Breast Cancer: New Drugs Pertuzumab, Everolimus Show Big Promise

Breast Cancer

First Posted: 12/07/11 06:44 PM ET Updated: 12/08/11 12:05 PM ET

SAN ANTONIO - Breast cancer experts are cheering what could be some of the biggest advances in more than a decade: two new medicines that significantly delay the time until women with very advanced cases get worse.

In a large international study, an experimental drug from Genentech called pertuzumab held cancer at bay for a median of 18 months when given with standard treatment, versus 12 months for others given only the usual treatment. It also strongly appears to be improving survival, and follow-up is continuing to see if it does.

"You don't see that very often. ... It's a spectacular result," said one study leader, Dr. Sandra Swain, medical director of Washington Hospital Center's cancer institute.

In a second study, another drug long used in organ transplants but not tried against breast cancer -- everolimus, sold as Afinitor by Novartis AG -- kept cancer in check for a median of 7 months in women whose disease was worsening despite treatment with hormone-blocking drugs. A comparison group that received only hormonal medicine had just a 3-month delay in disease progression.

Afinitor works in a novel way, seems "unusually effective" and sets a new standard of care, said Dr. Peter Ravdin, breast cancer chief at the UT Health Science Center in San Antonio. He has no role in the work or ties to drugmakers. Most patients have tumors like those in this study -- their growth is fueled by estrogen.

Results were released Wednesday at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium and some were published online by the New England Journal of Medicine. They come a few weeks after federal approval was revoked for another Genentech drug, Avastin, that did not meaningfully help breast cancer patients. It still is sold for other tumour types.

The new drugs are some of the first major developments since Herceptin came out in 1998. It has become standard treatment for a certain type of breast cancer.

Story Continues Below: A report from the Institute of Medicine's breast cancer panel advises six risk-lowering steps.
Avoid Unnecessary Medical Radiation
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
A report from the Institute of Medicine, an independent organization based in Washington, D.C., advises women to avoid unnecessary medical radiation such as diagnostic CT scans.

"These are powerful advances ... an important step forward," said Dr. Harold Burstein, a breast expert at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston who had no role in the studies.

A reality check: The new drugs are likely to be very expensive -- up to $10,000 a month -- and so far have not proved to be cures. Doctors hope they might be when given to women with early-stage cancers when cure is possible, rather than the very advanced cases treated in these studies.

Even short of a cure, about 40,000 U.S. women each year have cancer that spreads beyond the breast, and treatment can make a big difference in their lives.

Rachel Midgett is an example. The 39-year-old Houston woman has breast cancer that spread to multiple parts of her liver, yet she ran a half-marathon in Las Vegas on Sunday. She has had three scans since starting on Afinitor nine months ago, and "every time, my liver lesions keep shrinking," she said.

"My quality of life has been wonderful. It's amazing. I have my hair. ... If you saw me you wouldn't even know I have cancer."

Genentech, part of the Switzerland-based Roche Group, applied Tuesday to the federal Food and Drug Administration for permission to sell pertuzumab (per-TOO-zoo-mab) as initial treatment for women like those in the study.

The drug targets cells that make too much of a protein called HER2 -- about one of every four or five breast cancer cases. Herceptin attacks the same target but in a different way, and the two medicines complement each other.

The study tested the combination in 808 women from Europe, North and South America and Asia and found a 6-month advantage in how long the cancer stayed stable. All women also received a chemotherapy drug, docetaxel.

"That's a huge improvement" in such advanced cases, said study leader Dr. Jose Baselga, associate director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. He is a paid consultant for Roche.

So far, 165 deaths have occurred -- 96 among the 406 women given Herceptin and chemo alone, and only 69 among the 402 women also given pertuzumab. Doctors won't know whether the drug affects survival until there are more deaths.

The most common side effects were diarrhea, rash and low white blood cell counts, which often occur with cancer treatment. The dual treatment did not cause more heart problems -- an issue with other Herceptin combinations.

"We're really pleased that there were no new safety signals" and that pertuzumab is so promising, said Dr. Sandra Horning, Genentech's global development chief of cancer drugs.

