Businesses Getting Billions In Tax Cuts Despite Rising Corporate Cash Reserves

Money

First Posted: 01/01/12 08:42 AM ET Updated: 01/04/12 03:52 PM ET

OTTAWA - Profitable Canadian businesses are set to reap $2.85 billion in additional income tax savings in 2012, even as Prime Minister Stephen Harper complains about all the private "money sitting on the sidelines."

The last of five annual corporate tax cuts took effect Sunday, reducing the federal rate by another 1.5 points to 15 per cent.

The move comes as corporate Canada, from multinationals to midsize businesses, squirrels away hundreds of billions of dollars as it rides out a second storm of global economic turbulence in the past three years.

The latest figures from Statistics Canada through the third quarter of 2011 show Canadian business sitting on more than $583 billion in Canadian currency and deposits, and more than $276 billion in foreign currency.

Those cash reserves have climbed nine per cent since last year and 27.3 per cent since 2007, when the Canadian economy was booming and new corporate tax cuts were announced.

Even after removing Canada's banks from the equation, non-financial corporations saw their currency and short-term paper assets climb $33 billion in the third quarter of 2011.

Harper referred to all that stagnant capital at the end of a frustrating G20 summit in November in France, where global leaders failed to find much consensus.

"I should be clear on this: you know, I see every reason that markets ... there's a lot of money sitting on the sidelines, looking for opportunities," Harper said in Cannes.

"And I see every indication that markets are constantly searching for good news and opportunities."

In an effort to deliver good news and opportunities, the Conservatives have been cutting corporate taxes.

From 22.12 per cent in 2007 to 15 per cent on Jan. 1, federal corporate tax rates have been in steady decline. In fact, federal corporate taxes have been cut almost in half since 1990, when they stood at 28 per cent.

Provinces have also been lowering corporate tax rates.

Back in 2000, the combined federal-provincial corporate tax rate in Canada averaged 43 per cent — the highest among OECD countries.

Jack Mintz, a tax specialist who is chair of public policy at the University of Calgary, says Canada's combined federal-provincial corporate rate in 2012 will be around the world average of 26 per cent.

Mintz argues profits are being shifted back to Canada due to the tax cuts, a move that benefits provincial tax bases in particular.

Besides, he adds: "In an open economy, most of the corporate tax ends up impacting on labour and tends to be either shifted to higher consumer prices or lower wages. So it tends to be a regressive tax, the corporate tax."

"But the public doesn't perceive that," Mintz said in an interview. "They look at (corporations) as powerful and that if you cut corporate taxes you're making the rich more rich."

But whatever the long-term merits of the policy — and governments of all partisan stripes have got on board — the fact remains tax cuts have not sparked business investment in an ugly market.

And even the staunchest corporate tax cutters agree more cuts won't produce short-term investment.

"Businesses don't invest for political reasons," Perrin Beatty, the CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said in an interview.

"They invest because they feel the climate is such they'll get a return on the investment. You're not going to go off and hire somebody if you think you're going to be selling less stuff next year than you did this year."

Federal Finance officials suggest that the $2.85 billion revenue hit in 2012 from the tax cut "does not account for the positive impact of a rate reduction on economic activity or corporate behaviour."

But with all that corporate cash sitting in reserve, the argument can be a tough sell.

"Companies aren't spending the cash they are taking in now," says Jim Stanford, an economist with the Canadian Auto Workers. "So why would government, during a time of deficit, go deeper into debt in order to supplement corporate cash flow which is sitting idly, rather than being reinvested in the economy?"

Mintz agrees "this whole issue of cash on hand for corporations, it plays very well for the people who are critical of corporate tax cuts in terms of helping the more powerful."

"Yet on the other hand, that liquidity has helped us avoid a much more severe recession because Canadian companies have good balance sheets," he said. "If they didn't, they would have got into a lot more trouble."

Canadian companies suffered fewer bankruptcies and cut fewer jobs, for shorter periods, relative to American companies, Mintz notes.

Others say riding out a recession is no reason to offer profitable businesses more tax breaks.

Reducing corporate tax rates is not a new policy, says Armine Yalnizyan, an economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, and the policy "has given ample opportunity for business to actually rise to the occasion."

"But businesses are individually doing things that are perfectly rational in a world that is this uncertain right now, which is to keep your powder dry for when things are better."

Yalnizyan argues that in the current economic environment, corporate tax cuts should be rescinded, taxes should rise on profitable sectors and wealthy individuals, and governments should spend.

