Canada Should Arrest George W. Bush On B.C. Visit Next Week: Amnesty International

George W Bush Amnesty International Arrest

First Posted: 10/12/11 11:57 AM ET Updated: 12/12/11 05:12 AM ET

OTTAWA - Amnesty International wants the federal government to arrest former U.S. president George W. Bush when he visits British Columbia next week.

The rights body said both Canadian and international law require Canada to detain Bush and investigate him for war crimes and torture.

"It is incumbent upon Canadian officials to investigate, arrest and prosecute former president Bush for torture when he arrives in Canada a week tomorrow," said Alex Neve, Amnesty Canada's secretary general.

Bush and former president Bill Clinton are scheduled to attend an economic conference in Surrey, B.C. next week.

Neve said many will argue that arresting Bush is unrealistic because the United States is a close and powerful ally or that the crisis after 9-11 required extraordinary measures.

"None of those arguments justify inaction under international law," he said.

Neve conceded that arresting a former president would likely cause tension with the United States, but "taking a principled step merits that sort of strain."

Neve said Bush admitted in his memoirs that he authorized the use of torture against terror suspects.

American authorities used a variety of torture methods, including water boarding, beatings and sleep deprivation, Neve said. The Bush administration used euphemisms such as "enhanced interrogation techniques," but these methods constituted torture.

"All of this was authorized and condoned and put in place through his own repeated decisions."

Neve said the international arm of Amnesty sent a lengthy brief to Justice Minister Rob Nicholson outlining the government's responsibilities under international law and urging him to act.

"This is something the entire global movement stands behind," Neve said.

Nicholson's office did not respond to a call for comment on Amnesty's demand.

RELATED VIDEO:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

OTTAWA - Amnesty International wants the federal government to arrest former U.S. president George W. Bush when he visits British Columbia next week.The rights body said both Canadian and internationa...
OTTAWA - Amnesty International wants the federal government to arrest former U.S. president George W. Bush when he visits British Columbia next week.The rights body said both Canadian and internationa...
Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,490
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ray Russelburg
01:14 PM on 10/18/2011
Isn't it amazing how everyone feels that something THEY do is never wrong UNLESS it's someone ELSE doing it?

The End Does Not Justify The Means.

Torture is wrong no matter what you call it.

"Do unto other as you would have them do unto you." If this bible verse was law bush would be in serious trouble......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:15 PM on 10/17/2011
Is AI calling for the arrest of those responsible for Tianamon Square massacres?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:14 PM on 10/17/2011
Where is AI on this?

"The former dissident said Gorbachev should be brought to justice because from 1989 to 1991 he ordered the dissolution of several protest demonstrations, which led to the death of 100 people as Soviet police and military clashed with violent protesters. The demonstrators were said to have been promoting nationalist slogans in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Lithuania. "

http://rt.com/politics/bukovsky-gorbachev-london-lawsuit/

Pretty selective arrest list they have,...could there be politics involved?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:08 PM on 10/17/2011
Gorbachev was in Canada, why wasn't AI calling for his arrest?
He killed hundreds of his own citizens.
Why aren't they calling for Castro's arrest?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
10:41 AM on 10/16/2011
Arrest? That's so yesterday. Do the words "Extraordinary Rendition" mean anything to you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loveisallyouneed2
"Wow! Wow! Wow!" -- Steve Jobs' last words
07:41 PM on 10/15/2011
W Bush is so guilty of so many infractions against US and Intl law. If this man dares to show his bloody face beyond US borders, he should be arrested and tried, for crimes against humanity. Says something if the only path to justice we Americans can even hope for, come from beyond US borders. What does that say about US laws, morals and justice? It says, that there is one other reason to Occupy Wall Street, Haliburton being one of the badies.
09:36 AM on 10/15/2011
Canada arresting an American President??? LMAO! Yeah, right. That's as ridiculous as a five year-old grabbing a pair of handcuffs and attempting to apprehend George Christie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
05:42 AM on 10/14/2011
Yo, CANADA! HE IS ALL YOURS! HAVE AT IT!
11:47 PM on 10/13/2011
There are several countries that want to charge Bush for war crimes.Seems like he should be charged with useing 911 as an excuse to attack the wrong country and if being a threat and having weapons of mass destruction was justification to invade, why didn't Bush invade North Korea?
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
05:40 PM on 10/14/2011
It does not have oil.
It's too close to China.
It's army is way too big.

(not necessarily in that order)
12:14 AM on 10/16/2011
Nope, sorry, none of the above. We haven't TOUCHED Iraqi oil. The reason we went after Iraq over WMD's but not North Korea is pretty damn simple. North Korea has never made direct threats against us. Saddam most certainly has. Big difference.
10:51 PM on 10/13/2011
To Democrats:

"You chose policies that do not create jobs. You chose policies that grow government­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­. Don't complain to us about jobs. You're getting what you want. You're getting what you voted for. You were asked to choose between fewer regulation­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s to speed up innovation­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­, and you chose more regulation­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s­­. You did not choose a path that would lead to an expansioni­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s­­t economy. You did not choose policies or a path that would lead to enhanced opportunit­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­y for prosperity­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­. You were asked to choose between more free trade or more union controls over business, and what did you choose? You chose more union control. So everything you've chosen, you've gotten. And therefore I don't understand why you're complainin­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­g­­, because you got everything you wanted.”"
RL”””
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
03:02 PM on 10/15/2011
Off topic. This thread is about Pres. Bush and his policies about interrogation and International Law.
07:52 PM on 10/15/2011
In case you have not noticed, Republicans have blocked every single move the Obama administration has made since day one. The current administration has not been able to lead due to the obstuctionist game plan of your ilk. The tactics of delay and deny will ultimately backfire as most evil does, so you will get what you want least and deserve most. FOUR MORE YEARS!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:09 PM on 10/17/2011
How did they do that when Obama had a majority in both the senate and the house?
10:49 PM on 10/13/2011
Wow, great job Obama.

