Keystone XL Pipeline Delay: Canada Will Boost Exports To Asia, Harper Tells Obama At APEC Summit

Apec Stephen Harper Barack Obama Keystone Pipeline

First Posted: 11/13/2011 4:05 am Updated: 01/13/2012 5:12 am

HONOLULU, Hawaii - Canada has emerged from meetings with Asia Pacific nations with one foot firmly facing East in search of new economic opportunities and the other kicking its largest trading partner for delaying a major Canadian pipeline.

While the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation forums are often consumed with the nitty gritty of regulations and rules, Prime Minister Stephen Harper used the two days in Hawaii to more forcefully advance a trade strategy for the region that his government has been promising for the last five years.

Frazzled European and American markets mean all eyes are now on Asia Pacific economies and in their summit declaration, leaders of the 21-member APEC said the region is now the vanguard for global growth due to previous progress in forging closer economic ties and free trade.

Their efforts received a boost from U.S. President Barack Obama's success in brokering an expansion of an existing free trade bloc of countries in the region from four members to nine, with three more knocking at the door.

Canada's sudden reversal on its willingness to join the Trans Pacific Partnership was welcomed by the Americans, as having Canada as well as Mexico and Japan decide to join talks gives the new accord significant economic heft.

But the importance of Asian markets also saw Harper take a strong tone with his American counterpart.

While the two leaders took a chummy walk along a palm treed lined path at the resort hosting the summit, Harper had strong language for the president over the U.S. State Department's decision to order the Keystone XL pipeline rerouted and subject to further environmental assessment.

The 2,700-kilometre pipeline would bring crude from the new oilsands expansions in northern Alberta to be turned into gasoline and other fuels in Texas, the hub of the American refining industry.

The project will now be delayed for over a year, and so Canada must look elsewhere, Harper said.

"This highlights why Canada must increase its efforts to ensure it can supply its energy outside the United States and into Asia in particular," he told reporters.

"And that in the meantime, Canada will step up its efforts in that regard and I communicated that clearly to the president."

According to the White House account of the meeting, Obama said he supported the decision to delay TransCanada's Keystone XL project "to ensure that all questions are properly addressed and all the potential impacts are properly understood."

During a bilateral meeting on Saturday, Chinese President Hu Jintao noted with approval Harper's attempts to reach out and invited him to visit next year.

"You have repeatedly stated that you attach importance to our relationship and that you hope to forge an even closer relationship with China," Jintao said.

"I appreciate that position."

China has appeared reluctant to endorse the Pacific trade pact, likely wary of being drawn into an initiative that encroaches on its own sphere of influence in Asia.

Critics had been screaming that for Canada to lose out on the TPP was to blow a major economic opportunity, so it was with relief the Conservative government realized that the criteria for membership released on the weekend posed no threat to their longstanding support of dairy, egg and poultry farmers.

"It demonstrates our commitment to further deepen trade links in the Asia Pacific region," Harper said of the decision to join the TPP.

But Harper remained steadfast in his commitment to supply management as well, saying there was no need to lift the system of quotas and price controls on certain elements of the agricultural sector.

"Dairy, poultry and other sectors have been very healthy agricultural sectors in this country and that's why we think our policies are valuable," Harper said.

"But obviously as you know we're constantly in trade talks but I continue to believe we can advance our interests while at the same time protecting our interests in those various sectors."

Harper also signalled that a border security deal with the U.S. is nearing conclusion.

He announced that he'll visit Obama in December and that the deal will be part of their discussions

The "Beyond the Border" deal that was announced with much fanfare nine months ago as a way to continue to secure the borders but not choke off vital trade.

"It will be a very comprehensive package when it is announced," Harper said.

Harper And Obama's One-On-One Meeting
1  of  12
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
HONOLULU, HI - NOVEMBER 13: U.S. President Barack Obama talks with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit at the J.W. Marriott Hotel on November 13, 2011 in Honolulu, Hawaii. The United States hosted this year's APEC summit, with leaders from the 21 member economies convening on the island of Oahu. (Photo by Kent Nishimura- Pool/Getty Images)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

HONOLULU, Hawaii - Canada has emerged from meetings with Asia Pacific nations with one foot firmly facing East in search of new economic opportunities and the other kicking its largest trading partner...
HONOLULU, Hawaii - Canada has emerged from meetings with Asia Pacific nations with one foot firmly facing East in search of new economic opportunities and the other kicking its largest trading partner...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 262
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
08:53 PM on 12/05/2011
Q. What is the chance that, once the pipeline is built, a major environmental disaster will occur?

