Keystone XL Pipeline: Republican Deadline Approved By Senate Could Kill Project

Obama Keystone Xl Pipeline

First Posted: 12/18/11 02:56 PM ET Updated: 12/20/11 01:16 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Republicans may be crowing about the U.S. Senate's passage of a payroll tax cut bill that includes a measure aimed at expediting approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.

But could the measure passed over the weekend all but sign the death warrant for the pipeline?

The White House isn't likely to approve the pipeline after just a 60-day review of a proposed new route for the $7 billion project, one of U.S. President Barack Obama's top economic advisers said Sunday.

U.S. State Department officials reviewing alternative routes around a crucial aquifer in Nebraska had already made clear that two months was not enough time to decide the fate of the pipeline, Gene Sperling told CNN's "State of The Union."

The bill calls for Obama to approve the pipeline within 60 days or decide it's not in the national best interest of the United States.

But the two-month deadline "would make it almost certainly impossible" that the project will get the green light, added Sperling, joining the chorus of Senate Democrats who have made similar assertions.

"They've just killed the Keystone pipeline. They killed it because they forced the president to make a decision before he can make it so he's not going to move forward with it," Sen. Barbara Boxer, an ally of environmental groups, said Friday.

Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrats, suggested his party out-smarted Republicans.

"The president is apparently just going to use the option given to him not to let it go (forward)," said Levin. "There's a waiver in there which we understand the president is going to exercise."

The Canadian pipeline, a project that few Americans had even heard of just a few months ago, has become the latest flashpoint in a momentous, year-end legislative battle between Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Democrats were clamouring for bipartisan agreement on a bill that would extend payroll tax cuts and unemployment benefits for hard-hit Americans, and were miffed when Republicans in the House of Representatives inserted the Keystone provision into their legislation.

The House Republicans did so in the wake of a U.S. State Department decision to defer a final ruling on the pipeline until after next year's presidential election. State Department officials are assessing the pipeline because it crosses an international border.

The entire bill passed on Saturday, in fact, was in question again just a day later. The latest obstacle had nothing to do with Keystone XL, but because House Republicans want the payroll tax cuts to be extended for a full year, not just the two months currently proposed.

House Speaker John Boehner was calling for meetings with Senate leaders to come up with some kind of agreement.

Last month's announcement by the State Department on Keystone XL prompted howls of protest from Republicans. They accuse the Obama administration of making a political decision aimed at shielding the president from a backlash by his liberal base next November.

The State Department said it was deferring a final decision on Keystone XL so it could undertake a further environmental analysis on alternative routes around Nebraska's Ogallala aquifer, a major source of drinking water for millions on the Great Plains. But sources familiar with the State Department decision said it resulted from pressure by senior White House advisers.

Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Boehner pointed out that the White House was once fully supportive of the pipeline, and scoffed at the need for yet another environmental review.

"That's nonsense, they've had three years," Boehner said. "This was about to be approved last summer, so waiting and waiting and waiting is not the answer. It's time to proceed with the pipeline."

He added the president is "just kicking the can down the road because it may anger some people in his base."

The pipeline would carry millions of barrels of Alberta oilsands crude through six U.S. states to Gulf Coast refineries. Proponents say the pipeline will create thousands of jobs and end American dependence on Middle East oil, while opponents say the pipeline is an environmental disaster waiting to happen.

Republican lawmakers have been attempting to paint Obama as weak on job creation, and are holding up the Canadian project as a symbol of what they say is White House economic incompetence.

Obama, meantime, had suggested he'd veto any payroll tax cut bill that included the pipeline measure, and faced accusations this weekend from his liberal base that he'd blinked on that promise after the Senate, controlled by Democrats, left the Keystone XL language in the bill.

Sperling denied it.

"The president did make clear that he was not going to allow Congress to tie that vote to something that would mandate or force him to accept the Keystone permit when there was not adequate time to do a health and safety environmental review," he said.

"Because nothing in this bill mandates the president to do that, this ... did not go against his veto threat."

Republicans have vowed to carry on fighting for the pipeline, even if Obama refuses to approve it in 60 days.

"If the president denies the American people these jobs and this source of energy from our ally, Canada, it will not be the last time he sees this bill," a Senate Republican leadership aide told the Washington Post.

"Republicans will continue fighting for this bipartisan job-creation (measure), even if the president wants to stand between the unemployed and good American jobs."

Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer, meantime, scoffed at his Republican colleagues this weekend on Capitol Hill.

"The bottom line is that Secretary of State Clinton has said that if they rush the process, they're going to end the pipeline .... And the president is totally on board with that strategy," he said.

