Hurt Locker Piracy Lawsuit: Pay Up Or Face Court, Quebec Residents Told

Hurt Locker Piracy Lawsuit Canada Quebec

The Huffington Post Canada   First Posted: 11/29/11 12:22 PM ET Updated: 11/29/11 12:26 PM ET

The maker of the Iraq war movie The Hurt Locker has sent letters to more than two dozen Quebec residents accused of illegally downloading the film, demanding that they immediately pay $1,500 or face a lawsuit, according to a news report.

Montreal’s La Presse reported Monday that Voltage Pictures sent out the letters following a federal court’s order that Internet service providers Bell, Cogeco and Videotron reveal the identities of subscribers whose computers were alleged to have been used to download The Hurt Locker illegally.

Some of the targeted individuals have already contacted Voltage Pictures to resolve the matter “in one way or another,” an unnamed source close to the issue told La Presse.

But at least one targeted individual anonymously told the newspaper they plan to challenge the lawsuit in court.

Consumers’ groups have expressed concerns about the process of suing Internet subscribers on the basis of computer IP addresses.

Anthony Hemond of the Montreal Consumers’ Union told CJAD radio that an IP address identified a computer, not a person, so innocent people may get caught up such lawsuits. It was precisely this problem that prompted a federal U.S. judge to dismiss a file-sharing lawsuit earlier this year.

Questions have also been raised as to why these three Internet service providers were targeted in the suit, while subscribers of other large telecoms such as Rogers and Shaw were spared. Intellectual property lawyer Howard Knopf told La Presse it may be because Bell, Cogeco and Videotron are more inclined than the others to support file-sharing lawsuits.

“Shaw and Telus defended their customers’ right to privacy in 2004,” Knopf said. “Bell has done nothing, while Videotron has sided with the industry. Maybe if they had defended their customers at the time, there would be no lawsuit today.”

In an August ruling, a federal court judge in Quebec ordered the three Internet providers to hand over identifying information about customers whose IP addresses were logged sharing The Hurt Locker.

It marked the first time that the entertainment industry tried to sue Canadians over file-sharing since 2005, when a group of recording industry giants was rebuffed in its effort to launch a music file-sharing lawsuit. The judge in that case declared that file-sharing was legal in Canada. That judge’s decision was later set aside by a higher court.

Tech news site Torrentfreak reported in September that an IP address belonging to the Montreal Canadiens was listed in the Hurt Locker lawsuit. The Huffington Post was able to independently verify that the IP address was listed to the Montreal hockey club, but a team representative said in October the company was not aware of any pending lawsuits.

The company has not yet responded to a request for comment for this article.

Nicholas Chartier, the producer of The Hurt Locker, has developed a reputation for being a leading crusader in the fight against online piracy. His company, Voltage Pictures, sued nearly 25,000 U.S. residents for downloading the film via file-sharing programs. Nearly 90 per cent of the defendants have been dropped from the suit, though it’s not clear what prompted the move.

Chartier will deliver the keynote address at next month’s Content Protection Summit, an annual meeting of media executives to develop strategies for fighting piracy. He was previously in the headlines in 2009, when he was banned from the Oscars after he emailed members of the academy lobbying them to vote in favour of The Hurt Locker at the Academy Awards.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

The maker of the Iraq war movie The Hurt Locker has sent letters to more than two dozen Quebec residents accused of illegally downloading the film, demanding that they immediately pay $1,500 or face a...
The maker of the Iraq war movie The Hurt Locker has sent letters to more than two dozen Quebec residents accused of illegally downloading the film, demanding that they immediately pay $1,500 or face a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:34 PM on 11/30/2011
Someone has to tell this company that Canada is not USA.
In Canada, until the tories pass the new bill, IS NOT illegal to share files using peer-to-peer software.
Google -> Supreme Court of Canada file sharing and read the ruling about it. (dated back in 2004)

So there is nothing to worry about (at least for now)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
01:18 PM on 11/30/2011
It is illegal.

The 2004 case was overturned in 2006.
01:35 PM on 11/30/2011
Can you please provide the source of your information?

Makes no sense to request a new bill if the the rule was overturned. I have double checked and there are no news about the 2006 ruling. Please help me with this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
11:25 AM on 11/30/2011
I downloaded this movie in BC and never got a bill for it. Not sure if I am lucky but I wouldn't pay their bill nor show up in court. The movie is crap any way.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
10:33 AM on 11/30/2011
I haven't seen the Hurt Locker, but having heard of this story I'm just going to go ahead and skip it altogether.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 AM on 11/30/2011
What a despicable company. Boycott Voltage Films
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JJJSchmidt
09:53 AM on 11/30/2011
Anybody know of a website or an FTP server where you can download pretty much what you want without worrying about big brother watching your every move? Torrents sites are great for downloading but poor for being away from prying eyes.
12:23 PM on 12/18/2011
Try Megashares.
09:17 AM on 11/30/2011
Are they going after downloaders or uploaders because 24 seems like a small number.
09:14 AM on 11/30/2011
Guys, in case you didn't realize, stop downloading torrents of movies online.

