F-35: Canadian Jets Will Initially Be Unable To Track Troops, Talk To Older Planes

F35

First Posted: 11/22/11 03:50 PM ET Updated: 11/23/11 02:50 AM ET

OTTAWA - The first dozen or so F-35s slated to arrive in Canada won't be equipped with software that allows the stealth fighters to communicate with ground forces, a feature designed to prevent incidents of friendly fire.

The initial operating system also won't be equipped with a program that helps the fighters communicate with older aircraft, such as the Air Force's Aurora surveillance planes.

The software isn't expected to be added until an upgrade program is introduced in 2019 — three years after the Royal Canadian Air Force begins taking delivery the advanced multi-role fighter.

The absence of both items in the initial operating system is alluded to in heavily-censored access-to-information documents, obtained by The Canadian Press and referenced in military publications in the United States.

The system that helps distinguish between friend and foe is known as a Blue Force Tracker, a GPS-enabled device, and its absence means the computers of the first F-35s will not be able to link with ground troops until software is updated.

Aside from being a communications tool, the tracker acts as a check against friendly fire.

Also missing is a feature known as a Link 16, which allows highly advanced aircraft to exchange data, such as text messages, with ships and other, older aircraft in real-time.

Not having either of them could mean that the country's first F-35s would have to stick close to home until the systems are installed and crews are trained in their use.

Officials with the manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, declined to answer questions about the software upgrades, which are divided into a series of blocks.

"Lockheed Martin isn't discussing Block 4 content at this time," said Keelan Green of Thornley-Fallis, an Ottawa company that handles media queries for the U.S. defence giant.

National Defence headquarters in Ottawa also declined comment and referred questions to the Pentagon's joint strike fighter office, which did not respond.

According to the Harper government, being able to operate with allies in complex air-to-ground missions, such as the recently concluded campaign over Libya, is one of the major selling points of the F-35.

It was revealed a few weeks ago that the initial batch of Canadian stealth fighters would not be able communicate in the Arctic without modification — or until the 2019 software update.

Winslow Wheeler, an expert on the American F-35 program who used to work with the U.S. General Accounting Office, said even after the updates are installed, there's still a learning curve.

"Like any new piece of hardware, it'll take years to work them into your force and years to figure out what the limitations are with the system and how to work around it and it'll take money to fill the holes," he said.

Lockheed Martin has long said that the first aircraft would only have basic software. The absence of such key capabilities goes a long way perhaps to explaining why the Canadian government has decided to stagger its purchase of 65 jets out over seven years, with the bulk of them arriving after 2020.

Canada's current fleet of CF-18s reach the end of their service life that year. Opposition parties hammered the Conservative government last week, demanding to know what the back-up plan might be if the F-35 program is cancelled in the U.S. — or delayed any further.

The program is already up to seven years behind schedule.

Wheeler warned politicians that they should be paying attention to those kinds of details and nailing down how much of the software upgrades are covered by the initial purchase — or if they are regarded as sustainment costs.

"This is the kind of game our defence departments play when they want to squeeze the price a little bit," said Wheeler. "It's the continuing story of these kind of problematic systems. The more you scratch the surface, the more you find things missing — or delayed."

Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino has said there is a Plan B in the case of more F-35 hang ups, but he refused to discuss it and would only focus on the impending purchase, which could cost taxpayers between $16 billion and $30 billion, depending upon the estimate.

The Australians, concerned about delays, have opted to purchase a handful of the Boeing Super Hornets, the upgraded version of the F-18. At the same time, the U.S. Air Force has delayed retiring 350 of its F-16 Fighting Falcons in favour of upgrading them until the F-35 arrives.

The U.S. marines inked a deal this week with Britain to buy their entire mothballed Harrier jump jet fleet. The idea would be to cannibalize the British planes for parts in order to keep their vertical take-off jets functioning until 2025.

There has been no similar discussion in Canada.

"You'd think they'd be asking Boeing for some figures on service life extension plans," said Wheeler.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier version referred to F-16 Tomcats

Loading Slideshow...
  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    FIIn this file photo taken on July 14, 2011 and released by U.S. Air Force, a USAF F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter (JSF) aircraft soars over Destin, Fla., before landing at its new home at Eglin Air Force Base. Japan selected the Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011, to replace aging jets in its air force and bolster its defense capability amid regional uncertainty. (AP Photo/U.S. Air Force, Staff Sgt. Joely Santiago)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    A F-35 Lightning II sits on stage during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II delivery ceremony on July 19, 2012 at Lockheed Martin Corporation in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    Plane models stand outside the Lockheed Martin Corporation during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II Delivery Ceremony on July 19, 2012 in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jet sits in front the entrance of the Asian Aerospace 2004 show in Singapore 24 February 2004. The Asia Pacific offers one of the world's strongest prospects for defence-related spending, US aerospace giant Lockheed Martin said Tuesday as it expressed confidence in remaining a major supplier to the region's governments (AFP PHOTO/ROSLAN RAHMAN)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (AFP PHOTO/CARL DE SOUZA)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    A Lockheed Martin's F-35 Lighning II fighter jet sits on the tarmac for static display at the Singapore Airshow in Singapore on February 12, 2012. Boeing's much-delayed 787 Dreamliner is set to star at the Singapore Airshow this week where companies touting private jets and defence hardware to the Asian market will also be out in force. (ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

  • F35 JSF Take Off

  • F-35A Flight with External Stores

    On Feb. 16, 2012, the first external weapons test mission was flown by an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The F-35A is designed to carry up to 18000 pounds on 10 weapon stations featuring four weapon stations inside two weapon bays, for maximum stealth capability, and an additional three weapon stations on each wing.

