politicians should pay more attention to. Historically it has meant an underlying current of hostility towards government because government is "out of touch" with them. It doesn't usually end well if the trend of not representing voters continues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
09:32 PM on 10/07/2011
The issue is even simpler than voter fatigue - politicians today can best be described using the "same manure different pile" analogy. To many Canadians, there seems to be little point in voting when you know from experience that candidates will simply toe party lines rather than representing what their constituents want.

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
02:07 AM on 10/08/2011
We have moved away from what constituents want to what politicians are willing to do and right now they do nothing for the electorate but fabricate ideas and chase them. Back to my other question above. Who is not voting? Where are they not voting. Once we know we will be pretty quick in knowing why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
08:57 PM on 10/07/2011
If you don't vote, don't complain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jesusocialist
Austerity Is Fealty. Power To The Poor.
12:22 AM on 10/08/2011
Everyone has a right to complain.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
02:17 PM on 10/08/2011
you have the right to complain but don't be surprised if no one listens to you
02:01 AM on 10/09/2011
If you don't vote then you have no right to complain.