Kyoto Protocol: Canada Will Not Renew Climate Pact Says Peter Kent

Kyoto Protocol Canada

First Posted: 12/05/11 09:27 AM ET Updated: 12/09/11 04:29 PM ET

OTTAWA - Canada will not renew its commitment to the Kyoto protocol, despite a tempting climate-change offer from China, Environment Minister Peter Kent said Monday.

Kent said Canada will not sign on for a second Kyoto phase, even if doing so meant top polluter China would agree to targets to cut its own greenhouse gases.

China has long refused to adopt binding treaty commitments to lower its greenhouse-gas emissions. But this weekend, China's top negotiator signalled that Beijing would consider a target if the European Union and developed nations — including Canada — first agreed to extend their Kyoto commitments.

China's olive branch did not sway Kent. When asked if the offer might get Canada to reconsider signing on for a second phase of Kyoto after it expires next year, the minister simply said, "No."

He said Canada's "fixation" is on sealing a deal made two years ago at a United Nations climate-change conference in the Danish capital of Copenhagen.

"Canada has made clear this year that Canada will not make a commitment to a second Kyoto period," Kent said.

Jean Chretien's Liberal government joined Kyoto in 1998, but took little action to meet Canada's targets to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.
The Conservatives also ignored Kyoto after they came to power in 2006. Canada has since set its own target of cutting emissions by 17 per cent from 2005 levels by 2020 — the same goal set by the Obama administration in Washington.

The Kyoto accord requires countries to make even deeper cuts to their greenhouse-gas emissions, but the Tories say reductions of that magnitude would hurt the economy.

The world's biggest polluters — the United States, China and India — are not part of Kyoto and the Conservatives argue that any agreement that does not include the big emitters is meaningless.

Canada is among those pushing for a single agreement to replace Kyoto that would include all countries.

Environmentalists have strongly condemned Canada for its position on climate change and its approach to dealing with greenhouse gas emissions.

"Our loss of credibility on these issues didn't happen overnight," Queen's University biology professor John Smol said in a statement.

"It's partly the result of ongoing neglect of environmental science at the federal level, but it also stems from a long history of broken promises, both to Canadians and to our global peers."

Meanwhile, Kent also announced Canada will spend a total of $1.2 billion as part of an international "fast-start" plan to help poor countries with their climate change efforts. Some $400 million covered the period from 2010 to 2012, and another $600 million announced Monday will cover the period from 2011 to 2013.

TWITTER REACTS
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Canada will not renew its commitment to the Kyoto protocol, despite a tempting climate-change offer from China, Environment Minister Peter Kent said Monday. Kent said Canada will not sign ...
OTTAWA - Canada will not renew its commitment to the Kyoto protocol, despite a tempting climate-change offer from China, Environment Minister Peter Kent said Monday. Kent said Canada will not sign ...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 313
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
08:57 PM on 12/09/2011
So the worst polluter on the planet was at the table, and was contemplating a change of course because they know it's unsustainable, which countries have been trying to get for decades. Then Harper Government officially pulls out of Kyoto Accord. Harper Government now officially worse than China in ideology.

I'd like to thank all the shills and useless Baby Boomers for rebranding the PC's into the Reformacons and creating the Harper Gov't, all made possible with the "media" and our relentless drive to the bottom of reason and logic on all issues at all times. Education and thinking was supposed to protect society from these type of people

There should be protests everyday in Ottawa but they are not. Too cold. Too busy. Meh. No one cares for their country. Nothing can be done because nothing is done.

The least we can do, we can't even do.

And now your country doesn't care about you either.

What can be done to non-violently eradicate this lethal infection?
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
09:17 PM on 12/09/2011
Sorry bub, you lost me at blah blah blah.

BTW, what was China's proposal?
They promised to do something, someday, later, if they felt like it, and if we did it years before them?
Now there is a concrete proposal you can hang your hat on!
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
09:31 PM on 12/09/2011
you are a prime example of what is wrong. Everyday is suffering with you present.
photo
CharliePoole
It's fatal to be right when the world is wrong.
10:51 PM on 12/09/2011
I'm just curious "CanadaStan"... how do you get to have 3,622 comments and only ONE friend?

