Air Canada Strike: Federal Government To Intervene

Air Canada

First Posted: 10/11/11 10:37 PM ET Updated: 12/11/11 05:12 AM ET

MONTREAL - The federal government is moving to prevent a strike Thursday by Air Canada flight attendants by sending the matter to the Canada Industrial Relations Board for review.

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt told CTV News that a reference will be sent to the board Wednesday asking it to examine the difficulties in winning ratification of two tentative agreements reached by company and union negotiators.

"While the matter is before the CIRB, there cannot be a work stoppage," Raitt said from Vancouver.

Raitt said the board should not only look at the potential work stoppage and notice of strike issued Sunday, which set the clock ticking towards a legal strike, but the overall way in which the ratification failed.

Air Canada (TSX:AC.B) issued a statement late Tuesday that said it had confirmed Raitt's comments said the airline's representatives would will appear before the CIRB as required.

"Further details are not available at this point. It will remain business as usual at Air Canada and all flights will continue to operate as scheduled," the company said.

The latest twist in Air Canada's troubled contract negotiations comes after members of the union rejected the latest agreement, which was supported by leaders of the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

The tentative deal was reached Sept. 20 with the help of a federal mediator appointed by Raitt and the threat of back-to-work legislation that could have been quickly passed while the House of Commons was sitting.

The reference buys the government time to pass back to work legislation once the House of Commons resumes sitting on Monday.

Members of Parliament could have been recalled to pass any back-to-work legislation. But House rules would have prevented any law from being passed until after the start of the threatened strike early Thursday.

Earlier Tuesday afternoon, the union announced that its negotiators were prepared to resume talks and called on Air Canada to address more of the issues that have upset the airline's 6,800 flight attendants over the past decade.

"While no formal talks have taken place yet, we are ready to return to the table and find a way to keep our members and the public flying with a fair collective agreement," said Jeff Taylor, president of the Air Canada Component of the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

"Our members are clearly frustrated, and are demanding their sacrifices over the past 10 years be addressed," Taylor added. "Air Canada must be prepared to more on our key issues."

The union hasn't said publicly which parts of the previous agreement were rejected by the members. CUPE has also declined requests for comment and said it wouldn't make further comments to the media at this time.

Raitt said she's not clear on why flight attendants rejected two agreements given that Taylor had said the latest agreement gave workers 80 per cent of what they wanted.

Flight attendants she's spoken with were all over the place about what they liked and disliked about the two deals.
"It's a bit of a dog's breakfast," she said.

Sources say Air Canada's desire to start a low-cost carrier using lower paid new hires is just one of several issues that likely prompted a second rejection of a tentative deal. Workers fear this model will create a dangerous precedent that could be transferred to the mainline carrier.

Workers also felt increased pay during layovers and a nine per cent overall wage increase over four years wasn't enough compensation for sacrifices made since the airline obtained creditor protection in 2003.

A strike lasting a couple of days would cost the airline about $11.7 million a day in operating revenues and $1.2 million in operating profit, said Robert Kokonis, president of airline consulting firm AirTrav Inc.

Air Canada (TSX:AC.B) said it would operate a partial schedule with the help of company managers, Star Alliance partners and Air Canada Express flights operated by Jazz and Sky Regional Airlines.

While hopeful that a disruption could be avoided, the airline said it continued to "make the necessary preparations to minimize any inconvenience to our customers."

Kokonis said two-thirds of passengers, particularly business travellers and some leisure ticket holders, would rebook flights or make due with the reduced service.

Those most likely to be affected by a strike would be passengers unable to switch carriers or those flying to more remote destinations or where there isn't a lot of competition, he said.

WestJet Airlines (TSX:WJA), which has 35 to 40 per cent share of the Canadian airlines market, announced plans to add extra domestic and transborder flights to accommodate "stranded" Air Canada passengers.

The Calgary-based carrier was playing into passenger fears that could threaten to tarnish Air Canada's reputation, said Kokonis.
Via Rail also announced Tuesday that it would add capacity "as required" if there's a disruption of services at Air Canada.

Weary passengers could switch to alternative airlines longer term, fearful that the flight attendant strike will not be quickly resolved or that future negotiations with pilots and mechanics could break down.

A second contract rejection left the airline questioning the legitimacy of the union's representation. No members of the executive have resigned, but some flight attendants have launched a campaign against the executive.

George Smith, currently a fellow at Queen's University's School of Policy Studies, said the union likely looked at arbitration as its best chance to oppose the airline's efforts to reduce costs and possibly launch a low-cost carrier.