Related on HuffPost:

By Lee-Anne Goodman, The Canadian Press

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

WASHINGTON - Republicans may be crowing about the U.S. Senate's passage of a payroll tax cut bill that includes a measure aimed at expediting approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.But could t...
WASHINGTON - Republicans may be crowing about the U.S. Senate's passage of a payroll tax cut bill that includes a measure aimed at expediting approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.But could t...
Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:54 PM on 12/20/2011
Apparently even HP has seen though the incessant politicking the President has engaged in today, erecting the 956th straw tiger.

He says the wants the year's extension and so do the Republicans. But it is politics if he doesn't get what wants - to tax and spend..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:52 PM on 12/20/2011
it's all kabuki dancing, then Obama will use his over worked strategy of "caving" to get the pipeline he wants. Thats what most of his supposed caves" are about. He gets what he wants a repubs take the heat.

"But the prime minster (Harper) also said that on a recent trip to the U.S., he was told by a number of senior officials that the Keystone XL pipeline will be approved, thereby opening a new route for Canadian oil to be sent to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast."

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20111219/stephen-harper-year-end-interview-111219/
03:09 PM on 12/20/2011
Question: is the USA simply determined to hand every deal to China? Canada is an oil exporting nation. It's what we do. We are going to produce oil, sands and otherwise, and we are going to find customers for it. Frankly, we already have a positive balance of trade with the USA. Selling oil to China is starting to look like a better option since they seem to be a more reliable customer and we need to balance up all the manufactured goods we import from them
01:50 PM on 12/20/2011
Clearly a blog for those inclined to lean to either side of the fence. Whether Americans choose to get the "muck" from Canada or not will eventually be decided (my guess is a "no") so relax and enjoy the coming season. Not that it matters north of the border,as China is already lining up to fill their barrels. Season's Greetings :)
03:39 PM on 12/19/2011
I don't see how a pipeline could be serving the American best interest. The 7 billion investment would be better spent on HHO technology, since this is the way of the future.
03:58 PM on 12/19/2011
If you don't see that, then you must be wearing eyepatches.
05:11 PM on 12/19/2011
cononly if you do see that then you are hallucinating. Go to the emergency room but be sure you aren't driving yourself there.
photo
romil
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed
12:09 PM on 12/19/2011
Well from this article you can pretty much see that the repubs don't give a damn about Americans and instead want to satisfy their coprorate sponsors. They would hold helping AMERICANS hostage to please an oil company? They would tax regular, hard working Americans to further their greed.
I like what someone said about repubs: "Even a smart car wouldn't let them in".
03:59 PM on 12/19/2011
So why are so many dimocraps in favour then? LOL Dummer than a bag of hammers!
11:20 AM on 12/19/2011
LOL - I can see that, as with the old Pravda in the USSR, that it is difficult to get any non-left opinion posted here! LOL Typical left!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Planarama
Common sense will one day prevail.
10:01 PM on 12/19/2011
Your opinion is here although all you are doing is attacking everyone else's comments as opposed to stating some reasons why this project would actually be positive for Americans.

If you are so strong in your beliefs, then, provide comments with substance and impress us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Planarama
Common sense will one day prevail.
09:40 AM on 12/19/2011
I still have to laugh at this one.

The Re(tard)publicans were so outsmarted on this one. (No offence to the mentally handicapped by comparing them to the Republicans.)

Now I am hearing that the line, which will only create temporary jobs, will also process the oil for export which will not alter America's dependence on foreign oil one bit. Keep spinning the lies, Boehner, the smart people will eventually see through your deception.

A pipeline that will ship dirty oil to be processed and then exported will only help the oil companies, not the average American. We all know by this point the oil companies only care about themselves and their major shareholders, not our environment, not our prosperity and nothing to do with the rest of us.
11:00 AM on 12/19/2011
LOL - and where did you find the lies you post here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
12:17 PM on 12/19/2011
If you believe this pipeline will even take 1% away from dependence on MidEast oil then your as dumb as your name makes you look.

They're merely looking to export oil from Canada through Texas.. it's a messy project that will destroy land not only in Nebraska but elswhere too and will only make more millions for the oil-barrons while doing very little for working-class Americans
12:29 PM on 12/19/2011
Why not giggle more responsibly. everyone is entitled to his or her opinion and to call someone a liar without setting the record straight is a bit immature don't you think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drect
He who ceases to learn cannot adequately teach.
11:54 AM on 12/19/2011
They want you to think that American energy independence is actually possible. I don't think there is enough oil any where on the planet to keep America from not having to import from somewhere they don't like.

Sacrificing the worlds climate just a so some poeple can be put to work (temporarily) and a few more people can get rich is ridiculous.


Nice post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Planarama
Common sense will one day prevail.
09:00 PM on 12/19/2011
Thanks. I try to find the truth in between the lies.