Raw Food Provides Less Energy Than Cooked

First Posted: 11/11/11 04:14 PM ET Updated: 11/11/11 09:34 PM ET

Plate


Cooking food boosts the amount of energy your body can get from it — and hence the weight you gain by eating it.


That applies to both meat and potatoes, and likely had a profound effect on human evolution, says a study published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


It also means that current food labels — which list the same number of calories for ingredients whether they are raw or cooked — are inaccurate, suggests Rachel Carmody, a researcher at Harvard University and lead author of the study.


Evolutionary biologists had long suspected that the human diet became significantly more energy rich in the past two million years due to changes in the human body that make it require more energy, said Carmody, a graduate student specializing in human evolutionary biology.


"We see … increases in body mass, increases in brain size, some adaptations to energetically costly exercises such as long distance running," she told CBC's Quirks & Quarks in an interview set to air Saturday.


Interestingly, those changes came at a time when humans' teeth and guts were getting smaller, providing further evidence that the human diet must have been getting richer in energy.


Some scientists hypothesized that the extra energy may have come from eating meat. Previous studies found that cooking starchy foods increased the amount of energy that could be extracted from them by the digestive system.


Carmody and her colleagues decided to test the effect of cooking on the amount of energy provided by meat.


Because the risk of food poisoning makes feeding humans raw meat as part of an experiment impossible, the researchers ran their experiment on mice, which have a similar digestive system to humans, and can eat both meat and vegetable matter.


They compared the weight of mice that were fed either raw or cooked meat. And they performed the same experiment with raw or cooked sweet potato.


"In both diets, the cooked food led to a higher body mass," Carmody said.


The researchers suggest that is largely because cooking food makes it easier to digest.


"We can think of it as externalizing part of the digestive process," Carmody said.


As a result, the body doesn't have to expend as much energy producing digestive acids and enzymes and using muscles to push the food through. The food may also be digested higher in the digestive tract, allowing more of it to be absorbed by the body. Lower in the digestive tract, bacteria that live in the human gut take more of the food for themselves.


Finally, because cooking kills harmful food-borne microbes, the body doesn't have to spend as much energy on the immune system to deal with those microbes.


Carmody said researchers still aren't sure exactly when humans adopted cooking during their history. But she believes that whenever it happened, it had a significant impact on the amount of energy they could get from their food.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

Cooking food boosts the amount of energy your body can get from it — and hence the weight you gain by eating it. That applies to both meat and potatoes, and likely had a pro...
Cooking food boosts the amount of energy your body can get from it — and hence the weight you gain by eating it. That applies to both meat and potatoes, and likely had a pro...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:59 PM on 11/11/2011
Gotta go with Ross NW on this one. I've done much experimenting with foods as well, and meat doesn't digest easily, which is why it makes one sleepy. I eat raw fruits and vegetables on a regular basis, and have never had so much energy. I too, eat meat - hormone and antibiotic-free - on occasion, but only after my work day is finished, since it does require more digestion. I sometimes steam vegetables, but for the taste, other than the nutrition. And I always have a large salad with them. I work an evening shift, and often take a large raw fruit salad for my dinner becasue it gives me the energy I need, without the sedative effect of something heavier. It works well. As for raw meat....I don't imagine it sits well on an unaccustomed stomach. Given enough time and exposure, I suspect our stomachs will adapt to most foods to some extent. The question would then be: Why eat something that your body must adapt to, when foods that require no adaptation to human digestion, are so readily available?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
09:00 PM on 11/11/2011
This 'research' is far to vague and broad to be accurate. There are numerous benefits to both raw and cooked food, depending on many circumstances. In some cases, raw food provides numerous positive digestive bacteria, where as cooked food doesn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
08:59 PM on 11/11/2011
"Because the risk of food poisoning makes feeding humans raw meat as part of an experiment impossible."

Perhaps it would be an insurance risk, but one can certainly eat raw meat with no problem if it is fresh and of good quality.
08:41 PM on 11/11/2011
Using a sweet potato on mice is somehow proof? If you want to learn about the merits of cooked vs. raw foods, try eating greens, fruit, avocados, and/or coconuts. A starchy vegetable like a potato of course has to be cooked to utilize its nutrients efficiently, but the same is not true for all vegetables.

I've experimented with both vegetarian and non vegetarian diets. While I occasionally eat meat or fish, any meat in the morning makes me sleepy. On the other hand, fruit (including fresh squeezed juice or a smoothy, both raw ingredients) and wholesome grains provide me more energy so I can skip the coffee.

I don't need bad science to tell me what to eat. Everybody's body is different, but a reality check is in order on this one.