Canada Pulls Out Of Kyoto Protocol

Durban Peter Kent Climate Talks

First Posted: 12/12/11 04:10 PM ET Updated: 12/13/11 01:35 PM ET


Canada is formally withdrawing from the Kyoto accord, Environment Minister Peter Kent said Monday.


The decision to do so will save the government an estimated $14 billion in penalties, Kent said. The Conservative government says it has no choice given the economic situation.


Blaming an "incompetent Liberal government" who signed the accord and then took little action to make the necessary greenhouse gas emission cuts, Kent said he was formalizing what the Conservative government has been saying for weeks.


"Kyoto for Canada is in the past. As such, we are invoking our legal right to formally withdraw," Kent said.


The Kyoto Protocol, which expires next year, committed major industrial economies to reducing their annual CO2 emissions to below 1990 levels, while providing financial supports to developing nations to encourage them to follow suit eventually. Canada ratified the accord in 1997 but was not on track to meet its legally binding targets.


The Conservatives have committed to 17 per cent cuts from 2005 levels by 2020, a much lower threshold to meet than cutting below 1990 emissions levels.


Canada 'abdicating' responsibilities


NDP Environment critic Megan Leslie says Kent is fear-mongering about the consequences of staying in the Kyoto pact.


"What this is really about is the fact that our government is abdicating its international obligations. It's like we're the kid who's failing the class so we have to drop it before that happens," Leslie said.


The cost to staying in Kyoto is "absolutely" made up, she added.


Kent says Canada produces less than two per cent of global carbon emissions, Kyoto doesn't require major emitters like China and India to cut the amount of greenhouse gases they produce.


Kent says Copenhagen and Cancun agreements, which were negotiated in 2009 and 2010 as the world stared down the end of Kyoto, are the future.


Gary Doer, Canada's ambassador to the U.S., says Canada signed onto the Copenhagen agreement because it had the "on-ramp" for more countries to join in.


"We took measures, often which aren't credited in either of our countries, to start by reducing through energy efficiency the emissions from light vehicles," Doer told Evan Solomon, host of CBC's Power & Politics.


Canada had to notify the United Nations of its intent to withdraw from Kyoto by the end of the year or face additional cuts under the accord based on a five-year audit being conducted at the end of 2012. Canada would have been forced to buy expensive carbon credits to meet those targets.


The Conservative government has opposed any extension of the Kyoto Protocol framework in future agreements, arguing instead for a new international agreement that includes commitments from all major emitters, including those in the developing world.


The 194 nations attending the UN climate change summit in Durban, South Africa, agreed Sunday to start negotiations on a new accord that would put all participating countries under the same binding commitments to control greenhouse gases.


Kent returned to Ottawa from Durban Monday afternoon and made the announcement about two hours after landing.


He said he waited to formally pull out of the Kyoto Protocol because he'd promised a top UN official in Durban not to distract from the talks.


TWITTER REACTS TO CANADA PULLING OUT OF KYOTO PROTOCOL
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 154
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Burgess1
02:20 PM on 12/14/2011
Anyone who can't recognize that a country of 34M will always lose a per capita argument with a country that has 1.3B can't appreciate math. They are 36 times our population. If we entered Mad Max times reduced our emissions to 10% of our current they would still be polluting "less" based on per capita.

Secondly there is the question of sacrifice. The purpose of Kyoto is to find a way to do this so it is fair to everyone. China argues it would be too much of a sacrifice to rduce it's emissions even 1%of worldwide total, but by per capita, supposedly, it should be 36 times more severe economically than it would be for Canada. It would be worse, but not 36 times worse but hey, that's the "golden" per capita argument for you.

For Canada dropping 1% is 50% of our total emissions and only 1/17th of Chinas. Which country is sacrificing more reducing that 1%?

Further there is (as per kyoto) the question of economic reliance. When China emits 1 ton of GHG's they only make $434 for that. China pollutes for cheap. Canada earns $2,348 for the same 1 ton of GHG's. So if we understand math, we understand who is making the -astronomically- larger sacrifice between China and Canada to lower the GHG's by 1% of world total.

