Canada Fall Economic Update: Ottawa Likely To Miss 4-Year Balanced Budget Target

Flaherty

First Posted: 11/08/11 04:00 AM ET Updated: 11/10/11 07:18 PM ET

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty conceded Tuesday he won't be able to balance the federal budget in four years as promised, but he moved to lighten the load on workers and businesses by reducing a planned increase in payroll taxes.

Warning Canada's economic recovery is fragile and slowing, Flaherty told a business audience in Calgary he is ready to go further if conditions continue to deteriorate.

As he was preparing to make the speech, the European debt crisis claimed another political victim — Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, who announced he would resign like his Greek counterpart in the wake of unsustainable borrowing.

"We are well aware of the challenges ahead to the global economy and how that may impact Canada," said Flaherty, who has been an outspoken critic of the eurozone's political response to the crisis.

"Let me be clear. We will not be bound by ideology when it comes to making decisions to keep our economy strong and protect Canadians, their financial security and jobs."

During their winning election campaign this spring, the Harper Conservatives trumpeted their achievements on the economic front by boasting they would balance the budget one year earlier — in 2014-15 — than previously projected.

But Flaherty heard from economists last month that the budget assumptions of economic growth were no longer applicable, which would mean Ottawa's revenues from tax receipts would be lower than anticipated.

As well, the economists warned the minister that the risks of an even worse outcome were rising.

Plugging in the new numbers means Ottawa's deficit will balloon from the previously thought $19.4 billion next year to $27.4 billion, and for 2013-14, from $9.4 billion under the old estimate to $17 billion.

The changes throw into question whether the Conservatives can fulfil election promises that were contingent on a balanced budget within their current mandate.

During the campaign, Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised to allow households to share up to $50,000 of income for tax purposes — a limited form of income splitting — which would save families an average of $1,300 a year. The $75 adult fitness tax credit was also contingent on eliminating the deficit.

Ottawa was counting on savings from departmental cutbacks to put them into the black in 2014-15, but now the expectation is for a $3.5 billion deficit, once $4 billion in savings are included. Without counting the savings, the projected deficit would have been $7.5 billion.

In total, the government is adding about $29 billion in red ink from the current year to the end of the planning horizon in 2015-16.

According to the government's new fiscal track, the government will record a tiny $600 million surplus in 2015-16, but that is only if all the savings from cutbacks are realized.

Bank of Montreal chief economist Sherry Cooper said Flaherty was reacting to the new realities of the global economy.

When one sticks to a forecast despite changing circumstances, "that is a bigger risk than being adaptable to what is going on around us," Cooper said.

In a news conference, Flaherty said despite the bleaker outlook, the likelihood of Canada entering another recession in the near term is slim.

"It's certainly not what's anticipated by any of the private sector economists or by the department of finance. What we anticipate is modest economic growth," Flaherty said.

The changes to employment insurance premiums were leaked to some news media late Monday night and are minor in nature.

Ottawa will cut in half payroll taxes increases scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1 that would have raised premiums on workers by 10 cents per $100 of insurable earnings, and 14 cents for firms.

The changes will mean workers earning the maximum $43,000 of insurable earnings can expect to see their take home pay shrink by about $23 a year, while firms will be paying an additional $31 a year per employee.

As well, the government will also extend for another 16 weeks, until next October, the work-sharing program that gives employees the option of working fewer hours — to permit a co-worker to keep their job — and receive Employment Insurance benefits for the subtracted hours.

The government said the hit to its revenues will be $600 million next year, adding that it plans to return to the normal 10-cent premium increase in 2013.

"We will continue to make protecting Canadian jobs and the economy our top priority," Flaherty said.

Still the changes are unlikely to satisfy critics who believe Ottawa needs to do more to stimulate a fragile economy projected to record at best modest growth for the next year and a half.

"With stubbornly high unemployment, it is dumb and dangerous to increase the price of hiring by hiking taxes on jobs," said Liberal finance critic Scott Brison.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business, which had lobbied for the cancellation of the payroll tax hikes, took comfort that a half loaf was better than none.

"But the bad news is unless your employer comes up with a raise for you, your take home pay is going to go down," said Dan Kelly, the CFIB's head of legislative affairs.

However, a group representing the food services industry said the planned EI changes will still hit restaurant employers with a $13-million payroll tax increase.

"We appreciate that the EI increase could have been double, but any increase at all is bad news for employment in this economy," said Garth Whyte, president and CEO of the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association.

"This is especially true for us as a people industry, where opportunities for job creation are the greatest."

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce welcomed the payroll tax and work-sharing moves, which it said are positive for the economy.

"Both of these measures will help to support employment during a time of heightened economic uncertainty," said Chamber president and CEO Perrin Beatty, a former federal revenue minister.

The Canadian Labour Congress said it was pleased Ottawa is showing some fiscal flexibility, but said more needs to be done.

