Iran Nuclear Program: Uranium Enrichment Reportedly Begins Amid Threats

Iran Nuclear Program

First Posted: 01/08/12 04:06 PM ET Updated: 01/11/12 10:43 AM ET

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has begun uranium enrichment at a new underground site built to withstand possible airstrikes, a leading hard-line newspaper reported Sunday in another show of defiance against Western pressure to rein in Tehran's nuclear program.

The operations at the bunker-like facility south of Tehran, reported by the Kayhan daily newspaper, are small in comparison to Iran's main enrichment site. But the centrifuges at the underground labs are considered more efficient and are shielded from aerial surveillance and protected against airstrikes by up to 300 feet (90 metres) of mountain rock.

Uranium enrichment is at the core of the international standoff over Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. and its allies fear Iran could use its enrichment facilities to develop high-grade nuclear material for warheads.

Iran — which claims it only seeks nuclear reactors for energy and research — has sharply increased its threats and military posturing against stronger pressures, including U.S. sanctions targeting Iran's Central Bank in attempts to complicate its ability to sell oil.

A senior commander of the Revolutionary Guard force was quoted as saying Tehran's leadership has decided to order the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic oil route, if the country's petroleum exports are blocked. Revolutionary Guard ground forces also staged war games in eastern Iran in an apparent display of resolve against U.S. forces just over the border in Afghanistan.

Iranian officials have issued similar threats, but this is the strongest statement yet by a top commander in the security establishment.

"The supreme authorities ... have insisted that if enemies block the export of our oil, we won't allow a drop of oil to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. This is the strategy of the Islamic Republic in countering such threats," Revolutionary Guard deputy commander Ali Ashraf Nouri was quoted as saying by another newspaper, the Khorasan daily.

The latest statements are certain to ramp up tensions with the U.S. and its allies, which are trying to increase pressure on Iran to punish it for its disputed nuclear program.

For the moment, however, U.S. officials are seeking stronger diplomatic and economic pressure on Iran rather than increasing threats of military action. A number of experts say Iran is unlikely to close the strait because that could hurt Iran as much as the West.

In an interview broadcast Sunday, U.S. Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said Iran is laying the groundwork for making nuclear weapons someday, but is not yet building a bomb. Panetta reiterated U.S. concerns about a unilateral strike by Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities, saying the action could trigger Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces in the region.

"We have common cause here" with Israel, he said. "And the better approach is for us to work together."

Panetta's remarks on CBS' "Face the Nation" reflect the Obama administration's long-held view that Iran is not yet committed to building a nuclear arsenal, only to create the industrial and scientific capacity to allow one if its leaders to decide to take that final step.

The Kayhan newspaper, which is close to Iran's ruling clerics, said Tehran has begun injecting uranium gas into sophisticated centrifuges at the Fordo facility near the holy city of Qom.

"Kayhan received reports yesterday that show Iran has begun uranium enrichment at the Fordo facility amid heightened foreign enemy threats," the newspaper said in a front-page report. Kayhan's manager is a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final word on all important matters of state.

Iran's nuclear chief, Fereidoun Abbasi, said Saturday that his country will "soon" begin enrichment at Fordo. It was impossible to immediately reconcile the two reports.

Iran has a major uranium enrichment facility in Natanz in central Iran, where nearly 8,000 centrifuges are operating. Tehran began enrichment at Natanz in 2006.

Nouri said Iran's leadership has made a strategic decision to close the Strait of Hormuz should its exports be blocked. One-sixth of the world's oil flows to market through the strait, which is jointly controlled by Iran and Oman at the mouth of the Persian Gulf.

President Barack Obama approved new sanctions against Iran a week ago, targeting the central bank and its ability to sell petroleum abroad. The U.S. has delayed implementing the sanctions for at least six months, worried about sending the price of oil higher at a time when the global economy is struggling. But the new sanctions nevertheless prompted a series of threats from Iranian officials about closing the Strait of Hormuz.

The newspaper paraphrased Nouri as saying that a 10-day naval drill that ended Jan. 3 was preparation for such a closure. The Guard, which is Iran's most powerful military force and which has its own naval arm, has planned more sea manoeuvres for February.

Khamenei "determined a new strategy for the armed forces, by which any threat from enemies will be responded to with threats," Nouri said.

The U.S. and Israel have said that all options remain open, including military action, should Iran continue with its enrichment program.

Late Sunday, Iran's intelligence minister said several people have been arrested on suspicion of spying for the U.S. and plotting to disrupt Iran's parliamentary elections this year. He gave no further details.