A. 100%

Q. What's the chance the corporatists who caused it will clean it up or pay for it to be cleaned up?

A. 0%
10:27 PM on 11/15/2011
I can't figure out whether TransCanada has Harper in their pocket, or Harper has TransCanada in his pocket. Either way, I don't like the idea of the pipeline any more than I like Stephen Harper,.....That would be NOT.
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
08:46 PM on 12/05/2011
Harper and his cadre of regressives "couldn't be more bought if they were a hooker's enthusiasm." His prime directive is to deliver low-paid wage slaves to his owners.

Thank goodness Canadians are beginning to awaken to how they've been "loved" by the upper 1%.
02:11 AM on 11/15/2011
I like this CanadaStan! He's a wave of fresh air!
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
08:48 PM on 12/05/2011
No. No he's not. He has a special relationship with Satan (in the Bill Hicks sense of the word).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
10:09 PM on 11/14/2011
Why doesn't Canada just build some processing facilities so they don't have to bud the pipeline at all? And benefit Canada economically in the process.

For Conservatives to pretend that shipping crude to Asia or the US is somehow beneficial to Canada is pretty short sighted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:34 AM on 11/15/2011
Because then you need a separate pipeline for each finished product, or you have to keep switching products in the pipeline.
08:34 AM on 11/15/2011
Sounds like a pretty minor complaint considering the potential benefits that would ensue - like selling a finished product rather than more export of raw materials for other countries to us to make money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
08:44 PM on 11/15/2011
What "separate products'?

The only reason Canada doesnt build processing infrastructure is American interests. Canadian politicians dont care about Canada.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dread
02:43 PM on 11/14/2011
You people are forgetting that American politicians vote the way they are told to vote by their masters. If BP and Exxon do not want the Keystone pipeline they just tell Obama to kill it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
10:10 PM on 11/14/2011
Why wouldn't BP or Exxon want the XL pipeline? Specifically, not just some vague assumption. Show me the numbrs that show why their business would be hurt by tarsand oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don McLeod
01:33 PM on 11/14/2011
Harper's Conservative Christian Canada thumbed its nose at China with so many trips to Taiwan my his caucus when Harper took power. Also when he pressured China on freedoms for Harper's alliance partners. That Christians and missionary alliance people who need to proselytize to ensure they don't end up in hell when they die a final time. China will look at Harper's Conservative Christian Canada with more knowledge than most Canadians have. China is wary of Christians for good reason. Christians rewarded and empowered their China's own local "Snakes in Suits" just decades ago and the unfairness that happened as a result set the Boxer's off on a killing spree. China will be tough on Harper's Conservative Christian Canada.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:35 AM on 11/15/2011
What is the fastest growing religion in China?
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
08:50 PM on 12/05/2011
Religion was the opium of the masses - now it's sports CanStan - get with the times.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
12:31 PM on 11/14/2011
Harper is counting his proverbial chickens before they hatch.

Google bc's stand on the Enridge pipeline

and/or bc's stand on oil tankers on the coast

Polls show that at least 70% of British Columbians are against super tankers navigating the dangerous, remote northern coast. The Enridge pipeline would bring 225 super tankers to the coast every year. The result of one spill would devastate the coast. Former Premier Campbell was shot down when he proposed it and with an election coming up in the next year or so the Liberals would be committing political suicide if they support it.

Disapproval of the actual pipeline is also strong in the communities that the pipeline would run through.
01:51 PM on 11/14/2011
That's why they'd porbably try to ship out of the Port of Churchhill instead. Less problems getting a pipeline built, and a faster shipping journey to Asia (Mirmansk and access to the Northern Sea Route). Trouble is the limited time it's open (4 months) but that would give enough of a window for significant supplies of oil to go each year by super tanker. there's a reason that the Canadian government has been expanding the Port of Churchhill.
01:59 PM on 11/14/2011
Oh, forgot to mention - the Russians are building an oil pipeline to Murmansk, that through connectivity would give access to Northern China - so the plan would likely be, pipe it to Manitoba, sail it by supertanker to Murmansk in just 9 days, and put it in the pipeline at their end.
12:22 PM on 11/14/2011
This tar goop is a pretty hard sell isn't it?