Is this the "Change We Need"?

Heres why we are looknig at a downgrade:

Bush deficits (including the wars):

2002 $159 billion
2003 $378 billion
2004 $413 billion
2005 $318 billion
2006 $248 billion
2007 $161 billion
2008 $438 billion

Liberals like to point out how Bush turned a surplus into a deficit, but conviently forget about the enormous costs of the attacks of 9/11. Bush was actually pretty succesful at getting those deficits down from '04 to '07.

Obama deficits

2009 $1.4 TRILLION
2010 $1.3 TRILLION
2011 $1.6 TRILLION (PROJECTED­­­­­­)

The funny thing, is that Obama would kill to have Bush's deficits. If Obama got his deficit numbers way down to where Bush's were, Obama would call it a resounding success. "
-rob2trade­­”””
11:38 PM on 10/13/2011
Bush spent almost a trillion on TARP alone and remember he started out with a surplus thanks to Bill Clinton.
11:15 AM on 10/14/2011
Only reason Clinton had a "surplus" was that the Republican controlled Congress and Senate during the last half of his administration kept his spending in check.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loveisallyouneed2
"Wow! Wow! Wow!" -- Steve Jobs' last words
07:43 PM on 10/15/2011
Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Not a spend and borrow Repug
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
05:42 PM on 10/14/2011
Does any of this set free Bush free from starting an illegal war of agression? If not, your remark is irrelevant to the point the article makes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
05:56 PM on 10/14/2011
irrelevance is their viewpoint staple.
11:17 AM on 10/15/2011
I was replying an to irrelevant statement about deficit spending..not about the content of the article.
10:36 PM on 10/13/2011
Arrest the former prez??? Lunacy of the left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
05:28 AM on 10/14/2011
He should be IN JAIL for his crimes
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
11:35 AM on 10/15/2011
American war criminal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
michaelnel4449
Infidel chipping away at the 2 party system
10:13 PM on 10/13/2011
I voted for W the first time and didn't have the stomach to vote for him the second time. They wanted and needed these wars, they needed another pearl harbor. We may never know if they planned the attacks or if they knew the terrorists were coming. Either way, they got their wars and our tax dollars were used to feed the war machine one more time in a huge way. Two ten year wars, our nation cannot survive this kind of financial mismanagement. Lower taxes, borrow money from foreign countries to pay for the wars, it's ridiculous. It's like my boss telling me that I have to take pay cut, so I go out and buy 2 new cadillac's and make the payments with my credit cards. Nobody in their right mind would do this, but our government did it and nobody said a word.
He and his administraton should be investigated for war crimes, thousands of innocent persons in these two wars were killed and it was call collateral damage, not to mention the torture....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HummerHawk
10:58 AM on 10/15/2011
Obama gets your vote in 2012 even though he is killing people, including a US citizen with his drones. Libs pick and chose their issues to whine about. Why are libs so un-American?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
michaelnel4449
Infidel chipping away at the 2 party system
12:11 PM on 10/15/2011
Seem there are two points to make here.
1. George Bush lied us into 2 unjust wars, killed alot of people and yes he used drones too. I also count our troops as US citizens, and how many of those have died and have suffered as a result of his lies?
2. What did I say in my comment, that made you think I am a Lib? Are you happy with the GOP field, they are pathetic? Yet you stand up and call people names just like your trained to do. Listen to Rush this week.....
ccsysglf
question the question
07:44 PM on 10/13/2011
have you seen "W's" golf game lately.......
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
05:25 PM on 10/13/2011
Iraq War Facts, Results & Statistics at September 30, 2011

4,481 US Soldiers Killed, 32,195 Seriously Wounded
Spent & Approved War-Spending - About $900 billion of US taxpayers' funds spent or approved for spending through November 2010.

Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.

Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News) Last known holder of the $6.6 billion lost: the U.S. government.

Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
05:26 PM on 10/13/2011
Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings

Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion

Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion

Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questionable or supportable" - $3.2 billion

U.S. Annual Air-Conditioning Cost in Iraq and Afghanistan - $20.2 billion (Source - NPR, June 25, 2011)

U.S. 2009 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $7.3 billion as of Oct 2009

U.S. 2008 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion

U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
05:27 PM on 10/13/2011
Cost of deploying one U.S. soldier for one year in Iraq - $390,000

TROOPS IN IRAQ

Troops in Iraq - Total 40,000 U.S. troops. All other nations have withdrawn their troops.

U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,481 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army

Non-U.S. Troop Casualties - Total 316, with 179 from the UK

US Troops Wounded - 32,195, 20% of which are serious brain or spinal injuries. (Total excludes psychological injuries.)

US Troops with Serious Mental Health Problems - 30% of US troops develop serious mental health problems within 3 to 4 months of returning home

US Military Helicopters Downed in Iraq - 75 total, at least 36 by enemy fire

IRAQI TROOPS, CIVILIANS & OTHERS IN IRAQ

Private Contractors in Iraq, Working in Support of US Army Troops - More than 180,000 in August 2007, per TheNation.com..

Journalists killed - 150, 98 by murder and 52 by acts of war

Journalists killed by US Forces - 14

Iraqi Police and Soldiers Killed - 10,125, as of July 31, 2011