Montreal Massacre Anniversary: Hundreds Gather On Parliament Hill To Remember Murders

By Stephanie Levitz

First Posted: 12/06/11 11:45 AM ET Updated: 12/07/11 03:26 PM ET

OTTAWA - Suzanne Laplante Edward awoke one morning in October, on what would have been her daughter's 43rd birthday, only to see the Conservatives introduce a bill to end the gun registry.

That rude awakening made this Dec. 6 both personal and political for the still-grieving mother.

It was on Dec. 6, 1989, that a gunman burst into Montreal's Ecole Polytechnique, shot more than two dozen people and killed 14 women — including her daughter, Anne-Marie Edward.

Anne-Marie would have had three or four children by now; she would have been a successful engineer, Laplante Edward told hundreds of people gathered on Parliament Hill to remember the victims of the shooting.

Ensure her death won't be in vain, she urged them.

"We are about to lose a tool that is proven to save Canadian lives, to save women's lives, to save children's lives," she told the crowd Tuesday. "Please, please, do something."

The Montreal massacre, as it has become known, spurred implementation of the long-gun registry in 1991 in an effort to make firearms like the one used in the shooting traceable.

But it was dogged by cost overruns and political opposition and, in October, the Conservatives moved forward with their long-time commitment to abolishing it and destroying all the related the data.

As they lay roses to mark the women killed in December 1989, the end of the registry was as much on people's minds at Tuesday's ceremony as the memories of the women they were there to honour.

Conservatives were pointedly not invited.

Their choice to introduce the bill in the fall, when people's thoughts were turning toward the anniversary, was a callous decision, said Wendy Sol, administrative vice-president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, which organized the event.

"It's so tragic that the Conservatives chose this time in particular, when this registry was in place in honour of those women that were murdered," she said.

"They pretend they care about the security of Canadians and yet they do this. It makes no sense."

Rona Ambrose, minister for the status of women, was planning to another vigil later in the day, said her spokeswoman.

Some Tory MPs wore white ribbons in the Commons on Tuesday to mark the national day to end violence against women, including Candice Hoeppner, who had introduced a private member's bill under the minority Conservative government to end the registry.

But her party's enthusiasm for getting rid of the registry became the viral video of the day, with footage of the vote from November flashing around the Internet showing an Alberta MP like a schoolboy playing pistol with his fingers as he rose to vote.

In a statement, the prime minister said his government had taken concrete action to prevent violence against women.

"More needs to be done. Every Canadian has a role to play in breaking the cycle of violence and discrimination against women," Stephen Harper said.

"On this tragic anniversary, let us remember and commemorate the lives of all women who have been victims of intolerable acts of gender-based violence, and let us strive to eliminate these heinous and cowardly crimes."

NDP Leader Nycole Turmel said the Conservatives weren't going far enough.

"We have to fight every day; we have to fight hard, in our homes, in our schools, in our communities," she said.

"We have to stand together like today, bravely, against a government that is turning back the clock on women's rights."

Gun-control advocate Wendy Cukier says the Dec. 6 anniversary has a dual meaning.

"This Dec. 6 more than ever before, we must mourn but we must also work for change," she told the crowd, many waving placards with "save the gun registry" slogans.

A group of six survivors and witnesses to the massacre travelled to Quebec City to pressure their provincial government to move forward with a legal challenge to the destruction of data from the registry.

In Montreal, across town from the scene of the massacre, over 100 people attended a march outside the local courthouse.

They held up signs, chanted slogans, and played out dramatic sketches about sexual stereotypes and violence against women.

SLIDESHOW: Canadians remember the Montreal Massacre
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

OTTAWA - Suzanne Laplante Edward awoke one morning in October, on what would have been her daughter's 43rd birthday, only to see the Conservatives introduce a bill to end the gun registry.That rude aw...
OTTAWA - Suzanne Laplante Edward awoke one morning in October, on what would have been her daughter's 43rd birthday, only to see the Conservatives introduce a bill to end the gun registry.That rude aw...
Filed by Ron Nurwisah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 PM on 12/07/2011
"Anne-Marie would have had three or four children by now; she would have been a successful engineer, Laplante Edward told hundreds of people gathered on Parliament Hill to remember the victims of the shooting. Ensure her death won't be in vain, she urged them."

I don't want to be cruel, but you don't know that she would have married or had children or become an engineer. Strangely enough, those were the same goals that Marc Lepine had - to marry a nice girl (and probably have children) and to become an engineer. Feminists destroyed not only his opportunity to achieve that career goal, but destroyed his reputation also. For other perspectives on the Montreal Massacre, see http://montrealmassacre.homestead.com/index.html
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
07:53 PM on 12/06/2011
Quebec will have it's long gun registry regardless of the HarperCons refusal to acknowledge it as one tool in a many pronged effort to combat gun crime.