Europe doesnt want it, the US doesnt want it. China might want it although I dont see anything other than a lukewarm response.

Maybe its not the slam dunk we thought it was. The right tried the ethical oil angle (which made them a laughingstock) and the blood oil angle which made everyone just roll their eyes.
12:47 PM on 11/14/2011
Well put. Short. Concise.And to the point. Now I must decide "to agree or not to agree" That Is The Question!
01:13 PM on 11/14/2011
You can bet that any country with real oil to sell has ambassadors lined up at their doors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tooldude
02:30 PM on 11/14/2011
The cool thing about that "goop", is that it has been in production for 30+ years already. You have most likely used some product that has been produced from Athabasca oil sands crude.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:32 PM on 11/14/2011
unlikely if it's piped down to the USA already. Tar sands stays pretty much in the West, the other 2/3rds of the country never uses it. That's how the pipelines flow.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:20 PM on 11/14/2011
The Republicans are going to use this issue to make Obama look bad in the next election. They will claim that Obama's indecision cost America jobs, energy, and money. And if the Gateway project (the pipeline to the west coast) is approved within a year, it'll look even worse.

If Obama put off the Keystone decision for political reasons then he has misjudged badly.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:37 PM on 11/14/2011
totally not true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
10:59 PM on 11/14/2011
You may want to re-consider your analysis. The Republicans will use this to criticize The O, yes. But the people who will be receptive to that criticism are *already critical of him. There are no tangible jobs being risked here. No one is out of work because their job was suspended because of this. The jobs haven't even been created yet. o the political loss on that side is close to zero.