Oh. Never mind. I think the "Every day is suffering with you present" comment from "yer" explains it. As you were, private.
08:51 PM on 12/08/2011
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/photos/united-nations-security-personnel-escorts-u-youth-delegate-photo-120723733.html

'Muzzling' Abigail Borah and children everywhere when they speak truth to power cannot be allowed to stand. And yet it does stand. Perhaps change, change that allows the children to speak out and protect their birthright, will come to pass before it is too late for the human community to undo the desecration and damage that has been done by their greedmongering elders to their earthly home, the planetary home foolhardy elders are borrowing/stealing from them.

A Quartet on Thinking Globally and Acting Locally:

http://​www.7billionactions.org/story/​1187-steven-earl-salmony
http://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=_KkmFuM77qU
http://www.truth-out.org/​marching-cliff/1323195281
http://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=_XQIxr4gRQM&%3Bfeatu​re=player_embedded
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
09:19 PM on 12/09/2011
What was their point?
They wanted Canada to sign an agreement that let all the big polluters have a free pass?
How would that be good for the environment?
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
09:44 PM on 12/09/2011
Except that China looked to be in favour of an agreement and it is Canada that is crying about it. What a bunch of Harper losers.

I'm trying to imagine the size of your company spreadsheet used to manage all the hypocritical comments.
08:18 AM on 12/07/2011
We have to think globally and act locally, I suppose. Any thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XQIxr4gRQM&feature=player_embedded

http://www.7billionactions.org/story/1187-steven-earl-salmony

http://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=_KkmFuM77qU

Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,
established 2001
Chapel Hill, NC
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
08:09 PM on 12/06/2011
It's nice to have an adult in charge for a change.
Good job Harper.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
09:46 PM on 12/09/2011
The same adult who hides in the washroom whenever he doesn't get his way?
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:47 PM on 12/06/2011
Dry your tears girls, and please explain how the Kyoto treaty would actually reduce pollution and C02 emissions.
Odd how no one can ever explain that.
05:34 AM on 12/07/2011
Countries with a target under the KP reduced their emissions, most of them even went further... while countries without target increased their emissions 16... to 20... or 30%.
Most countries with strong Kyoto targets and which have reached them (Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, etc) are actually doing economically better on average.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
09:20 PM on 12/09/2011
Very few of them reduced emissions, and those were anomalies that happened because of political events like Germany shutting down the East German garbage.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
09:34 PM on 12/09/2011
That makes sense (and cents). Those countries are not wasting all their IQ points on supporting people like CanadaStan. The public actually appear sincere. In not supporting pollution, over time this has reaped economic benefits. Their economies are changing away from the polluted economies of Canada and USA. With higher standards of living the result.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katmandu01
08:50 AM on 12/06/2011
I wonder what Stephen Harper and Peter Kent will tell their children 20 or 30 years from now when they look around at the damage that will have been done to this planet by runaway climate change and they ask their fathers, "How could you let this happen? Why didn't do you something when you had a chance?"
09:40 AM on 12/06/2011
their children will probably thank them for not bankrupting the country's economy by trying tilting at windmills -- squandering money on something that is a natural cycle, and totally out of canada's hands anyway....
11:13 AM on 12/06/2011
Exactly
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katmandu01
12:32 PM on 12/06/2011
"...bankruptin­g the country's economy..."
Any suggestion that making a serious effort to reduce CO2 emissions and move away from a heavy reliance on fossil fuels is going to harm the economy of any industrial nation including Canada is nonsense. There's plenty of good research available showing how this can be done while maintaining a good quality of life and a sustainable future for everyone:
http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/solutions/
http://www.nrdc.org/international/files/globalchina.pdf
http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/synthesis.pdf
A bit closer to home the Canada's Pembina Institute has presented its own research to show how that country can in fact create more jobs by implementing strong climate policies than by continuing with business as usual. As well, Harper's business as usual model will ultimately be far more expensive than making an honest effort to deal with the problem of anthropogenic global warming.
http://digitaljournal.com/article/312257
"...tilting at windmills..." Where do you get your evidence for such a claim. You can't cite the work of any credible scientific body that does not support the validity of the theory of anthropogenic global warming and is not warning us aboutthe threat that it poses for humanity and indeed all life on this planet. That includes every single national scientific academy in the world as well as NASA, NOAA, the American Geophysical Union and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:37 PM on 12/06/2011
Wanna explain how Kyoto would preserve the environment?