"I think they think that they can do better in arbitration than they can do in negotiations," he said, adding that union members wouldn't lose much pay under that scenario.

Recent arbitration cases involving Air Canada customer service agents and Canada Post workers have required arbitrators to choose either the union's or the employer's position. That leads arbitrators to favour gradualism rather than hand either side a major victory.

For example, the recent arbitration ruling granting the union's proposal for a hybrid pension plan for new customer service hires has prevented Air Canada from achieving its objectives, Smith said in an interview.

Benoit Poirier of Desjardins Capital Markets said a strike by Air Canada flight attendants would be "slightly positive" for Transat (TSX:TRZ.B) since it reduces the potential threat of low-cost carrier despite the threat of government intervention.

Air Canada's discount carrier would compete against Transat and others on transatlantic, Caribbean and Mexican low-cost leisure routes.
On the Toronto Stock Exchange, Air Canada's shares closed down three cents to $1.38 in Tuesday trading.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

MONTREAL - The federal government is moving to prevent a strike Thursday by Air Canada flight attendants by sending the matter to the Canada Industrial Relations Board for review. Labour Minister L...
MONTREAL - The federal government is moving to prevent a strike Thursday by Air Canada flight attendants by sending the matter to the Canada Industrial Relations Board for review. Labour Minister L...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:34 PM on 10/12/2011
The last time Air Canada employees wanted to strike they planned on doing so there was no disruption of service. There are other airlines a person can take so it is not an essential service. As far as cargo goes, attendants are not needed on those flights. the Cons threatened back to work legislation before bargaining was over putting the union in an impossible bargaining situation.
Air Canada in no longer a Crown corporation and the only reason the Cons butted in was to weaken the union, that it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:32 PM on 10/12/2011
Labour board to decide on who is or isnt an essential service? Thats rich! an un-elected board of nobodys, making decisions for industry.
03:22 PM on 10/12/2011
At last, a government that takes the travelling public into consideration. The flight attendants got 80% of what they asked for, and ignored the recommendation of their own union.
Perhaps they might want to take into consideration that firstly, the airline must be able to compete, if not, none of them will have jobs. !!
photo
The Canadian
Stop Harper
02:28 PM on 10/12/2011
Fight on union brothers and sisters!

Unions are one of the very few counter-balancing forces to corporate power, and continue to protect the rights of ALL workers in Canada, although many people who are rabidly anti-union are too foolish to understand that.

By the way, if you disagree with my last statement, look up the history of labour laws, the benefits of which non-unionized workers enjoy. Labour laws, which brought you things like lunch hours, breaks, 40-hour work weeks, overtime, and the right to not die on your job, were drafted using union collective agreements as templates. Unions may not be perfect, but a workworld without them would be a horrible place.
01:41 PM on 10/12/2011
Conservative intervention makes everything worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
05:21 PM on 10/12/2011
More appropriate woulfd be government intervention inappropriate. Were you alive when Trudeau announced the 5 and 4. If you are wondering? He legislated the maximum amount a raise could be in inflationary times. That was governemtn intervention but it was liberal just for the record.
01:04 PM on 10/12/2011
It's funny that the Tories cite the fragile economy to justify back-to-work legislation because one of the major reasons why the economy is so fragile and at risk of collapsing is because workers are underpaid while CEOs are allowed to get multi-million dollar bonuses.
photo
The Canadian
Stop Harper
02:21 PM on 10/12/2011
Let me be your first fan.
11:39 AM on 10/12/2011
Little babies cant get their act together so its the governments fault.WestJet rules! No union.
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
12:08 PM on 10/12/2011
But how can it be successful and have a content workforce without a union? Is that even possible?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:18 PM on 10/12/2011
It couldn't be about the fact that Westjet still has it's founder involved in it's operations and Air Canada has been around since the 30's - not to mention it's founder is the Government, not someone passionate about the industry.

I put this as the main reasoning between WestJet and Air Canada in terms of employee satisfaction. Not to mention that they empower their staff and also match share purchases.

When WestJet has been around for 3/4s of a century and their founders are no longer involved, then we will see if WestJet needs a union or not.
06:15 PM on 10/12/2011
Yes it is possible.
It is also a lot easier for employers to completely screw over their employees in the absence of organized opposition.
So which scenario seems rife with the potential for abuse to you ?
Which group do you believe requires leverage to counter dirty tricks ?

BTW No one is going to mistake you for a rich capitalist so you can stop posting as if you were one.
11:16 AM on 10/12/2011
Harper doesn't care what union members think of him.
He is a divisive person and wont hesitate to alienate people who don't agree with him.