Alternatively, if Obama DID pass the pipeline without further environmental review, many on the left who will likely vote for him in 2012 might not. So, by delaying it, he clearly is trying to assuage those environmentalist voters on the left. Now, many on the left suspect this is just him postponing the inevitable, but the risk is from the left, not the right.
11:56 AM on 11/14/2011
Dear Prime Minister,
Why not stop the oil sands project and instead use the tar for macadam surfacing? It would probably be cheaper than the current methods and keep all the jobs in Alberta. On the energy desk you need to give the poor Canadian public a break and stop exporting our resources. Apply surplus to the domestic supply instead of bunkering for more profit.
Its no longer a secret that Canada's oil reserves are the largest in the world and the public, who are the actual owners excluded by the greedy energy block, are actually funding the feeding frenzy. If you reopen Canadian refineries and re-activate car manufacture in Ontario we could get back thousands of jobs.
Think about it. We could be a real country with our own economy not driven by world markets and capricious neighbors.
Oh Canada, Dormez Vous?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tooldude
02:32 PM on 11/14/2011
Not Harpers decision to make. This is Albertas oil, and the people of Alberta decide its fate.
02:46 PM on 11/14/2011
Only in alberta. Access to move it outside their province is not only albertas decision i think
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:34 PM on 11/14/2011
Not if it passes international borders.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:22 PM on 11/14/2011
I thought that as well, why not use it to make rubber and asphalt, and sell it for tar and feather parties.
11:36 AM on 11/14/2011
With our luck when the pipeline, port facilities have been expanded to supply oil to China, that will be the precise time that China will have their financial collapse. Then when we scramble to ship the stuff back south, the Americans will give us the one finger salute.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
10:18 PM on 11/14/2011
I, too, chortle at the notion that Asia is a preferable or stable economy in comparison to the US. It certainly is a popular notion among the less-informed and the knee-jerk anti-Americans, but it certainly doesn't make sense economically. Asia's economy is in even worse shape than the US, and are still in the middle of a housing bubble. When that bursts, China's level of consumption will grind to a halt. The us economy might not be what it was a decade ago, but it is still WAY stronger than Asia, and the US is Canada's physical neighbor. The notion that either country can do without the other is absurd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
11:18 AM on 11/14/2011
So the Chinese will say to Harper, "So, the Americans wont take your oil, huh? Ok, we'll give you, oh, let's say 1/2 of the world price for it". You can't exactly drive a hard bargain when you've just lost your biggest customer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:17 PM on 11/14/2011
The Chinese will be in competition with dozens of other countries for the oil. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, you name it.
07:12 PM on 11/14/2011
We haven't actually lost a customer. We've just failed in increasing our output and delivery speed to them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
10:19 PM on 11/14/2011
Well, build some processing enters.
10:20 AM on 11/14/2011
Obama, as a senator, voted "Present" instead of Yes or No, over 50 percent of the time rather than making a decision and not wanting to offend anyone. This pipeline issue had been studied for over three years and Hilary Clinton had said it will be approved. Then some environmentalists protested and Obama overruled her. This is another example of his stalling tactics, his caving to special interests and his desire to get re-elected at the expense of America's greatest ally whose soldiers made the ultimate sacrifice by helping the US in Afghanistan. Canada should sell its oil to the Chinese instead.
10:57 AM on 11/14/2011
Good analogy. my concern is "said the mouse to the elephant". I think though that when 1 out of every 10 people living in Calgary in 2008 was american the debate is already over. However i do give Prime Minister harper credit for trying to bluff with his economic base.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
10:59 AM on 11/14/2011
Canada should reconsider the tar sands entirely. How much more do we have to embaress ourselves when it comes to the environment. As the Texans say, we are all hat and no cattle. Canada used to stand for something other than making a quick buck.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 AM on 11/14/2011
Did you forget that the conservatives are in power? Oil money is all they really care about. Well that and war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cityprole
old,sly, crafty,arty, leftie
12:03 PM on 11/14/2011
"Used to" being the operative term..
Living on Vancouver island in BC, the last thing i want to hear about is a pipeline to our coast..this is something worth a big fight, and i know I'm ready..I hope the rest of the Province is, too..I cannot imagine another Exxon Valdiz, but totally probable on our beautiful coast..Harper is in for the fight of his political life if he tries to shove this down our throats..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:18 AM on 11/14/2011
Sad fact, Canada will never have trouble selling oil. Sad fact #2, oil sands are making a huge mess of Northern Alberta and yes, are affecting nearby first nations community with high rates of cancer.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2011/08/19/edm-cancer-oilsands-fort-chipewyan-study.html

Sad fact #3, running a pipeline through British Columbia to the coast to sell oil to Asia will be a conservationist's nightmare, cutting through pristine park lands.
10:32 AM on 11/14/2011
The fact is, every Northern community has high rates of cancer and they are no where near the oil sands.
Compare the cancer rates with smoking, diets, sedentary lifestyles and you will find your answer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 AM on 11/14/2011
Read the article. We're not talking about rates comparable to anything else. A study has been ordered based on preliminary evidence. And all those non-smoking fish in the water are also having a hard time.
11:40 AM on 11/14/2011
It is a well known fact that cancer rates rise in direct proportion to the distance from the equator. Sunshine ameliorates cancer rates.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:25 PM on 11/14/2011
Fact #1: A provincial commission did indeed find somewhat higher rates of cancer within one native community, but were unable to identify the cause. It may have been pure chance or the pulp mills or the abandoned uranium mine or cultural or the oil sands or some combination.

Fact #2: The disturbed area in Northern Alberta is currently 600 sq km, one-twelfth the area of Greater Toronto.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 PM on 11/14/2011
Tell that to the fish and the rivers because I don't think they got the memo.
06:03 PM on 11/14/2011
Keep the facts coming Black Rabbit.
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
10:13 AM on 11/14/2011
So quotas and price controls on eggs and dairy products are good, but a wheat marketing board is bad? I really wish this guy would map out his logic on government's role vis a vis commodities. Right now it appears to be policy by whim.
10:40 AM on 11/14/2011
I agree with what you say could that whim be that Canada is divided into little strategic blocks. do and say this here but not there to get the vote in particular blocks? I think this is politics in general.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
11:11 AM on 11/14/2011
I'm guessing that someone on the Wheat Board once made fun of little Stevie in school and this is payback.