Canada Wireless Foreign Ownership Decision Could See Rates Drop

Phone

First Posted: 11/29/11 09:09 PM ET Updated: 11/29/11 09:20 PM ET

OTTAWA - Canadians should expect lower prices after Ottawa announces its decision on foreign ownership in the wireless sector and sets ground rules for the next sale of broadband space, Industry Minister Christian Paradis indicated Tuesday.

But, despite wide speculation that Paradis was ready to announce those rules in a speech to an industry convention, the minister said he needed more time to study the issues.

"Some of you may be looking for an early Christmas present today, but I am afraid I am going to be a bit of a Grinch," he told the conference.

"Given the importance and the serious impact this will have on the lives of Canadians for years to come, this is not a decision that I nor this government will be taking lightly."

While Paradis did not say directly which way he was leaning, he did say he expected the decisions the government makes will lead to more competition.

"We expect that globally competitive prices for consumers will flow from these fundamentals," he added.

The minister also said he wants rural customers to receive the same wireless service as those in large, urban centres.

Globalive chief executive Tony Lacavera, operator of the Wind Mobile startup established after the last spectrum auction in 2008, had scheduled a news conference in Ottawa after the minister's speech.

Lacavera speculated that the government may be divided by intense lobbying from industry players, which have different interests and do not agree on the best way to proceed.

Many analysts had expected the government to announce that smaller players — those with 10 per cent or less market share — would be freed from any restrictions on foreign investment.

They also expected they would receive an effective set-aside in the new auction of 700 megahertz of spectrum. That would make it easier for small and new entrants to bid for spectrum to operate and compete in the sector dominated by Rogers Communications(TSX:RCI.B), Bell (TSX:BCE) and Telus (TSX:T).

"If they don't have a set-aside, we're going to be forced to fold into one of the new incumbents and you'll see all the new entrants do the same thing," said Lacavera.

"We all saw what happened between 2003 and 2008, pricing in Canada rose to the highest level in the world when there wasn't competitive pricing out there."

Mobilicity head John Bitove, another new entrant, said in an interview that the government should go ahead with the auction anyway — if it hasn't made up its on foreign ownership rules — because Canada is falling behind on the desirable 700-MHz frequency, which was vacated by the conversion of television signals to digital.

"The fact is you've got four new entrants soon to be five, and we're all going to need more bandwidth," he said.

Currently, telecom operators in Canada are restricted to a maximum 46.7 per cent in direct and indirect foreign investment.

Last year, Ottawa announced it was looking at three options on ownership. Removing all restrictions, removing restrictions for small players, or upping the foreign ownership limit to 49 per cent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

OTTAWA - Canadians should expect lower prices after Ottawa announces its decision on foreign ownership in the wireless sector and sets ground rules for the next sale of broadband space, Industry Minis...
OTTAWA - Canadians should expect lower prices after Ottawa announces its decision on foreign ownership in the wireless sector and sets ground rules for the next sale of broadband space, Industry Minis...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jonny Boy
12:38 PM on 11/30/2011
About time...When I was in US I thought ATT and Time warner were the worst company however after dealing with Rogers for about 7 month now I will take ATT or Time warner over Rogers any time. Same goes with Canadian banks too, their approach is take it or leave it whereas with US banks it is more like what can we do for you to take it.
11:48 AM on 11/30/2011
All I know is this: when I lived in the States prior to coming back to Canada six months ago, I had a pay-as-you-go cellular plan that cost me $8.00 a month (minimum) or 25 cents a minute...perfect for someone like myself who only used the mobile phone sparingly...PLUS, the phone (a very basic model) was free (with the purchase of a $30.00 phone card). And no contract.
No such plan exists in Canada. Nothing remotely close. The best I could do was a month-to-month at $50.00 a month with a "free" phone (which I am on the hook for for $200.00 but I pay over time on each bill).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jonny Boy
12:39 PM on 11/30/2011
Agreed. Also why do most phone companies require 3 years contract in Canada vs just 2 years in US?
08:18 AM on 12/01/2011
I pay exactly $100. per year for pre-paid with Rogers. I am a light user of cellular services so this works out very well for me.
01:14 AM on 12/11/2011
Please tell me more about this $100 plan, kannuk! I tried to find something like that and couldn't!
08:58 AM on 11/30/2011
No matter who comes into the picture, Bell, Rogers and Telus own the infrastructure for the communications in Canada. No matter what the government has done over the last ten years to rein them in, they find a new name for or reason to add fees to your billing. Plus, they will find ways to undermine any competition or buy them out. Face it. Canada remains stuck in the age of industrial barons and fiefdoms while the world speeds ahead.
12:45 AM on 11/30/2011
I drove to Boise ID last summer, through ares of Wyoming Utah and Idaho, that aside from the highway there were very little signs of humans. 5 bars the whole way. I can't get service 5 minutes outside of Shawville QC, only 20 miles from the transcanada highway. It took me 1/2 hr to complete a call last New Years. In tomorrows world many Canadians will never have a landline. Todays government needs to ensure wireless service to all, and an infrastructure that can't be overwhelmed down by something unforseen like New Years Eve.
12:09 AM on 11/30/2011
Pretty sure the old cell pic represents Canada's outdated mobile/wireless system.

Same can be said for internet services in Canada. The problem is Bell, Telus and Rogers have had no real competition for so long now, they won't let go without a fight and some major lobbying. Don't count on the conservatives dishing out anything to sweet for consumers. They will put the pinch on the big three and allow higher foreign investment, but will stop short of allowing outsiders to control wireless business in Canada.

Our country is so far behind the times it's amazing any foreigner even wants to try to do business here.
Christian Cotroneo
Editor, Huffington Post Canada
12:14 AM on 11/30/2011
Nice post. Thanks.
11:21 PM on 11/29/2011
awesome, i was hoping for a brick with an antenna pic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
09:33 PM on 11/29/2011
Again, do think you could use an OLDER cell phone model?
10:41 PM on 11/29/2011
I think the purpose was to show that our rates are still as expensive as they were in the late 1990s...
Christian Cotroneo
Editor, Huffington Post Canada
12:07 AM on 11/30/2011
You're the man, Colin.