Union members simply don't vote conservative so he couldn't care less about their rights to go on strike.
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
12:10 PM on 10/12/2011
Of course he cares - as we all do.
We all care about things that are detrimental to our economy - and unions are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nescobar
The CPC.....it's a small mind after all
12:43 PM on 10/12/2011
In the same vein he also cares about democracy, environmental laws, and labour laws. Because he also views them as detrimental to his agenda.
06:24 PM on 10/12/2011
Oopsy turkey guy....you forgot to finish your sentence.
Here, let me help you

We all care about things that are detrimenta­l to our economy - and unions are the last line of defense against business owners who, in light of the current government, feel that they will be shielded from the consequences of their bad faith negotiations with a wink and a nod from Ottawa.

It is open season on the Canadian worker.
Unions are the only way to shift the balance of power.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
10:19 AM on 10/12/2011
Harper doesn't want the Flight Attendants to strike. Perhaps its because they are mainly women and in his world...
11:39 AM on 10/12/2011
Proof it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
05:25 PM on 10/12/2011
Hard to debate this historically since there have been many Air Canada disruptions and reactions by past PM's. Yet it can not be tested since Kim Campbell isn't really considered a true PM.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Capital Ottawa
06:54 AM on 10/12/2011
Instead of interfering with the business of a private company, perhaps the government could turn it's attention to upholding our labour laws. In Canada workers have the right to collective bargaining, which includes the right to strike. AC flight attendants have rejected AC's deal twice primarily because of the two tiered pay grid AC would like to introduce. Take that off the table and a strike would be averted. AC wants to reduce it's employees wages (two tiered system) while the CEO lines his own pocket, disgraceful.
12:16 AM on 10/12/2011
I applaud the feds for threatening to intervene. AC is a private company with no ties to the government, although many people still call it our "flag carrier", whatever that means. AC being crippled by a strike would do harm to Canada's economy since they carry the bulk of air travellers.
Ignoring Kyoto is another great move, imo. While they're at it, cancel all foreign aid. I want my tax dollars spent on me, not to enrich despots...but I digress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
01:08 AM on 10/12/2011
You must be giddy then, about the additional $10 million your feds spent on Libya securing arms, the billions on new jet fighters and the rest of the billions on the new prisons.

Do you need to get fitted before the money is spent on you?
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
12:06 PM on 10/12/2011
Obviously you, and the other clues below, don't get sarcasm when you see it.
RSole is a leftie.
Clue #1. No Conservative ever advocates spending tax dollars on themselves.
Clue #2. His nom de plume.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
02:05 AM on 10/12/2011
So you like big government when it comes to intervening in the private negotiations between a private company and its employees, you don't like the scientific method and you' don't think there are benefits of foreign aid...but I digress.
02:28 AM on 10/12/2011
Private company?
They aren't very private about taking tax dollars to bail them out time and time again.
Sure, let's pay everyone $200 an hour and bail them out with tax dollars.
Will we give West Jet the same subsidies?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
11:46 PM on 10/11/2011
We have no 'Federal Government' in Canada anymore. All we have is Harper.
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pollclaire
jeu d'esprit
12:40 AM on 10/12/2011
I'm from Wisconsin. All we have is Walker, and some closed schools.

An education is no longer an enhancement to citizenship; the only thing that matters is your degree of willingness to work for a lower wage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
02:06 AM on 10/12/2011
But you have the Packers. Go Pack!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
11:15 PM on 10/11/2011
What is the point of even having collective rights if the government will not honour them anyways?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
05:31 PM on 10/12/2011
The government is driven by the middle class working and retired of large urban centres but not to the point they reflect many of their positional moves but enough through taxes and polular themes such as justice and health. Once they gain power they persue other interests.
10:29 PM on 10/11/2011
I'd be interested to see what Air Canada employees earn versus West Jet employees. I suspect that the Air Canada employees are not only better paid, they have a far superior benefits package.
10:49 PM on 10/11/2011
I'm sure AC employees have better pay and benefits. My hope isn't to take that away from them, but for WJ employees to eventually get the same or better.
11:17 PM on 10/11/2011
I wish I could earn as much too, but at what point do you draw the line? Is $30 an hour enough to serve coffee? Maybe put a tip jar at the front of the cabin?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
02:07 AM on 10/12/2011
Why should they be paid at all? Better still, why don't the passengers just vote on who flies the plane and who serves them?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmac0812
Think first, Act Second
02:30 AM on 10/12/2011
Sure they could get some third world pilot who will sail them right into the ocean and they could think of all the money they saved as their are about to take the plunge into the frigid North Atlantic!