Gay Marriage Canada: Justice Minister Rob Nicholson Says Ottawa Will Change Law So Foreigners' Same-Sex Unions Are Valid

Gay Marriage Canada Law

First Posted: 01/13/12 01:16 PM ET Updated: 01/13/12 05:41 PM ET

TORONTO - A legal loophole that could have undermined thousands of same-sex marriages will be remedied to ensure gay couples from abroad who marry in Canada will have their unions recognized here, the federal justice minister said Friday.

Rob Nicholson acknowledged the confusion surrounding the issue has upset many couples and stressed it's the government's view that these marriages "should be valid."

"We will change the Civil Marriage Act so that any marriages performed in Canada that aren't recognized in the couple's home jurisdiction will be recognized in Canada," Nicholson said Friday during a speech to the Canadian Club of Toronto.

Doubts were raised about the validity of thousands of marriages conducted in Canada for same-sex couples from the United States and elsewhere following a federal twist in a Charter of Rights case launched in Ontario by two foreign women seeking a divorce.

A legal brief filed by federal lawyers denies the women are even legally married. It argues neither woman was legally able to marry a person of the same sex under the laws of Florida or the United Kingdom. "As a result, their marriage is not legally valid under Canadian law."

Critics accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government of seeking to rewrite the rules on gay marriage to suit its right-wing agenda.

In announcing the government would change the law, Nicholson said Friday that "the confusion and pain resulting from this gap ... is completely unfair to those affected."

Liberal Leader Bob Rae, speaking to reporters at the party's policy convention in Ottawa, responded to Nicholson by lamenting, "Oh please, give me a break."

"These guys specialize in trying to turn the tables," Rae said of the Harper Conservatives.

"The only gap is the gap between the heads of Conservative cabinet ministers who have failed to live up the best and finest traditions of Canada with respect to our positions of tolerance," Rae added.

Randall Garrison, the NDP's critic for gay and lesbian issues, said Ottawa has repeatedly tried to use a loophole in the legislation to erode those rights "through the back door."

"They got caught and I think they were frankly quite surprised by the reaction, and so they've rolled back their position today," he said.

Robert Leckey, a family law professor at McGill University in Montreal and president of Egale Canada, called the minister's announcement "a positive step."

"I'm looking forward to seeing him act on the things he said," he said.

At the same time, "a little work will need to be done to make sure that what is done this time is done right," he added.

The couple seeking a divorce, identified in court records only by initials to protect their privacy, were married in Toronto in December 2005 and separated two years ago. One lives in Clearwater, Fla., the other in London, England.

Their marriage is not recognized either in Florida or the United Kingdom. As a result, they are unable to obtain a divorce in their home cities.

The couple also faced a barrier to divorce in Ontario — a requirement that at least one of them live in the province for a year or more. They have launched a constitutional challenge of that provision in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

In 2005, the Liberal government passed legislation recognizing same-sex marriage after several courts across the country had declared the practice legal. An estimated 5,000 of the 15,000 or so gay marriages performed in Canada have involved foreigners, mostly American couples.

TWITTER's REACTION TO GAY MARRIAGE CASE
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GAY VOICES

TORONTO - A legal loophole that could have undermined thousands of same-sex marriages will be remedied to ensure gay couples from abroad who marry in Canada will have their unions recognized here, the...
TORONTO - A legal loophole that could have undermined thousands of same-sex marriages will be remedied to ensure gay couples from abroad who marry in Canada will have their unions recognized here, the...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:04 PM on 01/15/2012
No confusion... Marriage is only for a man and a woman. It's pretty clear. No confusion at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starrigavan
05:18 PM on 01/16/2012
Except in:

Argentina
Belgium
Algoas, Brazil
Canada
Iceland
Federal District of Mexico
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Connecticut
Iowa
Massachusetts
New York
Vermont
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erin84
12:13 AM on 01/17/2012
Keep repeating that. Year after year, jurisdiction after jurisdiction keeps adding same sex couples to marriage laws. It'll be the law of the land, you folks will keep repeating it. Sad really.
01:16 PM on 01/15/2012
The flawed law was written under Milquetoast Martin, not Harper, and divorce laws are provincial, not federal jurisdiction - it seems the lefty fruitcakes even want to blame Harper for the ice on the sidewalk - bags of hammers!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starrigavan
05:31 PM on 01/16/2012
"I call people names because I'm so awesome!"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
11:00 PM on 01/14/2012
It's funny how the government recognized gay marrige in Canada but not any other country.
Likewise to the death penalty and torture. We woulden't dare do it ourselfs, but we're fine to export it.
Maternal care and abortion- on demand in Canada but we won't fund it overseas.

