Canada-U.S. Trade: Michigan Senate Committee Kills New Border Crossing

Detroit River International Crossing

The Huffington Post Canada   First Posted: 11/21/11 09:51 AM ET Updated: 12/05/11 10:15 PM ET

The fate of a proposed new bridge connecting Windsor with Detroit that Ottawa has called the country's "number one national infrastructure priority" is uncertain after a Michigan Senate committee voted down the proposal Thursday.

The Detroit River International Crossing, as it is known, has broad support in Canada, where the need to augment the 82-year-old Ambassador Bridge is largely undisputed. But it has been the subject of heated controversy in Michigan, where the Ambassador Bridge's private owner has been fighting an aggressive campaign to stop the new, publicly-owned crossing from being built.

The Michigan Senate's Republican-dominated Economic Development Committee voted the plan down Thursday, meaning it will not come before a vote in front of the full Senate.

Nor is it clear what happens next. According to State Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, the proposal is dead.

"I'm done with it at this point," Richardville told the Detroit Free Press. "It's unfortunate. An opportunity was missed" to create 20,000 to 40,000 jobs, Richardville added, "but there are other things we should be talking about."

But Rick Snyder, the Republican governor of Michigan who is backing the project, indicated he's not giving up.

"We're going to continue to pursue this as a solution because we should build a bridge for our citizens," he said Thursday, as quoted by AP.

The proposed $2.2-billion bridge would more than double the capacity of traffic between Windsor and Detroit. The Canadian side of the project would see a new parkway built bypassing downtown Windsor and creating for the first time a direct freeway connection from Ontario's busy Highway 401 to the United States.

The current Ambassador Bridge is over capacity and leads onto city streets in Windsor, causing frequent and long delays that cost Canada's economy millions in lost productivity.

About one-quarter of all trade between the U.S. and Canada crosses the Ambassador Bridge, amounting to about $150 billion in economic activity per year.

In a sign of Canada's eagerness to see the project built, Ottawa has offered Michigan $550 million to built the new bridge, which would be publicly owned but privately operated.

But that poses a financial threat to Matty Moroun, the billionaire owner of the Ambassador. Moroun has been engaged in an aggressive publicity push to prevent the new bridge from being built. The Globe and Mail reports that Moroun and his relatives donated $565,000 to 45 candidates now seated in the Michigan legislature.

Moroun owns a trucking enterprise that employs 5,000 people on both sides of the border, and critics say he built his empire thanks to his stranglehold on traffic across the Michigan-Ontario border.

Moroun's campaign has also received help from the Koch brothers, billionaire energy industrialists whose political pressure group, Americans For Prosperity, has been spending money on the effort to stop the bridge.

The group has been accused of running a smear campaign. Earlier this year, phony eviction notices appeared on the front doors of homes in Detroit's Delray neighbourhood. The notices, linked to AFP, alleged that residents would be evicted if the new bridge were to be built.

Fears about the fate of Delray were behind some state senators' opposition to the plan, but the issue has ideological overtones in the U.S's political arena.

"Republicans and Democrats have a philosophical problem with putting a private business out of business by building a publicly owned bridge," state Rep. Paul Opsommer told Bloomberg.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

The fate of a proposed new bridge connecting Windsor with Detroit that Ottawa has called the country's "number one national infrastructure priority" is uncertain after a Michigan Senate committee vote...
The fate of a proposed new bridge connecting Windsor with Detroit that Ottawa has called the country's "number one national infrastructure priority" is uncertain after a Michigan Senate committee vote...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 77
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:05 AM on 10/24/2011
Find out where Maroun lives. Protest outside his home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
osofar
America once was exceptional, and could be again,
03:15 AM on 10/24/2011
Michael Moore, as a Michigander, has a perfect opportunity to make another smash movie about this!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
osofar
America once was exceptional, and could be again,
03:07 AM on 10/24/2011
When China needs a bridge, they build it. When America needs a bridge, they postpone it. That is why the United States is continuing its decline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
08:33 AM on 10/23/2011
Bad decsion by the elected representatives of the People of Michigan. Real bad decision. This decision will cost Michigan for decades and decades. And if the present bridge goes out of service because of structural defects, where is the economy of MI then, relying on parts from Canada, as it does?
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
11:02 PM on 10/22/2011
Has the Michigan legislature so sold its soul that the economic good of the entire state is to be held hostage by the greed of ONE man (and his far-seeing enablers, the Kochs)? Has the governor not heard of the phrase "eminent domain"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heartlandmamma
10:20 PM on 10/22/2011
The last line in this article is galling. The purpose of another bridge is for less congestion and greater commerce for Detroit/Windsor as well as the entire US and Canada. It's not about putting Maroun out of business. It's significant that a quarter of all trade and commerce in the US from Canada comes across the Ambassador Bridge. That bridge is in disrepair.

