Alberta Drunk Driving Law To Crack Down On Impaired Drivers

First Posted: 11/21/11 04:57 PM ET Updated: 11/21/11 07:49 PM ET

Drunk Driving

EDMONTON - Alberta is cracking down on suspected impaired drivers with proposed legislation that calls for more mandatory vehicle seizures and licence suspensions.

The group Mothers Against Drunk Driving is praising the move, saying the prospect of having their vehicle impounded will stop people from drinking and getting behind the wheel.

But the hospitality industry says some of the measures aimed at social drinkers will drive business away from Alberta bars and restaurants, especially in rural areas.

Transportation Minister Ray Danyluk says Bill 26 is not aimed at people having a drink while out for dinner or with friends, but on changing people's behaviour.

"I have one goal for this legislation, and that is having more Albertans arrive home safe at the end of day," Danyluk said Monday.

Under the proposed changes, drivers caught with over the legal blood alcohol limit of .08 for the first time would have their vehicle impounded for three days. They'd also lose their licence until the criminal charge was resolved.

They would then have to install an alcohol screening device for one year — at their own cost — to prevent their vehicle from starting if booze were detected.

Repeat offenders would have to use the alcohol screening devices for up to five years and take a remedial driving course before getting their licence back.

Danyluk called the measures the toughest in Canada.

The other major change proposed in Bill 26 calls for drivers caught with blood alcohol levels below the legal limit — from .05 to .08 — to lose their vehicles and licences for three days.

The British Columbia government is reporting a 47 per cent drop in alcohol-related motor vehicle deaths 10 months after it introduced such immediate suspensions for people suspected of driving just below the legal limit.

Andrew Murie, CEO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said Alberta's legislation closely follows the B.C. model and will yield results.

"The fact that you would lose your vehicle for three days has enormous behaviour change on the public. The fact that they might lose their car is not worth the risk," Murie said from Toronto.

"That is what makes the big difference. That is where Alberta is going to get success from the delivery of this program."

Business groups say parts of the legislation aimed at people caught driving with just below the legal limit of alcohol will send a chill through the hospitality industry.

Mark Von Schellwitz of the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association says the group's 4,000 members in Alberta are worried they will lose sales.

He pointed to B.C., where some owners are reporting significant drops in customers. He said the association would prefer the province crack down harder on problem drunk drivers.

"More than 80 per cent think that it is going to have a very negative impact on their businesses as happened in British Columbia," he said.

"About 88 per cent of our B.C. licensed members reported an average drop in sales of 21 per cent."

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business called on the Alberta government to consult with restaurant and bar owners before passing the law.

The federation said it also wants the province to focus more on what it calls high-risk impaired drivers.

"The goal should be to ensure effective enforcement strategies to combat impaired driving without such a negative impact on small business," said Richard Truscott, the federation's Alberta director.

Police in Alberta can already hand out temporary licence suspensions, but only for 24 hours.

The government says Bill 26 does not include increased fines or demerit points for impaired driving because there is no evidence they have a significant impact.

Last year, 96 people died and 1,384 were injured in Alberta because of impaired driving.

The bill also calls for changes to rules governing new drivers, especially people under 18.

It says novice drivers with a graduated licence would have their vehicle seized for seven days if they were found with any alcohol in their system. Their licence would be taken away for 30 days.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CommonWealth-SinglePayer
Walk on the Right, VOTE on the LEFT
11:37 PM on 11/22/2011
Should be called the King Ralph Law
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:32 AM on 11/22/2011
The problem is more with the courts. They don't treat criminal negligence or vehicular manslaughter as serious as they should regarding drunk drivers. Courts can take away drivers licences but if people want to drive they still will. They do and they always can find another car to drive. These people need treatment but not in a day facility but rather an enclosed facility where they live and breath treatments with extremely severe control after their release. Once a drinking driver always a drinking driver. My body takes a year off work due to alcohalism, returns to work sober and within a year is back to drinking, saying, "I'll just have one" over lunch" I don't see him much any more. scary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:00 AM on 11/22/2011
Is there any evidence that a driver is impaired at 0.05 BAC?
Why is it being lowered from 0.08?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:58 AM on 11/22/2011
No need to lower the BAC, just enforce the existing law, and maybe toughen the penalties.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
10:45 PM on 11/21/2011
Best thing they ever did. Drunk drivers are selfish people who should suffer the full force of the law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JJJSchmidt
08:31 PM on 11/21/2011
It is not the drivers that will blow 0.05 to 0.07 that are the menace on the roads. Realistically, the laws now are saying if you are going out and going to have a drink regardless of quantity don't drive. I think the new laws are overkill.
08:27 PM on 11/21/2011
Provincial and federal governments and MADD are all after the drunk drivers that cause 30% of the road fatalities in Canada.