Another study is testing pertuzumab in 3,800 women with early breast cancer. Genentech says it has not set a price for pertuzumab, but sells Herceptin for $4,500 a month to doctors, who mark it up and add fees to infuse it. Herceptin's U.S. patent expires in 2019, so combination treatment might be more affordable once generic Herceptin is available.

"Pertuzumab is a winner" and should win government approval, said Dr. Eric Winer of the Dana-Farber cancer centre.

Dr. Gary Lyman, a treatment effectiveness researcher at Duke University, called the results "quite impressive," unlike what turned out to be the case for Avastin. He was on an FDA panel that recommended accelerated approval for Avastin as well as the recent panel that urged revoking its use for breast cancer because later studies did not bear out its early promise.

Winer and Lyman have no role in the new studies or financial ties to any drug companies.

The other study tested Novartis AG's Afinitor, which has long been sold for preventing organ rejection after transplants and to treat a few less common cancers including the type of pancreatic tumour that killed Apple founder Steve Jobs. It blocks one pathway cancer uses to spread. A one-month supply costs $11,000.

The 724 women in the study were worsening despite treatment with hormone-blocking medicines. They all were given one they had not taken before, and some also got Afinitor.

After about a year of follow-up, cancer progression was delayed 7 months in the group getting Afinitor and 3 months in the others.

"The two together have a much greater effect than you would expect from either alone," said study leader Dr. Gabriel Hortobagyi, breast cancer research chief at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. "They snip two wires that are critical" for growth signals to continue, he said.

However, the combo led to more side effects -- mouth sores, anemia, shortness of breath, high blood sugar, fatigue and lung inflammation.

"I have patients who tell me how long they live is not as important as the quality of the remainder of their life, where other patients will do just about anything and will tolerate any toxic levels or side effects," Hortobagyi said. "This is clearly one additional option for patients."

The cancer conference is sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research, Baylor College of Medicine and the UT Health Science Center.

___

Online:

Cancer conference: http://www.sabcs.org

___

Marilynn Marchione can be followed at http://twitter.com/MMarchioneAP

RELATED VIDEO:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

SAN ANTONIO - Breast cancer experts are cheering what could be some of the biggest advances in more than a decade: two new medicines that significantly delay the time until women with very advanced ca...
SAN ANTONIO - Breast cancer experts are cheering what could be some of the biggest advances in more than a decade: two new medicines that significantly delay the time until women with very advanced ca...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:42 PM on 12/11/2011
It will prolong the life of someone sufferiing with breast cancer but not their quality of life. So basically, it increases the longevity of the patients life, but with added side affects. It seems like a partial breakthrough but that is surely not one completed. Is this hope or is this false hope?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
12:28 PM on 12/11/2011
is the bcp causing cancer in all folks men and galssssssssssssssssss??????????????

seems oooooooooooooooooo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
04:03 PM on 12/08/2011
BTW, at least one of those top scientists tried to call a news conference before he was slaughtered viciously the night before it was to have taken place. If you continue to research these incidents you will learn of two undercover investigators from France who were working undercover in Britain that were mutilated in their apartment they were renting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
04:11 PM on 12/08/2011
what? why would HP let this comment in but not the proceeding one- this comment makes zero sense without the other. ???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ExpectAMiracle
03:59 PM on 12/08/2011
What a humongous load of pony loaf. This is nothing more than the heartless, avaricious pharmaceutical industry doing a little pre-publicity for yet one more of their poisons that do NOTHING to actually understand or prevent cancer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
03:58 PM on 12/08/2011
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/scientists.htm
This website details some of the horrific murders of microbiologists. Top microbiologists working on the cure for disease, killed in such a horrendous fashion one can only deduce that they were meant to scare others who dare to follow the same path.
Drug companies make billions in profit, a cure isn't in their best interest.
Believe that there exists those who feel zero empathy for others, and certainly don't care for the 'masses'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:35 PM on 12/08/2011
Is there any published cures that these microbiologist have found. Anything someone can do besides spending $1000 on natural products that may be doing the same thing? Aren't microbiologist the ones that founded some cancer treatments that have been effective? Wouldn't we still need them for all the other diseases out there? We do know that cancer much like the common cold is very difficult to treat and cure- it keeps changing.
08:23 AM on 12/11/2011
Cancer was cured over 30 years ago, but the Cancer INDUSTRY will not be allowed to be shut down......Think what would have happened to Jonas Salk in todays medical industry? He would have never been allowed to develop his vaccine
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
03:28 PM on 12/08/2011
I don't buy it. A drug that will prolong the life of somebody suffering with breast cancer- if they continue to pay for treatment (ie. drug company meds)...hardly a 'breakthrough advance", unless you own the drug company's stocks
photo
The Corporate Champion
Conservative, because someone's got to do the work
12:09 PM on 12/08/2011
The World Health Organization once classified birth control pills as carcinogens (not sure if they still do), and there has been plenty of research that shows an increased risk of breast + cervical cancer for those who use birth control pills.