15 years ago, it was illegal to walk into a store and steal a movie. It's no different today.
09:32 AM on 11/30/2011
No it's not, we have to fight this corporate bullshit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
09:41 AM on 11/30/2011
This is called files haring, digital "property".
They're not walking into a store and stealing an object.....

It's also called greed and using illegal means to determine who is committing this "theft".
It's much bigger than just those who would share a film online, those who wouldn't even buy the film if they couldn't download it. The stats prove out that file sharers are the ones that also buy the most DVD's, CD's and digital downloads of both music and films as well...

We've all seen this before too, when they complained that film would ruin radio, four track tape decks would ruin the music industry and VHS/Beta tape recorders would ruin the TV and Film industry. Nothing new here, it shall pass, but many will be penalized on the way.

Both Music and Film industries are still showing record profits, and growing every year.
By their own stats the Torrents count for less than %2 of what's out there...

I must admit I buy most of my stuff, but if Shania Twain sees this as being nonsense and downloads tunes, so should the populace.
10:13 AM on 11/30/2011
"The stats" wont float unless you can cite them.

When you have an infinite ability to replicate your private property, it's a bit more than sharing.

To me, the ethics on stealing is simple. Unfortunately, most people feel that if you can't get caught for doing something, then it can't possibly be wrong.

If you take a moment and look at a torrent file for a major movie (say transformers 3), you'll see seeders and leechers in the thousands for a single file. Consider all the different levels of quality for the movie, the formats etc etc you're talking about a dozen popular torrents out there with thousands of sharers each.

Just because a company is profitable, it doesn't mean stealing is an ethical right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:41 AM on 11/30/2011
The Harper government's latest stab at changing Canada’s copyright legislation is being dictated by the United States Trade Representative as shown here:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/06/piracy-and-counterfeiting-us-trade.html

So much for sovereignty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
11:02 AM on 11/30/2011
Political pressure does not have an impact on sovereignty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:01 PM on 11/30/2011
Oh oh I wish you were right my young friend....
Was this true, we'd probably be number one in Aviation technology....
See those Arrow Mark tens flying overhead ? Those Bradors patrolling the seas ? No ?

Our Canadian Sovereignty has suffered much in the last five decades..even more so...
We are the mouse sharing the bed with the elephant (is that still in print ?)
photo
grizzly bear55
King of the forest
07:38 AM on 11/30/2011
If a broadcaster does not take the necessary measures to secure their broadcasts. too bad.

If a movie distributor does not secure their movies electronically, it's their problem.

I never downloaded any movies, I have a dish and get movies by the hundreds from all over the world, but in my opinion the downloaders are part of a group who exchange their movies like I loan my CDs DVDs to friends, I paid for them and I can do whatever I want with them.

The Canadian and Quebec Charters prime any other law and are clear that any law that claims to override the charters must have a clause in it saying so, and can be challenged in court.
photo
grizzly bear55
King of the forest
07:28 AM on 11/30/2011
Good luck.

Quebec judicial system is not very generous, they will have a huge surprise.

The court may order the payment of $10 the price of going to a movie theater.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:24 AM on 11/30/2011
True, but they are not required to sue in small claims, and, if they win, then can demand that you pay their legal fees, which is what this legal blackmail is all about. Only the lawyers win in this fight.
09:15 AM on 11/30/2011
If the court wants to be punitive, they should force the defendant to take his family to the movies. 10$ my foot. It cost me and my family of four 60$ to watch a film.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
09:43 AM on 11/30/2011
Good one RDX.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timedalkat
07:19 AM on 11/30/2011
Worth the fight. No movie's worth 1500.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JJJSchmidt
09:49 AM on 11/30/2011
It seems like a bargain compared to the $3000 that the accused in the US was required to cough up.
05:50 AM on 11/30/2011
Crap movie. And certainly not worth $1500 you blackmailing suckholes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
04:06 AM on 11/30/2011
Don't pay. Class action Bell in a counter-suit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:46 PM on 11/29/2011
Funny how Videotron says they are on the side of the industry but advertise their internet service by the number of minutes it takes to download a 700 MB movie. Hypocrite much?
09:16 AM on 11/30/2011
An excellent point. We all know we shouldn't be downloading these films but videotron certainly does make it look acceptable.
10:50 AM on 11/30/2011
Videotron is owned by Quebecor Media, who also owns TVA and TVA films, who also distribute movies. It's no wonder why they're on the side of the industry, they're part of it.