Tehran says it needs the nuclear program to produce fuel for future reactors and medical radioisotopes needed for cancer patients.

The country has been enriching uranium to less than 5 per cent for years, but it began to further enrich part of its uranium stockpile to nearly 20 per cent as of February 2010, saying it needs the higher grade material to produce fuel for a Tehran reactor that makes medical radioisotopes for cancer patients. Weapons-grade uranium is usually about 90 per cent enriched.

Iran says the higher enrichment activities — to nearly 20 per cent — will be carried out at Fordo. These operations are of particular concern to the West because uranium at 20 per cent enrichment can be converted much more quickly for use in a nuclear warhead than uranium enriched to only 3.5 per cent.

Built next to a military complex, Fordo was long kept secret and was only acknowledged by Iran after it was identified by Western intelligence agencies in September 2009.

The facility is a hardened tunnel and is protected by air defence missile batteries and the Revolutionary Guard. The site is located about 20 miles (32 kilometres) north of Qom, the religious nerve centre of Iran's ruling system.

"The Fordo facility, like Natanz, has been designed and built underground. The enemy doesn't have the ability to damage it," the semiofficial Mehr news agency quoted nuclear chief Abbasi as saying Sunday.

___

Murphy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has begun uranium enrichment at a new underground site built to withstand possible airstrikes, a leading hard-line newspaper reported Sunday in another show of defiance against Wes...
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has begun uranium enrichment at a new underground site built to withstand possible airstrikes, a leading hard-line newspaper reported Sunday in another show of defiance against Wes...
Filed by Jacqueline Delange  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
10:00 AM on 01/09/2012
America needs to bring back the attitude,
You push me, I shove back
you shove me,I knock you on your butt. It's that simple
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
10:04 AM on 01/09/2012
And, of course, you will be the first in line to go, right? Or are you a Republican like Newt and Dick and George?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
10:24 AM on 01/09/2012
.
I volunteeded to go to Viet nam, so yep I'd go to Iran,in a heartbeat
By the -- it was a priveledge to serve
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
10:48 AM on 01/09/2012
War always makes life better for everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
10:54 AM on 01/09/2012
No.it doesn't. We when there is no fear of repercussion, agression comes from everywhere.
As individuals we do not actively look for a fight, but if agression comes our way or threatens our family we are ready to deal with it as indivduals. should be the same with the country
09:45 AM on 01/09/2012
....ok so it safe from airstrike, but does it have wifi.....was it not a computer virus last time....
08:17 AM on 01/09/2012
Why all the fuss. Let's give them a bomb. If they use it, that is the end of Iran except for a black skid like surface where it used to be. If American politicians didn't lie so much and weren't in the pockets of big oil, then maybe the masses would have a clue as to what is going on in places like Iran. As it stands now, the lying corporate bought politicians and their spin doctors have distorted the truth so much, I challenge anyone who says they know what is really going on. But then again, we are only the people or as the elite like to think of us, canon fodder.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
10:49 AM on 01/09/2012
So American politicians are also twisting what Iran is saying, preventing the entire world from knowing anything?
08:12 AM on 01/09/2012
No insurance company would write a policy on that bunker.
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
06:02 AM on 01/09/2012
Here we go again....
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrhandyman3105
Independent Voter
04:39 AM on 01/09/2012
Bunker huh? Like thats going to help. Appreciate that. Just makes it easier to contain the radioactive fallout/leaks during the strike.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:23 AM on 01/09/2012
Like most of the war mongering corporate press (lest we forget Iraq's WMD's; the sky is falling, the sky is falling) this bunch neglects to mention is that Iran is legally enriching uranium for nuclear energy and not for weapons which is an entirely different process and requires entirely different facilities which could could be detected even if they were underground.
The reason Iran has moved the process underground is because the US and their mini me (a fully armed nuclear nation that unlike Iran has refused to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty) in the region have been threatening to bomb Iran for several years, especially their nuclear energy facilities.
Iran was encouraged and helped by the US and other western governments in creating this program in the first place.
There are currently inspectors in Iran and Iran would agree to even more intrusive inspections if the US would give them a guarantee that it would attack or invade. The US has refused for the last decade to give such a guarantee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peacefrogg
04:17 AM on 01/09/2012
I wonder how Saddam is coming along with those weapons of mass destruction that they never found, right out of the rights playbook on how to ilegally invade a sovereign nation and murder its people.
photo
NevadaLib
pwning cons since 2007
02:34 AM on 01/09/2012
Look! They have barrels! I'm not undermining the potential threat of a crazy guy with a big weapon, but I'm having Deja Vu right now.
photo
cobry4949
cobry1112
02:10 AM on 01/09/2012
right the WAR MONGER EXPRESS IS WORKING OVERTIME. Do you see china and russia do anything nabout it?? and they live on that side of the planet.
http://www.henrymakow.com/congressmen_personally_profit.html
http://www.rense.com/general95/onwn.htm
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Starling5
Not an Earthling...
02:41 AM on 01/09/2012
BRAVO for your post.