I say that if we support Canadian values for Canadians we shouldn't be shy about projecting them to others, and that includes gay marrige and all the rightrs therein.
01:14 PM on 01/15/2012
another load of loser lefty pap
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erin84
12:14 AM on 01/17/2012
Another useless ad-hominem from a Conservative with the typical Conservative lack of intellectual ability.
09:55 PM on 01/14/2012
Another dog and pony show brought to you by Harper Inc. They misinterpreted the law in an attempt to open the door to reverse the law. It backfired on them and so they spin it that they are doing something about a flaw that never existed so they can get face time still blaming the Liberals. The flaw was as usual in the incompetence of the unbelievably sneaky Cons. This is a tried and true tactic -- blow up a non important but emotional issue to distract from what they continue to do behind closed doors that every single day changes our country, erodes our rights and basically sells Canada down the river to the delight of their foreign corporate masters while their famed contempt for our democracy.
01:12 PM on 01/15/2012
lol - WHAT A LOAD OF LEFTY PAP!
12:15 PM on 01/14/2012
looks like harpo got a few phone calls from pi$$ed off people

somebody is gonna get fired for throwing up that anti gay trial balloon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
10:17 AM on 01/14/2012
Harper should have made sure there weren't any flaws in that law. Good that he responded swiftly, and saved himself a lot of embarrassment. Now we have to cancel the "Northern Gateway and we are off to Kyoto to get our self respect back.
05:51 AM on 01/14/2012
Well, what can I say. I'm usually a harsh critic of Harper and the Conservatives, but they deserve credit when credit is due. Good for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
06:46 AM on 01/14/2012
I have to agree
08:18 PM on 01/13/2012
Good Job Harper!
photo
pleblian
One smart as meÉŖtər futÅ«tor
07:34 PM on 01/13/2012
Please don't take this the wrong way, but Canadian politics is boring

What interest could anybody have when you have a government that, for the most part, does the right thing?

I hate patriotism but I'm glad to be back in Canada
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsCanuck
Wife, Mother, New Democrat, Pro-Choice, Atheist
11:37 AM on 01/14/2012
I know, my favourite blood sport is watching a US election, now THAT's entertainment.
07:06 PM on 01/13/2012
The Civil Marriage Act came into effect by the previous Liberal gov when Paul Martin was Prime Minister.You can blame them for the loopholes not the Conservative gov.

Royal Assent: 20 July 2005
08:12 PM on 01/13/2012
I don't blame anyone for the loophole, I merely view it as unfortunate. Hooray for Harper fixing it.
08:20 PM on 01/13/2012
Thanks. I was just posting to the person below. I should have replied to his post.
06:45 PM on 01/13/2012
sorry rob, but your are coming up short on the truthiness scale ----you said apparently a marriage made in ontario could not be undone in ontario was the problem AND YOU TRIED TO BLAME THE LIBERALS

your federal lawyers were trying to make the case THEY WERENT MARRIED AT ALL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
uneeda
Make Peace in Our Time
06:17 PM on 01/13/2012
teflon steve caught again in the cookie jar
06:11 PM on 01/13/2012
Huffington Post, I made a comment regarding this article 25 minutes ago. Where is it?
08:04 PM on 01/13/2012
And someone in Moose Jaw had his soup served cold, that Harper isn't good for anything.
05:39 PM on 01/13/2012
Yes its things like this that truly worry us.
Will I have a Mayan interpreter?
Is sugar still white when the lights are out?
Nothing like the tail wagging the dog.
Run run ...we must hurry up or we will get away!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KaraC
Trans lesbian, atheist and humanist
07:05 PM on 01/13/2012
And I'm not diabetic, so we can just stop researching that, and I don't have premature babies so let's not bother about that. And I'm not African American so I don't need to worry about them being discriminated against. Hey, it's amazing how if something doesn't personally affect you, you can simply ignore the issue. Good discovery, reedunculous.
05:24 PM on 01/13/2012
A legal brief filed by federal lawyers denies the women are even legally married.-----

---the mysterious federal lawyers ----

i think to have the ghosts of this story buried these pepole should be identified and their connections with the tory party if any should be vetted and they should be given the opportunity to explain themselves -------otherwise it will always be there in the background that it was a ploy by the harpwer government for back door policy making