And that is why people who just blurt out, "Canada pollutes more per capita" and think they've found the answer to everything are idiot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geminivoyager
02:26 PM on 12/13/2011
What good news. Canada finally has the strength to avoid political posturing and do what is best for the country. The Libs postured on this but even they saw it was unworkable without the major polluters being on board also. There will be a lot of angry left wings flapping, but they will just have to suffer through a better economy just like the rest of us. If they are not happy with what they are saving, maybe they can start a collection to give money to industry? That would achieve their goals ... wouldn't it?
02:10 PM on 12/13/2011
Peter Kent's email address: kentp@parl.gc.ca
let him know that his decisions are a disgusting shame to Canada
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montezaro
11:14 AM on 12/13/2011
The gentle sounds of Harper's harp fills the sky... while Rome is burning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Humanitari Leandro
10:39 AM on 12/13/2011
repulsive, "we can pollute at will...we are canada" what a bunch of sad human beings their people in power, keep us going down
09:10 AM on 12/13/2011
As i awoke to this news..........i am ashamed to be a " Canadian ".........our grandkids will pay for this ......sadly !!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:55 AM on 12/13/2011
Please explain how the treaty would reduce emissions.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
11:07 AM on 12/13/2011
Please explain how it would not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:47 AM on 12/13/2011
We got scamed again. When did they start colecting 2-3 cents a liter for the carbon tax? Where is that money going or is it gone? Will they drop the tax now or will they keep collecting it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 AM on 12/13/2011
Protect those rich polluting corporations
or you might lose your next election.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Humanitari Leandro
10:39 AM on 12/13/2011
well said, they are such COWARDS all politicians
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frankie Veszlenyi
animal activist and environmentalist
07:58 AM on 12/13/2011
This government is a "QUITER!!!" Faced with a Challenge, instead of utilizing our Education, Technology and advancing our business prospects to further increase our potential to the rest of the world, they decide we are NOT Competant enough to TAKE IT ON!!!! Thanks for your support!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
07:51 AM on 12/13/2011
Canada has no choice but to go on burning fuel, and withdraw from Kyoto
That is the problem for all of us, we all live in artificial environments, supported by the energy of fossil fuels. We built our cities, roads and transport systems when fuel was cheap, now its getting too expensive to use and it’s killing the very environment it created. The Canadians are aware of that, but it is a system that can only function through forward growth. It cannot stop or go backward. To stop burning fuel would throw the Canadian economy into chaos, and decimate its industrial system. Canadian winters kill people, especially those used to being cosseted by central heating. http://www.yourmedievalfuture.com/
11:04 AM on 12/13/2011
The forward growth model will be unsustainable by not finding ways to get off dependence on fossil fuel production. The unchecked contributions to climate change are likely to cause more environmental disasters like flooding and /or drought ,disrupting the global product chain . We are already seeing this in ironically in auto manufacturing and sales. We are also seeing this in food production.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frankie Veszlenyi
animal activist and environmentalist
07:51 AM on 12/13/2011
Some are part of the solution, some are part of the problem, now Canada is part of the problem!!! - so much for a "Dream Team!!!" - FIND SOLUTIONS - This is NOT an Example to set for Business Communities - GIVING UP!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jrfunkenstein
'It's a sad and beautiful world'
05:50 AM on 12/13/2011
Kent should be known as the Minister for Corporate Toadying.

The Harper government continues to demonstrate its unwavering commitment to moving the country backward to a time when the will of the U.S. was all important and where the future of the country lies in being compliant and obsequious in our enslavement to interests that do not represent Canadian values of progressive thought and deed.

This man has been a disaster for this once proud and independent nation; for shame.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
11:12 AM on 12/13/2011
Well said, jr.  Faved
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jrfunkenstein
'It's a sad and beautiful world'
01:22 PM on 12/13/2011
Gracias amigo; previously returned the favor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
05:47 AM on 12/13/2011
Peter Kent and his master Stevie are dispicable Canadians and human beings.
They make me sick
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
03:38 AM on 12/13/2011
Just another bit of proof of the Tories' penchant for being behind the times.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rubrducky999
03:01 AM on 12/13/2011
Good for you Canada!
03:05 AM on 12/13/2011
For making a deal with the devil?