"Austerity does exactly the opposite of what businesses need. They want certainty not only in financial markets but they want to make sure people can buy their stuff. After all, everything flows from: 'Is anybody buying my stuff?'"

There are certain areas, said Yalnizyan, where government investment now will provide "years upon years upon years of high returns on your investment. Things like childcare, thinks like a dental care program for kids, things like infrastructure."

Where economists from the left and right meet is in agreeing tax cuts are not the primary driver in convincing businesses to re-invest earnings.

"Around the world, there are large pools of capital waiting for the opportunity to invest, but lacking confidence that the economy is going to warrant that kind of investment today," says the Chamber's Beatty.

Added Mintz: "The good news down the road is that I expect there will be some pretty significant investments taking place."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 206
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:39 PM on 01/04/2012
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions."
Know who said that?
11:30 AM on 01/03/2012
I'd rather have that money in the hands of corporations for expansion and job creation than in the hands of bureaucraps
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
11:57 AM on 01/03/2012
Personally I'd prefer a healthy mix of both, granted I'm also the type who would quickly replace our "bureaucraps" (lawyers and career politicians) with academics; people with actual education, experience and expertise in their fields, instead of political stooges whose sole concern is the accumulation of political capital to further their careers.
04:13 PM on 01/03/2012
look at how well the 'academics' are doing down south
10:03 PM on 01/03/2012
Thyat sounds good. To make it an effective policy, tax cuts should be given after the fact of expansion and job creation.
02:12 AM on 01/03/2012
Sixty-one percent of Canadians voted for parties that would have raised the corporate tax rate to 18% (Liberals), 19.5% (NDP), 21% (Green), or would have brought in other taxes on the rich (Bloc). That the thirty-nine percent minority can impose the politics of inequality on the rest of the country, giving obscene tax breaks to the rich and to corporations and "austerity measures" to everyone else, is a failing of our shambles of a democratic system. When the growing pool of money that corporations are holding in reserve is larger than the size of our massive (and also growing) national debt, it's time to raise corporate taxes a bit.
02:09 AM on 01/03/2012
We should not cast aspertions on our corporate bretheren. Flying first class, dining in the finest restaurants, wearing those Armani suits bejewelled with Rolexes is tough. Let's just tighten our belts with joy.
11:28 AM on 01/03/2012
Do I detect the green of envy here? Success is available to all who want to work for it.
03:07 PM on 01/02/2012
The CON thinking used to be that the corporate tax cuts were supposed to encourage business to spend the money they did not have to pay in taxes, and by so doing boost the economy. (Everyone would then benefit by the magic of the trickle down/tinkle on theory of economic mismanagement.) Now the greedy corporate welfare bums wait until the investment climate improves before risking their tax refunds - a sound business strategy for every single company but a lousy strategy for the economy as a whole. Without those dollars invested how will the economic climate change? Who is supposed to lead the way and create positive economic change? Isn't it supposed to be those with the $$?

Once again the 99% will fix the mess using their own money and following the rules and regulations set up to profit the 1%. I've been supporting banks, Shell and various other corproations, and paying federal and provincial govts' deficits since the late 1980's. I want my money back!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckistaneh
Science!
02:16 PM on 01/02/2012
Oops! "I've seen...."
photo
SkeeBee
Offending InFoxtrination Sufferers With Facts.
02:13 PM on 01/02/2012
Yup.
That does it.
Lived below the poverty line for a few years and STILL had to pay a massive chunk on my tax return.
Fek paying taxes for 2011-12 and fek Steve H and his goons and their agenda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckistaneh
Science!
01:45 PM on 01/02/2012
I seen a few posts that comment on how the Cons will lose the next election; unfortunately They are going to be difficult to beat.
1. They are changing the funding rules and will/ are easily out fundraising the entire opposition. Corporations and the very rich will fund the Cons pro corporation ideals.
2. The Cons had a yearly surplus when they took over from the Libs. Now we have record deficits due to the economy, lower corp tax rates, increased military spending, prison program etc. And they still won the election(see reason 3)
3. We have general public which is easily mislead due to many factors such as no interest in politics, media privately controlled by the very rich, Lots of "entertaining" brain dead shows on TV/internet.
4. A split center left opposition without a really good leader. They have to combine parties or elections have to change to something like proportional representation.
5 The Cons are masters at messenging. Way better than the opposition.
I'm sure there are more reasons. I don't think they can be beaten on the battlefield for the above reasons so they will have to be defeated in the trenches ie the internet using forums such as this one. Tell your lazy friends to start reading about what's going on. Maybe start occupy/what democracy looks like clubs/meetings. As Michael Moore would say.."do something" or there will be another conservative majority. :(
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tan2123
+ sec 2 123°
12:50 AM on 01/03/2012
sad but true- GET OUT AND VOTE IDIOTS! OF COURSE YOUR VOTE COUNTS!
02:00 AM on 01/03/2012
The one possible thing that might change the political climate is the fact that the Conservative base is aging and dying off. Young people -- new voters -- disproportionately vote Liberal and NDP (if they can be persuaded to vote), while older people disproportionately vote Conservative.