Quebec will have it's long gun registry despite the HarperCons meanspirited destruction of previously gathered information which Quebec helped accumulate.

We owe it to the 15 departed souls and total 47 students shot with legally purchased long guns, not to forget the sacrifice they made at the École Polytechnique and Dawson College.

We owe it to ourselves to use as many methods possible to restrict guns in our cities and make our streets safe for our children.

Shame on you, Stephen Harper. Shame on all conservatives..
08:24 PM on 12/06/2011
To get the facts straight, it was *not* a *long gun!*, but a Mini 14 Ruger and a hunting knife. Ruger 14 is definitely not used for hunting.

Just replace the + signs with tt :
h++p://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/%­C3%89cole_­Polytechni­que_massac­re

h++p://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/M­ini-14
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
08:34 PM on 12/06/2011
It's not a pistol. It's classified as a rifle for the purposes of the gun registry and Marc Lepine used it to hunt people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
08:52 PM on 12/06/2011
Gee.....I guess I'll have to tell the dead coyotes I shot with mine they really aren't dead.....

The Mini 14 is one of the most popular hunting rifles in Canada.

Be nice to meet ONE anti-gun person that has the slightest clue what they are talking about.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
08:53 PM on 12/06/2011
The Conservatives are doing EXACTLY what they were elected to do.

Shame on the Conservatives!!!

It is called "democracy". Look it up.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
08:59 PM on 12/06/2011
So as an advocate for the democratic process, you won't mind when Quebec and other provinces set up their own long gun registries.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:55 PM on 12/06/2011
The liberals pissed on these women's graves:

http://www­.lowe.ca/R­ick/Firear­msLegislat­ion/AGangT­hatCouldn'tShootStr­aight.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulex
Made in Canada
06:35 PM on 12/06/2011
I know a woman in Orangeville who went to a home for abused women with her kids. During the day, she went back home to pick up some clothing and her husband murdered her and the children with his gun. If gun registry laws were in place, it could have saved her life.

Bring the gun registry back! For the love of God don't destroy the data.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
08:33 AM on 12/07/2011
HOW could it have saved her life????

I'm sure a registration certificate would not have stopped him shooting her.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
10:46 AM on 12/07/2011
If the gun had been registered, it would have been ILLEGAL to shoot her with it. Or something like that...
06:25 PM on 12/06/2011
It's obvious that the Harper regime thinks the US system of uncontrolled guns works just fine. Why destroy the registry? Meanwhile, they cry crocodile tears on the anniversary of a major gun tragedy and propose adopting a US style gulag method of crime control. They are bigger collabos than were the Vichy politicos in occupied France.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:11 PM on 12/06/2011
Guns are uncontrolled in the US?
Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niceshoes60
07:44 PM on 12/06/2011
uh, yeah. There are HUGE holes in the U.S. (gunshows, classified ads, online sales, estate sales, etc.) The boys who participated in Columbine got their guns from gunshows. While in Wisconsin I attended an estate sale and the family room was dedicated to the display/sale of guns; the room was so full of guns that there was an overflow display in the garage.

People cross state borders, to states w/weaker gun sales laws, to buy guns and import them into states w/stricter gun control laws. No one knows how many guns are privately owned in America. Federal law prohibits comprehensive government databases. Estimates are between 195,000 - 225,000 guns (not including military & police firearms), but this does not account for guns that are sold illegally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
07:48 PM on 12/06/2011
go away!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
07:35 PM on 12/06/2011
First of all, they are destroying the registry because that, in part, was what they were elected to do.

Secondly, we will retain in Canada the registration of a million handguns and other restricted weapons.

Thirdly, we will require licensing of ALL gun owners, and we do not allow the carry of concealed weapons.

Fourth....who the heck are you to say Conservatives do not care about the Montreal Massacre????

So, democracy is why the registry is dying, we retain strict gun control unlike the USA, and your reflections on the validity of Conservative sentiment are offensive....

You might have a point on the crime bill, but one out of four is pretty poor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
07:51 PM on 12/06/2011
"they were elected to do" Where is your missing sense of accuracy? Do you even imagine that everyone who DID (less than 50%)vote for the power hungry psycho, did so b/c of the gun registry? dumdumdumdumdum...
One out of a ridiculous four that you contrived? why are you here???
05:57 PM on 12/06/2011
Stephen Harper. The tail wagging the dog
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
05:00 PM on 12/06/2011
A misogynist killed fourteen women. Ideas not bullets are the greatest danger to our Mothers ,sisters and daughters. The real issue it not guns it is violence against women. It is sad that people have chosen to politicize this day of national mourning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
04:56 PM on 12/06/2011
So if I think the Conservitives are correct and the LGR is an expensive boondoogle that solves nothing then I am not allowed to mourn these women ? That's basically what's being said here right? Wow. Classy move politicizing these womens deaths. Not that I would expect anyone involved with the NDP or Liberals to have any class but wow. No wonder nobody outside Quebec is drinking the cool aid anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
05:01 PM on 12/06/2011
WE all know that conservatives hate babies, and want grandmother to die. You know, like we all know that in the States it is the Tea Party that is "violent", not OWS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
05:37 PM on 12/06/2011
are you being serious? crawl under your rock backwards heathen. the tea partiers were never attacked by cops because they never broke the golden rule "do not oppose the rich". that is why those ss goons have been sent in
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
06:14 PM on 12/06/2011
Nonsense
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
07:54 PM on 12/06/2011
conservatives don't even have brains, you don't have a clue what "class" even is. You'd probably sell your mother
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
08:39 PM on 12/07/2011
This from the guy that thinks Harper's electoral success was a Jewish plot!

