NASA Says Canada In 'Hot Spot' Of Ecological Change

First Posted: 01/12/12 09:30 AM ET Updated: 01/12/12 08:25 PM ET


A new NASA study predicts massive ecological changes for Canada's Prairies and boreal regions by the year 2100.


Those areas are in "hot spots" highly vulnerable to massive environmental changes this century due to global warming, the study states.


Much of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba is predicted to see major shifts northward of plant and animal species.


"By about 2100, the climate change projections that we have today would suggest that there would be pressure on that grassland so prevalent in [the Canadian Prairies] to move further northward — and at the expense of the forest moving further northward as well," said NASA climate scientist Duane Walliser, who spoke with CBC News from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.


Walliser said that all across the globe, whole ecological zones such as deserts and tundra will be on the move because of "unprecedented" warming at a pace faster than at any time in 10,000 years.


But Western Canada will be among the areas hardest hit.


A map of the globe on the NASA study shows much the Prairies in bright red "hot spots" of ecological stress, where 100 per cent of the landscape is predicted to see major changes in plant species.


Researchers said the areas are vulnerable because they have wide transition zones where grasslands meet boreal regions.


"So anywhere in Canada where you are currently at what's called an 'ecotone,' or the transition zone between the prairie plant communities and the boreal forest plant communities, that's where the greatest change will be observed," said NASA collaborator, Jon Bergengren, a global ecologist and earth systems scientist.


The Saskatchewan Research Council is reaching similar conclusions.


One of its scientists, Jeff Thorpe, published a report last May suggesting the Prairies will see fewer trees, a loss in wetlands, and an invasion of species dependent on open grassland.


"Some of the grasslands species that we don't have yet, they're down in the United States, we expect them to shift northward into Canada," said Thorpe from Saskatoon Wednesday.


Some wildlife will not survive


The NASA study says 37 per cent of Earth's land surface will transform from one major ecosystem zone, or biome, into another, while 49 per cent of land surfaces will see at least some changes in plant species.


Bergengren said some wildlife will not survive these transformations.


“Obviously, it is much easier for plants and animals to migrate or adapt to this level of climatic change over 10,000 years than it is over 100 years,” he said.


The NASA model used a global temperature increase of two to four degrees this century, as predicted by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.




Predicted percentage of ecological landscape being driven toward changes in plant species as a result of projected human-induced climate change by 2100. (NASA/JPL-Caltech)



POSSIBLE IMPACTS ON CANADA:
Loading Slideshow...
  • Endangered Species

    Climate change could lead to habitat destruction for some species, such as <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/12/15/dangerous-polar-bears_n_1150226.html" target="_hplink">polar bears</a>. (Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images)

  • Arctic Ice

    <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/30/canada-arctic-ice-shelf-global-warming-melt_n_988447.html" target="_hplink">Melting polar ice</a> could lead to the arctic being open for shipping and resource exploration. (Slim Allgui/AFP/Getty Images)

  • Weird Weather

    Climate change could lead to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/18/extreme-weather-climate-change_n_1102137.html" target="_hplink">more weird weather</a> such as freak storms and more.

  • Boreal Forest

    Canada's boreal forests could be <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/01/12/climate-change-canada-nasa-hot-spot_n_1201757.html" target="_hplink">adversely affected by climate change.</a>

  • Invasive Species

    Warmer weather could allow invasive species to come into Canada. Some of them, <a href="http://www.farmzone.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=climate_change_and_malaria_070611" target="_hplink">like mosquitos, could carry diseases.</a>

  • Heat Wave

    Climate change could lead to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43301367/ns/us_news-environment/t/hotter-summers-few-decades-study-warns/#.Tw87UKVSR-U" target="_hplink">hotter summers. </a>

  • Bumper Crops Or Drought?