Your appraisal is accurate, though. It may well be BECAUSE of the changing demographics that the Conservatives are actively trying to stack the deck in their favour. But yes, sadly, I think they've got a very good chance of winning the next election unless the left gets organized.
11:32 AM on 01/03/2012
The old saying applies here - "if you're not a socialist when you're 20, you have no heart - if you're not a capitalist when you're 40, you have no head".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
12:44 PM on 01/02/2012
There are no myths anymore regarding what these crooks are doing. We've all seen how corrupt American politics have become and are now watching our own country follow suit. Our stellar world reputation is being shredded to pieces by right wing nationalism and a dirty stain called the oil sands.

I can't think of one good thing Harper's done for the people of Canada since winning the election. Can anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
01:22 PM on 01/02/2012
....chirp........chirp........chirp

I can't!
02:02 AM on 01/03/2012
Oddly, as much as I dislike 99% of what Harper has done, I can think of one: a national securities regulator would have made sense (though the Tories were prevented from following through with that).

I completely agree that that's the exception and not the rule, though. This country is definitely headed in the wrong direction under Harper, and undoing his damage will be a long and difficult process.
This comment has been removed.
09:44 AM on 01/02/2012
The problem with corporate CEO's is they know how to calculate profit but have no understanding of the big picture called economics 101. The money supply is finite and all on one side of the tilted playing board championed by politicians who are bought off. Consumers have less disposable income. How can they consume without cash. Must be the unions which cause this cash shortage, right? That's a spin we hear a lot. For a man with a masters in Economics, Harper doesn't show much knowledge in the area. He is out of sync with just about every reputable economist on the planet. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that consumption is down because there is no money in the hands of consumers. Obviously you can get a masters in economics now without studying the cause and solution to the great depression of the 30's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
01:15 PM on 01/02/2012
Harpe(R) is an idealist.
To him, the economy is only relevant for re-election.
02:08 AM on 01/03/2012
Actually, I'd argue that the problem with Harper is that his only goal is ensuring his continued dominance -- i.e. that the problem is that he is NOT an idealist; he has no ideals, beyond himself, in which he believes. The fact that we've seen Harper cancel the census, eliminate watchdog positions, get rid of the National Science Adviser, cut funding for NSERC, SSHRC, and the CIHR, prevent government scientists from communicating with the public, and greatly scale back the number of government scientists makes me think that Harper has no faith in the validity or veracity of his own ideals or ideas, and would rather eliminate sources of facts that could contradict him than face the facts. Harper wants the freedom to follow whatever course he stubbornly holds the country to, whether or not facts back his supposed ideals, and he knows that facts would NOT back him up. That's not idealism -- that's just narcissism and love for power.
09:39 AM on 01/02/2012
I'm sure some of that cash will trickle down to the worker bees eventually.
09:12 AM on 01/02/2012
More corporate welfare . More poor. More military. More prisons . More taxes for those left able to pay taxes . The end of the conservative party for the second time next election .
08:48 AM on 01/02/2012
The gap gets wider the rich get richer the poor get poorer doesn't government realize the importance of having a strong middle class, not just one side rich the other poor,
The poor use to have a goal to be in the middle now being in the middle is almost impossible, the more we give into one side the more unrest you will see. Then more protest will come and hoping these protest will be peaceful because people are not happy.
08:11 AM on 01/03/2012
Do you think they plan on creating strong middle classes in the foreign countries? This would enable them to show them the magic of capitalism. Never mind they have ruined lives of the first middle class to finance a new middle class.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
08:02 AM on 01/02/2012
So when is the Harper Government going to finally give equality to all? When is Prime Minister Harper going to recognize that Corporations are People to? He seems to be following in the footsteps of the American GOP so tightly, that Canada needs its own Citizens United Ruling. Then these corporations can directly contribute unregulated amounts of cash to the Harper Governments Election coffers. With these Corporate tax cuts, they will be able to donate so so much.
12:37 PM on 01/04/2012
We have equality for all - some just don't want to avail themselves to opportunity, preferring to suckle at the public purse