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    IN AIR, NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, MD - FEBRUARY 11: (EDITORS NOTE: Image has been received by U.S. Military prior to transmission) In this image released by the U.S. Navy courtesy of Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Navy variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the F-35C, conducts a test flight February 11, 2011 over the Chesapeake Bay. Lt. Cmdr. Eric 'Magic' Buus flew the F-35C for two hours, checking instruments that will measure structural loads on the airframe during flight maneuvers. The F-35C is distinct from the F-35A and F-35B variants with larger wing surfaces and reinforced landing gear for greater control when operating in the demanding carrier take-off and landing environment. (Photo by U.S. Navy photo courtesy Lockheed Martin via Getty Images)

  • F-35 First Ship Landing

    Courtesy: NAVAIR/JSF Program/Lockheed Martin

  • F35 Hovering

  • F-35 Flight Test Highlights

    Highlights of F-35 flight testing at NAS Patuxent River, Md., NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base, and Edwards AFB, Calif.

  • F-35 Performs First Night Flight

    The first night flight in the history of the Lockheed Martin F-35 program was completed on Jan. 19, 2012 in the skies above Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Piloted by Lockheed Martin Test Pilot Mark Ward, AF-6, an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant, launched at 5:05 pm PST and landed after sunset at 6:22 pm

  • F-35 Airstart Testing

    An F-35 test pilot talks about airstart testing at Edwards AFB, Calif., in early 2012.

  • F35 Air Show

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The first dozen or so F-35s slated to arrive in Canada won't be equipped with software that allows the stealth fighters to communicate with ground forces, a feature designed to prevent incide...
OTTAWA - The first dozen or so F-35s slated to arrive in Canada won't be equipped with software that allows the stealth fighters to communicate with ground forces, a feature designed to prevent incide...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:41 PM on 11/27/2011
Excuse my ignorance. If the new F-35 planes can communicate with each other they must have a frequency or some cummications device. If they can't communicate with ships and troops and planes. Well why not install devices in the older planes and ships that can receice and transmit messages on the same frequency and type of devices the F-35 planes use. Then the F-35 planes could be used in current condition. Just a thought!
06:40 PM on 11/23/2011
Before I buy anything, I have to decide:
1. Do I need it?
The F-35 could be used for defense or for attack. But who would we be defending ourselves against? Who do we need to attack? Canada would never be able to defend itself against any superpower, with its limited population and vast areas to defend.
2. Can I afford it?
If I can't afford the basic essentials, I can't afford a luxury car at $200,000.
Similarly, if we cannot afford good housing, adequate food, quality education and healthcare for all of our population, why spend money on warplanes that will never give service in proportion to undefined "needs"?
Do the right thing, Mr. Harper, and kill this project while the manufacturers cannot even give adequate assurance of value for money. The best way to demonstrate this country's real values is to say that we won't allow commercial and political interests control us any more. Stand up like a man!
02:07 AM on 11/24/2011
I see where your coming from but here is the catch, on the off chance we do get a giant target painted on our area of the world and we don't have adequate defences (or something reasonable to at least cover an organised retreat) would we then be screaming at harper as to why we do not have these planes? I am all for trying to give everyone in this country the basic needs of life, hell if I won the lottery I would personally start fixing communities so that I know the money is going to the right place but lets be honest we need to be able to defend ourselves. With North Korea testing out its long range missile program and Russians doing fly overs of our defences in the Arctic I say these planes are justified, I just wish they came with the friendly fire tracking systems installed, I don't like blowing up my friends. Some people below me say we have not been invaded since 1812, well to be honest they are right (kind of). German U-Boats in the St Lawrence River is not necessarily an invasion but more like "we were this close from shoving a missile up your @ss". Just remember Russian nukes don't have to hit their target, they can hit 500km away and still get the desired result they were looking for (they being who ever has the remote, not necessarily Russians just their nukes tend to go missing).
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
02:39 PM on 11/23/2011
"The software [to allow communication with older planes and ground forces] isn't expected to be added until an upgrade program is introduced in 2019 — three years after the Royal Canadian Air Force begins taking delivery the advanced multi-role fighter."