Seems bankrupting out industry by implementing Kyoto would simply result in more production moving to the already higher polluting factories in China.
So more pollution, not less.

Seems his children will be thanking him.
Thanking him for not listening to people who inexplicably support a treaty that would increase pollution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katmandu01
08:19 PM on 12/06/2011
So Kyoto was flawed. Tell me something I don't know; it's time to move on. The whole world needs to develop a binding and comprehensive agreement to deal the problem of anthropogenic global warming and that includes the industrializing nations like China, India and Brazil as well as the industrialized world. Harper and Kent have no intention of moving in that direction and have their hands buried in the sand (or perhaps one of their orifices).
"...bankruptin­g our industry..."
Nonsense. The Germans are making very good progress at reducing CO2 emissions and their economy is weathering the recession quite well under the leadership, by the way, of a conservative Christian Democratic chancellor.
His children's generation will spit on his grave.
photo
4everright
My heart went boom
08:42 AM on 12/06/2011
Good to see people are starting to wise up to the scam.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
03:47 AM on 12/12/2011
that any conservative alive hates the planet or that we're all going to die by their hands?
08:40 AM on 12/06/2011
"The world's biggest polluters — the United States, China and India — are not part of Kyoto and the Conservatives argue that any agreement that does not include the big emitters is meaningless."

Totally true - until those countries get onboard then anything else is just pointless. Why trash the Canadian economy for no benefit whatsoever. Good decision - it's time for Kyoto to go.
12:44 PM on 12/06/2011
So Canada with a GDP per capita of $51,147 will not committ unless India too with a GDP per capita of $1,527 committs? Appearantly, committment shall start at $1,527 per capita for some countries but not even at $50,000+ for some others.

Canadian hypocracy is limitless !!! You beat America at it. That says a lot. I will reconsider my position on Canada: the world would be better off if Canada would not exist.

Besides that, you are the little A--- H---- who complained to the US about the damage of acid rains on your forest - but apparently, you have un unlimited right to roll over external environment cost on other countries. You are such hypocrites
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:40 PM on 12/06/2011
Per capita is meaningless if your goal is to reduce pollution and save the environment.
On the other hand if it is a socialist wealth redistribution scheme then per capita does count.

What is your real goal for this treaty?
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:15 PM on 12/09/2011
Fan and Fav'd.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:28 AM on 12/06/2011
Just awful. Deniers, you can thank yourselves.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:40 PM on 12/06/2011
I'm welcome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 AM on 12/06/2011
David Rothchilds wants to force the world to use less energy etc 500 trillion$


500 trillions dollars in worth = half of the planets money controlled by the rothchilds = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym4TTmOJ4I8&feature=endscreen&NR=1 .............................

......................................... .................................................... ....................................

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b77baa3VdhM&feature=related = David Rothchilds is going to force the world to stop consuming stuff because he wants to save the planet.

..................................... ................................................. ............................................
.
Get ready for the slow down and be able to survive without thinking all will be the same.. I have been trying to tell you this for yrs.. that's why i have done what i have done.. don't plan on spending and consuming like normal.. The money is being extracted from the people to force us to use less.. your home will only be worth very little but people who have land to grow food will have value... sell your city / suburban houses asap and buy farm land with a structure...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
07:17 AM on 12/06/2011
If we want to stop global warming we have to stop burning fossil fuels. If we don't stop burning fossil fuels at the current rate, I doubt civilization will survive.

I seriously doubt that the Rothchild family controls half the planets wealth and I wonder if you are engaging in a little coded anti-semitism. I don't even know how rich he is personally, but if he is rich I wish we had more rich people who were as socially responsible as he is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:21 PM on 12/06/2011
I agree he is pushing the right agenda and i have no idea of his heritage.. I thought rothchild was some kind of swedish person..
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:06 PM on 12/09/2011
Nope. Nature wants us to use less energy, because fossil fuels are not infinite. Probably an American idea to have an economy based upon infinite resources while living on a finite planet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mirabay
stand for something or you will fall for
03:31 AM on 12/06/2011
this is harper under pressure from the states............might as well become one of the states because canada has lost it's b@lls..................
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:28 AM on 12/06/2011
You're right, Harper is mini-Bush.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:57 PM on 12/06/2011
How is he under pressure from the US?
If Canada actually implemented Kyoto it would make the US industry more competive with ours since our costs would go up but theirs wouldn't.