    Warmer weather could <a href="http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/sciencetech/archives/2011/05/20110506-112807.html" target="_hplink">lead to bumper crops</a> but it could also lead to <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110118/climate-change-crop-shortages-110118/" target="_hplink">drought and crop failure.</a>

  • Canada On Climate Change

    Canada's stance on climate change and the oil sands has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/29/canada-climate-change-policy-desmond-tutu_n_1119608.html" target="_hplink">upset protesters at home and abroad.</a> (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

  • The Oil Sands

    <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/07/19/canada-energy-policy-kananaskis_n_904012.html" target="_hplink">Alberta's oil sands are a boon to Canada's economy</a> but there are fears that it could add dramatically to climate change. (Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)



ALSO ON HUFFPOST
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

A new NASA study predicts massive ecological changes for Canada's Prairies and boreal regions by the year 2100. Those areas are in "hot spots" highly vulnerable to massive env...
A new NASA study predicts massive ecological changes for Canada's Prairies and boreal regions by the year 2100. Those areas are in "hot spots" highly vulnerable to massive env...
Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 644
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
01:00 PM on 01/16/2012
whatever happens..

it has been predicted by the agw models!

snow? it's in the models..

no snow? ditto..

rain? no rain? drought? no drought? hurricane? no hurricane?

it's all there!

LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
04:32 PM on 01/16/2012
"snow? it's in the models.."
Nope

"no snow? ditto.."
Nope

"rain? no rain? drought? no drought? hurricane? no hurricane?

it's all there!"
Nope

0 for 3, it's not looking too good for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
08:39 PM on 01/16/2012
oh FUCK!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
12:51 PM on 01/16/2012
OMG!!!

plants and animals in canada?

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wanderthewest
macrobiologist
12:00 PM on 01/16/2012
These projections are lacking--not because temperatures will warm, but because the interplay between grassland and forest, which is important for Canadian and Siberian transitions, also has to do with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere independent of its effects, because CO2 is a resource for plants, and plants with higher carbon demands (TREES) may benefit somewhat relative to grasses (especially C4 grasses for the nerds out there).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
04:43 PM on 01/16/2012
Are you trying to argue that the benefit of an increase in Co2 outweighs the negative impacts?

If so, I'd say that your science is about 30 years out of date.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wanderthewest
macrobiologist
12:30 PM on 01/21/2012
I didn't say that at all. I just said that high CO2 benefits woody vegetation. That is actually current science (do a CO2 + woody pear-reviewed lit search, and see the recent literature in Science, Nature, Ecology, etc.). As a scientist that studies grasslands (and loves them), there is no reason for me see an increase in woody vegetation in lands formally dominated by herbaceous vegetation as a "benefit", and this is happening all over the globe (central U.S., arctic, Africa, Australia, etc.
09:58 AM on 01/16/2012
Bah. Its the world going to end anyway this year.
02:29 PM on 01/15/2012
These computer models are so reliable - wait just a second while I fine tune my model - Yes Solyndra is profitable.
11:35 AM on 01/16/2012
If you had even a halfassed idea of how many things you rely on every single day were developed with computer modeling....
03:46 PM on 01/16/2012
I am quite well aware of computer modeling - I am also well aware of Garbage in Garbage out -
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
07:03 PM on 01/16/2012
Why do deniers focus so much on American Institutes and American companies? Do they think America is the center of the world, and therefore the center of AGW?
04:43 PM on 01/14/2012
Who knows? By 2100 we might be putting humans on that above list of "endangered species"..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
09:16 PM on 01/14/2012
Nah. Climate change, while wreaking havoc on many species unable to move with sufficient alacrity, will strongly favor adaptable generalists (crows,gulls, pigeons, dogs/coyotes, rats, and yes, homo sapiens as well, though maybe not in present abundance). We could very well be in Mad Max times by then, though.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
12:00 AM on 01/15/2012
We are adaptable, yes. The probability is that we and the cockroaches will survive.

