Rogers Violating Internet Rules, CRTC Says

First Posted: 10/27/2011 10:03 pm Updated: 01/26/2012 4:06 pm

Rogers

The CRTC is investigating Rogers Communications because it believes the way the company deliberately slows down some of its internet traffic violates federal rules.

The probe stems from a complaint by the Canadian Gamers Organization, an advocacy group for people who play video games, that Rogers has been hindering online games.

Rogers admitted in March that its network systems were unintentionally slowing down, or “throttling,” internet traffic for the game World of Warcraft, then said it had resolved the problem.

It further acknowledged in September that other games and programs might be getting tripped up by its throttling. The Canadian Gamers Organization's complaint detailed slow internet speeds experienced while playing Call of Duty: Black Ops.

The CRTC informed the gamers group on Thursday that it has referred the matter to its enforcement division, meaning commission staff consider Rogers to be violating the Telecommunications Act or CRTC regulations. Those rules allow throttling of peer-to-peer file sharing programs like BitTorrent, but not of time-sensitive internet traffic like video chatting or gaming.

“We are aware of several games that have had issues, but we don’t know 100 per cent right now. We can’t tell from the ends of the network,” said Jason Koblovsky, a Canadian Gamers Organization co-founder. “But it’s quite clear the CRTC thinks there’s something wrong.”

The CRTC’s enforcement division has the power to inspect Rogers equipment or order a third-party audit of the company’s internet systems. That could help give a more comprehensive picture of whether Rogers is illegally throttling games, or if the Call of Duty slowdowns are just part of broader internet congestion.

“There’s a lot of confusion and testing that needs to be done,” Koblovsky said. “Sometimes it can takes months of troubleshooting at the consumer’s end to determine whether it’s throttling or not.”

Rogers spokesperson Carly Suppa said in an email Thursday night that the company has "just received" a letter from the CRTC and "we are reviewing its contents." She repeated the company's position that it believes it is complying with CRTC rules.

If the CRTC confirms Rogers is in violation, the regulator can go so far as to order the company to partially reimburse customers and to change its practices.

Many critics denounce internet traffic management because it amounts to censorship over what content gets priority transmission on the internet, violating the principle of "net neutrality."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

The CRTC is investigating Rogers Communications because it believes the way the company deliberately slows down some of its internet traffic violates federal rules. The probe ...
The CRTC is investigating Rogers Communications because it believes the way the company deliberately slows down some of its internet traffic violates federal rules. The probe ...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:53 AM on 12/22/2011
CRTC is one step above China for leaniency.

Rogers - Cripples its customers for what they can do online. Horrible caps, throttling, filtering, a support system that even with detailed logs of packet loss will simply say "There isnt a problem"

Canadians are a proud and mature nation. Why do we have the CRTC telling us what we can and cant do online? I mean really, if anything in Canada needs to be 'occupied' my vote is the dismissal of the CRTC!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notatowniegirl
09:09 AM on 10/29/2011
This is exactly why I dropped Rogers as a provider. As a gamer, I was frustrated by the effect that the throttling had on my gaming. The first time I raided a 25 man ICC in World of Warcraft after the switch, my dps went from the bottom of the meters to the very top, and I could finally PvP without severe lagging. My ping went from 450-500 to less than 100.

Rogers sucks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
09:25 PM on 10/28/2011
CRTC Enforcement Division? I'm sorry, he is busy right now. Can I get him to call you back?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eurisko67
10:54 AM on 10/28/2011
“But it’s quite clear the CRTC thinks there’s something wrong.”

LOL. Perhaps they're telling you what you want to hear, to get you off their backs, pestering them with trival matters?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 AM on 10/28/2011
Its not that hard to figure out if rogers is throttling or not. Do like everyone else and google "rogers, throttling, game" and if a forum exists with possible workarounds and people complaining then, yes, rogers is throttling.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
12:20 PM on 10/28/2011
The problem has always been that you only can have one choice for a cable company.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
10:00 AM on 10/28/2011
Pulled all of my business away from Rogers years ago. Have been much happier (and a little richer) ever since.

Actually that's not entirely true, I got a Rogers employee cellphone plan some 11 years ago, and have managed to keep my plan through 'hardware upgrades', so I still have a Rogers cellphone, but it costs me 42$ a month for a plan full of bells and whistles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timedalkat
09:48 AM on 10/28/2011
If Roger's is your ISP drop them now.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
12:22 PM on 10/28/2011
Unfortunately, most alternatives are not that good. I had Bell for years, but then I realised that I was getting 3Mbits/sec and could get 10+, with cable, for the same money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis Bernardi
I live in a treehouse!
12:39 AM on 10/28/2011
Surprise, surprise.