The Marouns are the only private individuals, along the entire US/Canadian border, to own an international border crossing. They have been "trolls under the bridge", and totally divorced from Detroit's needs. The Marouns are the 321st richest family in the US (Forbes). They have a virtual MONOPOLY by also owning the holding company for several trucking companies they control, from both sides of the border, as the article states.

The Central Train Station they privately bought in the late 80's has sat abandoned for years, home to squatters, with no attempts at restoration. The film industry comes to shoot it as an example of "slum porn", thus further stigmatizing Detroit. It was once a true beauty of high architecture, built in the late 20's. That's the building Cain stood in front of the other day as an example of "community" urban blight. More like privately owned blight. There is so much wrong with what the Marouns are doing in Michigan, now with the help of the Kochs. Thousands of JOBS were just turned down by these republican legislators for something that was truly needed. Idiocy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mustangallee
What you write here will be in cyberspace forever!
07:12 PM on 10/22/2011
This attitude is why Detroit failed and most likely will not recover! It is all about one man...who can buy off a lot of people. Chicago has never been as crooked as Detroit!
Will the last one leaving Detroit please turn off the lights!
photo
TT Esty1
Failure is a temporary condition.
03:23 AM on 10/22/2011
This isn't a problem with public over private ownership; it's about money in my pocket and 'thank you masta'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:34 AM on 10/22/2011
Americans are not accustomed to building bridges to 'somewhere'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
01:30 AM on 10/22/2011
Elite corporate interests before citizens, before state, before country, and before largest trader partner. Nice to see Michigan con servatives will do anything for a nickel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MNJim
Gort Baringa
10:40 AM on 10/22/2011
It's the Amerikan Way!
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
04:55 PM on 10/22/2011
Missed a couple of "Ks" there, I see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
07:53 PM on 10/21/2011
What should be considered is the future. Infrastructure investments are good in the immediate short term and they are very, very good in the long term. To oppose this project is stupid. Go ahead Michigan, shoot yourself in the foot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mustangallee
What you write here will be in cyberspace forever!
07:15 PM on 10/22/2011
Don't blame the people of Michigan, we know who doesn't want this bridge built and why...and it isn't because of the will of the people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
07:50 PM on 10/21/2011
And the reason is?....money!. Same answer as always.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
09:09 AM on 10/22/2011
The reason for opposing is potential loss of profits to a billionaire owner of an undermaintained 82 year old bridge who with Koch brother buddies was able to "influence" politicians to act against the "publick goode". The fact that an improved crossing would provide tens of thousands of jobs for the peasants - and revitalize the regional economy doesn't matteall that much.r
photo
GeoToronto
Nik Nak Paddy Wak, Still Ridin' Caddy-Laks
05:29 PM on 10/21/2011
In all seriousness, this bridge will help many other businesses, so aren't they PO'd about this decision and why aren't they yelling and screaming?
Where's UPS, Purolator, GM, Ford, withtheir "just in time" car manufacturing/assembly?
I don't get it?
I personally think there should be a new bridge there, but maybe its not needed since no one is talking louder than the Moroun's?
09:56 PM on 10/21/2011
The bridge is indeed very much needed. In fact Moroun has already started to build a second bridge next to his Ambassador bridge but was forced to stop because a doubling of his bridge would cause bottle neck problems with local neighbourhood traffic. His location for a second span is far from ideal.

What you have here is a billionaire who is imposing his selfish will at the expense of the common good. He has bought Michigan politicians and has run misleading TV commercials to sway public opinion to support his personal interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
10:07 PM on 10/22/2011
the sad thing is that he owns all the decent crossing points properties on the American side thru shell corps. This might have to go to the federal level, and with the makeup of the USSC, that isn't going to work swiftly either.

I am sorry, but the idea of one man having ownership of a bottleneck is a constant source of wonder, and headshaking.
photo
GeoToronto
Nik Nak Paddy Wak, Still Ridin' Caddy-Laks
05:12 PM on 10/21/2011
I think we should stop doing any maintenance to the roads that lead to the bridge.and eventually "condemn" the raods, thus closing them and all traffic.
Pick another location for the bridge in the general location or make a super highway to Sarnia/Port Huron, that way you bypass that mess that is called Detroit.
10:29 PM on 10/21/2011
Those of us who live in Detroit just breathed a huge sigh of relief that you'll bypass us. We aren't bothered by people who think we're a "mess". We're grateful you stay away. Keeps our average IQ from plummeting towards Toronto's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:28 AM on 10/22/2011
Ya, that's why your city and state are so broke-assed - because you're smart. Greedydumbamericans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
04:26 PM on 10/21/2011
For Sale: Michigan Senate's Economic Development Committee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:29 AM on 10/22/2011
Sold.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
10:09 PM on 10/22/2011
it's already been bought and sold many times over. the sad thing is that Harper's crew is no different than the prostiticians on the Senate committee...