F-35 Fighter Contracts: Tories Tout Benefits, But Questions Linger About Jet's Development

F35

First Posted: 10/25/11 06:20 PM ET Updated: 10/27/11 05:56 PM ET

OTTAWA - The Conservative government was determined Tuesday to showcase the industrial benefits of the F-35 as more questions were raised about the stealth fighter.

Julian Fantino, the associate minister of National Defence, toured a new section of Bristol Aerospace in Winnipeg where horizontal tail sections for the conventional version of the jet will be built.

The contract was announced recently by Lockheed Martin as part of the U.S. manufacturer's plan to line up suppliers on a world-wide basis.

The tour and the reminder that $373 million in F-35 contracts have been won by Canadian companies came at the same time as the Opposition continued to hammer away at the government in the House of Commons over modifications that will be needed for the aircraft.

Briefing notes for the air force chief show that the fighter will not have the software needed to communicate from the Arctic and that the Defence Department will need to install a back-up system until the upgrade is available after 2019.

New Democrat MP Matthew Kellway called for the contract to be put out to public tender — something the Liberals have long-advocated.

He asked how much the government intends to spend to get working radios.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay said the difference between the New Democrats and Conservatives is that the government is prepared to spend millions on life-saving equipment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The Conservative government was determined Tuesday to showcase the industrial benefits of the F-35 as more questions were raised about the stealth fighter.Julian Fantino, the associate minist...
OTTAWA - The Conservative government was determined Tuesday to showcase the industrial benefits of the F-35 as more questions were raised about the stealth fighter.Julian Fantino, the associate minist...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:49 AM on 10/26/2011
Harper is in bed with Lockheed Martin.

That is why we are buying these jets, to save their sorry asses from collapse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Green
03:27 AM on 10/26/2011
This, along with an outrageous crime spending bill, are why I can never vote for the "fiscally conservative" Conservatives. They have no idea what matters in a cost/benefit world.
11:07 PM on 10/25/2011
These jets are a complete waste of money. We don't need them - who are we defending against? The Russians? There's this little matter of THE NORTH POLE between us - not conducive to aggression. Greenland? Yeah, sure. The Americans? More so than anyone else, but THEY BUILT THE PLANES - so if you're at war with them and they outnumber you 11 : 1, and they built the damn planes - fat chance you'll ever get any parts for repair. So, very simply, these jets are only useful for one thing: attacking countries smaller and weaker than ourselves, and that is despicable, like the rest of the Tory Rot.
09:58 PM on 10/25/2011
What's most amazing about the F-35s is the amount of confused reporting there has been about their pricing. For example, the CBC reported that Lockheed was quoting a price of $65million per jet. Defence Department estimates were $85million noted the CBC, just before stating the U.S. State Dept. was quoted as saying the jets will cost (get ready to panick) a traumatizing $135 million per jet. Of course it is all mostly nonsense, because Canada is not getting the vertical takeoff and landing version the U.S. is getting, hence the lower $65million and $85million price tag on our side of the fence. Funny how that wasn't mentioned by the CBC. Ignorance? Or and intent to mislead? Surely not to stir up anti-Conservative trouble? Like the reporting to date, I'll leave that to everyone's imagination here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
11:48 PM on 10/25/2011
North American Integration and the Militarization of the Arctic http://bit.ly/sMF41J

The jets are also cheaper because Canada has given sovereignty to the US over our Arctic. There is much more going on than the Cons are telling us.
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
06:31 PM on 10/25/2011
So, what do we get for how many aircraft, and servicing and maintenance units?? Do we even need this kind of aircraft?? We certainly don't need it for our defence, and why should we be attacking other countries???

I get the feeling that the feds are GOP/TBagger wanna bes, which is really scary!!!!