Politics Of Shipbuilding Mean Rough Seas For Harper

Canadian Shipbuilding

First Posted: 10/17/11 01:52 AM ET Updated: 10/18/11 04:31 PM ET


The Harper government is sailing into a potential political hurricane over $35 billion of naval shipbuilding contracts, the largest military procurement in modern Canadian history.


Later this week, the government is expected to announce two winning bidders for most of the work, one to build $25 billion of naval warships; another to construct $8 billion of supply vessels and other non-combat craft.


The Titanic-sized political problem for the Conservatives is there are three shipyards — in Halifax, Quebec City and Vancouver — competing for just two mega-deals and the thousands of regional jobs that come with them.


That means either the Maritimes, Quebec or the West is about to get one huge, painful and likely lasting kick in the shipyard.


Recent interviews with industry and government insiders suggest that Irving Shipbuilding of Halifax is the odds-on favourite to win the grand prize, the massive contract to build up to 15 warships at a cost of $25 billion over the next several decades.


That would leave Quebec and the West at broadsides for the $8-billion contract for the non-combat vessels.


Vancouver Shipyards is in a strong position to win that deal.


But so is a Canadian-Korean consortium that recently acquired the previously insolvent Quebec-based Davie shipyards. The group is betting everything on the non-combat project, and didn't even bid on the much larger deal for the warships.


The likelihood of a political storm from whatever region gets shut out of the naval contracts helps to explain why a Conservative political machine ordinarily fuelled by photo-ops has become all but invisible in the lead-up to such a huge and important military procurement.


Ministers not out front


Senior Conservative sources say this week's expected contract awards are causing so much political trepidation inside the Harper government that there is a good chance the prime minister, Defence Minister Peter MacKay and most other members of cabinet will be nowhere in sight for the official announcement.


If anyone isn't hiding under the cabinet table, it will be Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose.


She may lend her face and considerable communications skills to the event as the minister responsible for federal contracting, and to press the claim that $35 billion of taxpayers' money is being awarded entirely free of partisan and regional politics.


One senior official told CBC News that most ministers won't even know which companies have won the bids until the last minute.


Instead, the final selection and official announcement are being handled entirely by a special group of senior bureaucrats who have been managing the bid process for the past 16 months.


The official says the whole $35 billion worth of contracts were reviewed and approved by the Treasury Board in the past few weeks, but even those documents did not include the names of the two winning companies.


At no time will the full federal cabinet have any role in approving or otherwise reviewing the winning bids.


"The whole bidding process has been unprecedented," said the senior government official. "Everything has been done to ensure there is a fair result."


Consultants provided oversight


In addition to public servants trying to keep the process out of the hands of the politicians, teams of outside consultants were hired to oversee the bureaucrats.


For instance, a large British naval consulting firm, First Marine International, was hired to review all the Canadian shipyards in the running to ensure they were capable of undertaking such massive projects.


The accounting and business management firm KPMG was hired to ensure the bid selection process was set up to be fair and reasonable — that is, not slanted by the military to favour one shipyard over another.


Finally, the government hired a number of outside firms to act as "fairness monitors," essentially independent consultants overseeing the other consultants overseeing the bureaucrats managing the process.


There was certainly no shortage of material to oversee.


According to one report, Vancouver Shipyards alone spent more than $1 million just to prepare its bid — 30,000 pages of documents in 125 binders, shipped to the federal government in 22 boxes.


One of the more unusual moves by the Harper government was a warning to all the bidders this past summer that last-minute lobbying would not be welcome.


Perhaps the government had simply heard enough.


In the past two years, for instance, Irving Shipbuilding and its hired arm-twisters registered more than 100 formal meetings with Conservative cabinet ministers, senior political staffers and high-ranking bureaucrats in various departments.


Vancouver Shipyards and its lobbyists also logged dozens of equally high-level encounters.


Davie shipyards wasn't nearly as active as the others in the federal lobbying register, perhaps in part because it spent most of the past two years looking for a buyer to save the company from bankruptcy.


'Not about' one region over another


With only days to go until the final announcement of the winning bids, the Harper government is clearly scrambling for ways to try to soften the blow on the losing region.


For instance, one Conservative official close to the process tried to frame this week's expected announcement as "not about one region winning over another — this program is all a big win for Canada."


No matter where the ships are built, she said, the benefits of subcontracts will be felt across the country.


The government will point out that almost half the cost of the warships, for instance, will go into engines, high-tech components and other parts from subcontractors, many of them in Ontario and Quebec.


The government is also promising to hand the losing shipyard much of the leftover $2 billion in miscellaneous naval contracts included in the $35 billion, but not part of the two main deals being announced this week.


No matter how the government tries to spin this week's announcement, the Conservatives know the politics of it all guarantees rough seas ahead.


In 1986, Brian Mulroney's government took away a fighter jet maintenance contract won by Bristol Aerospace of Winnipeg, and gave it to Bombardier of Quebec.


The resulting outrage in the West drove the popularity of Mulroney's government into the basement of public opinion, and helped spawn the Reform Party.


This time, the Harper government has gone overboard to prove there was no political interference.