"But this is far from the plan that we need to deal with a slowing economy and rising unemployment," said CLC president Ken Georgetti.

"Minister Flaherty still plans to cut $4 billion from annual federal government spending, and nothing that he said today will stop unemployment form rising."

In his speech, Flaherty said while it is important to show flexibility, the government can't afford to break the bank either.

He noted that other countries, particularly in Europe, are failing to grapple with the nightmare of too much debt.

"Countries, like individuals, do not stumble into prosperity," he said. "They set out a plan and stick to it, so that they are fully capable of seizing opportunity when misfortune hits, instead of being overwhelmed by it."

As such, Flaherty said he is sticking to the broad strokes of his June budget, which phased out stimulus spending in infrastructure and announced plans to keep government spending growth to about two per cent.

The minister said he is also committed to cutting the corporate tax rate by 1.5 points to 15 per cent on Jan. 1, saying low taxes are one of the reasons the country is getting plaudits as a good place to invest.

In an unrelated announcement, the minister said the government had renewed its agreement with the Bank of Canada keeping the central bank's marching orders of targeting inflation at two per cent annually in place for another five years.

— Julian Beltrame reported from Ottawa and Lauren Krugel reported from Calgary.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty conceded Tuesday he won't be able to balance the federal budget in four years as promised, but he moved to lighten the load on workers and businesses by reducing a planne...
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty conceded Tuesday he won't be able to balance the federal budget in four years as promised, but he moved to lighten the load on workers and businesses by reducing a planne...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:41 AM on 11/09/2011
Some reforms needed in society itself.

Ex: minimum wage, as in the cost of living has gone through the roof, and wages have never increased in my lifetime, which again would be a relief to the working poor removing a huge burden from their lives - a concerted national effort to get wages raised would have to start somewhere - might as well be at the federal level.

. Ex.: poverty, as in ending it - aggressively tackling the issues surrounding poverty: homelessness, health care, addiction, which just goes to show all of our societal problems are closely interconnected when you really think about it.

Ex.: welfare, as in make it far easier to access SA and EI; also, increase the funds for people on either to compensate for inflation over the past twenty years.

Ottawa's display of indifference came at a disheartening time for the 3.4 million Canadians living in poverty.

The government delivered its response in October 2010 to the Senate's 2009 report, In From the Margins: A Call to Action on Poverty, Housing and Homelessness.

It rejected every one of the report's 74 recommendations.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/402/citi/rep/rep02dec09-e.pdf
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:37 AM on 11/09/2011
CANADA’S EXTRA-JUDICIAL SOLUTION TO HOMELESSNESS
The average age of the homeless people living in Canadian shelters is between the ages of thirty-five and fifty-five, and they have been drifting across this country in search of food, shelter and employment for the past twenty to thirty years.
In the 1980’s only 5% of this homeless population mentioned above had a criminal record, today over 70% of them now have a criminal record with charges ranging from totalitarian to completely moronic, for example; urinating in a public place could land you a prison term and then a life sentence down at one of the Canadian Homeless Shelters.
According to Pardons Canada four million people can not find suitable employment, ascertain a post-secondary education, or cross the American border due to criminal record checks, thereby leaving them as unproductive citizens in society with a higher aptitude to re-offend.
It would be interesting to know how many of Canada’s inmates have resided at a Canadian homeless shelter and were forced into working for Temporary labor Agencies prior to their various convictions .
http://www.canada.com/news/Tories+want+hike+fees+pardons/4211087/story.html
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:32 AM on 11/09/2011
Wasteful government
1. $12 billion dollar Liberal surplus gone.
2. $56 billion dollar Harper deficit here.
3. $541 billion dollar debt and rising fast.

Still to come
1. $35 per cent payroll tax EI increase.
2. $6 billion corporate tax cut.
3. $13 billion on prisons.
4. $16 billion dollar untendered fighter jets.
5. $1.3 billion dollar G8 - G20 photo-op and fake lake.
6. $4.3 billion Ontario HST.
7. $1.6 billion BC HST

Harper Pork-barrelling
1. Tony Clement riding—$50 million.
2. Peter MacKay riding—$87.7 million."
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:28 AM on 11/09/2011
We have Private Banksters which control the Federal Reserve

We have Wall Street Gangsters which create fianancial bubbles

We have lobbyist which control our governments.

People should check out the CMA DataVision website which shows that the "socialist" countries in Europe : Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland, are "Sovereign Tighteners," meaning they have the most improving credit rating.

In fact one can look at all their numbers, like debt/GDP and deficit/GDP, and see that they are in top fiscal shape, better than countries like the US and Canada.

These are countries that have the lowest gap between the rich and the poor and have the best social benefits.

The reason their center-left policies work is because they invest in human capital — people — and this better equips the workforce enabling businesses to make more money. When governments get more involved in worker benefits, like healthcare and drug plans, they are able to keep costs down, which keeps labor costs down for businesses.