Please keep on enlightening the sheople.
Thank you.
02:48 AM on 01/09/2012
Wow. What excellent and insightful links. I'm sure they were both peer-reviewed. /sarcasm.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Starling5
Not an Earthling...
03:05 AM on 01/09/2012
I'm sure that your sarcasm won't earn you any more fans than Zero on this site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
res ad triarios venit
01:55 AM on 01/09/2012
I think it is a bad idea for a country that stones women accused of adultery, amputates the limbs of petty thieves, uses waves of children to clear minefields, denies the Holocaust and the existence of gay people in Iran, and celebrates suicide bombers to have in their possession nuclear bombs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
06:26 AM on 01/09/2012
Maybe. I think it's a bad idea for a country like ours to use preemptive war to kill other people it doesn't like. In fact it's illegal, internationally, and I don't see how you could possibly argue the morality of attacking. Which is what you're advocating, I assume. You certainly aren't building an argument to leave them alone and "let the market take care of it". No, that Ayn Rand crap only works when you want to abuse people here at home. Well...maybe not you. I don't know. I think we've already had all the luck with "bad ideas" that we're going to have and we really need to assess our own bad ideas before we get around to punishing people for what we think are bad ideas. The emperor has no clothes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
res ad triarios venit
08:38 AM on 01/09/2012
Aderall might help
07:13 AM on 01/09/2012
I wrote about the same post as yours, but Huffpo banned it. No disparaging remarks. I found that odd and hope it doesn't happen again.
Jack Canuckski
Canadian Observer of the passing scene
01:14 AM on 01/09/2012
If you were an Iranian, and you were being threatened by the world's most powerful superpower, a country that has demonstrated its willingness to invade other countries, and its willingness to even use nuclear weapons, would you support your government if it was trying to develop a nuclear deterent?

More importantly, would you support your government if it weren't?

I don't think that continually threatening Iran, as the the US has been doing at least since Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech, if not earlier, is not going to cause Iranians to change their minds about their need to develop nuclear weapons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russg
02:16 AM on 01/09/2012
I most certainly would.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Starling5
Not an Earthling...
02:36 AM on 01/09/2012
More importantly, that the USA is working for ISRAEL, in this matter, and that said country is more of a threat to Iran than is the USA.
12:50 AM on 01/09/2012
Two things:

1. "... several people have been arrested on suspicion of spying for the U.S. and plotting to disrupt Iran's parliamentary elections this year..." The only people that have been "disrupting" elections has been the Iranian government themselves. Their most recent election was a complete fraud.

2. I don't think we have anything to worry about, I doubt we are on the brink of war. I think the U.S. and Europe are doing the right thing by pressuring the Iranian government economically, first. But if the sanctions do not work, air-strikes / war should occur.

I rather have a war, than a theocracy in charge of Nuclear Weapons for decades.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Starling5
Not an Earthling...
02:29 AM on 01/09/2012
Try again, buddy.

This time your defense of US interference didn't work.

Has it not occurred to you that both the USA and ISRAEL are also "Theocracies in charge of Nuclear Weapons"?................for decades.

I think we have, indeed, alot to worry about.

You'd rather have a war, would you?
02:43 AM on 01/09/2012
You think the U.S. and Israel are theocracies? You honestly believe that? Just because both countries have a strong religious population, does not make those countries, or those countries institutions religious, or non-democratic.

The real power in Iran is held by the Supreme Leader, Khamenei, a religious cleric.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
06:28 AM on 01/09/2012
Seriously? Why don't you go fight it yourself then.
12:23 AM on 01/09/2012
The Iranians have proven we have nothing to worry about as far as their nuclear program is concerned-will likely end with a big bang anyway- Isnt Qum the city that was rocked by a rather large earthquake a few years back? and will no doubt happen again! A lot of due dillegence in that decision, just like taking on the yanks fifth fleet!