Northern Gateway Pipeline: First Nation Leaders Say They Are Closing B.C. Borders To Pipeline

Enbridge Pipeline First Nations Bc

First Posted: 12/01/11 05:08 PM ET Updated: 12/02/11 06:01 AM ET

VANCOUVER - First Nations' leaders in British Columbia say they've built "an unbroken wall of opposition" from the U.S border to the Arctic Ocean against a proposed $5.5 billion petroleum pipeline.

The leaders announced Thursday that several First Nations have added their names to the Save the Fraser River Declaration, bringing the total number of signatory nations in B.C. to 61 and effectively closing the province's borders to the Northern Gateway project proposed by Enbridge (TSX:ENB).

The leaders announced they are also opposed to any efforts by Kinder Morgan to export Alberta tar-sands crude oil from B.C.'s south.

"North or south, it makes no difference. First Nations from every corner of B.C. are saying absolutely no tar sands pipelines or tankers in our territories," said Jackie Thomas, chief of the Saik'uz First Nation, in a media release.

The Saik'uz First Nation is located west of Prince George, B.C.

"We have banned oil pipelines and tankers using our laws, and we will defend our decision using all the means at our disposal," added Thomas.

But Enbridge (TSX:ENB), the company behind the project, quickly fired back, stating many First Nations are still interested in partnering on the project.

According to Enbridge's website, the project would connect Kitimat, B.C. and Edmonton, Alta. by 1,200-kilometre-long pipeline.

That pipeline would carry more than a half-million barrels of a heavy crude oil, known as bitumen, to B.C.'s coast from Edmonton for export daily and import a petroleum product known as condensate,

Written in opposition to the pipeline, the Save the Fraser River Declaration bans tar-sands oil pipelines in Fraser River watersheds and also prohibits tankers from the migratory routes salmon use returning to the B.C. river that stretches 1,370 kilometres.

Chief Art Adolph, of the St'at'imc Nation, said he's opposed to any plans by the federal Conservative government to push the pipeline through.

"If they are serious about respecting our rights, the government of Canada must stop pushing the oil companies' line that this is in the public interest, and the government of B.C. should step up to the plate too and begin protecting our rivers and coastlines from further environmental damages that violate our basic human rights," he said.

The St'at'imc Nation call home to lands surrounding such communities as Whistler, B.C., Pemberton and Lillooet.

According to a statement from the office of Federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver, the minister has stressed the importance of the pipeline.

"Minister Oliver has spoken on many occasions about our government's interest in expanding our energy export markets,'' said the statement.

Meantime, Enbridge said in a statement that First Nations are not unanimous in their opposition to the pipeline.

"We would point out that Enbridge continues to consult with many First Nations who remain interested in partnering with Northern Gateway," said company spokesman Paul Stanway.

He said while the project crosses three tributaries of the Fraser River, it does not cross the river directly.

By Keven Drews, The Canadian Press ALSO ON HUFFINGTON POST
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

VANCOUVER - First Nations' leaders in British Columbia say they've built "an unbroken wall of opposition" from the U.S border to the Arctic Ocean against a proposed $5.5 billion petroleum pipeline.The...
VANCOUVER - First Nations' leaders in British Columbia say they've built "an unbroken wall of opposition" from the U.S border to the Arctic Ocean against a proposed $5.5 billion petroleum pipeline.The...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
03:10 AM on 12/05/2011
How many of these people are there? I am surprised that they can dictate what can and can not be built or be driven (they mentioned tankers) across half of the nation of Canada. I'm against the pipeline myself, mainly because we don't need canadian oil here in the US - we need US oil here in the US. But I would be shocked if the nation of Canada gave up its sovereignity to these groups. If they do, they will be the laughing stock of the world. No idian tribes in the US would shut down the highways to tankers or anything else - the Army would be called in to put down the unrest, as it should be, and as I assume it would be in most other countries in the world, including Europe and Asia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nighthawk1982
03:40 AM on 12/05/2011
Maybe this shows you we don't have much freedoms as they do in Canada?
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
04:02 AM on 12/06/2011
You're right. Individual groups do not have the freedom to shut down interstate commerce. In fact, the states themselvec can not shut down interstate commerce. That's a freedom no group should ever have here in the US either.
09:51 PM on 12/04/2011
First Nations are, quite bluntly, a hindrance to our economic growth.
This will only serve to harden negative attitudes towards them.

Don't get me wrong, I'm for renewable, clean energy, but until the day comes when that energy is abundant and cheap, oil will have to serve. And that oil can help Canada stay economically stable.

A stable economy means stable funding for social programs and education. Not everything about oil funding is so bad...
12:45 PM on 12/04/2011
Sounds like the old `preserving the Earth versus cashing in on it'. Which one do people think will really be around longer?
10:27 AM on 12/04/2011
NOBODY wants this pipeline running through their land. It is being rejected by the people in Canada and the US. The message is clear. The corporations extracting oil from the tar sands should just give up and close the operation down before they lose more money. There will be no pipeline for the tar sands.
10:25 AM on 12/04/2011
We have become technologically advanced enough that we don't need fossil fuels anymore. ALL of our energy needs can be met by clean renewable energy. Fossil fuels have become obsolete and are running out.
12:41 PM on 12/04/2011
The only people that support fossil fuels are FOSSILS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anarchy4hire
Don't you love your guns, god, government?
05:07 PM on 12/04/2011
and most of our politicians are older than dirt cold war relics......you may be on to something
05:13 PM on 12/03/2011
Why does Canada spend so much time, effort, money, and aggravation on trying to construct pipelines to transport this goop, and not just invest money in construction refineries? Then Canada could sell value added products, and not just the unrefined bitumen?\