lol

Real "classy" that was!
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
04:06 PM on 12/06/2011
Nothing but single shot guns, that way Farmers can still plink and hunters can feel the thrill when the Grizzly comes atem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:15 PM on 12/06/2011
I will defend your right to own all the single shot guns you want.

What is your point?
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
09:24 AM on 12/07/2011
My point is that single shot guns are not going to work well in a massacre. If you need a gun a single shot is good enough.
10:34 PM on 12/06/2011
Bear or moose guns ( 30:06, .308 ) also come in a single shot models, so what's your logic???
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
04:03 PM on 12/06/2011
Lock up a Conservative, prevent gun deaths
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:47 PM on 12/06/2011
Lock up a libtarb, prevent idiocy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
07:55 PM on 12/06/2011
hohoho, there's a creative come back! geeez, talk about idiocy!
10:38 PM on 12/06/2011
Voters have spoken.. and whiners forgot to vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
10:54 PM on 12/06/2011
Voter DIDN'T vote on the gun registry...oh, but , but good point... drekaderaka derrrr
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:03 PM on 12/06/2011
If only there had been a gun registry in 1989, then the Montreal massacre would never have happened!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
05:04 PM on 12/06/2011
Do you really believe that? Registered firearms are just as deadly as unregistered ones.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
06:24 PM on 12/06/2011
I hope, and do believe, you are kidding.

LePine had a FAC, which allowed him to buy the weapon. He had passed all the legal requirements.

I don't think a registration certificate would have stopped him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
04:03 PM on 12/06/2011
Bill C-68 was simply an incredibly cynical and crass political move by the liberals to exploit a tragedy.

"When Ms. Campbell was enjoying a brief season of success in her re-election bid in the summer campaign of 1993, Mr. Chrétien was kept busy reassuring what he called the "Nervous Nellies" in his caucus that Ms. Campbell's star would soon fall. To bring her down, the Liberals planned to discredit her key accomplishment as minister of justice, an ambitious gun-control package.

Those measures -- enacted in the wake of the Montreal Massacre -- included new requirements for the training and certification of target shooters and hunters. We got new laws requiring: the safe storage of firearms and ammunition, which essentially brought every gun in the country under lock and key; screening of applicants for firearms licences; courts to actively seek information about firearms in spousal assault cases; the prohibition of firearms that had no place in Canada's field-and-stream tradition of firearms use.

I was one of the department of justice officials involved in that earlier gun-control program. When the House of Commons passed the legislation, Wendy Cukier and Heidi Rathgen of the Coalition for Gun Control, which had been part of the consultation process, supplied the champagne for a party at my Ottawa home.

So what were the Liberals to do, faced with a legislative accomplishment on this scale?

Simple: Pretend it hadn't happened,..."

http://www.lowe.ca/Rick/FirearmsLegislation/AGangThatCouldn'tShootStraight.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
08:07 PM on 12/06/2011
It's funny that you post a link to a pro firearm site...that's what we call redundant. We all know that you are missing key FACTS- you cons are always afraid of that word, it's always there to trip you up- why would anyone want to see the source of your brainwashing, the product is bad enough!
10:42 PM on 12/06/2011
Wow! the pot's calling the kettle black!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Devlin
02:29 PM on 12/06/2011
I have an apolitical question, and I hope somebody will see it and provide an answer in that spirit.

How does registration prevent gun crime?

I'm from Alberta, so, needless to say, I've heard the political catchphrase "criminals won't register their weapons" about a billion times. That criticism's never made a great deal of sense to me.

A more sensible criticism of the registration concept, as I see things, would be to say "you can still shoot somebody with a registered gun."
Am I wrong?
How does the act of registering a firearm make that firearm less likely to be used in crime?

I am LEGITIMATELY confused about this; I'm not trying to make a point.
Somebody help me understand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:04 PM on 12/06/2011
It doesn't. But, then again, that is not the purpose of registration.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cameron d
Good Guys Win
01:24 PM on 12/06/2011
A truly awful moment in Canadian history. Never again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
01:37 PM on 12/06/2011
That, at least, we can agree on..............
03:34 PM on 12/06/2011
Agreed