.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
03:49 AM on 12/12/2011
If you cut pollution your costs go down. Cost only go up if you continue to pollute and have to pay up. Investment in tech and processes would reduce that and recoup the losses. So, what are you talking about? So if we had more efficient companies we'd be in a better position vs the USA which sold everything off to China
01:16 AM on 12/06/2011
OK. OK. OK.

New hurricane record – 2232 days and counting since major Hurricane made landfall on the USA – last record was year 1900

So if CO2 increasing in the atmosphere has ZERO negative and only positive consequences like this then maybe we should ramp up buring of fossil fuels.

This is all good.

Huge reduction in numbers of major hurricanes hitting the US! This is awesome.

If increasing worldwide temps by .61C over the same time period then bring it on baby.

Burn more dino poop.

Maybe we'll get through another 10 years without a major hurricane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
csuciadams
Planner/Engineer Extraordinaire
03:12 AM on 12/06/2011
So short sighted...so sad for our children's future...
11:55 AM on 12/06/2011
You mean stopping governments from stealing trillions of dollars from our children and grandchildren is 'short sighted'.

OK.

Guilty as charged.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas Dunlap
09:47 AM on 12/06/2011
Frank Luchan: Whether or not a hurricane hits the US is determined by random factors. 2011 is in a tie for 3rd most active on record: http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/noaa-finalizes-2011-atlantic-h/58359
11:54 AM on 12/06/2011
Wow. Ok.

"...Concerning the number of hurricanes, 2011 was fairly ordinary..."

I guess you alarmists have resorted to claiming that 'ordinary' hurrican seasons are now PROOF of your fairytale scary bed time stories of Global Warming.

The bin filled with straws must be almost empty now that you keep grasping at them to prove your silly theories.
01:13 AM on 12/06/2011
I guess maybe the Canadian PM saw the recent headlines:

"New hurricane record – 2232 days and counting since major Hurricane made landfall on the USA – last record was year 1900"

Considering that Man/Bear/Pig Gore wanted to steal billions from average citizens because he was yelping about how hurricanes were going to wipe us all of the face of the planet, stuff like this is going to really heart the church of climatology.

Ya know, if you climate folks actually practiced any REAL science. Maybe, just maybe folks would listen to what you have to say.

Instead you all just blither and blather on about stuff that some whacky job at the IPCC just made up and typed into his MAC book.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
07:21 AM on 12/06/2011
Hurricanes are not the measure of climate change happening. It may be more about the intensity of hurricanes not the frequency. And certainly hurricanes hitting the U.S. is not a measure of global warming. There is more to the world than the U.S. I guess in your mind the Caribbean and Mexico don't count, or other parts of the world where they call them typhoons don't count. Let us be grateful we have been spared a hurricane for awhile, but rest assured that global warming will cause many problems irregardless of how many hurricanes we experience. By the way the tropical storm that made it to New England this year was no picnic and very unusual.
11:57 AM on 12/06/2011
"...hurricanes are not the measure of climate change....."

Not according to your lord and savior Al Gore.

According to Man/Bear/Pig Gore, global warming will bring us bigger and badder hurricanes.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:30 AM on 12/06/2011
You cannot be serious. Go read a book.
12:07 AM on 12/06/2011
only the religous zealots can believe in this global warming (limiting because the weather can only go up) ughhchgh climate change (that way the temperature can go up or down and they can still be right). it is awesome that this government is taking a stand against these fanatics for the common good of the people
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
conservatism = "low-effort" thinking.
01:18 AM on 12/06/2011
Irrational. Let me guess a conservative, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
07:24 AM on 12/06/2011
Generally religious zealots don't believe in global warming. A good example would be large numbers of tea party/fundamentalist Christians. "Belief" in global warming is driven by understanding the science and is good evidence of a rational sane mind whether the person is religious or not. It is not evidence of zealotry.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:30 AM on 12/06/2011
Exactly.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:43 PM on 12/06/2011
I'm an agnostic, the so called science behind AGW is a complete joke.

Hide the decline!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 PM on 12/05/2011
http://www.tomdispatch.com/