Someone ought to lose his or her job over this. But SH wants to play with his toys. Forget due dilignence and careful advance planning. Why is it that the party of supposed prudent fiscal oversight is so prone to absolutely awful decisions when it comes to spending money?
10:55 AM on 11/23/2011
Dear greyman,
Canada hasn't been invaded since 1812. All of the conflicts we have been involved with were other people's fights.
When I proudly served in the RCN everyone I met abroad took one look at my shoulder and said, "You're Canadian! We don't know you son but come on in and let's get to know you."
Greyman it's time to scrape the stars and stripes off your window and come down to Canadian earth. We don't need those planes. We do need medical care, education, international identity and freedom!
God bless my country and confusion to our enemy within,
O Canada Awake!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcpogo
06:56 PM on 11/23/2011
Occupy Ottawa - and Stephen Harper's office, bet it has a nice washroom too!
01:41 PM on 11/25/2011
We should actually do just that! Our so-called government isn't doing the job, we ought to go and tell them by filling the commons with 'Observers'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
10:54 AM on 11/23/2011
We need to stop Harper from making Canada a puppet nation.
10:42 AM on 11/23/2011
Canada's alternative to the F-35 could possibly be 99 Red Balloons.
Realist2011
beware false profits....
09:31 AM on 11/23/2011
But just be thankful for American defense contractors. If your F35's won't work initially, ours won't either. But that's okay, what would you expect from a jet that "only" costs a few hundred million a pop. Have no fear, in another eight years, and tens of millions more dollars per jet, we'll all be able to have F35 jets that actually work. In its infinite wisdom, and with defense contractors dollars firmly in their pockets, our politicians have put Americans in the enviable position of "no choice". Nonsense. There's always a choice. Washington just isn't capable of making the correct one, ever. Kill the F35 boondoggle.
07:39 AM on 11/23/2011
so the aussies and the americans decide to buy upgraded older planes while mr. law n order fantino decides to hold firm on buying f35 jets that don't work for Canada

can't communicate with ground forces and don't work in the arctic

tax cuts for corporations but the gov't finds 30 billion for jets that don;t work
04:56 AM on 11/23/2011
Really liked the beautiful picture of them almost being able to land the plane under control in pristine weather on and aircraft carrier on the ocean. Funny I was in the navy for 5 years I think i can count the number of pristine days on one hand that that event could of taken place and when did Canada get Aircraft carriers again just wondering I thought the last one we had was turned into razor Blades along time ago. Wait this is probably phase 2 or what unique up until now not need item can harper piss away cash on right the new Aircraft Carrier fleet. The bright side it looks like they got the planes to at least hover they still have a bit of a stability problem between the hover and forward decent cycle but what the heck either way they land. 129 million each and counting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulex
Made in Canada
12:34 AM on 11/23/2011
I swear to God if you told the Harper government to buy a chair they'd pay 7 billion for one with two and a half legs. Honestly!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CommonWealth-SinglePayer
Walk on the Right, VOTE on the LEFT
11:36 PM on 11/22/2011
Since there is no real need to use them, thus they wont have to be tested, but they will produce votes for Harper Reform, so it's worth it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
08:52 PM on 11/22/2011
You could probably buy the Super Hornets in bulk at this point, spend the money momentarily there and then issue a call to Canadian Airplane makers that we want a long range, high speed, air-to-air interceptor that would be ideal for defending not only Canadian borders but actually the entire North American air space. We don't have planes like that anymore, air to air combat has been limited in recent years but I think establishing the technology base is important because we cannot project the sheer military size of our southern cousin which is what Harper seems to be trying to do.

Much rather invest the money in a specialized and unique military force that could serve as a weight on the international scale.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrian31
60% of the time, it works everytime...
09:11 PM on 11/22/2011
Super Hornets are all we need. At $92 million a pop, they can come off the assembly line within months and pilot transition is seamless as most systems are similar to that of the baby Hornet. They can also be based in the Arctic at one of the new facilities being constructed/renovated with no concern about them operating in an Arctic environment.
We have no need for long range interceptors. Our 18's have done a pretty solid job along with USAF Eagles, Vipers and Raptors coming out of Alaska.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
09:29 PM on 11/22/2011
Agreed the 18 is a winner. I feel we need a fighter plane not just a bomber. New 18s do that. I`m sure when the bugs are worked out the F-35 will be a great bomber. But looking at the specs, I am not convinced it will dominate the skies even in perfect conditions let alone the arctic. The F-18 has proven its self.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Warpde
Badges? We don't need no stinking Badges.
08:07 PM on 11/22/2011
Something like buying a top end Cadillac without the breaks.
Or lights. Or oil. Or......
You get the picture.
Good to see that little, snark, deduction off my check to the Fed's are going to good use.
Just hope Harper gets to go in the first flight.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
08:01 PM on 11/22/2011
That's okay because the first 1000 can't fly! Seriously this bomber will be great on those unarmed civilians
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan Ottenson
The Christian Right are neither
07:11 PM on 11/22/2011
Wow, I'm so surprised our government made a decision without reviewing all of the data first
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrian31
60% of the time, it works everytime...
09:13 PM on 11/22/2011
There was virtually no data when the Libs agreed to the program. It's never a smart idea to go into a deal blind. Here, we were blind and deaf.