Voters in one part of the country, at least, will be demanding to know why.


Greg Weston can be reached atgreg.weston@cbc.ca


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

The Harper government is sailing into a potential political hurricane over $35 billion of naval shipbuilding contracts, the largest military procurement in modern Canadian history. ...
The Harper government is sailing into a potential political hurricane over $35 billion of naval shipbuilding contracts, the largest military procurement in modern Canadian history. ...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:56 PM on 10/18/2011
Of course the shipbuilding will go to the marytimes. There is no HST in Nova Scotia is there?
Where in the world did Mr.Harper get his hands on 35bill dollars in these tough economic times?
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
08:13 PM on 10/17/2011
$85 billion on war procurement. I don't remember all that in the election?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:33 PM on 10/17/2011
When regional politics enters into military procurement, the military loses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
09:15 PM on 10/17/2011
when military procurements infiltrates politics, the people lose
12:07 PM on 10/17/2011
Tough on crime. Stupid internet bills that hurt innocent people, crime bills that want to bring more people to jail, and tax money going to waste to build ships that we don't need.

I use to think Education, Health Care, and the needs to people were better, but Harper and his government clearly think differently.
12:06 PM on 10/17/2011
You must be kidding. The contract will go to Quebec City - no question about it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
10:39 AM on 10/17/2011
So spread it around. In this day and age of computers and fast internet, there's no reason whatsoever that ships can't be built in 3 places and have consistent quality and layout.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
01:23 PM on 10/17/2011
You were Navy when the last round of building and the one before that was in progress, weren't the 200 to 260 classes built in 3 different shipyards? I have forgotten but I seem to remember the contracts were broken up. Davie (I think) got the refitt contracts for the 260 class in Sorle some years later. I remember my little brother being part of a crew that deleivered one of them to Quebec. I think this was about the time of the first Patrol Frigate contract being let out but these matters get clouded with time. Besides, I had been Armoured Corps and anything other than an APC that could float was of little interest to us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
10:37 AM on 10/17/2011
Here is a quote from Hugh White at the Lowy Institute, in Austrailia, concerning naval ship procurement. "But the rest of us — voters and taxpayers — must take a share, (responsibility) too. Our governments do defence policy so badly, because we make it so easy for them to get away with doing it badly. See: http://www.lowyinstitute.org/

The idea that Canada is building a navy seems ludicrous, in that this idea has been bantered about for 30 years. Not that it isn't time to do so, but there are many hidden and some obvious reasons to not do so. The Arctic comes to mind, as the Harper clan attempts to save face over his lack of concern on sovereignty. The Americans refuse Canada's claims as well as the Russians, and the Chinese and others. Building a few ships is not going to change that one bit. Especially when these ships will be built over decades.

Having a majority government does not mean that closed door decision making, will help anyone. It only means that everyone will never know how stupid and foolish, and foot dragging some of these attempts at sovereignty really are.

Where these building contracts finally end up is most probably a political move at best. Canada's navy will still be extremely finite, but the political advantage for Harper is insurmountable, no matter where he spins his bottle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
12:53 PM on 10/17/2011
Indeed, it seems backwards that there is a debate about how it should be done, and not whether it should be done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis Bernardi
I live in a treehouse!
10:22 AM on 10/17/2011
There's starving people on our streets Mr. Harper. Please, meet with one and them him why 33 Billion in warships takes precedence over them.
03:47 PM on 10/17/2011
So are you suggesting that the government hand a pile of cash to homeless individuals? How will that solve the long term problem? What about national defence and obligations to our allies? Are you really just making the old "if there were no soldiers there would be no wars" argument?

Homelessness should be an individual and local responsibility. The feds have bigger fish to fry, such as protecting sovereignty, national defence, border patrol, and treaty obligations. You can't simple wave a magic wand make all those things go away. It takes planning and a LOTS of money. Besides, are YOU going to tell the shipbuilder in Halifax he can't have a job because the money is better spent on a homeless person who doesn't want to or can't work?
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
09:45 AM on 10/17/2011
Airshow Mckay has been softened up for weeks with leaks, his boat wont float.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
09:30 AM on 10/17/2011
This will the true test of the vindictivness of this government. How many seats did the Conservatives get in PQ? Anyone want to bet the farm that the other contract goes to BC!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:32 PM on 10/17/2011
There goes the regional politics again.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
03:42 PM on 10/17/2011
It is a sad comment on our governments but In all seriousness, there is a better than average chance that regional politics will be the deciding factor. Of course, that will never be admitted to and the reasons will probably fall within the realm of credible but under it all, will be the history of this country's use of regional politics to reward or punish. Been going since Confederation but it is much more subtle now. I guess they got better with experience.
09:15 AM on 10/17/2011
The Harper government is dishonest, power hungry and considers itself unaccountable. Its pious leader is disinterested in Canadians. Debt is his forte. Canada doesn't need ships. It needs health care and education and permanent jobs. Getting into green energy would be smart but the neo cons keep subsidizing oil. You can bet that ater this oil will be his biggest donor and making Canada a super power will be a very costly joke.