Helena Guergis Lawsuit: Former Tory MP Sues Harper, Others For Defamation

Helena Guergis Lawsuit

First Posted: 12/22/11 04:34 PM ET Updated: 12/22/11 09:47 PM ET

Former MP Helena Guergis is suing Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Conservative MPs Shelly Glover and Lisa Raitt, the Conservative Party of Canada and a number of other individuals for defamation and other claims.

The former member of Harper's cabinet, who had to leave the Conservative caucus in April 2010 following allegations against her and her husband, former MP Rahim Jaffer, launched the court action in Ontario's Superior Court of Justice. The statement of claim was obtained by CBC.

The unproven allegations related to drug use, fraud, extortion and association with prostitutes.

Guergis is not only suing her former boss and colleagues, but also Ray Novak, Harper's principal secretary, Arthur Hamilton and the law firm he works for, Cassels Brock & Blackwell, Guy Giorno, Harper's former chief of staff, Axelle Pellerin, a former aide to Guergis, and Derrick Snowdy. Snowdy is the private investigator from Toronto whose allegations helped spark the controversy around Guergis and her husband.

Snowdy spoke to Hamilton about Guergis and Hamilton then spoke to Novak, Harper and others, according to the statement of claim. Hamilton gave the impression that Guergis had used cocaine and engaged in other unlawful activities and that there was video evidence of it, the document suggests.

Quick Poll

Should Helena Guergis win $1.3 million in damages?

VOTE

Guergis is suing Harper and most of the others named in the lawsuit for defamation, conspiracy, intentional infliction of mental suffering and negligence.

Guergis is suing for general damages of $800,000 plus punitive damages of $250,000 and aggravated damages of $250,000.

A spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office, Carl Vallee, said "the allegations are groundless and they will be refuted vigorously."

In the statement of claim, Guergis alleges that in 2010, the defendants entered into a conspiracy with each other or with some of the other co-defendants, to "engage in unlawful acts in order to remove" or justify her removal from the Conservative caucus. She says they came up with the conspiracy to serve their political, personal or financial goals and not for a legitimate purpose.

She alleges the defendants "recklessly and callously" disregarded her interests and that they engaged in "unlawful" acts. She says while each defendant may not have engaged in an unlawful act, they had knowledge of the acts and supported them.

Guergis, who ran as an independent candidate in the May election and lost, says the conduct of Harper and the other defendants resulted in damage to her reputation and her career in politics, and damaged her ability to earn income. She said it also affected her health and well-being.

Guergis argues in her statement of claim that Harper's explanation to her that he had become aware of criminal allegations against her was either false or that he "accepted the veracity of those allegations without conducting an investigation or waiting for the result of a third-party investigation" and used them to justify her removal from caucus.

As a result, the court document claims, Guergis "was pressured to resign from her position as the Minister of State for the Status of Women," and did so "under duress."

The RCMP cleared Guergis and no charges were ever laid against her.

The statement of claim says Harper's public statement made in the foyer of the House of Commons on April 9, 2010, was "made in bad faith in an attempt to discredit" her and legitimize her resignation.

The statement of claim also alleges that the Conservative Party of Canada's removal of Guergis as a candidate in Simcoe-Grey was "effected unlawfully" and was not in accord with the "duty of good faith and duty of care owed by the CPC to the plaintiff."

It goes on to say that the CPC's decision to remove Guergis as a candidate was "effected at the direction of Harper, and was effected in furtherance of the conspiracy pleaded herein."

The 31-page statement of claim makes numerous allegations against individuals and organizations. It includes detailed descriptions of alleged defamatory comments Guergis says were made by some of the defendants.

Among the allegations is a claim that Raitt "spoke defamatory words" in saying that she saw Guergis using cocaine in the bathroom of an Ottawa restaurant with two other people

None of the allegations in her statement of claim have been proven in court.

ALLEGATIONS 'GROUNDLESS'

Raitt echoed the comments from the prime minister's office, saying the allegations are "groundless" and will be "refuted vigorously."

A spokesperson for Glover, MP for Saint Boniface, said the issue was a legal matter and Glover had no comment.

Giorno said in an email that the claim is "an incoherent mix of fantasy, fabrication and fiction."

"I am embarrassed for her lawyer and sorry that Helena remains detached from reality."

What the Tories did during the fall sitting
1  of  12
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
C-10 -- The omnibus crime bill, combining all the justice measures the Conservatives tried to pass when they had a minority government, is at second reading debate in the Senate and expected to pass in 2012.

