OTTAWA - NDP leadership hopeful Brian Topp is advancing a new reason to abolish Canada's unelected Senate: its potential to paralyze a national New Democrat government.
Should he become prime minister, Topp says he'd quickly introduce a constitutional amendment to do away with the "antiquated" upper house, which is made up entirely of Conservative and Liberal appointees.
He says he'd pursue abolition as "an immediate and urgent priority" if senators were to provoke a constitutional crisis by blocking the NDP government's budget or other important legislation.
He'd pursue the matter "more deliberately" with the provinces, which would need to approve an abolition amendment, as long as senators returned to their "traditional role" as subordinate to the elected House of Commons.
Topp's Senate proposal is part of a three-pronged approach he says would help restore responsible government in Canada.
He's also proposing to limit the prime minister's power to prorogue Parliament and introduce a mixed proportional electoral system, to end the distortions that result from the current first-past-the-post system of electing MPs.
On the latter, Topps says the NDP should ask for a mandate in the next election to create a new tier of MPs, who would be elected based on their parties' proportional share of the national vote. They would be in addition to MPs elected by the traditional method, which has resulted in parties winning a majority of seats with less than 40 per cent of the vote.
Various provincial efforts to introduce forms of proportional representation have failed to win popular approval in referendums.
"Canadians, I submit, are open to ideas about how to modernize our electoral system but are concerned about the implications of a pure proportional system," Topps says in a policy paper released Tuesday. "A more incremental approach seems more likely to succeed."
Combined with abolition of the Senate, Topp says his parliamentary reforms would result in little additional cost.
The NDP has long advocated Senate abolition and has even refused to recognize the one New Democrat appointed to the upper chamber by former prime minister Paul Martin.
Topp says the Senate could be a serious obstacle to an NDP government.
"When we form government in 2015, it will be an immediate problem facing our government since we will be confronted with a second chamber composed of Conservative and Liberal appointees. These senators may feel free to oppose the policies on which we will have been elected."
Topp was a key backroom negotiator for the NDP during an attempt in late 2008 to form a coalition government with the Liberals, propped up by the Bloc Quebecois. Facing a confidence vote that the Conservatives were destined to lose, Prime Minister Stephen Harper asked the governor general to prorogue Parliament.
Topp is now proposing a new Parliament Act, which would prohibit a prime minister from seeking prorogation when a confidence vote is before the House of Commons.
Brian Topp - What does the party need to do to win the next election?
1 of 8
FIRST SLIDE
PREVIOUS SLIDE
NEXT SLIDESHOW
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
Brian Topp - What does the party need to do to win the next election?
1
/ 8
SHARE THIS SLIDE
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
OTTAWA - NDP leadership hopeful Brian Topp is advancing a new reason to abolish Canada's unelected Senate: its potential to paralyze a national New Democrat government.Should he become prime minister,...
OTTAWA - NDP leadership hopeful Brian Topp is advancing a new reason to abolish Canada's unelected Senate: its potential to paralyze a national New Democrat government.Should he become prime minister,...
Democratic elections by provinces of their future senators would change the focus of its members away from the two-party system that the Senate was not intended to be. For the first time since confederation, our current prime minister is trying to do just this.
A constitutional amendment would be difficult because a majority of provinces and territories do not believe in abolition. Reform would be an easier solution, especially if it leads to a triple E Senate. A check in power would have to be included so that the Senate cannot introduce its own legislation, like in the US. I still say the people elected should be independents and not affiliated with any political party. These checks will help to make it a true House of Sober Second Thought.
I am sure if the reforms included limits on the PMO and the election of the PM individually, then any referendum would pass with flying colours.
Mike_vdB: A constitutional amendment would be difficult because a majority of
If the senate were abolished then there would be absolutely no checks on the House of Commons. This would effectively allow a majority government to become a five year dictatorship. However, the way that the senate currently works allows the government of the day to appoint whoever they want and stack it in their favor anyway. So I think that reform is what is required - making the senate electable and accountable, but still allowing Canadians a way to keep a runaway government in check.
4evercanadian: If the senate were abolished then there would be absolutely
Making the Senate electable (presumably based on geography) would be non-reflective of the majority, a huge waste of money and would create a gridlock similar to what you see in the States. Having one house simplifies things. If voters see the government as a dictatorship (which they essentially are anyway) they'll probably vote them out.
opprobrious: Making the Senate electable (presumably based on geography) would be
When polled Canadians consistently state that they want the Senate gone-not reformed. If this is a democracy, why not get the job done! The answer is clear- Liberals and Conservatives see that the Senate has some strategic value to them. Harper has waffled from abolish it to reform it; he'll not do anything with the Senate that amounts to anything that we want. A majority is now something to allow his party to impose its will on Canadians and not to allow the will of Canadians to direct his government.
lismore: When polled Canadians consistently state that they want the Senate
First Posted: 01/10/12 06:01 AM ET Updated: 01/11/12 10:42 AM ET