But we do not know about what happens to us if species that we have come to depend on become extinct. In this light, the serious declines in the populations of honeybees, frogs, and some species of bats is of concern. The honeybees, because they pollinate most of the fruits and vegetables and nuts we eat. The bats and frogs because they eat a lot of flies and mosquitoes, which would otherwise spread disease.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
01:07 PM on 01/14/2012
The Science that produces the best medicine , HC and technology also indicates the cause and results of man made climate change. The ignorant deniers cant have it both ways. The GOP lauds the HC in the USA, but refuses to accept the same scientific methods that determine climate change. Ridiculous
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
11:10 PM on 01/13/2012
If you're trying to understand NASAs business plan with this report, it helps to look at their WHO profit model: tinyurl.com/75gb2ut
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
10:17 AM on 01/14/2012
Great Chipher,

William F. Engdahl great stuff. Massive money = massive corruption and corporate control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
10:27 AM on 01/17/2012
Denialism really is like a cult, isn't it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
12:01 AM on 01/15/2012
Do note that tinyurl.com advertises itself as a way to hide affiliation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
10:59 PM on 01/13/2012
Anchorage on track for snowiest winter on record

By Mark Thiessen and Rachel d'Oro, Associated Press

Massive snowfall traps Alaskans in their homes
Jan 7:
Tanker bringing crucial fuel to Alaskan city hits ice

ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Weary Alaskans woke up to another big dump of snow on Thursday, adding to what already has been the snowiest period on record in Anchorage and causing more headaches in coastal areas struggling to dig out.

The snow started falling shortly before midnight, and meteorologists warned Anchorage residents the heaviest snowfall -- up to 16 inches -- could come later Thursday.

About 150 miles to the southeast, the Prince William Sound community of Cordova, which has already been buried under 172 inches of snow since November, could get another 7 inches Thursday, meteorologist Shaun Baines said. The picturesque fishing community has had so much snow, National Guard troops helping clear roads are running out of shovels.

"It's funny because, after the numbers of days we've had of snow, you actually get to a point where it almost becomes it's expected, that it's going to be snowing," said Teresa Benson, a Cordova resident and district manager for the National Forest Service.

In nearby Valdez, another coastal community that's seen 318 inches of snow, veterinarian Kathryn Hawkins said it's been difficult to keep up with the shoveling, and 8-foot walls of snow line either side of her driveway.

http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_19728471?source=rss
12:17 AM on 01/14/2012
Why can't science deniers understand that snow storms don't disprove global warming?

"There is a direct influence of global warming on precipitation. Increased heating leads to greater evaporation and thus surface drying, thereby increasing the intensity and duration of drought. However, the water holding capacity of air increases by about 7% per 1°C warming, which leads to increased water vapor in the atmosphere. Hence, storms, whether individual thunderstorms, extratropical rain or *SNOW STORMS*, or tropical cyclones, supplied with increased moisture, produce more intense precipitation events."

(emphasis mine)

http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/cr/v47/n1-2/p123-138/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
03:42 PM on 01/16/2012
why can't science doomers..

stop scaring themselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
10:23 AM on 01/15/2012
Yes Moose Luck. Thanks for pointing out the increases in precipitation leading to record snow falls as predicted by the science of manmade climate change/global warming.
Wib
Liberal former Marine who loves fly fishing and is
08:17 PM on 01/13/2012
And Canada wants to produce the shale oil that will further exacerbate the problem. Amazing. By the way, I think I have a way to make the climate deniers finally believe in what is happening -- and get the carbon industries to change their ways. Make protecting the climate profitable. Those folks care about nothing but money since they figure that by the time the damage is at its worst they will be dead and gone and to Hell with anyone who comes after them. Yes, let's just find a way to make protecting the climate and the environment profitable. Unfortunately, we probably don't have enough time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
10:54 PM on 01/13/2012
Yes shale oil uses naphtha and other solvents to dissolve that nasty gunk. That gunk must be combined with a new chemical to get it to flow through the pipeline. The pipeline will not make money at present prices and the refining will pollute Texas. The end of the pipeline is free trade port and most of the refined product will be exported. Any pipe line spill will be like a mini gulf spill of incredibly polluting crud!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
11:12 PM on 01/13/2012
Yeah, like the way WHO made global pandemic prediction profitable: tinyurl. com/75gb2ut
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
04:51 PM on 01/16/2012
That article doesn't support your argument. I suggest you actually try reading these articles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:54 PM on 01/13/2012
Yawn.
Another day, another global warming farce where no one can explain how the treaty that was going to save the planet would actually do that.