With files from CBC
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 147
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbo123
07:56 PM on 12/23/2011
It is my belief that Harper is an evil troll and I can well believe that he and his minions set this whole thing up. This has the flavor of Karl Rove. Anybody ever check out such a possibility? If he'll mess around in Massachusetts, he'll think nothing of invading Canada. Additionally, the similarity of politics between Harper and US republicans is striking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
02:46 PM on 12/23/2011
Cons eating each other..................Priceless!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
10:58 AM on 12/23/2011
Guergis was set up and royally sc.rewed by the harpies - I know a close relative of hers and Helena definitely got steamrolled, con style.
01:23 PM on 12/23/2011
why?
01:46 PM on 12/23/2011
helena's family practically runs her riding

she's just a rich spoiled woman who is used to getting her way because of her surname

but i do have to admit i like it when the neo cons eat their own
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
03:46 PM on 12/23/2011
Still doesn't tell us why Harper did it.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
10:52 AM on 12/23/2011
MEMO

To: All Staff
From: Harper's Imbedded Trolls and Shills

Re: On Choosing Photos
______________________________________________________

All photos published should be vetted on the following basis:

Those on the side of Mr. Harper, (regardless of how tenuous) must be portrayed as smiling, happy, or in a positive context (pensive, if used in small amounts may be used).

Needless to say, those against Mr. Harper, his policies, and in any way which can be portrayed as unpleasing to the PM or the PM"s office, the Privy Counsel or in the mind of any of the PM's cling-ons, must be shown in the most negative light and as unflattering as possible...

There are no orthr rules.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony frm Banff
Search for truth,not spin
10:51 AM on 12/23/2011
MMMMMMMM more dirt from your conscum government.
I truly believe these allegations against these conscum hacks, just because of the ruthless tricks they have done that have come to light recently. I truly hope she can tarnish the already marked conscum party, then maybe some of the centrists will come back to the Liberal fold as they see that this government is not what they truly represent.
If the cons say they represent true Canadian values, well they dont represent the values of Canadians with the trickery and deciet of late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
10:28 AM on 12/23/2011
Helena, come join the Liberals! We always have a place for enlightened former-Cons... and we respect our women.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keohane
10:49 AM on 12/23/2011
Can you do us all a favour and take her husband too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:06 AM on 12/23/2011
lol. no he's a creep
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiperSniper
10:26 AM on 12/23/2011
While not a fan of Guergis, she certainly does have a point. Her career was ruined due to innuendo and outright accusations which have proved to be false. Interesting though that Harper seemed to love her so something must have occurred behind the scenes that led to them trying and succeeding in discrediting her.
09:50 AM on 12/23/2011
They deserve each other.
09:32 AM on 12/23/2011
I expect that the Judicial result of this lawsuit will not be in the financial arena that she is hoping for... the public record however, I predict, will be an eye-opener. I suspect that this suit will be settled out of court, unless Guergis really isn't in this one for the money.
09:31 AM on 12/23/2011
Talk about high maintainance
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:54 AM on 12/23/2011
Typical of the Harper government.
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
09:20 AM on 12/23/2011
What? She wants another 15 minutes at taxpayers expense?
Sounds like she may be auditioning for the Liberal leadership.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
10:14 AM on 12/23/2011
Uhhh, she's one of yours, turks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
10:59 AM on 12/23/2011
turkey's just a paid poster - a fowl without a party or a clue.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
10:56 AM on 12/23/2011
Thank God for Christmas... Soon there will be less Turkey...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimonLeigh
09:01 AM on 12/23/2011
It's a good start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
08:43 AM on 12/23/2011
"...unproven allegations..."
Good grief, allegations are just that...allegations. To label them as "unproven" is ridiculous.
Oh, sorry, huffenpuff is scared of lawsuits too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:39 AM on 12/23/2011
Grammatically, though, the use of the word "unproven" is not necessary, unless of course it was emphatic.
08:29 AM on 12/23/2011
She would be better served by divorcing and suing her unethical husband who has brought all this upon her.
08:59 AM on 12/23/2011
Agreed! Don't worry she'll probably become a Liberal, she'll fit right in with that party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:42 AM on 12/23/2011
No. I wanna know what the allegations against her by Harper were. We were not told. It seems she has some ground for a case, otherwise she would not be proceeding with it. For all her faults as an MP, surely there are things for which she is not guilty.
08:18 AM on 12/23/2011
I'm thinkin a new nickname for Guergis like "Excess Baggage Guergis" would be appropriate to her new indepent status.
Folks just love the downtroddin.
As for the law suit I know its just to prove her honesty.
Or to buy new calling cards for her Hubby as Ex Ruler of the Universe and Get in the BackDoor free cards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:58 AM on 12/23/2011
Your use of the word "downtroddin" (downtrodden) is flippant. Whether Harper walked all over her remains to be seen because we don't know why she was kicked out. What is downtrodden here is the process. If she were my MP, I would demand to know why she was ejected.
09:39 PM on 12/23/2011
Meant to be flippant
I consider Guergis to be a speedbump.
Thank you for the English lesson .My Hon.BA in Phil/Med.English must have missed that.
As per usual we are all entitled to our opinions.Thanks for sharing.
(Gosh my science degrees missed that too...is flippant a bass fishing term?)