Keystone Pipeline Review Will Be 'Open-Minded': Clinton

Pipeline

First Posted: 10/11/11 07:30 PM ET Updated: 12/11/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says her department does not have a pro-pipeline bias as it determines whether to give the green light to TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL project.

"I have no reason to believe" that State Department officials are in favour of the pipeline, Clinton said in an editorial roundtable at The Associated Press on Tuesday.

She added State Department officials have been open-minded throughout the review process. Officials are slated to decide on the fate of the project by the end of the year.

"The department, both here in Washington and in Ottawa, has been very much in 'listen-and-outreach' mode," she said. "They have met with, talked with, received information from a very large group of interested parties; some for, some against."

Clinton acknowledged the issue was an emotional one, with strong opinions on both sides of what has become a fiery debate in the United States about Keystone XL. She also suggested some of the opposition to the pipeline in the six affected states might be politically motivated.

"You have states that are welcoming it, states that are rejecting it, all of whom, I think, are governed by Republicans, or maybe one isn't," she said.

In fact, only one governor has come out in opposition to the $7 billion pipeline, Nebraska Republican Dave Heineman. Congressional Republicans, meantime, are almost uniformly in favour of the project.

Despite the emotions, Clinton said State Department officials have been "extremely careful and thoughtful."

"I have been having our team go forward and do what they are supposed to do," she said.

Damon Moglen of Friends of the Earth scoffed at Clinton's reassurances of impartiality, pointing out that Clinton said last October she was leaning towards granting the permit to TransCanada.

"She made it clear a year ago she was biased," he said.

"The documents released through freedom-of-information requests have proven that not only is she biased, but other senior members of her department have acted with bias and complicity to TransCanada."

Keystone XL has become a political hot potato for the State Department, especially since it released emails last week that suggested a cosy relationship between those working on the file and TransCanada's chief lobbyist, Paul Elliott. Elliott worked on Clinton's unsuccessful presidential bid in 2008.

The New York Times made fresh conflict-of-interest allegations in a weekend piece, reporting that the State Department failed to do an impartial environmental assessment of Keystone XL by hiring an environmental consulting firm, Houston-based Cardno Entrix, recommended to it by TransCanada itself.

A TransCanada official confirmed the company had hired Cardno Entrix for work on other pipeline projects and was among the firms it suggested to the State Department.

But the spokesman also said TransCanada had no say over the State Department's decision to hire Cardno Entrix.

Keystone XL would carry millions of barrels a week of carbon-intensive oilsands crude from northern Alberta to refineries on the Gulf Coast. The pipeline has become a symbol of an increasingly heated debate in the U.S. about the country's reliance on fossil fuels and a perceived reluctance to embrace renewable sources of energy.

The pipeline has become a flashpoint for the environmental movement in the United States following last year's failed federal climate change legislation. Hundreds of people were arrested this summer in protests outside the White House aimed at convincing U.S. President Barack Obama to put the brakes to the pipeline.

The pipeline's opponents argue the project is a disaster waiting to happen as it traverses environmentally fragile areas of the U.S. Midwest, pointing to a series of recent spills along oil pipelines.

Proponents, meantime, say the pipeline will create much-needed jobs and help end American reliance on oil from volatile and sometime hostile OPEC regimes.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier story misidentified Friends of the Earth's Damon Moglen.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

WASHINGTON - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says her department does not have a pro-pipeline bias as it determines whether to give the green light to TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL projec...
WASHINGTON - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says her department does not have a pro-pipeline bias as it determines whether to give the green light to TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL projec...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:00 PM on 10/12/2011
For a Real experts view

To view Professor Goeke's biography, please click here: http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=41
To view the ad please click here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCTGMFAIYRg
Keystone XL will be the most modern pipeline built to date in North America. No other pipeline will operate with the same safety and operating procedures. If approved by the end of 2011, TransCanada would begin construction in early 2012. This privately-funded, shovel-ready project would put 20,000 people to work – constructing the pipeline and manufacturing the equipment for it. Keystone XL would inject $7 billion into the U.S. economy, and allow the United States to receive a safe, secure and reliable supply of Canadian and U.S. oil to enhance America's energy security.
06:59 PM on 10/12/2011
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA--(Marketwire - Sept. 26, 2011) -

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Professor Emeritus and Hydrogeologist Jim Goeke spent 41 years studying the unique structure of Ogallala aquifer. He has spoken out about the aquifer for a number of months now, including testifying before the Nebraska Legislature's Natural Resources Committee meeting in November 2010 where he made the following statement:
"A leak of the Keystone XL pipeline would not affect the majority of the Ogallala aquifer...those who think that a leaking pipeline will destroy the aquifer in Nebraska need to understand that it would be localized to an area of 10's or 100's of feet around the pipeline."
It is important to note that Professor Goeke is speaking in the ads as an independent expert – he received no compensation from TransCanada. Goeke says he has spent his career investigating the aquifer and says he would not promote something he thought was going to harm that area. He says he simply wants to get the facts out.
"I have spent my career drilling holes into and through the Ogallala formation," said Professor Emeritus Jim Goeke. "There is a misconception that if the aquifer is contaminated the entire water supply of Nebraska is going to be in danger – that is absolutely false.

"I understand the passion and emotion around the aquifer," added Goeke. "Consistent with my life's work, I am compelled to speak out on this subject because science has been lacking from the debate in this State."
08:21 AM on 10/12/2011
One more example that Hillary and Bill Clinton are the world champions of selling influence to gain political power and personal wealth. I am sure they will move from the ranks of mega-millionaires to billionaires when Hillary leaves government and joins Bill in racking in huge "speaking and consulting fees" from grateful corporations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
10:18 PM on 10/11/2011
I am not buying this, HRC!

You WILL approve this solely because of the fact that The Pratt House dictates everything State Department does.

You remember Pratt, don't you? If not, here is a video of you outsourcing State Dept. policy to The Pratt House: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfpgl6NqF0I&feature=related .

Now, Since David Rockefeller is Chairman Emeritus at Pratt and if Exxon desires this pipeline, then you will APPROVE it without reading one damn objection.