No one seems bothered that 70% of deaths are caused by SOBER divers. Why no action on that front?
07:18 PM on 11/21/2011
Mind boggling to see business' complain that they are losing out when lives are being saved. And it's kind of sad that news of a government getting tougher on DUI's is news. I would have liked to think that all provinces/states are already crack'n down as much as humanly possible to keep drunks and attics off the roads.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:16 PM on 11/21/2011
lol . . . only in Alberta

"Please let them drive drunk over short distances . . . it hurts our bar income."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
09:21 PM on 11/21/2011
Actually not. BC brought in very similar legislation early this year (I think it was) and er heard all the same rants.
06:59 PM on 11/21/2011
Zero tolerance I would love to see. If you are going to drink then don't drive period. Here in Ontario As of May 1, 2009, if you’re caught driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) from 0.05 to 0.08 (known as the "warn range"), the police can immediately suspend your licence up to three days for a first occurrence, seven days for a second occurrence and 30 days for a third or subsequent occurrence. And I applaud this revision in the laws in Ontario...bravo!!

Plus for Alberta, Manitoba and Quebec the drinking age should be 19 like the rest of Canada.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:18 PM on 11/21/2011
The drinking age can never be higher than the military service age.

You cannot tell an 18 year old that he/she can die for the country but can't have a beer.
07:28 PM on 11/21/2011
In BC, Saskatchewan, Ontario and the Maritime Provinces they can .... and do.
photo
WorkInCanada
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. John W
06:55 PM on 11/21/2011
In Saskatchewan if your blood alcohol level is between .04 and .07 inclusive it's an automatic suspension and vehicle is impounded. It's a good thing and has been in place for 15 years. Really, really makes people think twice about a second drink, and a third is taxi time for sure. I know someone who had 2 beers while waiting for his take out food and ended up with a BAC of .04 so now he knows he HAS to stop at one.

"The blood alcohol content (BAC) for 24-hour roadside suspensions
will be reduced to .04 from the current level of .06. The
Criminal Code (federal law) BAC for all drivers remains at .08.
This is the level at which drivers can be fined, convicted and/or
charged under the Criminal Code.
Education and addictions screening provisions for drivers who
exceed .04 BAC will be applied."
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
06:03 PM on 11/21/2011
Zero, and meters on every car. Its the law we are not going to enforce, no lets make law and save lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russg
07:30 PM on 11/21/2011
Our legal system works on a "innocent until proven guilty" basis. Your 'solution' assumes guilt until you prove your innocence (by blowing into the ignition breathalyser thingamajig). That is contrary to the free society in which we live.
photo
Mike Marlin
Good Spouse, Good Fishing,Good Friends,Proud Nativ
06:01 PM on 11/21/2011
I am against drunk driving, BUT have a problem with "Drivers caught repeatedly with blood alcohol levels just under the legal limit would lose their vehicle for up to seven days and their licence for up to 30 days" If they are below the legal limit they are not breaking the law and there vehicle should be left alone as should there licence. that is what the 0.08 is for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OhioYippieHippie
☮ If I'm free, it's because I'm always running.
07:10 PM on 11/21/2011
you lose you license no matter what for 6 months in ohio its not all bad there it sounds in some ways
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:23 PM on 11/21/2011
I agree. If they want to lower that number through legislation, then fine. But don't publish a number and then penalize someone for consistently being below that number.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russg
06:01 PM on 11/21/2011
A good start, but these penalties aren't nearly harsh enough.

Caught between .08 and, say, .14 for the first time? License revoked for one year. Second offense? Permanent revocation of your license. It is a privilege to be able to drive -- if you abuse it, you should lose it. Caught anywhere above, .14? Lifetime ban on your first offense. For either of these cases, I'd compromise by having a "faint hope" style clause where you could reapply for a license after 10 or 20 years.

Improve driver education and public transportation to go along with these rules and you have a formula for safer streets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shediac
05:49 PM on 11/21/2011
Alberta soon to run out of workers, darn.