How would the Kyoto treaty reduce C02 emissions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
10:23 PM on 01/13/2012
Yawn. Another denier.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:08 PM on 01/14/2012
Another boob who can't explain how the watermelon's Kyoto treaty would help the environment.

That's just sad...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
01:03 PM on 01/14/2012
it wont because China is exempt. China is responsible for almost all the new pollution in the last 20 years. Exempting China Brazil Vietnam and India basically handicaps the U.S. Europe and Japan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
03:45 PM on 01/16/2012
the MIC..

''is responsible for almost all the new pollution in the last 20 years.''
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
06:04 PM on 01/13/2012
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/

Climate Skeptics Parachute into Climate Conference City Waving Climategate 2.0 Banners
Posted by Dan McGrath in Bad Policy, Cap and Trade, ClimateGate, Copenhagen Treaty, IPCC, World Governance.

From the Blaze
On Tuesday, a skydiving team from the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) parachuted down on Toti beach, near the city where the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is taking place.

The skydivers carried two signs, one reading “Climategate 2.0 Science Not Settled”, the other “No New Treaty CFACT”. According to a CFACT press release, the dramatic entrance into Durban, South Africa, was to bring attention again to the Climategate 2.0 emails, which were leaked last month.

“Media covering COP17 are kidding themselves if they think they can ignore and wish away Climategate 2.0,” said CFACT Executive Director Craig Rucker in the press release. “Lord Monckton, the folks from Climate Depot and I will carry our message by parachute if that’s what it takes to wake up this conference and place the Climategate evidence of corrupted science where the world must see it.”
09:20 PM on 01/13/2012
The Climategate hackers knew very well they couldn't scientifically challenge the mountain of evidence supporting AGW, so they created a tawdry, tabloid-style public distraction instead and you and your skydiving friends fell for it.

Serving up flagrantly adulterated snippets of personal emails, purposefully taken out of context, and doled out bit by bit, clearly exposes the hackers and their corporate sponsors as the corrupt ones, not the scientists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
11:18 PM on 01/13/2012
Exactly the way WHO was corrupted by Pandemic Pharma: tinyurl. com/75gb2ut
They're public science rice-bowlers, congenitally incapable of having moral values.
Tell you what, you worship at Global Carbon Caliphate, but keep out of my pocket.
04:44 PM on 01/13/2012
Steve isn't smart enough for science and it appears a great many Canadians are equally as stupid or he wouldn't be our PM. And yet these same people believe in non existent and never seen gods who live somewhere that no one knows really but somehow they manage to have power over their life. Go figure!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:56 PM on 01/13/2012
Science!
Yippee!
Someone mentioned science!

Care to scientifically explain how the Kyoto treaty would reduce C02 emissions?
Or can it only be explained with politics, smoke, and mirrors?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
11:19 PM on 01/13/2012
..and 'Green Pope' tithe-taxes on every living human being from cradle to grave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
12:52 PM on 01/14/2012
I know. Why aren't more people talking about how a piece of paper can't physically change CO2 emissions.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
04:36 PM on 01/13/2012
How's morale over at TransCanada CanadaStan?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:13 PM on 01/13/2012
Link or it didn't happen HP, c'mon...show some love to NASA, they've had a hard year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WoolyBumblebee
Creator of TruthAndOblivion.com
10:35 PM on 01/13/2012
Too hard to find it yourself? I found it in under a minute. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-387