Don't Wait For Pregnancy, Say OB/GYNs

Wait For Pregnancy

First Posted: 11/16/11 04:24 PM ET Updated: 11/18/11 02:22 PM ET

TORONTO - New guidance from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is warning Canadian women against postponing pregnancy for too long.

The society says some women may be waiting too long to start their families, perhaps because they over-estimate their chances of successfully conceiving with fertility treatments, if the need arises.

It says women in their 20s and 30s need better reproductive counselling so that they have an accurate grasp of what waiting to start their families does to their chances of conceiving.

It says women need to know that fertility begins to decline significantly in the early- to mid-30s and that male fertility also declines with age.

"Some Canadian women may be inadvertently postponing pregnancy too long," says Dr. Kimberly Liu, principal co-author of the new guideline.

"There is a sense that women may be over-estimating the potential of assisted human reproductive technologies and underestimating the risks and complications associated with delaying pregnancy.”

A statement from the society says a lot of women are unaware of the limitations of assisted reproduction, as well as the fact that the success rates of these options decline steadily as women hit their late 30s and 40s.

"Fertility treatments aren’t a sure-fire route to pregnancy -- their rates of success are greatly influenced by age-related declines in fertility," says Dr. Allison Case, Liu's co-author of the guideline.

"Time can be of the essence for a woman in her thirties who needs assistive reproductive technology -- it is important that she gets appropriate treatment for her age."

The society says the proportion of women who delay childbearing beyond the age of 35 has increased significantly in recent decades.

Quick Poll

Do you think there's a right age to get pregnant?

Yes - mid-20s

Yes - 30ish

Yes - mid-30s

No - it's whenever it works for you

Other

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

TORONTO - New guidance from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is warning Canadian women against postponing pregnancy for too long.The society says some women may be waiting too long to st...
TORONTO - New guidance from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is warning Canadian women against postponing pregnancy for too long.The society says some women may be waiting too long to st...
Filed by CP  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
the pilgrim has landed
12:55 AM on 11/20/2011
Please, no more pregnant 60+ year olds.
12:50 AM on 11/18/2011
I don't put much faith in these studies, since they are often slanted to say what the "experts" want them to say, by omitting other information pertinent to the final results. In any case, women have been told for decades that they risk lower fertility rates by not having their children by the ripe old age of 25 or 30. Look around: it's utter nonsense. Women have children later - or not at all - and it doesn't seem to concern them too much. And that's as it should be. But, since the scare tactics haven't worked all that well, they're targeting the men, now. As things stand, most experts think the earth is over-populated anyway, which begs the question: Why would anyone be concerned with fertility rates when it clearly ISN'T a problem?
10:28 PM on 11/17/2011
sounds like none of the commenters have dealt with infertility - which does happen to youngsters (under 30 or 35) and not just 40 somethings that 'forgot' to have kids.
Biology means it's easier to have kids at a younger age. I was aware that even starting at 28 was old, but 31 years later - nothing! Waiting for surgery that may have an effect?
Lesson: start sooner rather than later and get tested after a year!
10:26 PM on 11/17/2011
HEY LADIES!! HAVE BABIES HAVE BABIES HAVE BABIES HAVE BABIES!!! GOOD, NOW YOU'VE HAD BABIES!! OH YEAH: SORRY THERE ARE NO FLEXIBLE WORK HOURS FOR MOTHERS, NO HELP WITH DAYCARE, NO FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND NO HELPING YOU ACHIEVE WORK/LIFE BALANCE! GOOD LUCK!
01:14 AM on 11/18/2011
Best. Comment. Ever.
08:31 PM on 11/17/2011
I, for one, am getting very, very tired of these articles that make us thirty-somethings who dream of having children guilty because we haven't yet. Thank you, but we KNOW our best breeding years are behind us, but we live with real-world challenges that make it extremely difficult to have kids. There was once a time - I've been told - when an employer might hire you if you didn't have a college degree, but these days you are in school until 30 only to find yourself struggling to get any work at all, let alone one that would allow you to afford or have time for having children . Also, try having a solid relationship in your 20s when you're concentrated on school, internships, working two jobs, moving around to meet those responsibilities. Try finding a job that let's you pay for day care AND make bills, food, student loan repayments, etc. Try to find a job where your employer doesn't expect you to work overtime at the last minute or understands that you have a sick infant and can't go to work that day because your aging parents live far away and cannot help out. Try having kids when you have aging parents who need your financial support. The point is, many women and men push off having kids, because doing so is the responsible thing to do. The real world is not kid friendly.
10:28 PM on 11/17/2011
beautifully put. could not agree more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vorpalmusic
08:03 PM on 11/17/2011
Other: do not have children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
06:38 PM on 11/17/2011
The largest issue is one of econmics, no matter what the age is selected. Clearly the human female is most fertile in her late teens, in her twenties, then starts declining. Males too need to think about their age for optimal fertility. Creating life is a wonderful experience, but today is costly. Economic along with a good marriage stability in whatever form is paramount.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
02:48 PM on 11/17/2011
A real good message. All those teen age girls out there.
04:48 PM on 11/17/2011
What does that have to do with women needing to know they have an optimal fertility window?

