Chiquita Oil Sands Controversy: 'Ethical Oil' Keeps Up Campaign As Fruit Company Denies Boycott

Chiquita Oil Sands Ethical Oil Boycott

First Posted: 12/21/11 03:14 PM ET Updated: 12/21/11 04:45 PM ET

EDMONTON - Oilsands advocates will keep calling a decision by Chiquita Brands to avoid oilsands-derived fuel a boycott even though the food multinational says that's wrong.

"You can word it any way that you want, but if your goal is to not use Canadian oilsands oil, that's a boycott," said Kathryn Marshall of EthicalOil.org, which has sponsored radio ads and public demonstrations against Chiquita's decision.

On Wednesday, a pair of sombrero- and poncho-clad supporters handed out brochures in front of an Edmonton grocery store, urging customers to boycott Chiquita in retaliation.

"Chiquita Brands International has declared war on the livelihood of Alberta families," said the brochure, which suggested people mail it to the store's head office.

That overstates the case, said Chiquita spokesman Ed Loyd.

"Contrary to some press reports, Chiquita is not banning or boycotting Canadian fuel," he said. "Chiquita currently utilizes, and will continue to utilize, Canadian fuel sources.

"We have encouraged our suppliers to test alternative energy sources, more fuel-efficient vehicles, and to source, where possible, various fuel sources that have a lower carbon footprint and commit to a strategy of continuous improvement.

"We are disappointed for our consumers and customers that there has been so much misinformation."

Federal and Alberta Conservative politicians have criticized Chiquita's decision since it was released last Friday.

More than 1,600 people have joined EthicalOil's Facebook site about the issue, said Marshall. Most are from the oilsands city of Fort McMurray and other Alberta communities, but many have joined from British Columbia and even the East Coast, she said.

"We've actually been flooded with donations," said Marshall. "We've also been flooded with new members too. It's been great."

Marshall said Alberta has a good environmental record. She added that the carbon footprint of oilsands crude is comparable to that of other heavy producers such as Venezuela.

"We are an environmentally responsible producer," she said.

Critics point out that fuel derived from the oilsands still emits about 10 per cent more carbon dioxide than Venezuelan heavy oil when mining, refining, transporting and final use are all considered. That's some of the most greenhouse-gas-intensive on the planet.

Several peer-reviewed studies have linked low levels of contamination in the Athabasca River to oilsands facilities. A recent report from the Royal Society of Canada concluded that the industry's rapid growth has outstripped Alberta's ability to regulate it.

The province and the federal government are developing joint, scientifically credible environmental monitoring to understand what's happening in the region.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:09 AM on 12/27/2011
Why is this article not mentioning it is a lobbyist for the tar sands, the EthicalOil.org is ONLY about promoting the tar sands and NOT human rights in other countries. This 'group' as more AstroTurf than the old Astrodome!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:54 PM on 01/23/2012
Promoting ethical oil from Canada does promote human rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
08:04 AM on 01/24/2012
I would actually believe what you said if you were called for a boycott of the companies that do business in these countries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Devlin
04:02 PM on 12/22/2011
Where better to look for moral advice than to a lineal corporate descendant of the United Fruit Company?
12:56 PM on 12/22/2011
I, for one, will buy tons of Chiquita bananas....I'm sick of oilsands rhetoric and their government backing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:55 PM on 01/23/2012
You like it that they support dictators and terrorists?
Try google!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:58 AM on 12/22/2011
"We are an environmentally responsible producer," says the woman who compares Canadian oil to VENEZUELA! lol! What a joke! And she's even wrong about that!

Bravo to Chiquita!! The rest of Canada is with you! ALbertamerica's oil-sands are a stain on our country... You know full well there are hundreds of other fuel sources that are much less destructive
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:57 PM on 01/23/2012
You like buying oil from Chavez who outlawed labour unions and seized television stations and newspapers?
Whose oil has a bigger carbon footprint than oil sands oil?