This is not a hypothetical question. If Canada wants to truly be an "energy superpower", why do they not build more refineries to deal with that stuff domestically?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:31 AM on 12/04/2011
These tar sands are such nasty, dirty, corrosive, polluting, garbage that refining them into useful products and disposing of the highly toxic byproducts would cost a bundle in any country that has meaningful laws requiring decent pay, health and safety regulations, and laws against polluting with large fines for noncompliance. That's why the tar companies want to ship the goop to Third World countries with lax health and safety standards.
05:13 PM on 12/04/2011
Because it's not Canada. We are Canada. The entity pushing this is engaged in manipulating our government, recently commented on by David Suzuki, and a portion of our people through disinformation and bribery. As you may have heard our prime minister has also clearly declared he is not presiding over the Canadian government but the Harper Government. In addition to Sunwyns observations the more times you can create a situation where product can be transported or changes hands (possibly without moving physically or outside of the company ie.between departments) the more charges you can attach to it with this being almost pure profit with no expense. Transportation does add cost but rarely does the actual cost resemble what will be billed out between departments and added to what you pay at the till. Avoiding value added activity close to the resource adds opportunity to skim a bigger piece of the pie and to take advantage of an unprotected populace elsewhere. Does all this shuffling around on paper (most transactions I've personally seen generally double the cost with each transaction) with unrealistically high returns for the house sound familiar? And sometimes a happy person leaves with winnings encouraging the rest to keep feeding the machine.
04:40 PM on 12/03/2011
the health effects of canadas tar sands is the number 7 top underreported news story of 2011 in canada, according to NewsWatch at Simon Fraser University . to read about it go to page 23 of the PDF file which can be found by googling " 2011's TOP 25 Under-Reported Stories in the Media- SFU News- Simon Fraser University" , and downloading the full report.
02:21 PM on 12/03/2011
i like this quote here... "The BC Hydro Public Power Legacy and Heritage Contract Act ensures that British Columbia's electricity assets, including transmission and distribution lines, must remain publicly owned."
which comes from...http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/EPD/PowerDev/Utilities/Pages/default.aspx

that does mean that we, the canadians, have decision making power when it comes to the way in which electrical and other forms of power is to be circulated and whether or not it is to be distributed for sale to other countries or not, doesn't it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:14 PM on 12/02/2011
apparently not much'

"Enbridge pipeline to B.C. coast gets support of Gitxsan hereditary chiefs"

"While the Gitxsan is the first group to openly support Northern Gateway, "a number" of other of agreements have been signed, said Janet Holder, the Enbridge executive in charge of Northern Gateway.

"Based upon our current negotiations we do believe that we have support from the majority of our First Nations along our right of way," she said.
07:12 PM on 12/03/2011
The pipeline route is located 50 kilometers to the south of Gitxan territory. Presumably, they are looking for jobs and employment opportunities for a pipeline that will pass through a neighbor's traditional lands (Wet'suwet'en and Kitselas First Nations). How's that for ye ol' divide and conquer strategy? It's an old story, the Rupert River was damed over the opposition of every community directly impacted by the development on the river (up to 70 or 80% of the population voting against it in local referenda), but widespread support from distant James Bay Cree communities (who stood to benefit with employment and jobs). How would you like it if New Brunswick got to decide how lands, rivers, and minerals were to be developed in your province? This isn't how decisions should be made in a Canadian framework, and the same should apply to First Nations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blood1
03:09 PM on 12/04/2011
If you follow the news out of Vancouver, this approval by a singular Chief is causing quite the uproar and outrage by other's in the tribe.

I would take a wait and see position, as the $$$ are relatively small.

I would take it with the same grain of salt that Canadian Transamerica spokesperson who stated that it was "unconstitutional for a State to complain about the pipeline going thru their aquifer reason" and then within 2 weeks, magically Transamerica had a revised pipeline.
08:19 PM on 12/02/2011
Those 61 nations signed the Save The Fraser River Declaration December 2010. To mark the anniversary of it 130 First Nations have declared their opposition to the Northern Gateway pipeline and to tankers on the coast. The best news I've heard in a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
07:41 PM on 12/02/2011
Enbridge pipeline gets support of B.C. First Nation | CTV News http://bit.ly/vnAMmN

So the blockade is now broken. The First Nations are together on this issue. We can't depend on them to be environmentally understanding
07:19 PM on 12/03/2011
Check your facts ... First Nations communities located along the pipeline route still are holding firm on a blockade. Gitxan territory is located 50 kilometers north of the proposed route. Do the Iroquois or James Bay Cree in Quebec also support the pipeline proposal, in what sense would this be relevant to the negotiations (accept as a PR strategy of Enbridge).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
07:33 PM on 12/03/2011
Your point is very blurry.
04:48 PM on 12/02/2011
The First Nation communities are the ones with the courage to stand up for the protection of the land and water that the Enbridge Pipeline could seriously threaten. If your live in British Columbia your coastal waters and the life that is sustained by it, will be destroyed quite easily if the 250 supertankers / year have trouble navigating around the delicate and intricate water paths to ship this tar sand oil to foreign countries. It is not only the First Nation communities that need healthy water. All Canadians should make themselves aware of the big picture before making it an "us against them" issue.

Watch this video only if want to see what must be protected.
www.ilcp.com/videos/spoil
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
03:21 PM on 12/02/2011
"Enbridge (TSX:ENB), the company behind the project, quickly fired back, stating many First Nations are [being sorely tempted by petrodollar bribes centered] on the project."

There, fixed that misstatement for the pipeline company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
02:34 PM on 12/02/2011
Whatever it takes First Nation, I am with you.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
02:22 PM on 12/02/2011
Good. This is necessary if we are to get off destructive oil. And we need to get off oil...FAST. Don't expect everything to be perfect. But not changing is the most dangerous thing of all.