In fact, these countries also spend the least on healthcare per capita.

The reality is they just want to cut taxes for corporations and the rich so they can make easy money.

BTW, the most fiscally irresponsible governments in North America have been conservative: Ronald Reagan, Brian Mulroney, Mike Harris, George W. Bush, and Stephen Harper (he has created a $15 billion structural deficit above and beyond the two-year stimulus spending.)
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:16 AM on 11/09/2011
OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD)

Wednesday, February 19, 2003

"Eliminating corporate welfare could yield many more billions." -Stephen Harper

Hansard (1540) Government Orders The Budget
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=714364&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=37&Ses=2

Corporate welfare is a term describing a government's bestowal of money grants, tax breaks, or other special favorable treatment on corporations.

Now we have Mr. Harper promoting corporate welfare in 2011...weird or what?
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:15 AM on 11/09/2011
Canada Explained....

http://www.youtube.com/mercerreport?user=mercerreport&hl=en&gl=US#p/search/0/yi1yhp-_x7A

&

How Parliament works...

http://www.youtube.com/mercerreport#p/search/9/Aealt-etGVs
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:14 AM on 11/09/2011
The ABC's of politics = Anything But Conservative, Corrupt, Convicts, Control, Conniving, Censors, Contempt, Conceit, Condescending, Circus Clowns, Childish, Contradictions, Covert, Cagy, Communist, Clueless, Confused Cowards, Concealing and the list keeps growing...
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:09 AM on 11/09/2011
For reference, the entire tangible common equity of the Canadian Banks in 2008 was $68 billion. The Canadian government injected a sum through mortgage purchases worth more than the entire tangible common equity of the Canadian banking system!

http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2009/10/22/BubbleWillBurst/

&

"Finance Minister Jim Flaherty repeated the mantra that the government acted early to get rid of risky mortgages. What he and Prime Minister Stephen Harper do not explain, however, is that the expansion of zero-down, 40-year mortgages began with measures contained in the first Conservative budget in May of 2006.

At the time, Mr. Flaherty announced that the government was opening up the market to more private insurers.

"These changes will result in greater choice and innovation in the market for mortgage insurance, benefiting consumers and promoting home ownership," Mr. Flaherty said.

The new rules encouraged the entry of such U.S. players as American International Group – the world's largest insurance company – and Triad Guarantee Inc. of Winston-Salem, N.C. Former Triad chief executive officer Mark Tonnesen, who spearheaded his company's aborted push into Canada, said the proliferation of high-risk mortgages could have been mitigated if Ottawa had been more watchful."

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/article727831.ece
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:09 AM on 11/09/2011
One Conservative misdeed, that has certainly flown under the radar, was the secret bailing out of our banks. This was necessary after allowing sub-prime mortgages to infiltrate our once sound banking industry.

And not only did Flaherty give them 150 billion dollars of our money, but they also tapped the U.S. government for 111 billion dollars more.

And you would think that after such a generous gift, our banks would ease up on service charges. Nope. Instead they gave their execs bonuses of 8 billion in 2009 and 10 billion in 2010. Rewarded for the fine job they are doing.

In the November 2009 "Markets At A Glance" investment newsletter by Eric Sprott and David Franklin, they revealed:

"Acknowledging the leverage levels above, you may wonder how the Canadian banks escaped the 2008 meltdown unscathed. The answer is that they received significant assistance from the Canadian government. First, they received $65 billion in liquidity injections from the Insured Mortgage Purchase Program (IMPP), whereby Canada Mortgage and Housing (CMHC) purchased insured mortgages from Canadian banks to provide additional liquidity on the asset side of their balance sheets. Next, the Bank of Canada provided them with an additional $45 billion in temporary liquidity facilities. Finally, a Canadian Bank (that shall remain nameless) also received assistance from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) through the purchase of $4 billion in mortgages prior to the IMPP program, for a total government expenditure of $114 billion.

more..DM
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
04:08 AM on 11/09/2011
Flaherty recently announced that he will be spending $6.5 million to advertise his government's tax policies as helping Canadians. What won't be included in this taxpayer funded blitz, is the fact that taxes only went down for the wealthy, while Canada's working class have seen an increase.

http://pushedleft.blogspot.com/2011/01/harper-and-flahertys-voodoo-economics.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/tax-man-to-hit-canadian-workers-harder-in-2011/article1851480

&

Their corporate tax rate is 34.2% and Harper and Flaherty are attempting to reduce ours to 15%, roughly half. And under the current agreement, the difference goes directly to the American treasury. $500 million annually for every point difference.

Statscan's former chief statistician Munir Sheikh
The Globe and Mail

A Canada-U.S. tax gap means a Canada-U.S. tax transfer ..

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/a-canada-us-tax-gap-means-a-canada-us-tax-transfer/article1991567