The United Fruit company supported thugs like that as well.
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
06:39 AM on 12/22/2011
Banana republic if ever there was one. Chiquita has drawn attention to it's own past & present practices. Really slipped on a banana peel with this.
12:31 AM on 12/22/2011
Do they still pay $2 a day to people for picking bananas? Or did they give them a raise to $3 a day?
12:22 AM on 12/22/2011
Premium of Alberta is siding with Chiquita
10:48 PM on 12/21/2011
Back Pedal fast Chiquita. I love Bananas, but will do my best to not eat yours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
12:05 PM on 12/22/2011
I will now be solely eating Chiquita. And I don't even like bananas!
01:44 PM on 12/22/2011
Free Country last time I heard. You might start to like them. If Chiquita has their way they will get to your store in trucks powered by conflict oil.
10:30 PM on 12/21/2011
So Chiquita tries to do the right thing and everyone whines? Even if they had a very bad track record, Chiquita has to start somewhere to make improvements. I know we haven't been weaned from the oil bottle yet, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be making the attempt. Find an alternate business before the oil completely dries up. At the rate we are going, we will suck the world dry in a few short years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:52 PM on 12/21/2011
If they cared about ethics, why wouldn't they boycott Saudi and Nigerian oil, among others?

This is just another greenwashing attempt that backfired on the United Fruit company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
12:06 PM on 12/22/2011
They use Canadian fuel. Just not Alberta's.
I'm sure they're buying from Saskatchewan.
10:30 PM on 12/21/2011
Harper's plan is to do absolutely nothing to reduce greenhouse gases so that Canada will be able to grow and export its own bananas. It is Harper's focus on exporting oil that is driving up our dollar and hurting manufacturing - we are well on the way to becoming a Banana Republic already..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:54 PM on 12/21/2011
Really?
When I looked his plan was to get a treaty that included all polluters, and to help the developing world reduce emissions with a 400 million fund.
And he has tougher regulations for Canada.

Kinda stupid to comment on what he is doing before actually looking, isn't it?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:07 PM on 12/21/2011
It's ironic that an organization that represents itself as being the ethical choice is acting seemingly so unethically... I guess it's not surprising given the nature of the group. Last time I checked this was still a democracy. If Chiquita feels that the responsible choice for their company is to avoid fossil fuels from Alberta then so be it. It's their choice to do so. EthicalOil.org seems more concerned about silencing anyone that doesn't share they're sunshine and rainbows view of the Canadian oil industry than participating in a real dialogue. There IS an environmental cost to what is happening in Alberta. Re-branding it in a pretty PC package or wrapping it up in ridiculous patriotic sentiment wont change that.

People need oil, there's not a lot of it left and we have most of it. Does anyone seriously think there won't be a market for this? Do we really need groups parading around like big tobacco back in the day saying "Smoke this Timmy! It's good for you! Those quacks don't know what they're talking about!"? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
12:29 PM on 12/22/2011
Couldn't Agree More! F & F.
09:08 PM on 12/21/2011
Chiquita boycotting the oil sands is like horsesh*t boycotting bullsh*t.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles the Great
Canadian/Israeli Goy in Alert,Nunavut
08:35 PM on 12/21/2011
Why are these people telling us what Canada can and can not do with our resources? This is imperialism. Also Chiquita when it was called the United Fruit Company does not have a good record either. I wonder does Latin America ring any bells?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
08:30 PM on 12/21/2011
Maybe it is time we just did what we wnted to do reather than be dictated to by other people. The suggestion that we ship our oil to China seems to be looking like a good idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
07:42 PM on 12/21/2011
"Chiquita Brands International has declared war on the livelihood of Alberta families,"

Seriously? Is anyone that stupid to be convinced that this is a bad thing?
09:28 PM on 12/21/2011
So whackjobs want to see Alberta children starve? I don't doubt it!
09:52 PM on 12/21/2011
Alberta children have been starving for a long time, look around! Not everyone there works in the oilfields. Don't try to deny it, I've seen it for myself having lived in Edmonton area for 7 years. If you are so concerned, get off the Internet and go help them!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Devlin
04:07 PM on 12/22/2011
The Alberta economy is, for good or ill, essentially a monoculture, and the quality of life there is very sensitive to the price of oil. That's an empirally demonstrable fact.