Even those not on the pill (men included) can be affected through estrogen in the environment left by women on the pill. An increase of estrogen in the environment hurts males more than female.

Research has shown that synthetic hormones also have adverse effects on babies in the womb.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
12:53 PM on 12/08/2011
That's why we go to doctors for BC pills. Because THEY have the current information (and they are sure).
10:51 AM on 12/12/2011
Way back when, more than 30 years ago, birth control pills contained much more estrogen than the modern ones.
10:27 AM on 12/08/2011
Check out www.cancersface.com. It's a guy who cured his cancer under a Cancer Centers care without Chemo. They pushed Chemo on him until they saw the tumors vanish before their very eyes. He shares everything without charging a dime.

Branden
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IrisMozenter
12:07 PM on 12/08/2011
Several of the articles he quotes say the exact opposite of what he claims. For example, http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/coenzyme-q10/NS_patient-coenzymeq10/DSECTION=evidence says that there is no proof that CoQ10 stops the development of tumors, while he claims the opposite. Hey, I use CoQ10 myself, but when you make claims like this, you have to be careful.
12:54 PM on 12/10/2011
I Know Kevin and his family. His son is one of my friends. From what I see the article says CoEnzyme Q10 levels are low in people with Cancer and other disease. So wouldn't be logical to increase it if you're sick.

The family has gone through quite alot. But thanks to his logical thinking by including traditional doctors from the beginning he has been able to prove there are other ways.

The best part of his journey was when the hospital charged him for Chemo, he never received. He was also sent to the Cancer Care Alliance in Seattle where he refused Chemo.
He was charged for it there too and they are still trying to collect on what his insurance didn't pay.

Now is that a scam or what. Yet at no time does he bash doctors. He does tell plain and simple how Chemo works. It's poison, you poison everything in the body and either the Cancer or the person dies first. Either way medicine claims the Cancer killed the patient.

Branden
09:45 AM on 12/08/2011
Some very mean comments below here...I am a survivor who has been a "health nut" since age 12. Unfortunately some of us just have the predisposition in our genes. We fight long and hard to stay with our children and family. We take these meds and suffer side effects so our children do not grow up without mothers. We cherish the extra months these meds bring, and so do our children! Do not just say we didn't eat well, or excersise, We derserved cancer no more than anyone else...eating well, do all that we could and it just happens. I hope you never ever know the pain we go through! I hope your children never see what mine went through. I salute these women trying new treatments to help themseleves all all of us!
10:57 AM on 12/12/2011
Yes, it's ridiculous to blame the person who gets cancer in most cases. Genetic research shows that some types of breast cancer and colon cancer do run in families. If you've got the marker in your genes, then at best you can delay the onset by exercising and eating your broccoli.