They are clearly not the audience for this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
05:16 PM on 11/17/2011
You are 100% right but they (teen) read and putting this story in this window is more exposure then younger adolescent women need. Just a point from my personal 37 years in social services. Too much info is not always the best. Just my thought. Thanks for your observation and a fresh perspective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
06:35 PM on 11/17/2011
ya also the comment about the male fertility thing.. men can father up to 100 i believe and thats not just biblical opinion its fact men can conceive as a general population consistently over 80..
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
02:43 PM on 11/17/2011
I'm having kids when I'm ready to have kids. It's that simple.

I could have had kids at 21, but then I'd have been stuck in mid paying office jobs, working long hours and seeing my kids for a few hours a day between school and daycare. NO THANKYOU.

My wife and I plan on having kids in 2-3 years, (I'll be 20-31), with the entire point of waiting being that we're now living a lifestyle which will allow us to be with our kids almost all the time, look after them ourselves and help guide them through life instead of trying to raise them on the side while trying to guide myself through life.

My ex (we broke up because she wanted kids and I wanted to wait) lived in a part of the province where getting pregnant before your 20s what all the rave. It should be obvious that kids in that part of town are all mostly rotten idiots. In her desperate attempt to get kids asap, she's now on her third husdand and nursing her fifth child. Talk about dodging a bullet !
03:57 PM on 11/17/2011
I'm totally on board with Jay - my wife and I are in the exact same boat and are waiting until we have our lives sorted out before we try creating a whole new life.

The info in the article is great to have but doesn't change the fact that, regardless of how old we are, we're not having kids until we are ready. If that means we miss the window, well so be it.
04:55 PM on 11/17/2011
It is always nice of the men to be so sure of these decisions for their partners.

You know, since they are fertile for their entire lives so if they change their mind they can just change their woman.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shandra Brown Valyear
Political Addict
02:39 PM on 11/17/2011
I was 34 when I had my first child and 37 when I had my second. They are the joy of my life. I work in a field where I see a huge age range of women having children (15-40 appr,). I have seen some really good teen moms and really good older moms but I have also seen the reverse in all age groups. Having children depends on the individual, not just physically and emotionally but also how a child will fit into their lifestyle. I personally would not encourage people to have children when they are young but I would encourage them to really look at the three elements I mentioned before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SMK1414
just another community organizer
02:33 PM on 11/17/2011
I believe the natural process of reproduction is the best, with exception for those who struggle to become pregnant and need medical assistance.

I would like to see a return to the promotion of a natural process of reproduction, especially when it involves taking away the body's natural reproduction and birth process. I have been subject to and watched relatives friends, and general media/populous become more and more accepting to artificially inducing the birth process and planning for or consequently receiving surgery for brith purposes.

The notion that our bodies cannot do what is natural and we must predict and intervene or even plan it conveniently for the mother or ob. takes away from the natural process for baby and mother. I am not suggesting safe medication is unacceptable. I have had my own experience and understand the labour of giving birth. It feels that we are forgetting how abandoning a natural process can affect the baby and the healthy instincts that occurr for both baby and mother.

