Polar Bear Trophy Hunting Ban Upheld By U.S. Judge

Polar Bear

First Posted: 10/17/11 07:45 PM ET Updated: 12/17/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON - A U.S. court has upheld a ban on American sport hunters returning home with polar bear trophies from Canada.

In a decision released Monday, the District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was within its mandate to forbid the import of polar bear parts.

Although the American Marine Mammals Protection Act does allow importing bear trophies if they were legally obtained, the Fish and Wildlife Service maintained that loophole was rendered invalid because climate change is threatening the species' survival.

"The Court ... finds that the MMPA mandates the Service’s conclusion that sport-hunted polar bear trophies are no longer eligible for import as a result of the species’ depleted status," the judgment says.

"Sport hunting is not among the narrow, enumerated exceptions to the MMPA’s ban on taking and importing depleted marine mammals."

The Humane Society of the United States welcomed the ruling.

"Just as we don’t allow the import of tiger skins and baby seal fur, American conservation law prevents American hunters from bringing home the heads and hides of imperilled polar bears shot in other countries," said Jonathan Lovvorn, a lawyer for the society.

Sport hunters pay about $30,000 to go on a polar bear hunt in Arctic Canada, an important source of cash in small communities that don't have very many of them. As well, hunters who kill bears to feed their families can sell the hides for about $400 a metre for extra cash.

In 2010, an international conservation watchdog found the annual export of 300 bear skins a year from Canada isn't big enough to threaten overall numbers of the species.

Traffic, an international wildlife trade monitoring network, concluded that while the great white predators may be slowly declining, numbers aren't falling fast enough to require a trade ban. Traffic also pointed out the overall estimate of bear populations at between 20-25,000 hasn't changed in years.

Inuit leaders have said local hunters will continue to hunt bears and that banning trophy exports won't save any of the animals.

In a related decision released Monday, Judge Emmet Sullivan also threw out a vital section of a U.S Department of the Interior rule that declared global warming is threatening the survival of the polar bear.

Sullivan found the administration of former president George W. Bush did not complete a required environmental review when it said the bear’s designation as threatened in 2008 could not be used as a backdoor way to control greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.<

The Obama administration agreed a year later, saying that activities outside the bear’s habitat such as emissions from a power plant could not be controlled using the Endangered Species Act.<

The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that filed a lawsuit over the 2008 rule, said the decision puts the fate of the polar bear back in the hands of the Obama administration and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.<

“The Obama administration has the chance to do right by the polar bear,” said Kassie Siegel, an attorney for the group.

“They need to decide whether the polar bear gets all the protections that other endangered species get, or whether they want to readopt a flawed Bush administration decision that exempts greenhouse gases” and other pollutants from the Endangered Species Act.<

Sullivan’s decision directs the Interior Department to respond by Nov. 17 with a timetable for when it will complete the required environmental review. Sullivan left an interim 2008 designation intact while the case continues.<

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier version referred to the U.S. Humane Society instead of the Humane Society of the United States

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:33 PM on 12/14/2011
Ever wonder why a lot of these animals end up protected? It's because they kill and maim people!!
Sponsored by P.E.T.C.B.W.
(People for Ethical Treatment of Cobras and Black Widows)
02:32 AM on 12/15/2011
are you dumb? maybe they 'kill and maim' people because people don't know limits, they are wild animals and their habitat is continuously shrinking -- either from the climate or because people move in on it and destroy it. polar bears and other animals don't just kill people for sport, like people do :/
oh and by they way, People for Ethical Treatment of Cobras and Black Widows is pretty dumb too...
04:28 PM on 12/14/2011
They should ban hunting of polar bears entirely and introduce anti-poaching regulations like they have in Kenya. Down there, poaching is serious business. The game wardens carry high powered rifles and if they see you poaching an animal, they are authorized to shoot you on sight. Now that is protection. Without laws like that, the bears won't stand much of a chance. If people are willing to pay 30k to go hunt them, I doubt that a fine or small amount of prison time will stop them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carmen Marino
05:34 PM on 12/14/2011
did you even read the story? the number of polar bears has not changed in years. They are NOT endangered. If they were endangered, then obviously it would be a problem.. If you have done research on poaching in Africa you would know that where there are regulated hunting laws which do allow the import of ivory and monitored hunting, for instance, those elephant herds are strong and thriving, but in countries where there is a total ban, THAT'S where the poaching takes place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anugs
07:05 AM on 10/18/2011
This hunt should either be restricted to the indigenous people of the north or band all together. Keep the F##king American trophy hunters out. This icon of Canada is going to go the way of the Dodo bird.
12:34 AM on 10/18/2011
A great decision by the US. Hats off.
Just like the elephants (tusks/ivory) -- the polar bears need protection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Juanne Michaud
Proud Canadian, loony lefty
10:59 PM on 10/17/2011
I hate hunters and hunting.

My parents have a cottage in the French River area; a real camp (we didn't get a road put in until about 20 years after my dad built the place). It is peaceful, and so quiet that you can hear the guy on Lot 1 (we're Lot 37) cutting wood. At night, the moon casts such a bright light on the water's surface that you think you could walk across it and up into the sky; on moonless nights the Milky Way stretches across the dome of night like a luminous scarf.

And then hunting season begins. These idiots show up, trespassing on private property (property that is clearly marked) shooting at anything that moves. The "sporting" hunter may exist, but I've never seen him/her.

I can understand sustenance hunting, but trophy hunting? If you want to prove how tough and brave you are, don't go into the bush with a shotgun; try shooting with a Canon instead.
10:29 PM on 10/17/2011
I'd like to think you are not Canadian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Niki Ashton for NDP
08:44 PM on 10/17/2011
Why not hunt inuit. The bears do, occasionally.