Furthermore, there are a number of young people and children stricken with cancer. THEY didn't do anything wrong with their lifestyle -- they didn't have time. It's either genetic or environmental.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
08:57 AM on 12/08/2011
So women with terminal cancer might live 18 instead of 12 months more. All the while feeling like crp because chemotherapy is poison. __ My best friend had chemo at age 25. It ruined his hips, "aseptic necrosis", had them both replaced and walked with a cane, then died of cancer at age 41 (it's counted as a cure after 5 years, he was officially cured.) __ My sister (age 63) is not getting chemotherapy, is on a macrobiotic diet instead. Calorie restriction is the best way to fight cancer relapse. Get the facts, judge for yourself. We are responsible for our health, not the medical industry.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
IrisMozenter
12:08 PM on 12/08/2011
Everyone makes their own choices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
07:07 AM on 12/08/2011
cannabidiol is the cure but you can't have any because it actually works this is the truth I challenge anyone here to prove me wrong http://youtu.be/jqQ1gZaAiNY
photo
caution50
atheist, geologist, humanist
07:30 AM on 12/08/2011
Cannibinoids demonstrate great potential for inhibiting tumor growth, but let's not descend into total fantasy quite yet. The active ingredients have to be identified, sequestered, understood, and synthesized into a workable and safe delivery system. There's no indication that simply smoking weed will cure your cancer.
11:20 AM on 12/08/2011
Go to youtube and watch Rick Simpson "Run from the cure". You are right smoking cannabis won't cure your cancer. As soon as you light it on fire 90% of the medicinal value goes up in smoke. However if you make concentrated hash oil and take it internally then that is a whole different story.
If you have netflix you should also check out "Burzynski", which isn't about cannabis but does shed some light on the corruption in the FDA and how the last thing the cancer industry wants is a cure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
12:32 AM on 12/13/2011
you mean let's wait and let ththethpppharmaceutical companies comtrol us
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
08:59 AM on 12/08/2011
It wouldn't work for late-stage terminal cancer. And neither do these drugs, just extend life some. And if it's true, heavy pot users should be immune to cancer, and they are not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anjushri
Veganism = Ahimsa
05:52 AM on 12/08/2011
I'm sorry but the pink ribbon campaign is just a big scam. They even bathe egg cartons in pink which is ironic since animal products are a great contributing factor to breast cancer along with lack of Vitamin D, poor nutrition and alcohol consumption. Instead of hearing about actual prevention -- like diet, adequate Vitamin D -- we are told to have mammograms instead or please donate so we can torture more mice or develop yet another drug and sell it. Just another very big cancer industry exploiting women. No surprise there.
07:05 AM on 12/08/2011
AMEN.....WHY NOT HELP THE PEOPLE THAT ARE LEFT WITH SIDE EFFECTS AFTER IT IS ALL OVER THAT DESTROY THEIR LIVES......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No death panels
There's no man with a trumpet. Only me.
07:47 AM on 12/08/2011
Please learn more about breast cancer.
12:01 PM on 12/08/2011
I would like to find a cause. After 100 years of research nobody knows.
05:38 AM on 12/08/2011
Would a breast cancer victim pay $60,000 out-of-pocket to live for another six months? Of course, desire to do so would vary in each case, but unless money is no object, what a dilemma.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PartyOfYes
Life is a pre-existing condition.
08:35 AM on 12/08/2011
And another question would be....why does it cost $60,000?
11:08 AM on 12/12/2011
Yes, that's an insane amount. I realize that the drug companies want to get back the money they spent on research, but still -- these drugs had already been developed for other illnesses. It makes you wonder how much the companies wasted on researching other drugs that turned out to be useless or deadly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsCanuck
Wife, Mother, New Democrat, Pro-Choice, Atheist
04:09 PM on 12/08/2011
It means 6 more months with their children and family.
nancynancy
Atheist.
05:20 AM on 12/08/2011
Big promise? I don't think so. These new "wonder drugs" gives a person an extra 180 days filled with anemia, high blood sugar and lung infections for which they will fork over $60,000, and in the end they will still die.
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
08:17 AM on 12/08/2011
6 months of extra life and without additional side effects. Yes, it sounds horrible. /s
nancynancy
Atheist.
11:17 AM on 12/08/2011
The article clearly states, " the combo led to more side effects -- mouth sores, anemia, shortness of breath, high blood sugar, fatigue and lung inflammation." And for those additional side effects, the tab is $60,000. And then the person dies.