Women naturally begin their journey when and if they desire a baby in a healthy and rewarding manner.(biological, or adoption) Again I am speaking of the majority of women, not those who do require the assistance and intervention, with attention to baby and mother medical assistance can be as natural as possible and also very rewarding. It is not a convenience, it is a tremendous responsibility and life change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scooterish
Please pass the meat!
02:14 PM on 11/17/2011
I knew I always wanted children, even at a very young age, but my first was not born until I was 39 and the next one at 42. I tried to get pregnant for 6 years before we conceived, and only one time to conceive the 2nd time. I'm very happy it turned out the way it did. I know so much more than I did in my early 30's and only do what's I feel that's right for me and my family. I don't listen to these studies and the fear that is born of them. Children bring love and teach love and that is why we have them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
01:56 PM on 11/17/2011
Well if anything this is the most hopeful sign for the planet's future - the more educated and wealthy we get, the less children we have and sometimes we end up unable to conceive because we wait too long. Perhaps in 50 years this trend will finally put a cap back on our population - 7 billion is already quite much.
02:31 PM on 11/17/2011
Nick you are wrong. If you are educated and wealthy, it is better to have more children. The world needs more children coming from educated, stable families than the opposite. I am pretty you can figure out why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
03:25 PM on 11/17/2011
You misunderstand me. As education and wealth rises *around the world*... population growth falls. My having 5 educated (and not as well off anymore) kids using resources at a Canadian rate is not what the world needs. My having 2 kids is enough. I don't even have one yet btw.
For reference:
http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.html
06:23 PM on 11/17/2011
Being educated or financially secure is not a guarantee on a better child rearing environment. Domestic abuse, child abuse, those things happen no matter how wealthy you are.
01:14 PM on 11/17/2011
If you are not ready when you are biologically at your prime, then think about adoption if you are choosing to start a family later. There are much greater risks to giving birth in your late 30s and 40s and there are many healthy children who need permanent families. And if this is something you would consider, start the process a couple of years early of when you would like to start parenting. I have had bio children in my late twenties and would like another, but feel given mine and my husband's age the most responsible way to do this is thorough adoption. We are two years into the process and are awaiting the referral of a baby/toddler. And it has been every bit as special as when I was pregnant with my bio kids- not 'second best' at all.
01:30 PM on 11/17/2011
It isn't babies that need to be adopted. It is older children who flounder in the system in need of parents.
01:50 PM on 11/17/2011
Yes, very true but unfortunately when you have biological children you have to take into consideration that most older children coming out of care have experienced a lot of physical, mental, and/or sexual abuse. It would be irresponsible of us as parents to potentially expose our young children to that. As well as the fact that many agencies in adoption will not allow it. And, there are millions of babies around the world who need adopting too, please don't kid yourself. Those 'older' children you refer to were once babies who have not been adopted. I will also address the obvious comment(s) that will be made about adopting domestically. It was our first preference but we are not allowed to because a) we can have bio children b) we are not of Aboriginal or African descent and will not be considered for those children, which unfortunately make up the vast majority of children in care in our province. So it is not as simple as 'yes, I will take an 11 year old child out of care and into our family'.
04:51 AM on 11/19/2011
If women shouldn't have kids in their 30s or 40s, then biologically they would be unable to have kids. So, your thinking is seriously flawed. If you would stop assuming that you know anything and start reading actual medical literature, you would find that there is only a slight increase in risk for problems for women in their 30s and much more so for women in their 40s. BTW - the article is about fertility, NOT about pregnancy risks. Pregnancy "risks" have a lot to do with a woman's health status. So, a fat or unhealthy woman (i.e., smoker, drinker, etc.) in her 20s has much more of a risk of negative outcomes in pregnancy than would a healthy 30-something woman. Also, if you know anything about statistics, then you would know that the increase in chromosome problems as a woman ages (another "risk") is actually a very tiny percentage (meaning 95% or more will have normal pregnancies) and testing is usually fairly accurate in predicting a problem. Also, there are similar risks to women in their late teens to early twenties as there are to women in their 40s. So, it's great that you had your "bio children" in your late twenties and you luckily do not want to have any more children, but keep your ignorance about medical knowledge to yourself because it makes you look stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKQueenie
No such thing as coincidence, just synchronicity.
01:06 PM on 11/17/2011
I had to log on just so I could F&F all the posters below me. All really great points and really, each of you said something I would have said anyway. Glad to know people still think before making huge life decisions. Children are not just for 18 years of your life....it's a life long challenge of love and patience. Not just about ...I dunno, retiring early and gifts.

...Maybe I said too much, but thats why Im here, I guess...